More

HuffPost Social Reading

New Jersey Gay Marriage Bill Passes State Assembly Vote, Now Heads To Chris Christie

New Jersey Gay Marriage

ANGELA DELLI SANTI   02/16/12 06:59 PM ET  AP

TRENTON, N.J. — The New Jersey Assembly on Thursday passed a bill legalizing same-sex marriages, setting the stage for an expected veto by Gov. Chris Christie.

The 42-33 vote sends the bill to Christie, who won't take immediate action. The Republican governor who opposes gay marriage had promised "very swift action" if the bill passed both houses of the Legislature, but the Assembly isn't required to send the bill to his desk until the close of business Friday. The Senate approved the bill Monday.

"Without question this is a historic day in the state of New Jersey," Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver said after the vote. She said she had never been more proud of the Democratic caucus for doing "what citizens sent us here to do: to deliberate, to use the legislative process to represent the interests of all New Jerseyans."

Steven Goldstein, chairman of the gay rights group Garden State Equality, echoed the speaker's sentiments.

"Today, the Legislature has brought us to the promised land," said Goldstein. "We know the governor won't let us enter, but we finally behold the view of our dreams and we will never turn back."

Christie and most state Republican lawmakers want gay marriage put to a popular vote. Democrats say gay marriage is a civil right protected by the Constitution and not subject to referendum.

Six states and Washington, D.C. recognize gay marriages. Washington State's new gay marriage law is scheduled to take effect in June.

However, 30 states have adopted constitutional amendments aimed at preventing gay marriage, most by defining marriage as a union between man and woman.

The affirmative vote in the Assembly after more than two hours of debate ended weeks of speculation over whether Democrats who control the chamber would muster the 41 votes needed for the measure to pass. Four of the Assembly's 47 Democrats voted no, and a fifth was out of town and didn't vote. No Republicans voted in favor of the bill.

The Senate passed the bill 24-16. In that chamber, two Republicans voted for the bill and two Democrats voted against it in what was otherwise a party-line vote.

The bill would need several Republican votes in each house to override the governor; Christie himself essentially guaranteed that that won't happen.

With that in mind, Democrats who identified same-sex marriage as their No. 1 priority for the two-year legislative session that began in January have adopted a longer view. They say there's no rush for an override vote, especially because the Legislature has been unsuccessful in every prior attempt to override Christie, most notably to reinstate a surcharge on millionaires.

Instead, they plan to bide their time in hopes that support for gay marriage – currently 52-42 percent in New Jersey, according to one recent voter poll – will continue to grow.

"We do have two years," said Reed Gusciora, a Trenton Democrat who sponsored the bill in the Assembly and one of two openly gay state lawmakers. "We changed a lot of views in the last couple of weeks. Give us two years and we're going to change a heck of a lot more."

Gusciora also expressed hope that the governor would reconsider.

"I hope at the end of the day the governor understands what it's like to grow up as a gay or lesbian in the state, and that there are challenges, there is discrimination and this will come a long way of helping right all the wrongs," he said.

In case same-sex couples can't win gay marriage through legislation, they have engaged in a parallel fight in the courts. Seven gay couples and several of their children have sued, claiming that the state's civil union law doesn't work as intended.

Civil unions were designed to provide the benefits of marriage to gay couples without the title. They were adopted after the Supreme Court instructed the Legislature to provide marriage equality to same-sex couples.

The state's own review commission has since found problems with the law, however, and many same-sex couples have backed that up with testimony before the Legislature.

Gay rights advocates say civil unions have not provided true equality. They complain that they set up a separate and inherently unequal classification for gays – something social conservatives dispute.

Assemblyman Jay Weber, a conservative Republican, said the state's civil union law satisfies a Supreme Court order to grant gay couples the benefits and protections associated with marriage. He said he opposes altering the traditional definition of marriage.

A gay marriage bill was defeated in the Senate two years ago, just before Gov. Jon Corzine, a Democrat who supported the measure, left office. Advocates' hopes dimmed with the arrival of Christie, a Republican who spoke against gay marriage when asked about it during his campaign.

