iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Guatemala Weighs Drug Legalization

Guatemala Legalize Drugs

ROMINA RUIZ-GOIRIENA   02/13/12 10:45 PM ET  AP

GUATEMALA CITY — U.S. inability to cut illegal drug consumption leaves Guatemala with no option but to consider legalizing the use and transport of drugs, President Otto Perez Molina said Monday, a remarkable turnaround for an ex-general elected on a platform of crushing organized crime with an iron fist.

Perez said he will try to win regional support for drug legalization at an upcoming summit of Central American leaders next month. He got his first public support on Monday at a security meeting with El Salvador President Mauricio Funes, who said he too is willing to consider legalization.

"We're bringing the issue up for debate. Today's meeting is intended to strengthen our methods of fighting organized crime," Perez said with Funes. "But if drug consumption isn't reduced, the problem will continue."

But after returning to El Salvador, Funes said he personally doesn't support legalization because it would "create a moral problem," though he supports Perez's right to bring up the issue for consideration.

"Imagine what it would mean," Funes said. "Producing drugs would no longer be a crime, trafficking drugs would no longer be a crime and consuming drugs would no longer be a crime, so we would be converting the region in a paradise for drug consumption. I personally don't agree with it and I told President Otto Perez so."

Perez's proposal comes as drug cartels have taken over large swathes of Guatemala and other Central American countries, fueling some of the highest murder rates in the world. A May 2011 report by the U.S. Congressional Research Service said that 95 percent of all cocaine entering the United States flows through Mexico and its waters, with 60 percent of that cocaine having first transited through Central America.

In just a month in office, Perez has transformed himself from one of Latin America's toughest advocates of military action against drug cartels to one of the region's strongest voices for drug legalization. His stance provoked strong criticism from the United States over the weekend, and intense discussion inside the country, where Guatemalans argued for and against his proposal in the streets and on radio talk shows.

One analyst said Perez's about-face could be designed to pressure the U.S. into providing military aid, currently banned by the U.S. Congress because of past human rights abuses.

"This is kind of like a shot across the bow, saying if you don't help us, this is what we can do," said Anita Isaacs, a Guatemala expert and professor of political science at Haverford College.

But Perez's backers said the change grew out of the realization that if demand continues in the U.S., the small country will never have the resources to fight the flow of illegal drugs from producers in South America to the world's largest consumer market in the U.S.

"Are we going to be responsible to put up a war against the cartels if we don't produce the drugs or consume the drugs? We're just a corridor of illegality," Eduardo Stein, a former Guatemalan vice president who headed Perez's transition team.

"The issue of drug trafficking and consumption is not on the North American political agenda. The issue of drugs in the U.S. is very marginalized, while for Guatemala and the rest of Central America it's very central," he added.

U.S. President Barack Obama would cut funds to fight drug trafficking in Latin America in 2013, according to his budget proposal released Monday. While the Obama administration has promised to shift anti-drug resources from law enforcement and military intervention to treatment and prevention, funding would be restored to slightly higher than 2011 levels in the proposal after suffering a cut in 2012.

A growing number of former Latin American leaders have come out in favor of legalization, saying the U.S. efforts to fight drug trafficking in Latin America have only caused more violence and sucked up resources.

Colombia President Juan Manuel Santos has said he would be open to legalization if the entire world agreed.

"It's a theme that must be addressed," Colombia's Foreign Minister Maria Holguin told reporters in Cartegena Monday. "The war on drugs definitely hasn't been the success it should be and it's something the countries should discuss."

Honduras, another major transit country, has never formally considered legalization. Mexico President Felipe Calderon has said it wouldn't make sense to legalize drugs in the region as long as they remain illegal in the U.S.

Perez, 61, was elected in November and took office last month on a platform of cracking down on the country's rampant crime, a product of gang and cartel violence, along with the legacy of a bloody 1960-1996 civil war.

Army, police and paramilitary are blamed for killing the vast majority of 200,000 victims, most of whom were Mayan.

More than half of Guatemalans live in poverty in a nation of 14 million overrun by organized crime and Mexican drug cartels. Perez's predecessor, former President Alvaro Colom, sent troops to retake some provinces from the Zetas drug gang.

Perez, the first former general to be elected president since peace accords were signed in 1996, also took office with the mission of ending a long-standing U.S. ban on military aid imposed during the civil war because of concerns over human rights abuses.

Close advisers say he supports meeting the conditions set by various U.S. congressional appropriations acts for restoring aid that was first eliminated in 1978, including reforming a weak justice system and prosecuting war criminals.

But both U.S. and Guatemala officials agree that a reverse on the ban won't happen any time soon. Among other reductions, Obama's budget proposal cuts military aid to the region for fighting drugs by $5 million.

Perez first made his drug proposal over the weekend.

Political analyst Alvaro Pop said Guatemala would benefit from legalization "because it would get us out of a fight that has blocked our chances of developing as a country." But he added that Perez would have to carefully define exactly what he wants to legalize.

