iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

School Lunch Guidelines: Preschooler Told Homemade Turkey Sandwich Not Nutritious Enough, Given Nuggets Instead

School Nuggets

First Posted: 02/15/2012 9:47 am Updated: 02/15/2012 5:41 pm

A preschool student at West Hoke Elementary School in North Carolina ended up eating three chicken nuggets for lunch two weeks ago -- because a state inspector declared that the 4-year-old's lunch wasn't nutritious enough.

The turkey and cheese sandwich, banana, potato chips and apple juice, according to the Carolina Journal, didn't meet U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines. So to meet those requirements, the child was given chicken nuggets. The agent was inspecting the entire class' lunch boxes that day.

The state's Department of Health and Human Services requires that all lunches served to pre-kindergarten students -- whether from school or home -- meet USDA meal guidelines of one serving each of meat, milk and grain, and two servings of fruit or vegetables. The regulations also state that if meals or snacks brought from home do not meet nutritional requirements outlined in the "Meal Patterns for Children in Child Care," the school "must provide additional food necessary to meet those requirements."

It's unclear to state officials why, exactly, the girl's meal was deemed insufficient. The girl's mother thought that the potato chips and lack of vegetables may have been a problem, but Jani Kozlowski, fiscal and statutory policy manager for the Division of Child Development told the Carolina Journal that the meal should have met guidelines.

"With a turkey sandwich, that covers your protein, your grain, and if it had cheese on it, that's the dairy," Kozlowski said. "It sounds like the lunch itself would’ve met all of the standard."

The struggle to comply with USDA guidelines in school meals is not new. Celebrity chef and TV personality Jamie Oliver spent years trying to remove flavored milk from school cafeterias. The target: glucose. While flavored milk met USDA guidelines for dairy, those recommendations ignore the fact that a carton of flavored milk often contained more sugar than a can of soda.

In the first move of its kind in over 15 years, the government last month announced new guidelines to ensure students are given healthier options for school meals. The new standards call for more whole grains and produce as well as less sodium and fat in school meals. While the measures mark a step forward from previous years, they still compromise amid push-back from Congress to keep pizza and french fries on the menu -- counting both the tomato paste on pizza and the potatoes that make fries as vegetables.

And for many schools and parents, just getting young children to eat their servings of fruits and vegetables is a struggle. But a new study last month suggests that a quick fix could be as simple as showing kids some pictures. Researchers from the University of Minnesota found that elementary school students chose and ate more carrots and green beans when their lunch trays prompted them with pictures of those vegetables in their respective tray compartments.

"I think a lot of times they just need an example of what they're supposed to do," Deb LaBounty, nutrition services supervisor for Richfield Public Schools, told the Pioneer Press. "A lot of times, the battle is getting the kids to take the fruit or the vegetable."

Even with the researchers' low-cost idea, schools still face costly issues. For school districts to comply with new federal regulations that bring in fresh fruits and vegetables, they have seen a rise in prices, The New York Times reported. To add to that, school meals are often products of a complex web of corporate alliances among those in the food industry, in which schools pay high prices for third-party food processors to turn those products into unhealthy fried and fat-laden items.

As schools struggle to weigh and make decisions between high product and labor costs for fresher, healthier meals versus the lower overhead of processed but unhealthier foods, students are the ones who sacrifice. For a year, Chicago school teacher Sarah Wu secretly ate a school lunch every day and documented her experiences.

"That particular meal seemed barely recognizable as food," Wu told Good Morning America of her hot dog, tater tots and Jell-O lunch one day. "I was struck by the fact that the students I'm working with really rely on the school for so much, including potentially their best meal of the day."

Even in Los Angeles, where the schools have been noted for their progress toward healthier, more nutritious meals, schools still grapple with making those offerings more appealing.

"The healthier it gets, the more disgusting it is," student Kevin Albrecht told CBS News.

On Jimmy Kimmel Live last November, chef and media personality Jamie Oliver, who actively works to fight childhood obesity by promoting healthy school lunches and nutritional education, declared that "the food companies of America own you," adding that "These moron frozen food companies -- pizza industry, french-fry industry -- have basically bought, bribed, bullied Congress, who have completely let everyone down, into basically making it okay to feed [students] french fries every day."

Still, some schools -- like several in California -- have taken the matter into their own hands, and have found ways to profit from those efforts. Umpteen school districts have taken part in a decade-long initiative, supported by a philanthropic organization, that provides schools with equipments and chefs who teach cafeteria workers to cook from scratch and produce fresh meals.

