More

HuffPost Social Reading

Paul Pfeifer, Ohio Judge, Rejects Death Penalty Law He Wrote

Paul Pfeifer Judge

ANDREW WELSH-HUGGINS   02/15/12 12:25 PM ET  AP

COLUMBUS, Ohio — As a young state senator 30 years ago, Paul Pfeifer helped write Ohio's death penalty law. Today, as the senior member of the state Supreme Court, he's trying to eliminate it.

It's not uncommon for sitting judges to change their mind on the death penalty – U.S. Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun famously said in 1994 he would no longer "tinker with the machinery of death" – but Pfeifer may be the only one to argue so ardently against a capital punishment law he himself created, and yet continue to rule on death penalty cases.

"I have concluded that the death sentence makes no sense to me at this point when you can have life without the possibility of parole," Pfeifer said in his most recent public comments, testifying in December in favor a bill to abolish Ohio's law. "I don't see what society gains from that."

After the U.S. Supreme Court declared capital punishment unconstitutional in 1972, states spent several years rewriting their laws; those enacted by Florida, Georgia and Texas ultimately met the court's threshold for constitutionality. Other states had to follow those models to have their laws upheld. Ohio's first attempt, in 1974, was found unconstitutional, but the second try, when Pfeifer was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, was enacted in 1981 and has never been successfully challenged. Lawmakers pledged at the time to draft a law reserved for the most heinous murders.

At least two county prosecutors say Pfeifer should stop ruling on death sentences, including Hamilton County prosecutor Joe Deters, who said that Pfeifer's actions were inappropriate. "It gives rise to a credible inference that he cannot be fair to both sides," Deters said recently.

Pfeifer's position is unusual but on solid legal ground as long as he keeps his opinions out of his rulings, said Marianna Bettman, a University of Cincinnati law professor and former state appeals court judge.

Ohio has 148 inmates on death row. Executions are temporarily on hold while federal courts review the state's lethal injection procedures, but that delay is not expected to last forever. The Democrat-sponsored bill to abolish the death penalty has little chance of passing.

Pfeifer, a Republican, has always charted his own course on the court. For years he was a member of a foursome – two Democrats and two moderate Republicans – dubbed "the Gang of Four" for a series of 4-3 rulings that critics said were anti-business and favored Democrats and their causes. He's also not afraid of mud-slinging: In his spare time, the lifelong farmer raises Black Angus cattle.

Pfeifer had been on the court only two years when, in 1994, he dissented on a vote upholding the death penalty for a man sentenced to death for shooting his ex-girlfriend at the elementary school where she worked as a custodian. Already, he appeared to be having his doubts, writing that "the death penalty is special" and should be "reserved for those committing what the state views as the most heinous of murders." That defendant, John Simko, died of natural causes on death row in 1997.

Pfeifer made similar statements in court opinions over the years. He took his position public in 2001, calling unsuccessfully for an independent panel to review the law. He began to complain that prosecutors were overusing the statute, seeking death sentences in domestic quarrels that went bad instead of for the worst of the worst killers.

He often cites the case of Richard Nields, who murdered his girlfriend in their southwestern Ohio home in 1997, then stole her car and travelers' checks, as an example of overreaching by prosecutors.

"This case is not about robbery," Pfeifer wrote in his dissent to the court's 2001 decision upholding Nields' death sentence. "It is about alcoholism, rage and rejection and about Nields' inability to cope with any of them." Ultimately, Gov. Ted Strickland agreed and in 2010 changed Nields' sentence to life without parole.

In January 2011, Pfeifer made his strongest statements to date, calling on Gov. John Kasich to empty death row.

Pfeifer says he's required as a judge to take positions to make laws better, hence his current stand. He's also required to rule according to the law and the Constitution, which he says he does. Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor says she's comfortable Pfeifer is following the law and not showing bias.

Since 2001, Pfeifer has written the majority opinion upholding death sentences in five cases, dissented in two others and upheld death sentences while disagreeing on aspects of the decision in four other cases.

As recently as December, Pfeifer set an execution date, signing the order for a man who raped and killed his girlfriend's 3-year-old daughter.

Ohio first allowed the option of life without parole instead of a death sentence in 1996, then changed the law in 2005 to make it even easier to put killers behind bars for life while skipping death penalty charges altogether. Pfeifer says those changes have made the death penalty unnecessary.

State Rep. Ron Young, a conservative Republican, challenged Pfeifer on this point in December, arguing that removing the death penalty would create a slippery slope where eventually life without parole would be challenged as too harsh.

Pfeifer's experience as a death penalty supporter-turned-opponent is not isolated.