The U.S. Embassy in Guatemala issued a statement Sunday saying that legalizing drugs wouldn't stop transnational gangs that traffic not only drugs, but also people and weapons.

__

Associated Press writers Katherine Corcoran and Michael Weissenstein contributed to this report from Mexico City and Vivian Sequera from Bogota, Colombia.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

GUATEMALA CITY — U.S. inability to cut illegal drug consumption leaves Guatemala with no option but to consider legalizing the use and transport of drugs, President Otto Perez Molina said Monday...
GUATEMALA CITY — U.S. inability to cut illegal drug consumption leaves Guatemala with no option but to consider legalizing the use and transport of drugs, President Otto Perez Molina said Monday...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 78
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:26 AM on 03/13/2012
Take a look at portugal in 2001 they had the balls to finally try something different. they were tired of locking up non violent drug offenders clogging up their courts, costing their country billions having to keep them all locked up. So against the advise of the united states they decriminilized the possession and use of all drugs, heroin, cocaine, meth, ecstasy, ect.. there were many people in law enforcement who were very much against this, claiming drug use would sky rocket. Well it was done please google drug laws in portugal, drug use did not go up at all ! now 12 years later drug use is about the same in adults but its down in teen use, this decriminalization of drugs worked so well that many other countries started to do the very same just google drug laws in mexico, or even russia ! Yes russia has also done this, I never dreamed that russia would have more free drug laws the the USA. How many facts will it take before we realize prohibition of drugs can never work, other countries have come to their senses but we are the USA we know best, I know for a fact in this country drugs will become legal it may take a hundred years and we will likely be the last country on the planet to do it but it will happen, to bad I wont live long enough to see it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:54 PM on 02/14/2012
De Guatemala a Guatepeor.
02:47 PM on 02/14/2012
A documentary I watched around 20 years ago stated that the Columbia Cartel was raking in $50 billion a year. Where does this money go? Where is it invested? They have a competitive advantage. They don't pay taxes and they are murder on the competition. I often wonder to what extent the American housing crisis is the the result of organized crime's venture into the stock market. They certainly don't stick 50 billion in a sock. They have the most to gain by keeping drugs illegal. Give them a little more power and society could fall into the rule of warlords. Why do governments like my Canadian government not legalize drugs like ayahuasca and Ibogaine? Ibogaine although not without side effects cures addiction. Addiction is gone. Ayahuasca helps addicts face and heal trauma. Organized crime may have already co-opted our democracy. Who can't you bribe with $50 billion dollars.
11:49 AM on 02/14/2012
actually Central and South American countries might be able to profit off "legally" exporting drugs to the US, where the stringent bans would ensure blackmarket pricing despite possible increases in yields abroad. however, the governments down south would still need to remove organized crime from most involvement in production and distribution to gain control, which would entail more violence nonetheless. worldwide legalization would directly undercut the criminals.
09:35 AM on 02/14/2012
I am so happy to see that this small countrys are willing to do the right thing for their people. Only if United States were to do the right thing? War on drugs has kill more inosent people then the war in the middle east!!! The cartel is THE ONLY LOOSER. Drug war has been the best business for the cartel. If United States legalize drugs? The caretel would go out of business. The killing would stop here and also in Mexico. Just take a look at the ALCOHOL INDUSTRY. Prohibition did not work.
08:37 AM on 02/14/2012
Legalizing drugs will curb the drug sales. Moreover when people have alternative to natural drugs they will stay away from processed drugs which are the real culprits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
unity13
06:13 AM on 02/14/2012
I have yet to here a coherent, factual argument for keeping drugs illegal.
06:37 AM on 02/14/2012
i comes from a piece of legislation that granted a monopoly to certain companies
09:37 AM on 02/14/2012
Keeping drug illegal is a job security for the war on drugs. The cartel is the huge winner!!!
11:34 PM on 02/13/2012
Nobody is ever going to stop people from using drugs, ever. So open your minds people, Guatelama has to do whats best for Guatemala. Maybe we can't legalize drugs, but we can't win against an industry that is worth 20,000 dollars for each penny invested. So lets try something.
10:45 PM on 02/13/2012
The United States Embassy is right. Guatemala was, for years, joked about as "the bananna republic" a one crop economy, a tropical paradise cum sweltering sinkhole with presidents, supported by American foreign aid, who feigned democracy but ruled as dictators. If it is surrendered to international narcotraficantes, we will have Helmand, Afghanistan right here on our doorstep in the Americas.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Ourstorian
Free your mind and your ass will follow!
08:09 AM on 02/14/2012
There would be no "banana republics without the involvement and neo-colonialism of the U.S. Moreover, America is the center of narcotraficantes. Stop blaming the countries to the south for our massive consumption of drugs.
02:35 PM on 02/14/2012
I am more interested in attacking DEMAND for drugs in the United States and in western Europe than in international blame throwing. Colonialism exploited conditions that already existed, such as crops that could only be produced in certain climates, which forced countries to resort to agricultural monoculture. The colonials siphoned profits out of these countries, even those that offered a variety of products and resources. Until there is an effective propaganda war against drug use, people will continue to consume the awful stuff, and many will be lost to drug addiction.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
looneydoone
not a "cookie"
10:29 AM on 02/14/2012
We in Latin America have had enough of *your* 41 year long, now global (DEA in 63 countries) "war on drugs" Every study has concluded it to be a spectacular failure.

