iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Heartland Institute's Leaked Documents Reveal Climate Skepticism Efforts

AP    
First Posted: 02/16/2012 4:06 pm Updated: 02/16/2012 6:55 pm

WASHINGTON (AP) — Leaked documents from a prominent conservative think tank show how it sought to teach schoolchildren skepticism about global warming and planned other behind-the-scenes tactics using millions of dollars in donations from big corporate names.

More than $14 million of the money used by the Chicago-based Heartland Institute would come from one anonymous man, according to the leaked documents prepared for a meeting of the group's board.

Heartland is one of the loudest voices denying man-made global warming, hosting the largest international scientific conference of skeptics on climate change. Several of its documents were leaked this week to the news media, showing the planning and money behind its efforts. Heartland said some of the documents weren't accurate, but declined to be more specific.

As detailed in the papers, Heartland's plans for this year included paying an Energy Department consultant $100,000 to design a curriculum to teach school children that mainstream global warming science is in dispute, even though it's a fact accepted by the federal government and nearly every scientific professional organization. It also pays prominent global warming skeptics more than $300,000 a year and plans to raise $88,000 to help a former television weatherman set up a new temperature records website.

"The stolen documents appear to have been written by Heartland's president for a board meeting that took place on Jan. 17," Heartland said in a statement. "The authenticity of those documents has not been confirmed." The institute singled out one of the six documents — claiming to be a summary of efforts on the issue of global warming — as a fake.

Because Heartland was not specific about what was fake and what was real, The Associated Press attempted to verify independently key parts of separate budget and fundraising documents that were leaked. The federal consultant working on the classroom curriculum, the former TV weatherman, a Chicago elected official who campaigns against hidden local debt and two corporate donors all confirmed to the AP that the sections in the document that pertained to them were accurate. No one the AP contacted said the budget or fundraising documents mentioning them were incorrect.

David Wojick, a Virginia-based federal database contractor, said in an email that the document was accurate about his project to put curriculum materials in schools that promote climate skepticism.

"My goal is to help them teach one of the greatest scientific debates in history," Wojick said. "This means teaching both sides of the science, more science, not less."

Five government and university climate scientists contacted said they were most disturbed by Wojick's project, fearing the teaching would be more propaganda rooted in politics than peer-reviewed science.

Businesses and other interests often offer free curriculum materials to financially strapped schools, hoping that teachers will use them and help disseminate their views or promote their products.

Energy Department spokeswoman Jen Stutsman said Wojick's federal work has nothing to do with climate change and that the agency maintains that global warming is real and manmade.

Heartland also planned to spend $210,000 to help Cook County Treasurer Maria Pappas tour the nation to speak about municipal debt, according to one document. Pappas lost to Barack Obama in the 2004 Democratic primary for a U.S. Senate seat. Pappas confirmed this in a phone interview, saying what Heartland was doing was exposing a "financial tsunami" of municipal debt.

The leaked document also discusses a new million-dollar Heartland initiative to promote the ability of patients to use experimental drugs that have not yet received federal safety approval, and efforts to support embattled Wisconsin Republican leaders in "Operation Angry Badger." Those parts of the documents were not independently confirmed.

The documents also show Heartland has raised more than $2 million from large insurance companies and nearly half a million dollars from tobacco interests.

A person who emailed 15 media and bloggers as "Heartland insider" sent six different documents purporting to be from the libertarian think tank. The insider then killed the email account used to send the documents and could not be reached. Heartland spokesman Jim Lakely would not confirm or deny the claims made in the five documents that he did not call fake.

The most sensational parts of the documents — and much of what has been confirmed independently — had to do with global warming and efforts to spread doubt into what mainstream scientists are saying. Experts long have thought Heartland and other groups were working to muddy the waters about global warming, said Harry Lambright, a Syracuse University public policy professor who specializes in environment, science and technology issues.

