iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Latvia Russian Language Referendum Has High Turnout

Latvia Russian Language Referendum

GARY PEACH   02/18/12 06:58 PM ET  AP

RIGA, Latvia — Latvian voters resoundingly rejected a proposal to give official status to Russian, the mother tongue of their former Soviet occupiers, though the defeated referendum Saturday is expected to leave scars on an already divided society.

Russian is the first language for about one-third of the Baltic country's 2.1 million people, and many of them would like to accord official status to the language to reverse what they claim has been 20 years of discrimination.

But for ethnic Latvians, the referendum was a brazen attempt to encroach on Latvia's independence, which was restored two decades ago after a half-century of occupation by the Soviet Union following World War II.

Many Latvians still consider Russian – the lingua franca of the Soviet Union – as the language of the former occupiers. They also harbor deep mistrust toward Russia and worry that Moscow attempts to wield influence in Latvia through the ethnic Russian minority.

"Latvia is the only place throughout the world where Latvian is spoken, so we have to protect it," said Martins Dzerve, 37, in Riga, Latvia's capital. "But Russian is everywhere."

With over 93 percent of ballots counted, 75 percent of voters said they were against Russian as a national language, according to the Central Election Commission results.

However, in the eastern region of Latgale, which straddles the border with Russia, a majority of voters approved changing the constitution to make Russian a national language. The region is Latvia's poorest and has a high percentage of ethnic Russians and other minorities.

"Society is divided into two classes – one half has full rights, and the other half's rights are violated," said Aleksejs Yevdokimovs, 36. "The Latvian half always employs a presumption of guilt toward the Russian half, so that we have to prove things that shouldn't need to be proven," he said.

The referendum sparked high voter participation, with more than 70 percent of registered voters casting ballots – considerably higher more than in previous elections and referendums. Long lines were seen at many precincts both in Latvia and abroad, with voters in London reportedly braving a three-hour wait.

In Chicago, Mara Varpa, 57, said she voted against the proposal since Latvian is an integral part of the national identity and should therefore remain the sole official language.

"I don't think there should have been a referendum to begin with because it's already in the constitution, but since there was I had to vote," Varpa said.

Though the Russians who spearheaded the referendum admitted they had no chance at winning the plebiscite, they at least hope the approximate 25 percent of support will force Latvia's center-right government to begin a dialogue with national minorities.

Hundreds of thousands of Russians, Belarussians and Ukrainians moved to Latvia and the neighboring Baltic republics during the population transfers of the Soviet regime. Many of them never learned Latvian and were denied citizenship when Latvia regained independence, meaning they don't have the right to vote or work in government.

According to the current law, anyone who moved to Latvia during the Soviet occupation, or was born to parents who moved there, is considered a noncitizen and must pass the Latvian language exam in order to become a citizen.

There are approximately 300,000 noncitizens in Latvia.

Politicians and analysts said the plebiscite will widen the schism in society and that the government will have to undertake serious efforts to consolidate the country's two groups.

Many fear the disgruntled minority will keep up the pressure by calling for more referendums to change Latvia's constitution for minorities' benefit.

--------

Associated Press writer Tim Jacobs in Chicago contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

RIGA, Latvia — Latvian voters resoundingly rejected a proposal to give official status to Russian, the mother tongue of their former Soviet occupiers, though the defeated referendum Saturday is ...
RIGA, Latvia — Latvian voters resoundingly rejected a proposal to give official status to Russian, the mother tongue of their former Soviet occupiers, though the defeated referendum Saturday is ...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:26 PM on 03/21/2012
This is russian imperialism making a comeback, nothing more. Stalin had a strategy to counter the collapse of the USSR- move lots of russians into colonised territories so russia can control them even if they become independent.
08:52 PM on 02/20/2012
the extreme hatred of russians by estonians latvians and lithuanians is well known to all
02:10 AM on 02/21/2012
You are completely wrong. There certainly is dislike but to call it extreme hatred or even hatred is completely of base. Show us your evidence (rather than a stupid "is well known to all" remark) when you make such outrages statements.
It "is well known to all" that 2+2=5.
02:05 AM on 02/22/2012
bronze soldier of tallinn? That's estonia but I mention Estonia Latvia Lithuania. All those countries majorities do not like having Russians in those countries because they were annexed by soviet union and they are still very upset and angry and do these things like desecrate graves of russians and establish official languages and this is constant discrimination and disrespect!
12:01 AM on 02/20/2012
what's really needed is some incentive for the Russians to go back to Russia where they belong. The whole population transfer thing is a violation of the Geneva Conventions prohibiting the occupying power (Russia in this case) from transferring its population into territory it occupies. For some reason, this wasn't enforced.

Maybe the Latvians could create a huge economic crisis whereby everyone suffers deprivation and the Russians go back to Russia where the living is better. Then Latvia could be rebuilt by the Latvians.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
waldopepper
I'd tell you all about me if you were my friend.
01:19 PM on 02/20/2012
Sadly for the sake of their own personal harmony they belong in Latvia, as the majority of them were no doubt born in Latvia at it is the only home they have ever known.
02:22 PM on 03/21/2012
They were born in USSR, not Latvia. And since they hate independent Latvia and want to live under kremlin rule, they can go ahead and move to Russia.
08:49 PM on 02/20/2012
The world is against ethnic cleansing. Hello?!?
01:31 AM on 02/21/2012
Hello.. the world (and Geneva Conventions) are also against the transfer of an occupier's citizenry into 'territories occupied' which was one of the specialties of the Soviet Union which used it in an attempt to destroy cultures and nations which might cause it trouble and also for economic and territorial gain.

