More

HuffPost Social Reading

Boys' Testosterone Levels Before Birth Seen In 'Manly' Fingers, Strong Jawline

Manly Fingers

First Posted: 02/15/2012 8:10 am Updated: 02/15/2012 8:10 am

By: Jennifer Welsh, LiveScience Staff Writer
Published: 02/14/2012 07:05 PM EST on LiveScience


Hands are keys to the past, even if there isn't much past to tell. A glance at a boy's digit ratio — the relative length of index to ring finger —shows if he was exposed to high testosterone levels before birth. These testosterone levels even lead to "manlier" faces, even before the boy hits puberty, the research suggests.



In the uterus, before a baby is born, testosterone seems to have what the researchers call an "organizing effect" on the face — it helps controls how the face and other parts of the body (including the sex organs and yes, the fingers) develop. This means that researchers can use digit ratio as a measurement of testosterone exposure before birth, which comes from both the mother and the developing baby. A low ratio, where the index finger is shorter than the ring finger, indicates high testosterone levels, and the opposite for a high ratio. 



Previous studies of digit ratio and adult male faces indicated that the lower the ratio (and therefore the higher the testosterone levels during development) the more "robust" the man's face is, the study researchers said. This work suggests this robust and masculine face is already present before puberty, since prepubescent boys with low digit ratio have features of a characteristically masculine face.



Fingers on the line



The researchers studied a group of 17 boys ages 4 to 11 and measured their finger lengths, and took images of their faces. They digitized these images by marking 70 measurement points to compare the face shapes. Analyzing the data on the computer, the researchers were able to see what parts of the face could be linked to digit ratio, and how strongly they were correlated.



They saw that prenatal testosterone levels account for about 15 percent of the variety in a boy's face shapes. The researchers found that low digit ratio corresponded to this "robust" masculine face with a more prominent jawline and smaller eyes, even before puberty hits. For comparison, boys with higher digit ratios have smaller chins and larger foreheads and eyes, what the researchers refer to as a "more childlike/female appearance."

"The overall shape patterns associated with high and low digit ratios depicted in our sample of boys closely resemble the ones found for adult men," study researcher Sonja Windhager, an anthropologist at the University of Vienna, told LiveScience in an email. "In an ongoing study, we are now collecting data of adolescents to compare the magnitude of shape difference associated with 2D:4D before and after puberty," she said, referring to the index/ring finger ratio.

More traits

Face shape and finger length aren't the only traits associated with digit ratio and developmental testosterone levels. "Men with a lower 2D:4D ratio are perceived as more masculine and dominant. But what we do not know is how this works for children," said study researcher and anthropologist Katrin Schaefer, also at the University of Vienna.

Prenatal testosterone exposure has been correlated to physical performance, musical ability and even decision making, as well, Windhager added in an email. "The question now is whether not only the relationship between digit ratio and facial shape, but also the associated trait attributions and behavioral tendencies hold true for children too."

The study will be published tomorrow (Feb. 15) in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

You can follow LiveScience staff writer Jennifer Welsh on Twitter @microbelover. Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter @livescienceand on Facebook.



Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

By: Jennifer Welsh, LiveScience Staff Writer Published: 02/14/2012 07:05 PM EST on LiveScience Hands are keys to the past, even if there isn't much past to tell. A glance at a boy's digit r...
By: Jennifer Welsh, LiveScience Staff Writer Published: 02/14/2012 07:05 PM EST on LiveScience Hands are keys to the past, even if there isn't much past to tell. A glance at a boy's digit r...
Filed by David Freeman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 741
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
vandegrasse
Don't Panic
09:56 PM on 02/20/2012
Interesting. Boys who have musical ability are manlier than their sports' buddies. That's rich!!
03:06 PM on 02/18/2012
Which way do you look at your fingers to determine whether ring or index finger is longer? If you look at it from the palm side, the relative length seems reversed from the view from the back of the hand. Does anyone else see this?
photo
vandegrasse
Don't Panic
09:57 PM on 02/20/2012
That's a most astute observation!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gregstevens
I'm just some guy.
10:23 PM on 02/16/2012
Great. All this really means is now there's one more stat that guys can lie about on dating profiles in order to sound more manly.

"Hey girl!

I'm 6'1", 185 pounds, 30 inch waist, and my 2D:4D is 0.81.