"Scientifically there is no controversy. Politically, there is a controversy because there are political interest groups making it a controversy," Lambright said. "It's not about science. It's about politics. To some extent they are winning the battle."

A 2010 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences surveyed more than 1,300 most cited and published climate scientists and found that 97 percent of them said climate change was a man-made problem. Yet, public opinion polls show far more doubt in the American public.

An environmental advocacy group, Forecast the Facts, on Thursday started a petition and social media campaign to complain to two of Heartland's corporate donors listed on the documents, Microsoft and General Motors. The two were not the biggest donors; Microsoft donated $69,000 over three years, while the General Motors Foundation gave $45,000. But those are companies that "need to hear from their customers" that they are not happy about promoting climate skepticism, especially after General Motors got a government bailout, campaign director Daniel Souweine said.

General Motors spokesman Greg Martin said the company's foundation gives money to "a variety of different groups holding a variety of opinions." Microsoft said through its public relations agency that it donates software to 44,000 nonprofits that pass IRS standards, as Heartland does, and that it considers climate change a serious issue.

The documents showed how heavily Heartland relies on a single person it identified only as "Anonymous Donor." In the past six years, the man has given $14.26 million to the institute, nearly half its $33.9 million in revenue.

___

Online:

Heartland Institute: http://heartland.org/

Forecast the Facts campaign against Heartland donors: http://bit.ly/wfd3uY

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON (AP) — Leaked documents from a prominent conservative think tank show how it sought to teach schoolchildren skepticism about global warming and planned other behind-the-scenes tactics usi...
WASHINGTON (AP) — Leaked documents from a prominent conservative think tank show how it sought to teach schoolchildren skepticism about global warming and planned other behind-the-scenes tactics usi...
WASHINGTON (AP) — Leaked documents from a prominent conservative think tank show how it sought to teach schoolchildren skepticism about global warming and planned other behind-the-scenes tactics usi...
WASHINGTON (AP) — Leaked documents from a prominent conservative think tank show how it sought to teach schoolchildren skepticism about global warming and planned other behind-the-scenes tactics usi...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 858
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
powder chowder
☮ Peace: the final frontier...
01:00 PM on 02/20/2012
When will people realize that everything happens as a result or consequence of something else and not because Jesus loves me and the bible tells me so... We contribute to global warming. It's a fact that I'm certain even Jesus would agree is real.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bodine666
Life is not a dressed rehearsal for the hereafter.
05:49 PM on 02/19/2012
----- "This means teaching both sides of the science, more science, not less." -----

Both sides? On one side there is 97% of everybody in agreement. On the other side there are companies that specialize in dumping millions of tons of carbon into the air every year that says they don't 'accept' the facts. The deniers argument is supported by geologist and weather forecasters. Neither of which have any expertise in climate science.

Here's a typical climate change denier's fact. "We had snow today, in the middle of January. Proof the climate isn't getting warmer."

These deniers are the same crowd that 'proves' evolution isn't true because they don't understand it.

There are two sides to the science. The facts, supported by centuries of records and 97% of everybody, and the deniers supported by tons of cash from oil, coal, and gas companies.

Just curious. When the oceans begin to threaten coastal cities what is going to be the excuse given by the deniers? I don't know but my guess is it will go something like this, "god is punishing America because of birth control and equal rights for women." The cons will readily accept this because we all know how much their god hates everybody except rich, white, male republicans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ed Haskell
Sometimes too much drink is barely enough...
10:42 PM on 02/22/2012
No, no, you're totally wrong!

They'll blame it on the gays...
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
10:52 PM on 02/18/2012
kelly hodgson below, smugly: "Read the documents. No fossil fuel interests. Sheesh. "

This is mind numbing denialism. Publicola was right. The Heartland Climate Propaganda has been plastered all over the web for days now. That Heartland who relentlessly and remorselessly fosters climate denial on numerous fronts. That Heartland who receives substantial funding from the Koch brothers and is known to have received funding from Exxon in the past. That Heartland who is now in the midst of an advertising campaign supporting Governor Scott Walker for his recall election. And along comes kelly hodgson insinuating that there are no fossil fuel interests at play here.

