iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Google's Motorola Bid Approved By U.S. Department Of Justice

Google Motorola Approved

MICHAEL LIEDTKE and GABRIELE STEINHAUSER   02/13/12 07:23 PM ET  AP

SAN FRANCISCO — Google's $12.5 billion bid to buy cellphone maker Motorola Mobility has won approvals from U.S. and European antitrust regulators, moving Google a major step closer to completing the biggest deal in its 13-year history.

Monday's blessings mean Google Inc. just needs to clear regulatory hurdles in China, Taiwan and Israel before it can take control of Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc. and expand into manufacturing phones, tablet computers and other consumer devices for the first time.

Getting government approval in China looms as the biggest stumbling block remaining. Google's relationship with China's ruling party has been on shaky ground since the company blamed hackers in that country for breaking into its computers two years ago. The breach prompted Google to move its Internet search engine from mainland China in protest of laws requiring some results to be censored.

Google prizes Motorola Mobility's more than 17,000 patents – a crucial weapon in an intellectual arms race with Apple, Microsoft and other rivals maneuvering to gain more control over smartphones, tablets and other mobile devices. Google announced the deal six months ago.

The deal will "enhance competition and offer consumers faster innovation, greater choice and wonderful user experiences," Don Harrison, Google's deputy general counsel wrote in a blog post.

Besides signing off on the Motorola Mobility deal, the Justice Department also approved two other moves in the mobile patent battles. The approvals cover the $4.5 billion purchase of Nortel Networks patents by a group including Apple, Microsoft and BlackBerry maker Research in Motion Ltd. and a separate Apple acquisition of Novell Inc. patents.

The Justice Department ended its investigations after concluding the new patent owners won't try to drive up the prices of competing mobile devices by demanding exorbitant licensing fees. The agency said it was particularly concerned about key patents held by Motorola Mobility and Nortel.

Apple Inc. and Microsoft promised to license the Nortel patents on reasonable terms while Google's commitments on the Motorola Mobility patents were "more ambiguous," according to a statement from the Justice Department's antitrust division.

Nevertheless, the Justice Department didn't find any evidence that Google's ownership of Motorola Mobility would lessen competition in a mobile device market that is becoming increasingly important as more people connect to the Internet on smartphones and tablet computers instead of desktop and laptop computers.

In granting its approval, the European Union also raised concerns about Motorola's aggressive enforcement of its patents. EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia said regulators will "keep a close eye on the behavior of all market players in the sector, particularly the increasingly strategic use of patents."

In its statement, the Justice Department also vowed to crack down on any sign that mobile patents are being used to throttle competition. Microsoft said it was encouraged by the regulatory commitments.

Other key concerns centered on Google's Android operating system, free software that now powers more than 250 million mobile devices made by a variety of manufacturers, including Motorola Mobility. Competition could be hurt if Google gives Motorola Mobility the most advanced versions of Android or withholds the mobile software from other cellphone makers.

Google, though, has pledged to make Android available to all its mobile partners. Even if Google were to discriminate, cellphone makers still could rely on mobile software from Microsoft Corp., Research in Motion and Hewlett-Packard Co., among others.

The European regulators see no danger that Google will prevent other device makers from using its popular Android operating system after the takeover.

"Android helps to drive the spread of Google's other services," the Commission said. "Given that Google's core business model is to push its online and mobile services and software to the widest possible audience, it is unlikely that Google would restrict the use of Android solely to Motorola," which only has a small market share in Europe.

The government reviews in U.S. and Europe have come as regulators also have been conducting a broader inquiry into whether Google has been abusing its dominance in Internet search to hobble its rivals. Those investigations are still ongoing.

Assuming Google eventually takes over Motorola Mobility, the union will open new opportunities and pose potentially troublesome challenges for a management team that so far has concentrated on Internet search, ad sales and other software-driven online services.

Motorola Mobility's expertise in mobile devices and set-top boxes for cable TV will allow Google to play an even more influential role in shaping the future of hand-held computing and home entertainment. Even as it navigates the regulatory gauntlet, Google has begun testing a device for connecting electronic components within homes, according to a filing with the Federal Communications Commission.

Absorbing Motorola Mobility also threatens to crimp Google's earnings growth and drag down its stock price. That's because Motorola Mobility has been struggling on its own as Apple's iPhone and other smartphones made by rivals such as Samsung Electronics undercut sales of its products.

Google is making a huge bet that Motorola Mobility can do better. The $12.5 billion price is more than the combined amount that Google has paid for the 185 other acquisitions that it has completed since going public in 2004.

