iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

iPad Ban Sought By Shenzhen Proview In China Over Trademark Battle

Ipad Ban

By JOE McDONALD   02/14/12 03:35 AM ET  AP

BEIJING -- A Chinese company said Tuesday it will ask customs officials to ban imports and exports of Apple's iPads due to a dispute over ownership of the trademark.

All of Apple's iPads are manufactured in China, meaning global sales of the popular tablet computers might be affected if authorities agreed to enforce such a request by Shenzhen Proview Technology.

The dispute with Proview, which won a court ruling that it owns the iPad name in China, has resulted in authorities seizing iPads from retailers in one city. Proview said it has asked for enforcement in 30 other cities.

"We are now working on a request to China Customs to ban and seize all the import and export of the iPad products that have violated the trademark," said Xie Xianghui, a Proview lawyer. He gave no indication when the request might be filed.

Apple, based in Cupertino, California, defended its ownership of the iPad name.

"We bought Proview's worldwide rights to the iPad trademark in 10 different countries several years ago. Proview refuses to honor their agreement with Apple in China," said an Apple Inc. spokeswoman in Beijing, Carolyn Wu.

Wu declined to comment on the possibility of Proview requesting a ban on iPad imports and exports.

China is Apple's fastest-growing market. Its iPads and iPhones are manufactured by a contractor, Taiwan-based Foxconn Technologies Group, at factories in southern China.

Shenzhen Proview Technology registered the iPad trademark in China in 2001. Apple bought rights to the name from a Taiwan company affiliated with Proview but the mainland company says it still owns the name in China. A Chinese court rejected Apple's claim to the name in China last year. Apple has appealed.

"Our case is still pending in mainland China," Wu said.

Chinese rules allow trademark owners to request seizure of goods that violate their rights, according to Stan Abrams, an American lawyer who teaches intellectual property law at Beijing's Central University of Finance and Economics.

The rules were enacted partly in response to foreign pressure for Beijing to stamp out rampant unlicensed copying of foreign movies, music and designer clothes. Abrams said exports can be seized under rules meant to prevent manufacturers in China from sending unlicensed copies to other markets.

"All of these things that Proview can do, whether it's going to court or Customs, these are the things that we want to see," Abrams said. "So it's definitely ironic."

Chinese news reports say Proview, which makes computer displays, is deep in debt and needs a big settlement from Apple.

Proview has yet to make an offer to settle, said Xie, the company's lawyer.

"We are now focusing our work on upholding rights and haven't made negotiation proposals to Apple yet," he said. "As for the reasons, you should ask Apple."

Shenzhen Proview Technology is a subsidiary of LCD screen maker Proview International Holdings Ltd., headquartered in Hong Kong.

Apple bought rights to the iPad name in 2009 from a Taiwan affiliate, Proview Taipei, that registered it in various countries as early as 2000.

A Chinese court ruled in December that Proview is not bound by that agreement. It rejected Apple's complaint that Proview was violating its rights.

Apple might be able to sue the Taiwan company on contract grounds for selling name rights it didn't own, Abrams said. But he said a victory in such a suit would not give Apple rights to the name on the mainland.

"This kind of thing happens, but it's a mistake and it's a really bad one in this case," Abrams said. "They're paying for it now."

___

AP researchers Yu Bing and Zhao Liang contributed.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 256
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
10:46 AM on 02/17/2012
When Apple sued other companies because they almost copied the iPad, iPhone design, I could be amazed by those companies' lack of design creativity.

In this case what's perplexing is the lack of inventiveness by Apple, ...that they had to stick to the word Pad instead of finding another suitable i-Name for their gadget.
photo
GentleGim
The opposite of austerity is GROWTH.
07:09 PM on 02/14/2012
Apple should immediately announce plans to move manufacturing to other countries and see how fast this frivolous lawsuit gets dismissed. The facts are that Apple did pay for the trademark in China years ago and even Proview doesn't dispute that they sold the trademark for use in other countries. How could anyone argue against export to countries that are indisputably legal. It's just a bald money grab by some guys who invented nothing and contributed nothing and happened to luck into owning a name that could be made worth something (though not by them) which they sold to Apple before they realized they might have gotten more. If China enforce an export ban, every other company in the world will pull out of China for fear of being held for ransom without cause.
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
03:50 AM on 02/15/2012
Unfortunately, US electronics firms will never pull out of China in any relevant manner. It would be suicide for them. The only effect this would have is afford exclusive low-cost manufacturing leverage to Asian brands. This is the hard cold fact.