Deniers have no least common denomnator. They have no floor. They have no limits below which they will not stoop. Deniers are not wired with shame circuits. Deniers would be happy to sell out their species for oily pocket change.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Norgard
“Every generation needs a new revolution.” -TJ
01:45 AM on 02/18/2012
Climate change denying will cease when the corporate powers of this world decide they can make a profit from it. Until that day they will continue to pour money into it. That day may not be that far off. We've already reached peak oil so you can bet that conservative think tanks everywhere are thinking about where the next windfall will come from.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Norgard
“Every generation needs a new revolution.” -TJ
01:37 AM on 02/18/2012
Corporations that have a vested interest in denying the existence of man made climate change will continue to spend money and resources in a comprehensive public relations campaign as long as see that their efforts bring results. Clearly they do, and for the simple reason is that they are able to spend vast amounts of money. The evidence can be seen in the posts to this story. The question is not where man made climate change exists, its about why so many people don't believe that it does. That my friends is the power of propaganda. Money talks, it always has.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Captimprobable
11:00 PM on 02/17/2012
The thing that always puzzles me about climate deniers is this absolute fear seemingly intertwined with the prospect that "going green" will facilitate the rise of the hippie! OMG!

I think they're scared that greener tech, relying less and less on unsustainable fuels/energies as the years pass, will facilitate the types of individuals within the economic framework that will actually not only provide cheaper means for energy, but that the overall dynamic that greed plays in it's currently vaunted position will take a back seat to...dare I say it...the over all good. OMG!

While people will still be fabulously wealthy...the mere thought that actions and innovations might be used for purposes other than complete personal enrichment makes their heads_implode.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kris79
Chai Tea Party...redistributing spices & flavors
03:16 PM on 02/18/2012
The problem is that not only oil companies make huge profits, but stockholder do too. People get paid good money by oil companies to extract it from their backyard. Anyone with a stake in oil does not want to change the status quo. I hope that it does not take something cataclysmic for people to realize that this is a serious matter that we need to deal with NOW.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:18 PM on 02/17/2012
You kids need to get out of your small little world every once in awhile. This story that has you wetting your panties is going down in flames fast. Lol! The religious environmentalists just can't seem to stop the downward slide.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
12:27 AM on 02/18/2012
Hopefully one day pappy will piece together a coherent paragraph.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
06:00 PM on 02/17/2012
Politico:
---------------------

Heartland Institute raising money off 'Denialgate'

The Heartland Institute is trying to raise money to go after environmentalists and the media for the widespread distribution of documents purported to be its internal budget, fundraising and strategy plans.

A spokesman for the Chicago-based libertarian group said President Joseph Bast sent an email to donors Wednesday soliciting funds as it considers civil and criminal prosecution against the person who originally obtained the materials, as well as blogs and publications that later published them...

In a separate email sent Wednesday to "Heartlanders, Directors, Donors, and Friends," Bast apologized to donors who had their identity disclosed in the document leak. He explained that someone pretending to be a board member contacted his staff and asked for several items to be resent to a new email address...

It also threatened to pursue civil “and possibly criminal” charges and “collect payment for damages, including damages to our reputation." And it said the person who contacted it for the materials was guilty of identity theft and computer fraud.

On Thursday... Bast sent another email to donors... In that email, Bast made another pitch for money to help with its legal defense fund. "Litigation is expensive.."

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/73002.html#ixzz1mgN1DTU2
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
07:17 PM on 02/17/2012
Is this the same Heartland who was relentless pursuing scientists in their concocted climategate and hockey stick scandals.

One supposes that they have to try and put a good face on it so that they can continue to receive funding from their fossil fuel interests.