Google's stock rose $6.29, or 1 percent, to close Monday at $612.20. Motorola Mobility's gained 18 cents to $39.63, just below the proposed sale price of $40 per share. Google is based in Mountain View, Calif., while Motorola Mobility has its headquarters in Libertyville, Ill.

___

Steinhauser reported from Brussels.

Also on HuffPost:

Check out the slideshow (below) to see Google's 5 most expensive acquisitions to date.
Loading Slideshow...
  • #5 - ITA Software ($700 million)

    <strong>What people said...</strong> <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-04-21/google-said-to-be-in-talks-to-buy-travel-software-maker.html" target="_hplink">Henry Harteveldt</a>, analyst at Forrester Research: "Google's mission is to organize the world's information, and ITA does that for travel" <a href="http://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001881.html" target="_hplink">Edward Hasbrouck</a>, author and policy analyst for Consumer Travel Alliance: "Google's purchase of ITA Software is likely to be a bad thing for travelers." <strong>Acquired: 2010</strong> <em>Source: <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-off-with-ita.html" target="_hplink">Google Blog</a></em>

  • #4 - AdMob ($750 million)

    <strong>What people said...</strong> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/technology/companies/10google.html" target="_hplink">Neil Strother</a>, analyst at Forrester Research: "The deal shows that Google is serious about becoming a major player in the mobile advertising ecosystem" <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/technology/companies/10google.html" target="_hplink">Marc Rotenberg</a>, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center: "We've reached a point in Google's evolution in which Washington agencies and Congressional committees need to look more closely at the company's dominance of Internet services" <strong>Acquired: 2010</strong> <em>Source: <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/weve-officially-acquired-admob.html" target="_hplink">Google Blog</a></em>

  • #3 - YouTube ($1.65 billion)

    <strong>What people said...</strong> <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/google-buying-youtube-for-165-bln-as-street-cheers" target="_hplink">Goldman Sachs</a>: "We expect investors to be excited by the strategic opportunities, but they will be skeptical of the $1.65 billion price, given YouTube's early stages" <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/09/technology/googleyoutube_deal/" target="_hplink">Martin Pyykkonen</a>, analyst at Global Crown Capital: "I would think that a lot of advertisers would be willing to pay a premium for a video search ad opposed to paid search text" <strong>Acquired: 2006</strong> <em>Source: <a href="http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/google_youtube.html" target="_hplink">Google</a></em>

  • #2 - DoubleClick ($3.1 billion)

    <strong>What people said...</strong> <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/tag/doubleclick/" target="_hplink">Federal Trade Commission</a>: "The FTC lacks the legal authority to block the transaction on grounds, or require conditions to this transaction, that do not relate to antitrust" <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/tag/doubleclick/" target="_hplink">Jeff Chester</a>, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy: "The FTC is supposed to protect the privacy of Americans in the digital age. The excuse offered by the majority of the commission-that consumer privacy can't be addressed by current antitrust law-reveals a lack of leadership and determination to protect U.S. consumers" <strong>Acquired: 2008</strong> <em>Source: <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/weve-officially-acquired-doubleclick.html" target="_hplink">Google Blog</a></em>

  • #1 - Motorola Mobility ($12.5 billion)

    <strong>What people are saying...</strong> <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/google-motorola-deal-2011-8" target="_hplink">Henry Blodget</a>, editor-in-chief at Business Insider: "This deal could end up being a disaster" <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-jarvis/google-buys-rat-poison_b_927155.html" target="_hplink">Jeff Jarvis</a>, author: "Google buys rat poison" <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/8702125/Google-buys-Motorola-Mobility-market-reaction.html" target="_hplink">Hendi Susanto</a>, analyst at Gabelli & Co: "Google and Motorola will create a stronger hardware - software integration to compete with Apple, Samsung, and HTC." <strong>Acquired: 2011</strong> <em>Source: <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/supercharging-android-google-to-acquire.html" target="_hplink">Google Blog</a></em>

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 234
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
09:42 AM on 02/14/2012
Google eat world.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
05:30 AM on 02/15/2012
Google and Motorola 20B market cap, together still smaller than Microsoft is bigger and Apply twice that. market cap wise around 250 and 500..
gross revenues are 10B Google 3B moto, 20B Soft and 46 B Apple.
06:31 AM on 02/15/2012
Google ear world
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrickwwalker
09:39 AM on 02/14/2012
This could be a particularly bad move for Google.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
02:19 PM on 02/14/2012
Patrickwwalker knows more than all the exec's and consultant's at Google.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:03 AM on 02/14/2012
What antitrust? Big business owns our Congress. We need more competitiive competition, not monopoly competition.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
02:22 PM on 02/14/2012
If this was Google purchasing Apple, or visa versa, then I'd agree with you.

