Kim Kardashian Allure March 2012 Cover: Practically No Makeup! (PHOTOS, POLL)

We knew she'd be Allure's cover girl, but we didn't know she'd go for a natural look, again.

Kim Kardashian once again ditches her signature smokey eyes (for the most part) and pink lips for a natural, clean look for the March issue of Allure magazine.

The cover, which debuted on her blog Tuesday, shows a fresh-faced Kim with dewy skin and water-drenched curls, a total low-key look according to make-up artist Fulvia Farolfi:

"Kim is a natural beauty. So we wanted to show her as naturally as possible, like she had just come back from the beach."

This isn't the first time we've seen Kardashian go for a low key look. She also ditched cosmetics for the December issue of Marie Claire, and subsequently was dubbed the "barefaced bombshell."

We're thinking she's taking our special advice yet again.

What do you guys think of Kim's fresh face?

Scroll down for cover photo.

Quick Poll

What do you think of Kim's cover look?

Love it! She's a natural beauty!

Hate it! Where's our glam Queen?

VOTE

Share your vote on Facebook so your friends can take this poll

Comments

[Catherine in Tulsa]

04:07 PM on 02/20/2012

I think she's more beautiful like this, because she looks real and not like a barbie. However, this is far from makeup free. And probably far from touch up free.

[Connie Markley Boppre]

09:16 AM on 02/20/2012

this is just minimal makeup. we'll never see this wh**e with no makeup. i wish she'd just go away. no one remembers her father is who GOT O.J. off for MURDER

[Catherine in Tulsa]

04:07 PM on 02/20/2012

and her mother is the one who just got off with OJ.....

[efrallyn]

11:29 PM on 02/19/2012

plastic paradox printed paper. its smoke and mirrors we love to hate...materialistic mimes will fade in time, once we realize we all must smile at each other in order to survive..look past the smoke and you'll see its a circus we paid to see..

[Hailardri]

10:44 PM on 02/19/2012

When will I see a headline that says "Kim K. goes.........."?

And then she is gone, never to be seen in public again..

Buh Bye.

[Branson Huggins]

10:41 PM on 02/19/2012

No makeup seriously? Give me a break. I'm a man, and I can see the layers of makeup on her face. Give me a break.

[sf girl]

03:57 AM on 02/19/2012

She almost looks like her old (real) self.

[cpaigethomas]

03:52 PM on 02/18/2012

As many have pointed out - she is wearing plenty of makeup not to mention the airbrushing done on a magazine cover photo.

[Arabella5757]

04:29 AM on 02/18/2012

That looks like make up to me. Just not 10 lbs of it.

[ineedausername]

01:31 AM on 02/18/2012

Shes wearing a full face of makeup applied differently

[LiberalLee]

11:07 PM on 02/17/2012

Now she matches.
Nothing on the inside, nothing on the outside.
Just surgically sculpted mush.

[AfroGoddess]

03:36 PM on 02/17/2012

Given that we've seen Kim without makeup, calling this her natural look is a bit of a stretch. Never underestimate the power of lighting and makeup artistry. This isn't "no makeup" just different makeup.

[Loulou117]

02:26 PM on 02/17/2012

Kim is a natural beauty, I agree. Please don't say she is all natural in this cover, mascara, eye liner, light foundation and lip gloss doesn't mean natural, it means she didn't wear all the make up she is used too.

[ChaiKat]

02:10 PM on 02/17/2012

Practically doesn't exactly count as natural. But I guess it takes a bit of make-up to look that unmadeup!.

[kelli2358]

01:49 PM on 02/17/2012

These people that leave all the negative comments about Kim on here are so funny to me, if they only knew how stupid they seem. For one thing I really don't know how anybody can say that Kim is not beautiful, that's just crazy. And the ones who say she's not beautiful inside either...how can they say something like that if they don't know her personally. And the funniest thing to me is how so many say they are so tired of hearing about her and they need to keep her out of the news but they are the ones that clicked on the link knowing it was about Kim, read the story and then left a comment! Jealous much?!

[LiberalLee]

11:08 PM on 02/17/2012

Helllloooo? We're laughing at her lack of TALENT not looks.

[kelli2358]

02:17 AM on 02/19/2012

ummmm..... hello??!! Did you not read any of the other comments? I think you should before you reply to mine. One in particular actually said that Kim wasn't beautiful on the outside or inside. And I don't really care what you guys are laughing at..... but I'm laughing at the fact that all you haters who say she has no talent and that you're tired of her being in the media still click on the link and read the story knowing that the story is about Kim and then take the time to comment about it too! See the thing is.... she has her own clothing line, fragrance line, reality show and she's filthy rich....sounds like she must have done something right.

[Hailardri]

10:46 PM on 02/19/2012

I can say it for you. She is not pretty - inside or out.

[masontganes]

01:49 PM on 02/17/2012

Where is the "MOST HATED WOMAN IN AMERICA" article????

Yes she is totaly hot and all men would love to devour her.
But as a human being or potential wife material- she is THE WORST kind of woman anyone could hope for.