More

HuffPost Social Reading

GMO Produce Opposition Could Ultimately Hurt European Farmers


First Posted: 02/17/2012 4:00 am Updated: 02/18/2012 12:42 am


* Major seed makers ceased research on GMO crops in Europe

* Scientists stress need for all research to lift output

* EU farmers fear will be less competitive on world markets

* Paradox between GMO crop bans and huge use in animal feed

By Sybille de La Hamaide

PARIS, Feb 17 (Reuters) - European farmers are likely to fall behind in the competitive world grain market as EU consumer hostility to genetically modified organisms (GMOs) drives away research and prevents cultivation of high-yield and pest-resistant crops.

The European Union has approved only one GMO grain for cultivation - Monsanto's insect-resistant MON810 maize (corn). Fierce opposition has led Germany, Austria, Greece, Hungary, Luxembourg and Bulgaria to ban it.

A moratorium in France, Europe's largest grain exporter, was annulled for legal reasons in November, but the government has said it aims to reinstate the ban before spring sowing starts in some regions at the end of this month.

Farmers and scientists say, however, that GMO maize has shown it can improve output and cut costs.

"It's clear that in continents where they have access to these GMO techniques, they will go faster than in Europe," Fabien Lagarde, director at French oilseeds technical institute Cetiom, said.

"So Europe will lose in terms of competitiveness compared with the rest of the world, notably for maize," he added.

French farm group AGPM provided data on the results of using MON810 maize on over 22,000 hectares in 2007, the year before France imposed its moratorium. The GMO strain prevented an average loss in yields from pests of 0.5 tonnes per hectare, an advantage worth about 100 euros per hectare, it found.

This included the additional cost of 35 to 40 euros per hectare for GMO seeds over conventional ones, AGPM Deputy Director Cedric Poeydomenge said.

MON810 helped farmers save 8,800 litres of pesticide and 30,000 litres of fuel to spread it, AGPM said.


WHEAT EXPORTS NOT AT ISSUE

The damage to Europe's competitiveness in global markets will be limited, however, by the fact its main export crop is wheat, a grain with little GMO research and development to date. Europe's maize output is about half of its wheat production.

A study by biotech lobby International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) found that the global area planted with GMO crops rose 8 percent last year to a record 160 million hectares.

The main biotech crops were cotton, with 82 percent of all crops now GMOs, soybeans at 75 percent and maize at 32 percent.

European farmers sowed GMO maize on 114,490 hectares last year, or just over 1 percent of the total EU maize area, the ISAAA said. That compared with 88 percent in the United States, U.S. government data showed.

Spain had 85 percent of the total EU area sown with MON810 last year, amounting to about one quarter of all maize planted in the country.

Poeydomenge said Europe could find a market for increased maize output in North Africa and the Middle East to feed growing poultry populations.

"These markets are now mainly supplied by Argentina, Brazil, the United States, Ukraine and sometimes France, like this year (after good weather boosted crops)," he said.

"Farmers must be allowed to have access to it (GMOs) because we are in a world market. And if tomorrow we are not competitive, we'll disappear from it."

By increasing maize output, the EU also could reduce its current annual imports of about 30 million tonnes of GMO crops such as corn gluten feed and soybean meal to feed livestock.

"We import GMOs because otherwise we can't survive. It's another absurdity," said Marc Van Montagu, president of the European Federation of Biotechnology.


RESEARCH FLEES

Some of the world's top seed makers have given up on developing GMOs for the European market, including BASF Plant Science, Syngenta and BayerCropScience.

Biotech companies such as Monsanto, Limagrain and KWS SAAT have cut research on small-scale projects in the few EU countries that allow GMO cultivation.

Farmers in France, by far the largest EU grains producer and exporter, fear the flight of researchers will have major consequences in the long run.

"All researchers are now abroad. This is an intolerable situation that does not allow us to prepare for the future," Guy Vasseur, chairman of the French Chambers of Agriculture, said.

"Some say we have to wait for second-generation GMOs. But when you miss the first step, you miss the second, and you have far less chances to be in the following ones," he added.

Not all European farmers agree that access to GMOs would be beneficial, however.

"Cultivation of GMO plants brings up not only food security problems but also environmental and biodiversity ones, especially in a country like Italy where, due to the land peculiarities and size of farms, it would not be possible to avoid environmental contamination," said Carlo Franciosi, an official of Italy's biggest farmers association, Coldiretti.

And some scientists say it is hard to see much difference between the rise in yields due to genetic modification from the rise in conventional crops.

French farm ministry data shows that the country's maize yields were multiplied by five between 1950 and 2010 to nearly 10 tonnes per hectare, just by conventional means.