Gerald Kogan, a retired chief justice of the Florida Supreme Court who prosecuted death penalty cases early in his legal career, now says the death penalty should be abolished, with the possible exception of worst of the worst defendants such as Osama bin Laden or a mass serial killer.

Rudy Gerber helped write Arizona's death penalty law in the 1970s but now opposes capital punishment and represents death row defendants trying to escape the law he created.

In California, Don Heller authored a 1978 ballot initiative that created the state's death penalty law. Thirty years later, with more than 700 inmates on death row, Heller has changed course and is advocating the law's demise, saying it's too prone to human error.

___

Andrew Welsh-Huggins can be reached at . http://twitter.com/awhcolumbus

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

COLUMBUS, Ohio — As a young state senator 30 years ago, Paul Pfeifer helped write Ohio's death penalty law. Today, as the senior member of the state Supreme Court, he's trying to eliminate it. ...
COLUMBUS, Ohio — As a young state senator 30 years ago, Paul Pfeifer helped write Ohio's death penalty law. Today, as the senior member of the state Supreme Court, he's trying to eliminate it. ...
Filed by Simon McCormack  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:53 PM on 02/28/2012
My only problem with the Death Penalty is that we are all so concerned about the painless ending of life of those who committed painful, horrible crimes to begin with. Those that murdered anyone could have cared less about what pain they caused their victim, or the pain of the families of the victim. If there is a "True" doubt in a case, then investigate to ensure that case is true before taking an inmates life.However in cases where the is "NO DOUBT", we need to punish these cases quickly. I don't care what pain it causes.

As far as Justice Pfeifer who now stands and says do away with the death penalty, the same law he helped to write, he should step down, as a judge, and not be allowed to hear death penalty cases. He took an oath to hear cases without prejudice, now that he has made his thoughts known then he must step down.

My family is one who's cousin was murdered in cold blood, caught on tape, shot execution style in a drive-thru business he owned. Because the defendant Bobby T. Sheppard did not want to be identified. There is no doubt the pain he caused, There is no doubt the pain he caused the family of the murder victim. There is no doubt this man deserves to die. There is no doubt this man's case has been bouncing around for years in the courts. I care that justice has not been served.
11:00 PM on 02/19/2012
As a strong proponent of the death penalty, I am deeply troubled by the number of people that have had their convictions overturned. I saw a show on false confessions last year on Frontline that pretty much proves to me that confessions can't be trusted, so I believe it should only be applied in cases of conclusive physical evidence and suggest a true life without parole sentence in other cases. Perhaps real maximum security, with prisons solely for lifers, one prisoner to a cell like John Gotti had, locked up 23/7, no interaction with other inmates.
Let them serve the rest of their "natural" life, I might go so far as to designate the facility as a hospice and make inmates DNR (Do Not Resuscitate), no transplants, only supportive drug therapies like insulin, blood thinners, etc.

You can see the entire show about false confessions:

"How could four men confess to a brutal crime that they didn't commit? Inside the incredible saga of the Norfolk Four -- a case that cracks open the justice system to reveal almost everything that goes wrong when innocent people get convicted.­"