A recent report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealed that more than a third of high school students were eating vegetables less than once a day -- "considerably below" recommended levels of intake for a healthy lifestyle that supports weight management and could reduce risks for chronic diseases and some cancers.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

A preschool student at West Hoke Elementary School in North Carolina ended up eating three chicken nuggets for lunch two weeks ago -- because a state inspector declared that the 4-year-old's lunch was...
A preschool student at West Hoke Elementary School in North Carolina ended up eating three chicken nuggets for lunch two weeks ago -- because a state inspector declared that the 4-year-old's lunch was...
Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,487
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (32 total)
12:34 PM on 03/03/2012
Yeah kid, pink slime and fake salt are better for you.

VOTE OBAMA OUT NOW!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
candcje
Progressive, Liberal Democrat and Proud of it!
04:50 PM on 02/22/2012
The idiocy of this experience is obvious. But just to be clear regarding what the article actually says... The inspector did NOT call for the replacement of the sandwich with 3 chicken nuggets. The inspector called for the ADDITION of the nuggets to go along with the sandwich.

I don't understand how the lunch was deemed insufficient given it had a protein, dairy, grain and two servings of fruit/veg (banana and apple juice). Sure the chips were "snacky" but they were in addition to the rest of the meal. If anything was deemed insufficient, I could sort of see saying the juice didn't qualify as a fruit and so the kid needed an extra fruit or some sort of vegetable that wasn't deep fried (like the chips). but to add more protein in that case seems out of touch with the meal that was present.