But it's Motorolla, hardly a competitor by any means. As stated in the article, the purchase is more about acquiring patents than anything else.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aneesia
08:42 AM on 02/14/2012
The premise of anti-trust laws is to stop the manipulation of prices in the marketplace by large companies, with the threat of being broken up, which would create more companies and more competition within the market....driving prices down.....providing there is no collusion.
Which doesn't happen anymore because corporate America has purchased the US Congress and much of the US Government, and courts, lock stock and barrel.
Which is why OWS is so important....since the vote is taken as a joke in big government.
06:27 AM on 02/14/2012
never use em'
04:25 AM on 02/14/2012
what happened to anti-trust laws?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:04 AM on 02/14/2012
Big business owns our anti-trust lawyers and our Congress.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TwoZeroOZ
02:23 PM on 02/14/2012
It's Motorola... If anything, these companies are more vertically aligned rather than competitive.
04:06 AM on 02/14/2012
Anti-trust is bs. Even breaking up AT and T was wrong. The whole premise of anti-trust assumes the public has a right to technoogy that they don't own. The flaw of anti-trust is that monopoly's actually increase competition long term because of the resentment that builds when they are abused. When monopolys are used properly it results in lower prices. Today, there are so many outlets for competition that it's absolutely wrong for the government to interfere in ANY deal today just because it's anti-competitive. There is no such thing as anti-competitive anymore. Look at Microsoft. It went from totally dominating to weak because of government interference.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:29 AM on 02/14/2012
Your argument would be more convincing if you could point out at least one example in recent history where monopoly powers have been used properly, resulting in lower prices, and not as a means to stifle competition to keep prices high.
10:21 AM on 02/14/2012
Wal-mart. Probably one of the best examples.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChristianEcon.com
"The Lord abhors dishonest scales."--Proverbs 11.1
05:11 AM on 02/14/2012
Assuming private entities have a right to tech hasn't necessarily worked out too well either.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
Private corps can't do it better!!!
02:49 AM on 02/14/2012
Oh good. More evidence to prove that reagonomics is still the order of the day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftHandUTurn
How long have I been out?
02:35 AM on 02/14/2012
I don't like companies getting too large---
02:57 AM on 02/14/2012
Why is that? You have no problem with the Gov't getting bigger and there is no company 1/100 the size, power and immunity from litigation/prosecution as the US Gov.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
04:26 AM on 02/14/2012
what the heck does companies getting larger have to do with government getting larger?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChristianEcon.com
"The Lord abhors dishonest scales."--Proverbs 11.1
05:12 AM on 02/14/2012
What is it when the ultrawealthy buy the government?
02:15 AM on 02/14/2012
Pity. Motorola was a great company!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RealityMyFriend
02:00 AM on 02/14/2012
Wont improve their crappy droid phones...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
illegalneocon
01:07 AM on 02/14/2012
The campaign donations are paying off.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
12:20 AM on 02/14/2012
So nice to see that Huffpo fixes it's comment history page glitzes much the same way as Edmonton fixes it's potholed roads. They put up a sign and ignore the complaints.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
breakingpoint
War is a Racket - Smedley Butler
12:20 AM on 02/14/2012
I kow this was a hoax, still the final outcome of this idea is catching up with me
http://youtu.be/kl1ujzRidmU
01:25 AM on 02/14/2012
Was this a hoax? I just saw this video on Headline News and was wondering that very thing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
breakingpoint
War is a Racket - Smedley Butler
01:57 AM on 02/14/2012
yeah it wasn't really her laptop - was clever though
photo
cobry4949
cobry1112
12:13 AM on 02/14/2012
What a bunch of htpocrictical laws, they refuse to let Tmobilt and Att and they let all our media be bought by sever people and now, our monopoly laws run this way who ever has the most money get the apprroval. What happen to our monopoly laws. like everything else they been flushed by MONEY and payoffs
01:27 AM on 02/14/2012
There is a vast difference between Google purchasing Motorola and ATT's proposed Tmobile acquisition. The latter would leave very few competitors in an already narrow field of play whereas the former is merely Google branching out to another sector, thus, fostering greater competition with other phone manufacturers (and making up for their big loss with the Nortel auctions last year).