Rihanna, Chris Brown Grammy Performances: Whose Dance Set Was Best? (VIDEO)

AOL Music:

Leading up to the Grammy Awards tonight, much had been speculated about both Rihanna and Chris Brown's respective performances. After all, the former couple's connection with the Grammys was forever marred by the domestic violence scandal that led both to cancel their performances back in 2009.

Read the whole story at AOL Music

Comments

[JuicyNiquey]

08:33 PM on 02/14/2012

they both were lousy.

[Syracuse HouseParties]

03:52 PM on 02/13/2012

They were actually pretty good. I think chris brown is the better dancer though. Rihanna is not really a big dancer but Chris Brown prides himself on his moves. He can also sing his butt off. You can definitely see the difference in this video/blog post of mines. check it out:

http://fiestafrog.com/blog/index.php/chris-brown-grammy-performance-2012-54th-grammy-performance/

[knj1022]

07:32 AM on 02/15/2012

He can sing his butt off? Since when? He never sings live when he performs, I don't know what show you watched.

[JoeMentia]

11:01 AM on 02/13/2012

They both stunk. Rihanna was dull, in both song and dance, and while Chris Brown can obviously dance, his music is as horrible as it gets. Honoring this kind of stuff at a music awards show would be like honoring McDonalds and Taco Bell at a Restaurant awards event.

[mushimom]

06:08 PM on 02/13/2012

LOL!!!....:D

[RosesForObama]

10:32 AM on 02/13/2012

No contest.

He was lip syncing and just danced to his song. She on the other hand not only sang her song , but danced as well while singing like a REAL artist does.

[benitalu]

04:46 PM on 02/14/2012

I love Rihanna and I thought that she looked great, danced well, and sang like a pro. She's hot, and talented. No getting around it.

[LRM216]

10:30 AM on 02/13/2012

I looked at this picture of her with the blonde hair and I thought she was Denise Richards! Anyone else see that?

[Fattonecat]

10:24 AM on 02/13/2012

They both suck

[MisteRational]

10:22 AM on 02/13/2012

Who cares? The Grammys are irrelevant. It's an industry popularity and sales contest. I am not saying great artists do not receive Grammys, just saying that many are not so great (the young Mr. Brown case and point).

[holyfrak]

10:00 AM on 02/13/2012

I think Chris definitely beat her...

[sc00by]

09:57 AM on 02/13/2012

Whats the point of watching some lousy lip-synching?

[BankerTee]

09:49 AM on 02/13/2012

HP, too cheap to pass on, no?

[KMad18]

09:46 AM on 02/13/2012

The only thing I see when I look at Chris Brown is a guy who beat and bit a girl. Some things just can't be erased.

[indy girl]

09:43 AM on 02/13/2012

Who cares how they sang? I just hope she is smart enough to stay away from abusive relationships and he got some help for his anger issues.

[imonlyhereforthelaughs]

09:41 AM on 02/13/2012

They both sucked.

[G Goo]

10:01 AM on 02/13/2012

My feelings EXACTLY !
Whenever, they came, I left the room.

[panichead]

09:35 AM on 02/13/2012

Neither one was any good. The best performances of the night were Adele, Bruno Mars and both Foo Fighters performances. I have always been a hater of Taylor Swift cause everytime I have seen her perform on one of these shows she had been terrible but last night I thought she was fairly good, I was suprised.

[benitalu]

04:49 PM on 02/14/2012

Quite frankly, I'm sick of hearing and seeing Adele. I like Bruno Mars, but I'm tired of him too. Adele is okay, but she has a husky, rough voice. Nothing special. I like her, but I think she's getting way too much hype now. There are more talented women singers than her.

[Hardyman1966]

09:35 AM on 02/13/2012

Color me unimpressed, especially with Mr. Auto Tune.