More

HuffPost Social Reading

Sacramento Kings Wait On City Proposal To Privatize Parking For New Arena Funding

Nba

First Posted: 02/13/2012 10:39 am Updated: 02/13/2012 1:21 pm

The Sacramento Kings are getting lots of attention in California's capital, but it hasn't been for their play. As of this writing, the Kings sat in last place of the NBA's Pacific Division.

What's putting the focus on the Kings is the way officials are trying to gather financing to build a new arena and keep the team. Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, a former NBA All-Star, and others are pushing a plan to auction off the city's parking spaces to a private firm to collect around $200 million -- half of what's projected to build an arena.

Sacramento, mired in a $39 million budget deficit for the current fiscal year, would lose the $9 million a year it receives from its metered spaces and structures, according to the Sacramento Bee. The lease could run 50 years. But arena supporters point to a study asserting that a new venue would bring in $7 billion over 30 years.

The team has threatened to move if it doesn't get a new home, and officials have until March 1 to formulate a viable proposal. If they can't, the NBA has given its blessing for the team's owners, Joe and Gavin Maloof, to court other destinations. Anaheim, Calif., and Seattle, Wash., have emerged as potential suitors.

Sacramento is one of many regions under pressure to build new sports venues, continuing the debate over whether public resources should be used for privately owned teams. Under several proposals recently, Minnesota taxpayers faced the possibility of shelling out hundreds of millions of dollars to help finance a $1 billion stadium for its NFL team, the Vikings. And despite economic woes just about everywhere, other teams are also seeking new digs or expensive renovations: They include the NFL's San Francisco 49ers, St. Louis Rams, Atlanta Falcons, San Diego Chargers and Oakland Raiders, as well as Major League Baseball's Oakland A's.

The Kings have played in their current home since 1988. Although Power Balance Pavilion has the NBA's lowest capacity at 17,317, it has had trouble filling the place. Sacramento, as of Sunday, was averaging 14,924 in attendance, 24th in the 30-team league. It has stumbled through five losing seasons, following an era in which it was one of the league's best teams and regularly packed the building.

The feasibility study, commissioned by the plan's backers, determined that the new arena would bring in $157 million a year to the area, plus $6.7 million in taxes.

"Like with anything, the devil is in the details," Victor Stango, a professor of economics at the nearby UC Davis Graduate School of Management, told The Huffington Post. "Those details are particularly important because this is a long-term commitment."

A task force expects to raise part of the other $200 million needed to finance the arena through the sale of the old arena's property and new digital signage, according to the Los Angeles Times. But any talk of sacrificing public assets such as parking revenues comes at a delicate juncture. The city's school district recently approved $28 million in budget cuts that call for about 200 layoffs, and the city has had to trim police and fire service.

Neither the mayor nor the NBA responded to requests for comment.

There is also uncertainty over how privatized parking will work. Recent moves in Chicago and Indianapolis to privatize parking resulted in higher rates and have met with mixed results, according to reports.

UC-Davis's Stango said that the city would be trading one long-term asset, the parking, for another, the team -- and that "no one knows" whether the exchange is worth it.

The city council last week narrowly rejected putting the matter to a public vote in June, several months after the NBA is expecting an outline, the Bee reported. Now the city must quickly come up with a workable plan so the Kings will park long-term in Sacramento.

The meter is running.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The Sacramento Kings are getting lots of attention in California's capital, but it hasn't been for their play. As of this writing, the Kings sat in last place of the NBA's Pacific Division. What's ...
The Sacramento Kings are getting lots of attention in California's capital, but it hasn't been for their play. As of this writing, the Kings sat in last place of the NBA's Pacific Division. What's ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
11:14 AM on 02/14/2012
Handouts for Pro sports teams is a symptom of complete economic insanity and must come to an end.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
First Blast
won't be fooled again
02:24 AM on 02/14/2012
Selling public assets to private interests so that the government can give a stadium to private interests
01:27 AM on 02/14/2012
Selling off city parking and other assets is just another form of taxation to fund the special interests which profit from professional sports. Talking about conflict of interest--Keven Johnson's cronies from the corporate industrial sports complex are who he represents--not the common citizen. That the City Council cold vote 5-4 against putting it on the ballot tells me they know this is just serving special interests. This is Taxation Without Representation.
11:48 PM on 02/13/2012
The Maloofs are billionaires who own the Palms in Vegas, among other holdings. This plan is nothing more than a scam to get the taxpayers of Sacramento to build them a stadium. They have been threatening to move for several years unless the city, meaning the taxpayers builds them a new stadium. This in a city whose homeless population continues to grow year after year. I like Sacramento, I used to live there, but city pride is being used by greedy billionaires who couldn't care less about the city or the poor to get hundreds of millions of taxpayer money. If stadiums were such a good investment, billionaires would own them, instead of cities they con into building them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maloof_family

Kevin Johnson should know better. He is just a tool of the Maloofs.
09:36 PM on 02/13/2012
Sounds like they're trying to sucker the local government into corporate welfare.