In 2011 Mexican authorities seized 1,020 metric tons of precursor chemicals at the Ports of Manzanillo and Ensenada (2,244,000.00 US LBS). In the past week another 27 m. tons of precursors were seized at Manzanillo (the vessel "Petrokva") ALL OF IT SHIPPED FROM SHANGHAI, CHINA, most destined for Puerto Quetzal, Guatemala. Why is favored trade partner China exempted from this "drug war" ? And how much of this enters the USA in uninspected shipping containeras at US Ports ? How has poppy production in Afghanistan grown to current production levels during US occupation ? Where is Afghan poppy being refined into heroin ? How is that product being distributed to the global market, and by whom ?

. Scroll down to the catalog of weekly articles. Click on archivo historico and read "Big Stick War" dated 22 July 2011....there are several other compelling articles you should have a look at in this link
http://www.esp.mexico.org/lapalabra/colaborador/127/manu-dornbierer
10:01 PM on 02/13/2012
Guatemala has a right to govern as they please, this being said the U.S. needs to stop funding these governments as we clearly have separate agendas!
09:29 PM on 02/13/2012
Living in Central America and working in South America I am deeply saddened at the terrible damage the drug trade has done to the societies here, and I am maddened when drug use in Europe and America is tritely described as "recreational." There will come a point when people down here say enough! You want to use drugs? Well here they are, as much as you want. We have wasted enough lives on this already.
10:52 PM on 02/13/2012
Attacking the production and distribution of marijuana, cocaine, methamphetamine and heroin has done little good. It's time to effectively attack DEMAND. I suggest that on every American college campus, a huge billboard with a full color picture of the corpses of the gruesome mutilated innocent victims of Mexican drug gangs be displayed to those kids who think smoking pot is recreational and a harmless rite of passage. The caption on that billboard should read: THIS IS WHAT YOU BUY WHEN YOU SMOKE POT! STOP RIGHT NOW!
11:43 PM on 02/13/2012
You could do that but I am not sure anyone would care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HawaiiSteve
be your own lamp... let truth be your light!
02:29 AM on 02/14/2012
Legalize it and you eliminate the profit in trafficking. Much more effective than billboards!
09:05 PM on 02/13/2012
YES - just do it.
09:04 PM on 02/13/2012
Of course they should. Legalize!!!!!!!!
08:57 PM on 02/13/2012
I support the drug legalization, no matter what we doing will never control the drug, we have to legalize it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Metcalfe
Caught at 1st. slip trying to cut
09:45 PM on 02/13/2012
No we legalise becausec then we CAN control it to a great extent. Like alcohol.
11:05 PM on 02/13/2012
That analogy won't wash! Drugs are far more damaging than alcoholic beverages and have never had the widespread culinary use and sacramental uses of , wine, beer and even spirits. If drugs are legalized, this will only spare the druglords from the nuisance of the police; prices will not go down by much because they still have to produce the stuff while buying arms, hiring bodyguards, assassins and torturers to deal with their rivals. With years of experience in running illegal business, these druglords are not going to become upright taxpayers. They will still hide money in secret bank accounts paying paperweight taxes only Come legalization, they will infiltrate respectable charities to take over for use in money laundering schemes. They will bribe politicians on a scale unheard of, with billions given as campaign contributions, from supposedly clean and legal sources. And they will make only the most minimal look-good contributions to treatment programs for drug addicts, the victims of their products.
08:55 PM on 02/13/2012
http://www.guatemala-times.com/opinion/editorial/2928-guatemalas-president-proposes-legalization-of-drugs.html

Guatemala’s President proposes legalization of Drugs

Guatemala City. This is already the second time that Guatemalan President Otto Perez Molina in less then a month since he took office, is proposing to legalize drugs......
.... The money issue, the massive power of the narco- dollar through money laundering that benefits the US and European Economies has been a taboo for the international mainstream media, it is not politically correct to write abut the dark powers of the narco –dollar within the “legal” economies of the developed world.

There have been only two voices in the desert :

READ: The Guardian 13, December, 2009. “Drug money saved banks in global crisis, claims UN advisor”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/global/2009/dec/13/drug-money-banks-saved-un-cfief-claims

Bloomberg. Jun 28, 2010: “Banks Financing Mexico Gangs Admitted in Wells Fargo Deal. By Michael Smith. Just before sunset on April 10, 2006, a DC-9 jet landed at the international airport in the port city of Ciudad del Carmen, 500 miles east of Mexico City. ..........
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-06-29/banks-financing-mexico-s-drug-cartels-admitted-in-wells-fargo-s-u-s-deal.html