European research in conventional crops continues.

"I'm dubious of the attitude that says there is no salvation outside GMOs," said Herve Guyomard, scientific director for agriculture at Europe's largest farm research centre, France's National Institute for Agronomical Research (INRA).

INRA's conventional research programme, called "Amaizing", aims to boost maize yields at a time when grain yields are stabilising in Europe and avoid a widening competitive gap between the bloc and its competitors.

"If we also drop the effort to continue conventional research, which includes genetics but not GMOs, it's certain that we will be unable to keep up with countries that develop GMOs with the aim of boosting yields," Guyomard said. (Additional reporting by Charlie Dunmore in Brussels, Nigel Hunt in London, Michael Hogan in Hamburg, Martin Roberts in Madrid and Svetlana Kovalyova in Milan, editing by Jane Baird)

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FOOD

* Major seed makers ceased research on GMO crops in Europe * Scientists stress need for all research to lift output * EU farmers fear will be less competitive on world ma...
* Major seed makers ceased research on GMO crops in Europe * Scientists stress need for all research to lift output * EU farmers fear will be less competitive on world ma...
* Major seed makers ceased research on GMO crops in Europe * Scientists stress need for all research to lift output * EU farmers fear will be less competitive on world ma...
* Major seed makers ceased research on GMO crops in Europe * Scientists stress need for all research to lift output * EU farmers fear will be less competitive on world ma...
Filed by Reuters  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 224
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
05:04 PM on 02/24/2012
I don't think you want to consume GMO or the animals that consume GMO. This is going to kill the planet. Watch documentary about this:

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-world-according-to-monsanto/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
organicconnect
11:10 AM on 02/23/2012
The idea being floated here, that anti-GMO is anti-science is a PR attempt by Monsanto and its brethren to cover their abject terror of science examining their product. Their opposition to labeling their products is another symptom of this terror. Bio-tech companies insist their products are safe. But if we raise questions about this we become "labeled" as anti-science. Here is an excellent examination of this issue: http://organicconnectmag.com/wp/science-and-the-labeling-of-gmos/
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
11:38 AM on 02/23/2012
many university professors also call you antiGMO people anti-science. these are ag scientists and molecular biologists. explain that.
11:47 AM on 02/23/2012
I can explain that. They are evil people paid by Monsanto. There is no grey area here
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:10 PM on 02/23/2012
You aren't really an organic farmer are you? Most real organic farmers have learned to co-exist with conventional proGMO farmers. Conventional farmers outnumber organics over 40 to 1. Go look and see what just happened in Boulder, CO. The conventional farmers were initially inactive in the local GMO debate, but became very active when the talk of banning GMOs actually became reality.

And you people lost.

Yes...we only make up about 1% of the population, but that's still at least 3 million of us. Most of us, by far, are proGMO. As long as you people believe we are all controlled by Monsanto, the uglier this debate will get. And organic farmers will mostly lose.
02:15 AM on 02/23/2012
I love how all of the anti-tech, pro-environment people ignore this telling excerpt:

"MON810 helped farmers save 8,800 litres of pesticide and 30,000 litres of fuel to spread it, AGPM said."

GROWING GMO'S ALLOWS US TO REDUCE PESTICIDE APPLICATIONS AND REDUCE TILLAGE, BOTH OF WHICH CAUSE CHEMICAL RUN-OFF INTO WATER SYSTEMS.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:12 PM on 02/23/2012
The antiGMO frankennuts don't like to read actual data.
11:54 AM on 02/22/2012
That's a biased headline that implies opposition to GMO is hurting farmers rather than how biotech companies that lobby for consumers to have a choice to buy GM products while suppressing labeling laws that warn them are hurting humankind in general.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:06 PM on 02/22/2012
Why does it hurt humankind in general?
01:44 AM on 02/22/2012
I believe GMO's are a large part of our ever growing health issue's. Those and micowave ovens. Look at the advent of those 2 thing's and the increase in health issues over the same time period....Eating this stuff & using these ovens might not seem to have any ill effects ...in the short term, but nobody could see the long term effects....until now.
09:09 PM on 02/21/2012
The anti GMO movement is a missed opportunity to shine a light on the most highly concentrated source of GMOs in our food system: animal flesh and milk. The fact that we've been genetically manipulating animals and their feed for years is absent from this campaign. Instead the focus is on GMO plant crops for human consumption which represent a mere fraction of GMO compounds that the average meat eating omnivore consumes overall in his diet.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:24 PM on 02/21/2012
Most insulin is now GMO. Are you against that? Swine genes are inserted into bacteria to produce insulin for diabetics. Hepatitis B vaccine is GMO. Are you against that?