Only if labor costs rise in China significantly, and it's no longer viable to economically manufacture there, will US/EU brands pull out. China will not allow mfr wages to rise, it's their competitive edge.

This is an effort to grab market share of a popular product by forcing out the main competitor in the tablet market, only to copy it and produce for their middle class market, expel US/EU brands (by whatever means), while still dumping low-coset electronics on our shores via Walmart (i.e. Samsung... yes, they do manufacture in China, bot via contract, including Foxconn and their own fab plants in China)

We're being naive by bashing just one of our US brands... in essence, handing over the global business to Asian brands... they will not follow suit to improve their own labor issues. They will continue to dump on our shores while banning sales of our brands on theirs.

A few good reads:

http://www.bizaims.com/content/copycat-cars-price-over-quality

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/07/china-makes-the-world-takes/5987/

http://stopsamsung.wordpress.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kurtvb
Knowledge is Power
08:27 AM on 02/15/2012
Apple should not announce anything. Rather they should initiate plans to build here, and shut down 100% once they are ready to produce. A cold break is the best way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ttowse
05:10 PM on 02/14/2012
China owns the knowledge on how to manufacture every product the USA once held privy. Corporations that began in America deserve to reap a full harvest of misery their greed has brought on themselves and their sacred shareholders. China creates nothing but has been given the keys to rob the world. China's abuse of copyright laws and manufacturing fakes goes unpunished.

Made in America is back and those that sold out did so at their peril. Finally.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
traveling1
50 states, 7 continents, 55 countries and counting
06:14 PM on 02/14/2012
I was thinking something similar.... maybe Apple (and others) will have to start manufacturing here in the US and pay US workers.
07:04 PM on 02/14/2012
It's going to take a little while for the Right To Work states to lower their wages below $1 an hour... but they're working on it. It's just than darned EPA and OSHA that they have to get rid of first... so the heavy metals can be dumped in the soil and rivers and unsafe working conditions can be allowed to occur.

Soon Grasshopper, Very Soon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
05:03 PM on 02/14/2012
Do you really think China Inc would let it's booming trade in apple products be put at risk by anyone ?
Unless of course it was what China Inc wanted.
03:45 PM on 02/14/2012
Apple has been playing this game of suing others and trampling little guys to expand it's monopoly; maximum profits, abusive wages and conditions. What goes around comes around. It's time to teach Apple a lesson.

Tragedy is gullible 'fans' just don't get how they're being screwed by their idol.
03:52 PM on 02/14/2012
its
03:58 PM on 02/14/2012
Glad you agree.

;-)
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
03:53 AM on 02/15/2012
You need to understand what "monopoly" means. In this case it does not apply.
07:46 AM on 02/15/2012
You're right. I expressed it poorly. But a company that sues others for infringing should be sued for infringement. Punishment is met out and lessons learned when it hurts and for a giant like Apple, pain could only mean a few billion dollars.
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
03:45 PM on 02/14/2012
This is nothing more than China attempting to muscle out foreign brands with successful products, only to copy the tech/branding for them to replicate. We've seen it with Goog and others attempting to operate there.
http://www.bizaims.com/content/copycat-cars-price-over-quality

China will continue to leverage, and corner for itself, their low-cost labor to exclusively sell to their growing middle class while continuing to dump low-cost products via Walmart on our shores... and we'll continue to buy them (i.e. Samsung... yes, they manufacture in China, both via contract, including Foxconn and their own fab plants) In essence they want their market to themselves and to sell in the US/EU market, at prices our companies can't compete with.

In essence, US/EU firms won't be able to compete either in Asia or in the US.

