More

HuffPost Social Reading

Payroll Tax Cut Deal Reached In Congress

Payroll Tax

First Posted: 02/16/2012 12:58 am Updated: 02/16/2012 12:40 pm

WASHINGTON -- Congressional negotiators reached a final deal to extend the popular payroll tax cut for the rest of the year, with Republicans agreeing to tack the $100 billion cost onto the deficit and Democrats accepting diminished jobless benefits as well as some drug testing for the unemployed.

The costliest part of the measure extends the current 2 percent payroll tax holiday enjoyed by some 160 million workers through the end of the year, saving the average family about $1,000.

It also prevents a cut in doctor payments under Medicare, and funds extended unemployment benefits, even as it starts to cut their duration from 99 weeks to 73 weeks.

While the payroll tax break is paid for with borrowed money -- a major concession for GOP leaders who had adamantly opposed new deficit spending -- Democrats gave up their traditional stance that emergency unemployment benefits should not be offset with cuts elsewhere. They also agreed to quicker cuts in the duration, and to allow drug-testing of unemployed people who had tested positive before or who were seeking work in certain jobs.

Republicans relented on other restrictions they had hoped to place on people looking for work, including requiring them to enroll in GED programs.

The entire deal nearly collapsed late Wednesday when three Republican senators on a conference committee tasked with finishing the package refused to sign off, and one Democrat -- Maryland Sen. Ben Cardin -- balked at hits to the federal workforce pension plan. It reportedly took a call from President Barack Obama to break the logjam.

Obama also called Rep. Chris Van Hollen, another Maryland Democrat on the committee who was worried about the impact on the many federal workers in his district.

The $52 billion cost of the unemployment extension and Medicare "doc fix" will be funded in part by forcing federal workers to contribute more to their pensions and by auctioning off unused sectors of the broadcast spectrum. Precise estimates of that revenue were being reviewed by the Congressional Budget Office Wednesday night. Federal workers would pay for about $15 billion of the unemployment extension by having their pension contribution raised from 0.8 percent to 1.55 percent. Spectrum auctions would provide about $15 billion, according to preliminary estimates.

To pay for the $22 billion "doc fix," negotiators agreed to cut about $7 billion that goes to hospitals to cover debts. Another $5 billion would be cut from the health care law's prevention fund, created to curb things like childhood diabetes and smoking. The rest comes from altering payment formulas for hospital aid to certain states, cutting some Medicaid assistance to Louisiana that was boosted after Hurricane Katrina and trimming payments to clinical labs.

The negotiations came together relatively quickly after Republicans caved Monday on their insistance that the payroll tax cut be paid for.

Republicans had admitted they lost the fight over payroll taxes before Christmas, when Democrats were able to paint them as protecting the rich at the expense of middle-class workers, since the tax applies only to incomes up to $108,000. Senior members of the GOP admitted as much, soon after House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) gave in, but cast the Democratic position as purely political.

"When you're dealing with people whose only interest is in the next election, you gotta find some way to break the impasse," Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said. "I think everybody understands this is the president's favorite stick to beat opponents with, and I think part of the strategy of the House Republicans is let's get the sharp sticks and the big sticks off the table."

Democrats embraced the deal after negotiations over specific parts of the compromise, especially the drug-testing and the spectrum auctions, seeing it as an overall win.

The spectrum auction was hailed by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) because after unemployment is paid for, about $7 billion to $8 billion would be left to build a nationwide emergency communications system, fulfilling the last major recommendation of the 9/11 commission.

"We've made great progress and are very close to a historic milestone -- creation of a new nationwide communications network for our first responders," Rockefeller said while the final touches were being put on the deal.

Lawmakers said they were not sure when the compromise measure would come up for a vote, because were still being translated into legislative language.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Congressional negotiators reached a final deal to extend the popular payroll tax cut for the rest of the year, with Republicans agreeing to tack the $100 billion cost onto the deficit an...
WASHINGTON -- Congressional negotiators reached a final deal to extend the popular payroll tax cut for the rest of the year, with Republicans agreeing to tack the $100 billion cost onto the deficit an...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,425
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (48 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
Beatriz09 12:26 PM on 02/16/2012
So ... a year ago, the GOP absolutely wanted Obama to extend the Bush tax cuts for the 1%, EVEN when that would increase the deficit by $800 billion during the next decade. They ONLY accepted to extend the Bush tax cuts for the 99% of Obama accepted to add at least $80 billion for the ultra-rich to the deficit.