Does that sound sexy to you? *WINK*"
04:39 PM on 02/16/2012
If this is the case, then I imagine bigger boobs means a greater woman.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GaryNOVA
Fear My Micro-bio!!!!!!!!
07:51 PM on 02/16/2012
you mean it doesn't?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tanya11111
appraiser of folly
09:39 AM on 02/23/2012
well duh ;-)
04:37 PM on 02/16/2012
Correlation does not imply causation.
photo
jf12
Occupying myself
12:20 AM on 02/17/2012
Especially true for low correlation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JTyroler
knows that there is no GOP savior for 2012
03:40 PM on 02/16/2012
I wonder if they'll look into pre-natal hormone levels and gender identity and sexual orientation. This is something that needs a lot more research.
04:06 PM on 02/16/2012
Stress could link to that. If you put a mother mouse under stress (strobe lights usually) the male offspring are gay. They will not mount female mice. Its been a conducted and repeated experiment. We are also ~98% similar to a mouse, this offers insight.
09:47 AM on 02/16/2012
Looking at the picture of the boy on the far left, I'm now led to believe that aliens are exposed to extremely high doses of testosterone in the womb, test tube, or human chest cavity.
04:06 PM on 02/16/2012
clearly
03:12 PM on 02/18/2012
You've got it backwards. "High" refers to high digit ratio, not high testosterone exposure. It's pretty clear from the picture that the photo on the right is the most "masculine" featured (coarser features, bigger jaw, smaller eyes, etc). The high digit ratio face is softer, with larger eyes, narrower jaw, and more childlike/feminine appearance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tiemposdepaz
08:23 AM on 02/16/2012
Agreed. Why is the sample size only 17 boys? Are the boys all related? That's too small a sample to be credible.
photo
I AM THAT
Left? Right? Neither...I'm educated.
07:47 AM on 02/16/2012
perhaps the church can use this info.
04:06 PM on 02/16/2012
In what way?
photo
I AM THAT
Left? Right? Neither...I'm educated.
05:21 PM on 02/16/2012
not in a good way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Grey
07 Saluting our armed forces
07:34 AM on 02/16/2012
Grrrr.
A sample size of 17 and they call it " prenatal testosterone levels ACCOUNT for about 15 percent of the variety in a boy's face shapes"
Journalism is dead because it's reporting it as Scientific Fact. Science is dead because it thinks a study of 17 is sufficient.

This should read "an extremely small sampling found a possible correlation between". This is hypothesis stage stuff not even theory.
08:22 AM on 02/16/2012
Actually, to be truly pedantic, this is the observational "stage"; assuming you're referring to some nonexistent template/recipe for science.

Or perhaps you'd prefer Popper's falsification method..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Grey
07 Saluting our armed forces
12:31 PM on 02/16/2012
Well I don't recall if there is a definition of how much you can say at what stage based on SS. Prolly not.
But a SS of 17 would get me laughed out of my proffesion. We talk about Millions of Units and sample 77. This is about Billions of males and a sample size of 17. Even 'scientific' opinion surveys (an oxymoron at best) know better than this and sample 600 people.
07:20 AM on 02/16/2012
Come on...next you are going to say that the bigger the feet are the bigger the.....er.....intellect.
04:07 PM on 02/16/2012
shoes
04:23 PM on 02/16/2012
...er...socks...
07:15 AM on 02/16/2012
And how is this any different from palm reading to discover truths about a person based on the hands?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Grey
07 Saluting our armed forces
07:35 AM on 02/16/2012
With a sample size of 17, it's less scientific than palm reading.
09:48 AM on 02/16/2012
and yet still slightly more credible than Huffington Post
04:15 AM on 02/16/2012
FAKE STUDY WITH PHONY RESULTS!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RustamnTanya Qazi
07:42 AM on 02/16/2012
and boring to boot!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pixeloid
Reality has a liberal bias.
03:52 AM on 02/16/2012
How do you measure the fingers? Mine seem to be almost exactly the same length. Does that make me a macho man or a sissy boy?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:03 AM on 02/16/2012
Both.

Maybe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pixeloid
Reality has a liberal bias.
04:45 AM on 02/16/2012
Possibly neither, but I can't be sure.
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
06:53 AM on 02/16/2012
I don't think I've ever seen a description of how the measurements are made. It would be particularly interesting in my case, since my index fingers curve a bit. It's a family trait, and a bit of a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Betty Carter
There STILL ain't no shame in my game!
03:40 AM on 02/16/2012
My index finger is about 1/2 inch shorter than my ring finger. This study suggests I should be manly, but as you can see I am not. I have extremely feminine features naturally. I don't even have an adam's apple, well I probably do but you can't see it.