Seems to me these would effect the body more quickly than food that is digested.

Do you recommend antiGMers protest clinics?
photo
rich3324
Likes: Chasing villagers. Dislikes: Fire
12:38 PM on 02/21/2012
So how does the third world grow enough food?
11:44 AM on 02/21/2012
How on Gods green earth did we ever survive with out GMO'S!? I think more testing and being prudent in the introduction of GMO's is smart I also think getting rid of life patents would be VERY helpful.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:10 PM on 02/22/2012
Lower global population, less consumption due to poverty and general starvation.
Do you have information on life patents? I swear I read in one of the ag magazines in the past month or so that the patent on roundup ready corn or one of the widely used GMO seeds is about to expire.
01:32 AM on 02/23/2012
Monsanto's patent on RoundUp ran out last year and they are getting destroyed by generic makers of glyphosate.

This fact makes the argument that Monsanto sells GMO to sell chemicals ridiculous. RoundUp ready gmo's are the only GMO that requires a chemical
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sister777
Make Corporations Pay
08:44 AM on 02/21/2012
What?! Since when did Reuters and HP become PR dummies for the destruction of mankind for greed?! OMG. Sure European nations may lose out this year, but in the future they will be feeding the rest of the world due to their vision.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:10 PM on 02/21/2012
Did you notice in the article that Europe has to import feed they could otherwise grow there if they were allowed to grow more GMO? explain that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sister777
Make Corporations Pay
08:48 AM on 02/22/2012
Yeah, that makes zero sense. What the heck is going on and how do we stop it?
photo
view from the veranda
jus' trying to make sense of it all...
05:11 PM on 02/20/2012
GMO moderators in the house....
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
06:55 PM on 02/20/2012
oh goody....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberal and Proud of It
11:21 PM on 02/20/2012
Hello View:

You are quite correct. Big GMO biotech's shrill shills are at it again.

It is quite amazing to witness this bizarre propaganda war being waged on the American people. Those of us in Boulder County (Colorado) witness it all the time.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
08:45 PM on 02/21/2012
If I am a shil l because I am a farmer...so be it. I support farmers not Monsanto.

I read about your situation in Boulder. The behavior towards farmers by people like you is disgusting. Simply disgusting. Your all or nothing ideological campaign against GMOs threatens farmers' way of living. Got that? It has nothing to do about Monsanto coming in with "shills" with some type of conspiracy.

Organic farmers and conventional farmers have been coexisting until people like you started all this. I would guess many organic farmers are disgusted by you as well.

Did you notice you lost? The Daily Camera now supports GMOs:
http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_19564349

The article has a middle of the road tone, but it's obvious you lost.

Science wins.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
09:04 PM on 02/21/2012
Here is a line from the Boulder Daily Camera editorial above:
"We were swayed by the conventional farmers, who were treated most unfairly by some of those opposed to the crops."

The antiGMer behavior in Boulder is disgusting
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberal and Proud of It
03:02 PM on 02/20/2012
The apparent Monsanto/biotech shills on this blog sound quite like the ones who are attacking the people of Boulder in the Boulder Daily Camera blogs and elsewhere. Perhaps they have the same essential PR training from the Monsanto Manifesto playbook?

Since Monsanto doesn't have any scientific backing for its extraordinary claims, it must rely on consumer FAITH, a pseudo-scientific priesthood, PR missionaries... and if all else fails, persecution.
03:07 PM on 02/20/2012
Do you come to Huffpost for information or confirmation?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberal and Proud of It
05:10 PM on 02/20/2012
Neither.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
06:49 PM on 02/20/2012
hey.. thanks for the heads up on the boulder blog. will have to check it out and support my fellow "s hills". lol
photo
Steppinwolf
Harry holler
01:27 PM on 02/20/2012
A great source for information on organic food:
Organic Bytes
http://www.organicconsumers.org/organicbytes.cfm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberal and Proud of It
01:41 AM on 02/20/2012
Congratulations, Europe! You are doing the right thing by standing up to corporate greed, pseudo-scientists and their pseudo-scientific science fair projects.

European farmers need only observe the slowing dying continent of North America from afar. Better living through chemistry and American "agriculture" have created the world's largest morgue for hundreds of species.

In America, we call that "progress."