Wonder how this would sound in court. The only other climate scandals involve Heartland interests hounding and falsely pursuing innocent scientists.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
07:39 PM on 02/17/2012
Yup. Some of those scientists have now penned an open letter to Heartland - here are excerpts:

---------------
As scientists who have had their emails stolen, posted online and grossly misrepresented, we can appreciate the difficulties the Heartland Institute is currently experiencing following the online posting of the organization’s internal documents earlier this week. However, we are greatly disappointed by their content, which indicates the organization is continuing its campaign to discredit mainstream climate science and to undermine the teaching of well-established climate science in the classroom.

We know what it feels like to have private information stolen and posted online via illegal hacking. It happened to climate researchers in 2009 and again in 2011. Personal emails were culled through and taken out of context before they were posted online. In 2009, the Heartland Institute was among the groups that spread false allegations about what these stolen emails said...

So although we can agree that stealing documents and posting them online is not an acceptable practice, we would be remiss if we did not point out that the Heartland Institute has had no qualms about utilizing and distorting emails stolen from scientists...

We hope the Heartland Institute will begin to play a more constructive role in the policy debate. Refraining from misleading attacks on climate science and climate researchers would be a welcome first step toward having an honest, fact-based debate about the policy responses to climate change.

http://tinyurl.com/6uaynca (pdf)
10:32 PM on 02/18/2012
Read the documents. No fossil fuel interests. Sheesh.
photo
GunnisonVern
my bio is not micro
05:32 PM on 02/17/2012
When environmental extremists irresponsibly claimed the Gulf Stream was on the verge of shutting down, The Heartland Institute reported the truth (see http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20505 and http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/314/5802/1064a).

When environmental extremists irresponsibly claimed global warming was melting the glacier atop Mt. Kilimanjaro, The Heartland Institute reported the truth (see http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=14287 and http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/55553/page/1).
Time and again, global warming alarmists make wild, irresponsible assertions that are contradicted by sound science ... and then they have the nerve to try to smear anybody that reports the scientific evidence. It is disappointing that the News-Press decided to publish just such a smear attempt.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
05:48 PM on 02/17/2012
GV: "When environmen­tal extremists irresponsi­bly claimed the Gulf Stream was on the verge of shutting down..."

Really. Which "evironmental extremists", exactly, claimed that the "the Gulf Stream was on the verge of shutting down"? Please provide tthe exact quotes stating as much and with direct links to their primary sources - thank you.

(And no, continued citations to Heartland Insitute propaganda putting words into the mouths of others does not qualify as exact quotes from primary sources.)
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
05:56 PM on 02/17/2012
The Heartland Institute reports "the scientific evidence"?
God, that's pathetic.
03:36 PM on 02/17/2012
I guess I am a born skeptic...always questioning - especially when I hear so-called 'experts' making claims. My first question to myself....'yeah, and who is paying you to say...'. We must not always accept everything at face value - a healthy 'gut feeling' helps too.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trepasky
Sanity is neither free nor easy
03:42 PM on 02/17/2012
SO who to believe the institute (Heartland) that tried to convince Americans that tobacco was safe or a bunch of climate scientists concerned about our future.

Tough call for sure!
04:03 PM on 02/17/2012
And tobacco companies are still paying so that their product is considered 'safe'! Even if we left out all those 'experts' on both sides of the climate argument...one must be deaf, dumb and blind not to realize that something is going on with the Earth's climate. It might not be a bad idea if we stopped abusing our one and only 'home'. In the end, Nature will still have the upper hand.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
03:47 PM on 02/17/2012
Yeah man, I know what you mean... like that "gut feeling" that so many have that evolution is a hoax, or that "gut feeling" that the Sun revolves around the Earth.

When I hear the so-called "experts" making claims that we evolved from ape-like ancestors, or that the Earth revolves around the Sun, or that the Earth isn't flat, my first question to myself....­'yeah, and who is paying you to say...'. We must not always accept everything at face value!