Don't buy their BS.
09:32 PM on 02/13/2012
No Deal. This is extremely short-term thinking on the politicians behalf. Those projections are pie-in-the-sky numbers.

It's better to control the money making assets than to give them up to others without a firm trade of equal or more valuable assets.

No smart business would agree to this deal.
photo
KarmaPatrol
Fair and balanced and sugar-free
08:16 PM on 02/13/2012
7 billion over 30 years assumes the Sacramento (and American) economy can keep paying for ever rising ticket prices. Example: dealerships have often bought a number of season tickets to induce auto sales but now the dealers keep getting profits squeezed from the manufacturers and now internet sales, will they keep buying tickets at primo prices? Maybe yes but it's kind of tough to assume what this place will look like economically in a couple decades.
lofttypeofaview
Glad I don't have Republican Stockholm Syndrome!
08:12 PM on 02/13/2012
So let me get this straight. The 1% and the Republicans are 100% against Socialism if it benefits the 99% but if they are beneficiaries, then they are 100% in favor of Socialism?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1dabut1
Power is not alluring to pure minds. Thomas Jeffer
10:20 PM on 02/13/2012
right i think.
photo
local21
33% recall rate, Walker is next
07:01 AM on 02/14/2012
F&F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
07:40 PM on 02/13/2012
Those assets they are attempting to sell belong to the taxpayer. Let the team go and send a message to all sports franchises that the free ride is over. Enough.
08:12 PM on 02/13/2012
I do agree with you. If private industry (professional sport teams) cannot make money on it own, don't ask to be subside by tax money, which is use for other public projects. Sport teams don't meat public projects. If the team in this story had a winning season, they could build the arena without tax payers money. Maybe the team should issue shares and bonds to the public and investors, to raise money for operation of the business and money to build the arena. Stop taking tax payers money for your sport dream projects.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1dabut1
Power is not alluring to pure minds. Thomas Jeffer
10:23 PM on 02/13/2012
well they can make it on the own just not at 5/6/7/8... million, a man, a year. if they weren't allowed to rob the tax payer, thing would come down to reality.
photo
Troutguy
A bad day fishing is better than a good day workin
07:30 PM on 02/13/2012
And you would think that the GOteaParty would be all up in arms about this taxpayer funded boondoggle. But I guess it's only Socialism if Obama's involved.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:39 PM on 02/13/2012
People who sell public assets, like parking and toll roads, have only one interest in mind - their own. It's a bad deal for the public. Thanks to Perry in Texas, we will soon be paying toll road taxes for a foreign corporation to drive to work (for the rest of our lives, and generations to follow).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph LeCompte
The USA isnt broke.It was robbed.
05:19 PM on 02/13/2012
Just say no. The NBA is rich enough to fund their ball courts. People will spend money in other areas of the local economy. More corporate welfare anyone?
Eric4969
Type Today Post Tomorrow
05:16 PM on 02/13/2012
And dont look now they are a SOCIALIST corporation OOPS LMAO!!! So is Football & Hockey LMAO How about that America you love SOCIALISM lololololololololololololol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
06:29 PM on 02/13/2012
What does LMAO mean?
lofttypeofaview
Glad I don't have Republican Stockholm Syndrome!
07:59 PM on 02/13/2012
It means Laughing My A(double s) Off!
04:13 PM on 02/13/2012
Ron - excellent article. I'd like to add two points. First, the move to hand a Sacramento asset - parking - to a a private corporation is not really connected to the stadium.They want to do that anyhow, the stadium is just an excuse. The politicians in California have been dedicated to "privatizing" services to enrich their patrons, mainly wealthy Republicans even when the politician is allegedly Democrat.

Second, the real villain is the media. Sports sells newspapers and TV/radio air time so they will gladly push any burden on working taxpayers. Ridiculous claims about economic benefits go unchallenged. I lived in Oakland when the media stampeded local politicians into giving a no-vote sweetheart deal to the Raiders AFTER AN EARLIER DEAL HAD BEEN OVERWHELMINGLY REJECTED BY VOTERS, including myself. But the SF Chronicle, sports talkers, and the papers that became the Bay Area News Group got what they wanted. Oakland wound up burdened with a huge debt that its schools and streets still haven't recovered from. And never will, I think.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:45 PM on 02/13/2012
"Ridiculous claims about economic benefits go unchallenged" - that has been a media hard core fault for a long time. We don't have investigative reporters anymore that don't knuckle under and challenge stupid and unreasonable assertions. When Mr. King didn't respond to Newt's attack in the gop debate, that was the classic winner take all example.
04:01 AM on 02/14/2012
That's definitely true. I think the state of the mainstream media is a result of the fact that seven major corporations run over 95% of the media, a fact well documented in Ben Bagdikian's book on the media monopoly. They're interested in cliches promoting corporate greed, not facts or human decency.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fozzi58
I want my country back
03:21 PM on 02/13/2012
Bu-bye!

Chicago is going to lose $300 million over the 75 years that thier parking meters are leased for for a $90 million payout up front. Short term thinking by short term politicians continues to make these politicians think and make decisions based on election cycles, as opposed to what is good for their jurisdiction for the long run.