This time around, advocates have presented gay marriage as a civil rights issue. The bill includes an exemption for religious leaders, institutions and facilities, meaning no one would be required to perform, host or lease space for a gay marriage.

Republican Sen. Kip Bateman of Somerset has taken a different approach. He recently drafted a resolution asking voters to approve gay marriage at the ballot. The resolution must be approved by the Legislature to be placed on the ballot in November, which Senate President Steve Sweeney has already said he won't allow.

.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
TRENTON, N.J. — The New Jersey Assembly on Thursday passed a bill legalizing same-sex marriages, setting the stage for an expected veto by Gov. Chris Christie. The 42-33 vote sends the bill to ...
TRENTON, N.J. — The New Jersey Assembly on Thursday passed a bill legalizing same-sex marriages, setting the stage for an expected veto by Gov. Chris Christie. The 42-33 vote sends the bill to ...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,737
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (91 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
dutchman 08:58 PM on 02/16/2012
It pains me to admit it, but when I was a much younger man, I bought into the beliefs of those I grew up around in conservati­ve Nebraska, and managed to convince myself that gay people were somehow "different­" and not deserving of the same rights, at least as they related to marriage.

But then something happened.

I moved to Boston and took a job at what was then one of the largest HIV  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter010908
The easiest way to control people is through fear.
12:26 AM on 02/20/2012
No doubt the evangelicals will be crying over this one.
06:21 PM on 02/20/2012
I am not an evangelist but I am sad for you and for future generations. Christ will return and will he know you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter010908
The easiest way to control people is through fear.
07:47 PM on 02/20/2012
blah blah blah

People have been talking about Christ return for the last 2000 years and I’m not sure if you haven't noticed, he hasn't come back.

People like you look for natural disaster and conflicts around the world as some sort of sign that he might return but you know what they have been occurring for the last 2000 years and he still hasn't returned.

People like you think they are the chosen generation that he will come in your lifetime to save you all, but you know what, for the last 2000 years every generation has thought they are the chosen ones.

I truly pity people like you who live in a delusional state of mind.
12:46 PM on 02/19/2012
The Christie veto, what a slap in the face of honest legislative work! The lawmakers debated and came to the conslusion that NJ should have gay marriage. The voters of NJ elected these very lawmakers to make all decisions regarding the laws of the land. But that is not good enough for Mr. Christie, he wants the "people" to decide again. But if we take the referendum off the table (because it won't be allowed) we are left with many Repulicans and some Democrats who actually agree with the idea of gay marriage. They need a boost of confidence to act on their own authority as they were elected to do. The tenets of marriage remain the same regardless of who is marrying. Override Today!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lacasarosada
12:25 PM on 02/18/2012
gluttony is a sin
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter010908
The easiest way to control people is through fear.
12:26 AM on 02/20/2012
According to who?
01:50 AM on 02/18/2012
Christie ENDED his career.
Unseen hands will make sure he achieves NOTHING, and then he'll be dumped from office.
12:29 AM on 02/18/2012
Wait a minute, he has a check from the Koch brothers in one hand and a bacon-cheeseburger in the other, he'll have to put one or the other down first before he can veto -- what, he vetoed the bill it appears he just folded the check ...
photo
kimbanyc
LIBERAL NY DEMOCRAT
07:21 PM on 02/17/2012
ONE AND DONEFORTHETEFLONTON
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EmmaDarian
All in all, I'm loving every rise and fall (RHCP)
05:25 PM on 02/17/2012
He vetoed it. He's officially on the wrong side of history and the Constitution. I knew he'd wait until the end of the day.

He's a political opportunist and nothing more.
05:08 PM on 02/17/2012
He is a coward. There comes a time when a person should do what is right.
04:58 PM on 02/17/2012
Read Christie is going to veto the bill.....It's sad when a governor will allow flags be flown at half staff for a drug addict and veto this bill. If addicts are apparently accepted by the governor than why can't he accept a gay marriage bill? Makes no sense to me.
tomjefferson2005
Obama, House, Senate 2012 for the sake of America
03:15 PM on 02/17/2012
Many posters on here who oppose gay marriage say that being gay is not natural; that nature itself shows us that it is not. Here are some scientific observations to consider: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/07/0722_040722_gayanimal.html
06:23 PM on 02/20/2012
Were your parents gay? Of course not!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
03:09 PM on 02/17/2012
We let SUV-driving, gun-toting, science-hating, bible-thumping right-wingers get married.