And now they want to REDUCE unemployment benefits, and only accept to extend a crucial  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Everts
Combat vet. technical trainer, progressive.
03:57 PM on 02/17/2012
Please let me be alone in a room with Boehner and Cantor...pleeeeeze!
photo
wipokerpro
I'm sorry. Did I offend you?
09:38 AM on 02/17/2012
Urine test for unemployment. Wow how brilliant. I do the numbers in my head and I come up with large cost and larger government to actually do this. Funny thing about Republicans is that they are proven to grow government much more than any Democrat. Just look at those wonderful Reagan years. As far as the Democrats go they need to get there party unified to blow these Republicdumbs out on there asses. Get rid of the far left Democrats also. They only obstruct like the Republicdumbs. Extremism is dangerous. Speaking from a Moderate Democrat like myself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jamico Bob
One can put a price on gold, friends are priceless
09:12 AM on 02/17/2012
Republicans had admitted they lost the fight over payroll taxes before Christmas? They actually 'admitted they lost'....hope they will use those three words again, come November! And, throw-in a couple more...'congratulations Ohbama'. That's five words. Like gimme five. High. Low. LOL
12:28 AM on 02/17/2012
News Flash: GOP manages to do something positive for Americans while still pursuing their primary goal of sabotaging the US economy before the next election. At this time experts are calling this deal a one-off.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:47 PM on 02/16/2012
Category: Important. Number of pieces of legislation: 1. Length of time to produce: Exceeds reasonable standards. Civics class lesson: The dysfunctional application of the U.S. legislative branch of government.

At this process rate the U.S. is still in big trouble.
11:46 PM on 02/16/2012
I kinda' wish that Boehner & Cantor obstructed the bill. I wanna' see tyheir approval rating drop into single digits. And, as a Virginia resident, I wanna' see Cantor blown the %$#@ out off office this year!!!
11:31 PM on 02/16/2012
The Republican are so proud of not raising our taxes but they turn around and loot America's retirement funds
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D OBrien
Hey hey, my my
11:02 PM on 02/16/2012
Republicans want workers to 'pee in a cup!'
With what they've ALL been swallowin' from their 'candidates' for the last year....................
I'm not the least bit surprized!
'Bottoms up boys!'
09:15 PM on 02/16/2012
Forced to add on more debt... wow. It will be really wonderful when the scales fall off the eyes and they realize the importance of a balanced budget. To me, that is one of the MOST important things this year... and the right for Religious Freedom that is being eaten away at.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mansterEZ
searching for secular humanist fact-based truth
08:53 PM on 02/16/2012
This proves just how far right the Dems have drifted. Requiring the unemployed to "drug test" for "certain jobs" is a giveaway since employers for "certain jobs" already implement this tactic. Reducing the maximum unemployment benefit from 99 weeks to 73 weeks? It's called insurance for a reason. The Obama Administration will be forever known as the great capitulation. IMHO caving to extremists is never good policy because extremists are not rational or reasonable. They slowly erode liberty until none remains. I am reminded of Uncle Ben Franklin's words: Those who would sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither.
09:16 PM on 02/16/2012
You realize that shortening the unemployment benefits means that Obama can claim a decline in unemployment when they fall off of the program.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mansterEZ
searching for secular humanist fact-based truth
02:33 AM on 02/17/2012
It's all part of that "funny math" both parties use for political expediency. Not counting people who fall off the "counted rolls" makes me ill. We need a 3rd party, and soon, to rectify politics as usual for maintaining the status quo. You're absolutely correct in your dissection.
photo
mac2jr
The truth always wins out
08:23 PM on 02/16/2012
Q) Which drug are they testing for, illegal, legal, otc, home grown, smoked, shot up, snorted, drank?

Q) Which drug testing labs are they going to use, government, private, a governor's wife's, foreign?

Q) How often are they going to test, with each check, monthly, semi-annually, annually ?