China has no concern for their workers, their gov is allowing the manufacturing labor violations to occur. Apple pulling out would have "0" effect on labor issues. This can't even be solved by the US industry collectively, much less one company. This is an issue that can only be resolved by Western trade policy with Asia.

http://stopsamsung.wordpress.com/
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
03:40 PM on 02/14/2012
I bet that for just a second, Apple directors wished they had manufactured in the USA. I'll also bet that a second later they remembered how much money they made in the last 10 years and quickly remembered why it's not manufactured in the USA.

Ironic that while Apple tries to sue the competition around the world to halt the sale of their products, that a bad IP deal could prevent them from obtaining any of their iPads from China.
foodle
My micro-bio is NOT empty!
03:42 PM on 02/14/2012
Why is this ironic? The legal department of major companies is as much a money making department as any other. Modern corporate operating procedures include legal battles. This is nothing different (except maybe in scope and press coverage).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bring in swat
03:28 PM on 02/14/2012
ahhh good 'ole USA Manufacturing foresight...
foodle
My micro-bio is NOT empty!
03:10 PM on 02/14/2012
How interesting. A Chinese company is working to throttle Apple sales in hopes for a payoff. Yet another Chinese company (Foxconn) is making tons of money assembling iPads. I wonder which Chinese company is paying bigger bribes to the government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Travis
Really, do you need one?
03:13 PM on 02/14/2012
This has always been a concern - China has no respect for copyright/IP. Pay close attention to this as this may be a sign of things to come.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blizzard man robot voice
03:04 PM on 02/14/2012
I guess I'll have to buy a Samsung iPad now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aneesia
03:02 PM on 02/14/2012
China regularly ignores copyrights on foreign products internally and sells copies of the products en masse. That's what Apple gets for bypassing manufacturing in a relatively stable country like the USA..
photo
Pectin
Lie to me...
03:13 PM on 02/14/2012
Nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
04:58 PM on 02/14/2012
Get a grip Pectin.
They've been doing that for years now.
Except now their products are as good as the originals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Travis
Really, do you need one?
03:14 PM on 02/14/2012
Many (all) companies have the same to look forward to. Virtually 90% of our products are made in China and soon the Chinese will start holding them all hostage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ILoveGreatDanes
If you can read this,my cloaking device is broken.
02:55 PM on 02/14/2012
TEN Apple articles on the tech page? Really, Huff? This Apple admiration is kind of sickening.
02:54 PM on 02/14/2012
We told you so. Many posters, including myself, said it was just a matter of time that Asian companies would not just stop at stealing Apple's patents and create their own devices using Apple’s patents (for instance the original Galaxy Tab and other devices). So now China is boldly blackmailing Apple outright, and in a major way Apple deserves it for abandoning American workers.

O.K., Apple would make less profit manufacturing in their own country (assuredly at first), but after reestablishing their manufacturing base back in America their profits would eventually increase, perhaps even more since they won’t have to spend billions on international litigation.

I know, I know, Apple is not the only American company to betray American workers and to that I say to China and other Asian countries, “BLACKMAIL THEM ALL, don’t just stop at Apple.”
photo
Pectin
Lie to me...
03:13 PM on 02/14/2012
"We told you so."

Did not.
06:07 PM on 02/14/2012
Unfortunately for you, you were not a part of our enlightened group, but admittedly everyone should have seen something like this coming particularly Apple as these countries are blatantly copying their patents. Hey (regarding outsourcing American jobs), Apple lives by the sword so they die by the sword as this wouldn't be happening if their manufacturing plants were in America.
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
02:52 PM on 02/14/2012
From a government that tolerates this:
http://www.bizaims.com/content/copycat-cars-price-over-quality
02:48 PM on 02/14/2012
My Huff Post is left justified.
photo
jdoeremi
The gentlest gamester is the soonest winner
03:27 PM on 02/14/2012
Looks that way, doesn't it?. Mine looks just a tad on the center left but not insufferable.
03:28 PM on 02/14/2012
Mine is totally on the left side. I know the Huff Post leans left, but come on!! lol