Not saying anyone should be forced to move or be evicted, but if the Russians were moved in for economic and political gain, then politics and economics could justifiably be used to encourage them to repatriate...sort of a win-win situation..
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
04:08 PM on 02/19/2012
My inclination would be to encourage everyone to learn at least one other language. Latvians should presumably learn Estonian, Russian and Lithuanian (the languages of their neighboring countries), but probably also English since it's still the world's lingua franca.
02:22 AM on 02/21/2012
Most Estonians and Latvians also speak English. Many also speak Russian. It is not practical for Estonians to learn Latvian or Latvians to learn Estonian since the greater world environment these languages are nowhere as useful as English or Russian.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
03:31 PM on 02/19/2012
a similar situation existed in Estonia where Russian-speaking people were looked down upon by the native Estonians. They seem to have resolved it more peacefully, however. Latvia has a long history of being pretty intolerant and hateful. During WWII most Latvians sided with the Nazis occupiers and helped them find and deport Jews to their deaths in the concentration camps. So it's strange they would view the Soviet occupiers and their progeny negatively.
12:15 AM on 02/20/2012
what an ignorant comment. If an occupying power moves it citizens (illegally) into your country, don't you think you may have a less than charitable attitude towards these interlopers who are just there for the economic benefits?

And Russia was the first occupier of Latvia via the Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement whereby the Nazis sold out the Baltic states to Russia to give them time to beat up on France and England without the distraction of a second front. The Russians conducted a brutal occupation with arrests, torture, murder and mass deportations to Siberia.

When the Nazis started pushing the Russians out, the local population understandably sided with them.

The Latvians were less cooperative than many of the E Europeans with the Nazi roundup and murder of Jews, although some certainly did cooperate. There is a memorial in Riga to the many Latvians who hid and protected local Jews
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
09:12 AM on 02/20/2012
Hardly. It was spot on about the Latvians cooperation with the Nazis. They can't cover up the facts....
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/36quest2.html
03:02 AM on 02/20/2012
You probably forgot the fact that the Soviets were allies of Hitler and they occupied, as the best friends, Poland together. All these changed some years later. When Soviets themselves were attacked by Nazi - the Soviets called this as a Great Patriotic War. I have nothing against to be patriotic its all right and sound nicely. But the problem with Russians is (as a big and rich country which great natural resources) that they won’t understand that other nations (very small countries) are patriotic too. Instead of this, after the war, they occupied Hungary (1956), Czechoslovakia (1968), Afghanistan (1979) and they kept their military bases almost in whole Central and East Europe. Nowadays (since a formation of EU) they perpetuate much more sophisticated politics – hundreds of thousand Russians are moving to Europe. Hmm…one day this Russian minority would say: we are discriminated. Think hard what will happen next…
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
09:07 AM on 02/20/2012
I hardly need a lesson in Eastern European history and this was a poor attempt at best. My point was simple but complete. You know enough to be "dangerous".
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
KIVPossum
Moldova Marsupial
11:52 AM on 02/19/2012
We have much the same here. The Soviets made everyone learn and use Russian, so there are few people in Chisinau over 40 who know much Moldavian (Romanian). The younger people are learning both. To the north of town, Romanian is the language in the villages and few know Russian.

It will take another generation before Romanian moves back into general usage in the capitol
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
04:06 PM on 02/19/2012
Similarly, my friend who went to Kazakhstan said that only a few elderly people in the countryside speak only Kazakh, while most people speak either Kazakh and Russian, or only Russian.
11:29 AM on 02/19/2012
Standing around on train platforms and bus stops in Riga one will see one young person in a group speaking in Latvian and being answered in Russian, a common sight. Too bad the austerity measures are driving these young people away as they are the ones to solve the problem.
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
10:12 PM on 02/18/2012
I had to learn Russian in Czechoslovakia, even though it was at least officially an independent country, and Russian was not listed as one of the official languages. So why do some Russians in Latvia refuse to learn Latvian? They want imperialism, they want reannexation.
06:22 PM on 02/18/2012
It seems the conditions for national convergence are in place.

The article suggests the a barrier towards citizenship for the older generation is the language exam. That seems a reasonable entry point for full participation.

For the younger generations:
'Children born after Latvia reestablished independence (August 21, 1991) to parents who are both non-citizens are entitled to citizenship upon request of the parents.'

Current ethnic Russians and citizenship:
[2007] 28.2% of the population is ethnic Russian and more than half (56.6%) are citizens'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-citizens_(Latvia)
05:39 PM on 02/18/2012
The article points out the problem. Some of the Russians and other ethnic minorities have not learned or tried to learn the Latvian language. They have had 20 years to learn a minimum amount of Latvian. It is not that difficult. In addition, one must realize that Latvia has been occupied by Russia and Soviet regimes for centuries. Latvians know both languages. They had no choice but to learn both languages. Do the ethnic minorities today have an inability to do what Latvians were forced to do in the past? The resounding vote against Russian is appropriate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bterway
02:42 PM on 02/18/2012
Hang in there, Latvians. Don't let it happen.
08:55 PM on 02/20/2012
latvia is being bigoted and racist and awful here
02:31 AM on 02/21/2012
I assume you are for making Spanish an equal language with English in America. There are many Russians in the U.S. so lets make that an equal language also. Are you game?