Q) Who pays for the testing, the broke UE person, the taxpayer, the companies that did the firing?
photo
skyeagle
R.I.N.O.
08:30 PM on 02/16/2012
Hello Mac: Try this. 1,000,000 unemployed. 2% are on drugs (a liberal's conservative estimate). High volume facility drug testing cost: $25. One week's enemployment check $300. So if 2% of the unemployed are on drugs and fail a drug test that is 20,000 people per million unemployed. At $300 per week that is $15,600 a year. The cost: $25,000,000 plus paperework. The savings, $15,600 a year at 20,000 people. The savings at these figures is $312,000,000 a year less the cost of (the government) paying for the tests. The savings are greater if there are 2, 3, 4 or more million people on unemployment. Any questions MacJr
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clarkkentdlyplnt
08:41 AM on 02/17/2012
It really doesn't matter. It will be stricken as unconstitutional. :D
photo
mac2jr
The truth always wins out
10:31 AM on 02/17/2012
Yes, since many people are sick or on prescribed medications, how will we know the difference, especially since each drug, legal or illegal, stays in the system for different periods?

Do we also pay for the transportation to the testing facilities for each of the unemployed in the USA? Some of these places will be 50 miles distant, if there are any at all? Or, do we pay local doctors to do the samples and then pay for them to send the samples to a distant lab?

Do we have drug testing labs in every town or city that has an UE office, remember many file for UE by mail or phone call, even in the big cities, the UE offices are too overloaded as it is?

Much of the UE benefit process is now automated and one only has to phone in and answer a series of questions, will this now require doing away with this cost saving efficiency to go back to the old stand in line for hours system?

Will UE offices have a qualified doctor standing their to take the pee test?

How many politicians will be getting rich off of this law?
07:51 PM on 02/16/2012
Why would anyone think the Republicans favor the rich over the rest of us? Duh...
11:38 PM on 02/16/2012
It's a proven fact they leave a lot richer then they came in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dizzy Caruso
07:39 PM on 02/16/2012
Our so called leaders should be drug tested ,, show a good example, YA RIGHT
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:34 PM on 02/16/2012
"Federal workers would pay for about $15 billion of the unemployment extension by having their pension contribution raised from 0.8 percent to 1.55 percent."

I see, so "Federal workers" (ie, mostly "middle class" workers) will PAY by essentially having THEIR "taxes" raised by .75 %... But MILLIONAIRES and BILLIONAIRES are still "off limits"!

Why is it that a teacher or transit worker can have their taxes RAISED (to chip in during an American crisis) but the UBER WEALTHY continue to dodge even the merest 1% tax hike?!! And that's only on the income that isn't HIDDEN in the Caymen Islands!
07:26 PM on 02/16/2012
Perhaps drug testing for welfare recipients would help decrease the costs of entitlement programs including housing, food stamps and direct payments.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
odhinn42
Veteran, News-junkie
07:35 PM on 02/16/2012
I will be fine with drug-testing welfare recipients when all people that receive a government paycheck are required to do so as well. Until then it is a restriction applied inequitably, and I can't see how I should support that. Personally, I'd rather it not be in place at all, but if it must, then it must be done so across the board. Senators and Congresspeople should have to submit as well, so should all medicaid and medicare recipients, all people getting federal loans, all the banks that got a federal bailout, the entire auto industry, every. single. person. that receives a federal benefit. Or no one. To say its 'fair' any other way is just rationalization, IMO
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:51 PM on 02/16/2012
Extremely WELL stated... Fanned and faved!!!
07:54 PM on 02/16/2012
You can add government contractors to the testing -- their paychecks come for us tax payers. (From a guy who worked almost 40 years for gov contractors.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cvwilson
08:41 PM on 02/16/2012
How? There is absolutely no evidence that drug use is higher among the poor than it is among the general poputation. In fact, in Florida where they started drug testing benefit applicants last year 2% of them tested positive while drug use among the general population is 6%. Probably because the poor can't afford to buy drugs. The idea that the poor and working class are nothing but a bunch of drug users is a right-wing myth used to rationalize their callousness and hard-heartedness.

One more thing, the programs that you mentioned are not entitlement programs. They are welfare programs. People get entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Unemployment because they have paid into those systems and are therefore "entitled" to them. Get it?