We let latte-sipping, tree-hugging, organic-gardening, atheist lefties get married.

Used car salesmen, bank robbers and even pedo.philes can hear wedding bells.

Couples who don't want or can't have children get to enjoy wedded bliss.

Good grief, even swingers and poly-folk can tie the knot.

Several thousand gay and lesbian couples joining the parade just aren't going to screw anything up. Even in NJ.

Get over yourselves homophobes and start enjoying life. It's a lot bigger and richer and more varied than you've ever imagined.
photo
kimbanyc
LIBERAL NY DEMOCRAT
07:22 PM on 02/17/2012
OUTSTANDING
06:27 PM on 02/20/2012
You are correct, the world is confused. Civil union fine, but not marriage, yes marriage is between one man and one woman, no exceptions period.
02:40 PM on 02/17/2012
Conservatives need to worry about things that are important, and not worry about if the person you love has a vagina or penis.
02:36 PM on 02/17/2012
For a guy who loves to talk tough when faced with powerless constituents, he sure is gutless when it comes time to do his job and either sign or veto the bill.
01:41 PM on 02/17/2012
Here's a general question for the anti-gay posters here - As someone who is gay I've spent literally thousands of hours over the years commenting on this site in favor of gay legal equality and gay dignity in our society (and without even a toaster oven to show for it from Gay Headquarters!). What is it that you imagine is the least bit enjoyable about this aspect of my so-called "gay lifestyle"? Why would ANYONE EVER choose to be in this situation? Think about it and then think about the FACT that gay legal equality has hurt no one wherever it's been attained. Maybe, if you're at all intellectually honest, you'll conclude that YOU, not us gay people, are the ones who are being unethical.
PS. I see precious few heterosexuals ready to embrace a life of celibacy, so maybe you shouldn't be so ready to demand it of us gays in order that we be "moral".
PPS. Sodomy, traditionally defined per the medieval Catholic church, refers to ANY sex acts not involving the genitals exclusively - homosexual or heterosexual. The great majority of heterosexuals have therefore committed sodomy. Just a friendly reminder since we all know the admiration of the anti-gay crowd for TRADITION.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
02:19 PM on 02/17/2012
What a bunch of blithering nonsense --- and I'm sorry if you didn't invite a response from me, since I'm neither an "anti-gay poster" nor anti "gay rights." You a appear to be precisely the sort of self-interested person that causes people that aren't anti-gay anything to not care one way or another about your self-centered issue. Keep up the good work. Your comment appears to be entirely motivated by a desire to spew your own rhetoric without any relevance to the article you're supposed to be commenting on. You see the word, "gay," and you take that as an invitation to spew rhetoric. Thanks for reminding me why I stopped reading th Huff Post, including its daily gay headlines. Geez --- from the Huff Post, you'd think "gay" was the one important issue on everybody's mind. NOTHING MORE IMPORTANT THAN GAY. By the way, you can't achieve "gay dignity" by legislation or by publically ranting about it for "literally thousands of hours."
photo
TBJ
Irrelevent Blurb
02:43 PM on 02/17/2012
Wanting equal rights = self-interest? I'm sure you'd be self-interested, too, if your rights were denied/put up to a popularity contest.
photo
iyalode5
expatriot extraordinaire
04:09 PM on 02/17/2012
What is your problem? JohnJames isn't 'spewing', you are. He shared his experience in an open and honest comment. Your words, however, are dripping with toxin, the hatred and resentment that are pouring off your keyboard are poisonous. You say you stopped reading huffpo because of its 'gay headlines', but here you are, infecting this comment board with your animus. John James did nothing to hurt you, but you react by viciously striking out. Why are you so resentful? Take a long look in the mirror and be honest, for once.
photo
DougSmith
I calls it like I sees it
01:14 PM on 02/17/2012
People that make jokes about Christie's weight and people that make jokes about gay people certainly have something in common.