http://www­.pbs.org/w­gbh/pages/­frontline/­the-confes­sions
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tracee Collins
APATHY = COMPLICITY
07:03 AM on 02/19/2012
Good for him. It takes courage to admit you were wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
salamanca1
They're good eatin', but you need a lot of 'em
03:55 PM on 02/18/2012
Emotionally speaking, there are plenty of criminals I would like to see fry. Rationally speaking, the error rate in capital cases, in which a death row inmate is later exonerated by the evidence, is so high that I absolutely reject the death penalty. In Illinois some years ago, about nine out of 12 death row inmates turned out to be innocent, which prompted then Gov. and now inmate George Ryan to impose a moratorium on the death penalty. Batting .250 will keep you employed in major league baseball, but it's a really crappy accuracy rate if you're killing the supposedly guilty.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kathy smelser
07:06 AM on 02/18/2012
why should the tax payers have to pay for people to just sit in prison for life with no parole ....their crimes were so bad that the courts see them as a life long danger and should be put away ....we should not have to take care of them ...bullets are still pretty cheap
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tracee Collins
APATHY = COMPLICITY
07:04 AM on 02/19/2012
Maybe so...but they don't do it that way....after YEARS of appeals at public expense, specialized housing, etc., it's WAAAAYYYY more expensive to kill folks in prison, simply to meet the demands for vengeance.
It's also extremely hard on the children. Trust me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kathy smelser
07:15 AM on 02/20/2012
it is not about vengeance it is about doing what needs to be done
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockysparks
there's no law against being annoying.
10:45 PM on 02/17/2012
I lived in Ohio and wrote about Ohio Supreme Court decisions for several years. Paul Pfeifer is a judicial hack and always has been. He is notorious for his inconsistency and has little respect from the Ohio Bar Association.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubenillo
The truth always prevails
07:19 PM on 02/15/2012
Judge Paul Pfeifer. Your Honor why would you like to take the death penalty and replaced with life in prison with out parole, what we have to do execute them faster so we the tax payers and the government save all this money. And I don't need to get paid to inject them the lethal dose.
04:44 PM on 02/15/2012
Judge... it's called a DETOURANT to crime. If criminals get three squares, and a roof over their heads, TV, radio, and personal relationships, they may be better off than most citizens in other countries. That is the benefit to society. What is the benefit to society to incarcerate young men who get caught with a marijuana cigarette? The ones who BENEFIT here seem to be the Judges and Attorneys who get PAID to hear cases, and APPEAL, AFTER APPEAL, AFTER APPEAL!
07:06 PM on 02/15/2012
I have never met someone who had murdered another person, or caused their death in some fashion, to say that they considered or ruminated about the death penalty prior to committing the act for which they were then arrested and prosecuted. I have met, spoke with, and interviewd about 40 + such persons (some who are now on death rows). I am a criminal defense investigator and I have been employed as such for 22 years. The 'death penalty' was not a 'deterrent' to any of these folks (an aside: you really should consult a dictionary prior to writing words of which you are not familiar ..'detourant' ?). For those who have caused another's death (intentionally or unintentionally), it obviously was not a deterrent.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:34 PM on 02/15/2012
Thank-you for your comment. I had my doubts that the death penalty or any other punishment served as deterrents, and your comments supported that line of thought.
08:37 PM on 02/15/2012
If someone plans a murder, the death peanlity is not a deterrant but it does deter him from doing it again it if he gets caught and his executed.
07:16 PM on 02/15/2012
Actually, it's called a deterrent (tip for the future, don't use all caps for your spelling errors).
Secondly, it's only called a deterrent, it doesn't work. Look at the figures for the US compared to other OECD countries (Or, for that matter, murder rates in the US for death penalty vs non death penalty states.)
photo
climbing panda
there's a log in my cabin
04:14 PM on 02/15/2012
the benefit is to say, as a society, that certain crimes are deemed so heinous as to forfeit the offender's life; that their crime will result in the ultimate punishment that man is able to mete out.
04:05 PM on 02/15/2012
I wonder how he would feel if a grandchild of his was kidnapped, abused and tortured to death?
lofttypeofaview
Glad I don't have Republican Stockholm Syndrome!
06:03 PM on 02/15/2012
How would you feel if the wrong person was executed for the crime?
07:10 PM on 02/15/2012
Obviously, gd3 failed to read the article. The judge said that the death penalty should be reserved for the most heinous of crimes and gave the example of the rape and murder of a 3 year old child. So, gd3's example of kidnap, abuse and torture was exactly the
crime(s) for which the judge agreed the death penalty should be reserved. gd3, you missed that part? Perhaps your emotions got the better of you.
07:31 PM on 02/15/2012
DNA cuts two ways, if DNA of the perp is found in certain places of a child I think the evidence is incontravertible, when combined with other evidence then you get to the point there is no doubt. I do believe with executions the standard needs to be higher than a reasonable doubt, the standard should be beyond any doubt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kathy smelser
07:13 AM on 02/18/2012
and the act of execution should not take 20 years of appeals the whole process needs to be adjusted ....but we all know that finding an agreement on this will probably never happen
01:24 PM on 02/15/2012
It is encouraging to see examples of the evolution of humanity especially in people who wield power. There is hope afterall.
05:54 PM on 02/15/2012
For those who murder other inmates and officers in prison and who can not punished because they are already serving life in prison. Or for those murderers who escape and murder innocent people who expected the government to protect them. Yes, we have evolved, haven't we?
06:56 PM on 02/15/2012
Those who murder in prison (either other inmates or officers) most certainly could be prosecuted for capital murder (that is, be death penalty eligible) regardless of their already-existing sentences.
07:33 PM on 02/15/2012
Au contraire, mon ami. Inmates who murder in prison can absolutely face new charges and can be prosecuted AND receive the death penalty. And some of us have evolved. 50% of the world's countries have abolished the death penalty completely. The U.S. is only one of 3 'civilized' nations that still implement the death penalty (China and Japan being the others). There are several countries that implement the death penalty that are considered for the most part "Third World Countries" (e.g., Saudi Arabia, some African countries, India, Indonesia). AND please name one inmate who was serving a LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE sentence who then escaped and then committed a murder. Just one name, please.