And yes, I have to say that this article appears to me to be little more than biotech propaganda.
08:16 AM on 02/20/2012
So an article that aligns with your dogmatic beliefs is considered factual but one that doesn't is considered propaganda. When did huffpost turn into fox news?
11:10 AM on 02/20/2012
Our family has been eating organic food for a decade and have recovered our health. GMO food tastes terrible and is deficient in nutrients and loaded with chemicals. It has been shown that organic farming provides greater yields than chemical farming. Animals have been shown to always prefer organic feed to GMO feed whenever they are given the choice. We have to ask ourselves why a corporation like Monsanto wants to fix a problem that doesn't exist. Indian farmers have been committing suicide over the problems created by GMO seeds. Thousands have been bankrupted over their use and the government is finally pushing back to stop the destruction.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberal and Proud of It
05:12 PM on 02/20/2012
The first sentence is a false conclusion.

The second sentence is a false question.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
07:59 PM on 02/20/2012
The message from Liberal and Proud if It has been brought to you by LWFS (Liberals Who Fear Science).

....and if you contact LWFS in the next ten minutes you can buy the specially branded HuffPost nightlight. Just the perfect gift for those clueless antiScience liberals in your life who fear the dark, fear technology and want their mommy.
.......only 19.95* (plus Shipping and Handling).

*Not available in common sense farm country. Will only deliver to food snobs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberal and Proud of It
08:39 PM on 02/20/2012
Empty words from Monsanto et al.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sister777
Make Corporations Pay
08:59 AM on 02/21/2012
If liberals were afraid of science why is it conservatives are afraid of stem cell research and will not admit to climate change?
07:44 PM on 02/19/2012
Let me just get it on the record that I WHOLEHEARTEDLY support Europeans banning the sowing of gmo seed! (and keep buying shortfall of production from us)
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
08:39 PM on 02/19/2012
oh darn...the secret is out that we American farmers who are using GMOs are making more money from this European GMO banning stuff.

I hereby retract all the proGMO stuff I have been saying. Yes...Europe keeping banning those GMOs

Down with GMOs*
Down with GMOs*

(*but in europe only)

hehe

hehehehe
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
peegan
Obama 2012
10:54 AM on 02/20/2012
And when these European countries get more money per unit than any American farmer will ever dream of because the food is not GMO you will cry foul.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
08:44 PM on 02/19/2012
...was I too sarcastic?
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
07:13 PM on 02/19/2012
wow...looks like I POed more than a few of the clueless antiScience/antiGMers. LOL!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:24 PM on 02/19/2012
Regarding the latest GM corn to be shuffled through by industry insiders:

"The Cornucopia Institute notes the USDA received almost 45,000 public comments opposed to MON 87460, with only 23 comments in favor."

Hazel, you have 22 friends you can connect with. (I'm assuming you were one of the 23 who commented in favor)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:54 PM on 02/19/2012
I think you can safely assume that Hazel was 20 of them, under one guise or another.
01:58 AM on 02/23/2012
Jono,

Why is it not shocking at all to me that you believe accuracy of a scientific opinion is related to the number of public comments it gets on a website?

::facepalm::
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberal and Proud of It
12:54 AM on 02/20/2012
You may dispense with that threadbare Monsanto/biotech canard--that to be "anti-GMO" is to be somehow "anti-science." Sorry, but we have seen this propaganda technique many times before. The pro-Monsanto coven in Boulder, Colorado has attempted for years to inflict biotech "anti science" propaganda against the people of Boulder. Thus far, they have only fooled the gullible, the credulous, and several of our local politicians.

Sorry, we have yet to see unequivocal evidence that any or (let alone all) GMOs are 100% safe for human and animal consumption. And sorry, but 100% certainty is THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE STANDARD FOR SAFETY !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:45 PM on 02/22/2012
Most scientists feel antiGMO is anti-science. Here's several examples from the google:

http://www.science20.com/science_20/blog/christie_wilcox_takes_antigmo_scaremongering_atlantic-86114
http://kfolta.blogspot.com/2012/01/critical-reading-anti-gmo-literature.html
http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2011/02/purdue-scientists-refute-anti-gmo-claims/

and yes there's a claim to antiGMO scientists such as here:
http://www.saynotogmos.org/scientists_speak.htm
But that site says these are old position papers and as I look through them, they all seem to say we fear that they are not safe, but we don't have any evidence that that's true.

The only thing that is 100% certain in life is d3ath. And your wording is not indicative of someone who wants to have a rational discussion.
Just sayin'
A science oriented liberal.
02:02 AM on 02/23/2012
We will secede our positions if you can prove that organic food is 100% safe for human consumption.

Actually, I will give you $100 if you can prove, unequivocally, to me that ANYTHING is 100% safe.. (You'll have to come to the Monsanto HQ to pick up your cash)