/sarcasm

Science denier rhetoric is stupefying.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
03:25 PM on 02/17/2012
National Academy of Sciences (2010):
---------------------------------------------------------------

From a philosophical perspective, science never proves anything—in the manner that mathematics or other formal logical systems prove things—because science is fundamentally based on observations. Any scientific theory is thus, in principle, subject to being refined or overturned by new observations.

In practical terms, however, scientific uncertainties are not all the same. Some scientific conclusions or theories have been so thoroughly examined and tested, and supported by so many independent observations and results, that their likelihood of subsequently being found to be wrong is vanishingly small. Such conclusions and theories are then regarded as settled facts. This is the case for the conclusions that the Earth system is warming and that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities.

http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12782
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr MOTO
VMFA 112 MAG 41 4th MAW
03:15 PM on 02/17/2012
"The IPCC itself doesn’t recommend policies or whatever; they just do an assessment of the science. But it’s sort of framed in the context of the UNFCCC [the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change]. That’s who they work for, basically. The UNFCCC has a particular policy agenda—Kyoto, Copenhagen, cap-and-trade, and all that—so the questions that they pose at the IPCC have been framed in terms of the UNFCCC agenda."

http://discovermagazine.com/2010/apr/10-it.s-gettin-hot-in-here-big-battle-over-climate-science
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr MOTO
VMFA 112 MAG 41 4th MAW
03:17 PM on 02/17/2012
DISCLAIMER: I am not suggesting that Climate Changes is not happening, only questioning how much the human race has affected it and, more so, the options on the table to curb it.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
03:26 PM on 02/17/2012
American Geophysical Union
---------------------------------------------------------

The Earth's climate is now clearly out of balance and is warming. Many components of the climate system... are now changing at rates and in patterns that are not natural and are best explained by the increased atmospheric abundances of greenhouse gases and aerosols generated by human activity during the 20th century...

In the next 50 years, even the lower limit of impending climate change—an additional global mean warming of 1°C above the last decade—is far beyond the range of climate variability experienced during the past thousand years and poses global problems in planning for and adapting to it. Warming greater than 2°C above 19th century levels is projected to be disruptive, reducing global agricultural productivity, causing widespread loss of biodiversity, and—if sustained over centuries—melting much of the Greenland ice sheet with ensuing rise in sea level of several meters. If this 2°C warming is to be avoided, then our net annual emissions of CO2 must be reduced by more than 50 percent within this century.

http://www.agu.org/sci_pol/positions/climate_change2008.shtml
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
04:45 PM on 02/17/2012
Why do you question the human role?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:20 PM on 02/17/2012
Yes, they have a specific agenda: Minimizing the harm from global warming. Evil socialists, I tell you!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sherwoodforest
Seeing the forest for the trees
02:39 PM on 02/17/2012
This should be a bigger story. Leaked emails were huge on FOX a few years ago and were misused as "proof" against the science. This is real proof of the war against science- and it is a real war. Koch Brothers are also big contributors to Heartland....please post more on this story!
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
04:48 PM on 02/17/2012
The documents only tell what we know already. The Heartland Institute pushes the agenda of a very small number of very wealthy under the guise of education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thanks4Watching
Daily dose of cynicism
02:38 PM on 02/17/2012
I take climate change deniers about as seriously as I take evolution deniers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:21 PM on 02/17/2012
The problem is that there's a bunch of them in policy-making positions. If that wasn't the case they would make great laughing stock.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siara
Obama 2012
02:00 PM on 02/17/2012
As far as I'm concerned, the Conservative approach to climate science is on a par with getting a shaman to toss some chicken bones around and interpret the resulting pattern.
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
07:00 PM on 02/17/2012
I dunno, sometimes a shaman will get it right just by accident.
03:12 AM on 03/02/2012
Hell yes. Shamans don't pollute the planet when they toss around some chicken bones (if Shaman's actually do that). Who would you trust more? A shaman, or a climate change denier. I'll pick the shaman every single time, and I promise you I'd be better off because of it.