Besides, a sandwich, banana and chips is a pretty big meal for a 4-year-old.
01:46 PM on 02/22/2012
LOL, some guidelines... be more out of touch with reality, if you could.
10:59 AM on 02/22/2012
How are processed chicken and unknown fillers wrapped in a concoction of breading and spices and fat healthier than a turkey and cheese sandwich? I guess I don't feed my kids right.
07:36 AM on 02/22/2012
I pack my High School daughter's lunch every day. We shop very carefully for healthy foods. It is not always what foods, but what are in the brands. For instance, calorie count in the bread, whether whole grain or not, processed foods or not, salt content and how the chips are made and ingredients. We always check on the sugar and cholesterol count and type of everything we purchase. Therefore, my daughter's lunch that may have chips, deli turkey with cheese and low calorie and low cholesterol mayonnaise sandwich, yogurt, power bar, fresh fruit is so much more healthy than school chicken nuggets, and tastier foods than what they serve in the guise of being healthy. My daughter's lunch is not full of the cheap foods bought by the school full of bad cholesterol and salt. Another big problem is that several of her friends are at an income level where they cannot get the cheaper of free meals at school but cannot afford lunches or breakfasts, so I pack very large lunches so my daughter can share her lunch with these students.
What I cannot figure out is that it seems these health officials (going all the way to the top of the field) are not trained well at what good nutrition really is, that the cheapest oils and fats they can get are used, that salt content is not even considered, and that the food industry has such influence regarding snack foods and meals.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:20 AM on 02/22/2012
When I was in the 1st grade I went to lunch at my school and realized that they were serving fish sandwiches (something I simply could not handle at that age). My mom hadn't packed me a lunch that day so I decided to just not eat anything. My teacher saw that I didn't have any food and she came over and told me that I had to go and buy the school lunch. I did as I was told but then sat at my table leaving the sandwich untouched. My teacher returned and said I needed to take at least one real bite. I told her that I couldn't eat fish but she insisted and I, being an obedient little kid, did what she said and took the bite. Without even having the chance to set the sandwich back down on my plate I threw up all over the kid sitting next to me. The teacher apologized to my mom and my mom apologized for not sending me to school a packed lunch on fish sandwich day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shewolf2002
EDUCATION is a national security issue.
03:09 PM on 02/22/2012
The really sad thing about your story? Back then, people understood the incident for what it was - good intentions gone awry. It was embarrassing for the child, distressing for the parent, and also mortifying for the teacher, whose intentions were good. No one blew things out of proportion, everyone apologized, and when it was over, bygones were bygones, and life went on.
Nowadays, everyone has a hair trigger, and the slightest incident provokes the equivalent of road rage - the parent blows up, claims little Susie is emotionally scarred for life, and sues the teacher & school district, the teacher goes on the defensive and claims it never happened, and the school district fires the teacher. There is little to no goodwill or forgiveness anymore in our society, and it's a shame.
Anyway, this story shows that now we have also lost important knowledge about hard facts, such as nutrition. Who in their right mind would judge chicken nuggets to be superior, nutritionally, than a homemade turkey sandwich??? And how did they rise to the post of inspector? Truth IS stranger than fiction.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:06 AM on 02/22/2012
Wow this is big brother at its finest.
08:55 AM on 02/22/2012
Except very little of the story is true, as it turns out. check into things beyond the initial (often partial or simply mistaken) first impression. look beyond the headlines. be alert for updates--there have been more than one update to this 'story'--which is what it turns out to be.
03:16 PM on 03/15/2012
i just looked back through this story and find no updates. Are you sayoing HP is lying to us and then not correcting the lies....what a shock
NFA
4 8 15 16 23 42
03:04 AM on 02/22/2012
This story isn't true. There was no 'state inspector' and nothing was 'confiscated.' If you read updates to this story (which you can easily find in a google search) you'll see that this is just sensationalist journalism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cheesesteak wid
04:02 PM on 02/21/2012
How obese was the inspector
09:13 AM on 02/21/2012
The government does not have the right to tell us what to feed our children. We are sliding down a very slippery slope to where BIG BROTHER is watching us and telling us how to live our lives. Parents should be giving their children healthy foods but if they don't it is not the government's business. Next they will be telling us what our children can and cannot wear, which books we can read to them etc, etc. I have many friends who have come from communist countries and they say this is how it started, with the govt. slowly taking control. Vote for the only candidate that espouses personal liberty. VOTE RON PAUL!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Snippert
Pray for Mojo
04:43 PM on 02/21/2012
There's no slippery slope. This just increases accountability for the parent. The government should protect kids from crappy parenting. If you're a good parent, you have nothing to worry about. I think you're just paranoid and being taken advantage by those who tell you the sky is falling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KMAJ
Iraq war Veteran
05:30 AM on 02/26/2012
If they are so concerned about parenting and well-being of America's children, maybe they should be a little more active with gang activity in L.A.
03:20 PM on 03/15/2012
actually i do not see them holding anyone accountablle, rather they are assuming the duties of parents. I understand your point but the "good parent" you reference is defined by them and they will pick and choose which aspects they want to control.
09:55 PM on 02/22/2012
Ron Paul??? What are you nuts? That guy will get us killed...
08:47 PM on 02/20/2012
I'd rather see tax dollars spent on providing parents with classes on nutrition than on health inspectors to check on home made lunches.
08:50 AM on 02/22/2012
There was NO inspector! really, this is how and why rumors acquire such power--nobody checks any negative-seeming story it seems. (although our natural skepticism turns on quickly when it's a positive story....interesting contrast).
as mentioned by another poster, check the updates to this story. there was a researcher, that's all,no inspector, and it's not clear that the researcher did anything at all. the girl was **offered** the chance to go on line and get **additional** food if she wanted. her home lunch was **not** taken from her.
she apparently misunderstood, or her mother did, and wound up thinking she would be charged for the lunch, and mommy objected to that--which was itself not correct (no charges involved)--not to the rest of this nonsense.
it was insensitive of the lunch worker (or whomever) not to realize that the kid would be embarrassed by being singled out. that was a mistake. she or her mom deserves an apology for that part of it. but that's about it. this is NOT a national news story for heaven's sake.
read beyond the surface of things! go to snopes.com if necessary. don't for heaven's sake become another victim of internet rumors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hypyrwyf
ignorance begets fear begets violence
01:24 PM on 02/22/2012
Honored to be your first fan. You're so patient.
07:51 PM on 02/20/2012
As the vegetarian mother of a lifelong vegetarian three year old, there would have been hell to pay if this was my kid.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CR90
03:21 PM on 02/24/2012
I don't want to get in to a big huge argument, your child after all, but are you "forcing" vegetarianism on your child or did your three year old choose it? I don't want to fight, just curious.
07:42 PM on 02/20/2012
At a school I used to go to, everybody would bring just snacks and soda, no sandwiches or apples at all. How dum that the inspectors didn't check my school. I was the only one who actually brought a sandwich without bring 30,000,000,000,000,000 snacks for one person.
04:57 PM on 02/20/2012
It's not up to the "Inspektor" to tell my child to drink milk. I send water or sugar free lemonade in my daughter's lunch. I don't give my children juice or milk. Neither is a better alternative to water. The USDA needs to look at the nutritional content of the garbage coming out of the school 'kitchen' instead. No wonder most of the country is obese look at the model of nutrition we teach our children. Disgusting.
07:44 PM on 02/20/2012
I agree 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000% with you.
07:55 AM on 02/22/2012
My children were milk intolerant, good thing no one ever insisted they drink milk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hypyrwyf
ignorance begets fear begets violence
12:31 PM on 02/20/2012
found the link to the local paper update:

http://www­.carolinaj­ournal.com­/jhdailyjo­urnal/disp­lay_jhdail­yjournal.h­tml?id=878­0”