iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Proview, Apple iPad Dispute: Lower China Court Rules In Favor Of Shenzen Proview Technology In Trademark Battle

Proview Apple Ipad

ELAINE KURTENBACH   02/20/12 08:00 AM ET  AP

SHANGHAI — Apple's dispute over the iPad trademark deepened Monday after the Chinese company that claims ownership of the name said it won a court ruling against sales of the popular tablet computer in China.

Xie Xianghui, a lawyer for Shenzhen Proview Technology, said the Intermediate People's Court in Huizhou, a city in southern China's Guangdong province, had ruled on Friday that distributors should stop selling iPads in China.

The ruling, which was also reported widely in China's state media, may not have a far-reaching effect. In its battle with Apple, Proview is utilizing lawsuits in several places and also requesting commercial authorities in 40 cities to block iPad sales.

Apple Inc. said in a statement Monday that its case is still pending in mainland China. The company has appealed to Guangdong's High Court against an earlier ruling in Proview's favor.

Apple insists it holds the trademark rights to the iPad in China.

"We bought Proview's worldwide rights to the iPad trademark in 10 different countries several years ago. Proview refuses to honor their agreement with Apple in China and a Hong Kong court has sided with Apple in this matter," said Apple spokeswoman Carolyn Wu.

Calls to the court in Huizhou rang unanswered.

A letter to Proview's chairman Rowell Yang from the Beijing office of the law firm King & Wood, which is representing Apple, accused Proview of breaching "principles of good faith and fair dealing" and of making "false and misleading" statements.

Proview, a maker of LCD screens which is based in Guangdong, has asked regulators to seize iPads in China in a possible prelude to demanding a payout from Apple. A Shanghai court is due to hear a similar case on Wednesday.

So far, iPads have been pulled from shelves in some Chinese cities but there has been no sign of action at the national level.

Shenzhen Proview Technology is a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based Proview International Holdings. It registered the iPad trademark in China in 2001 and says the name was used for a computer described as an "Internet Personal Access Device" that employed touch panel technology.

The company says it plans to ask China's customs agency to block imports and exports of iPads.

Apple contends that it acquired the iPad name when it bought rights in various countries from a Proview affiliate in Taiwan in 2009 for 35,000 British pounds ($55,000). Proview won a ruling from a mainland Chinese court in December that it was not bound by that sale.

Proview International's shares have been suspended from trading on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange since August 2010 and reports say it is deep in debt. It will be delisted in June if it cannot show it has sufficient assets, business operations and working capital.

Proview has filed a trademark-violation lawsuit that goes to court Wednesday in Shanghai. In the meantime, China's mass media is abuzz with speculation over the case.

"The iPad trademark case: Who cheated who?" quizzed a story in Monday's edition of the 21st Century Business Herald.

Apple, based in Cupertino, California, points to a Hong Kong court ruling in July that said Proview had acted with the intention of "injuring Apple."

According to that ruling, Apple set up a company in Britain to buy the iPad trademark from owners in various markets without revealing Apple was the purchaser.

Proview has accused Apple of acting dishonestly when it bought rights to the iPad name from Proview's Taiwan affiliate. A Hong Kong court document shows that once the dispute arose, Proview demanded $10 million for the iPad name in China. But Hong Kong's legal system is separate from the mainland's.

___

Researcher Fu Ting contributed to this report.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

SHANGHAI — Apple's dispute over the iPad trademark deepened Monday after the Chinese company that claims ownership of the name said it won a court ruling against sales of the popular tablet comp...
SHANGHAI — Apple's dispute over the iPad trademark deepened Monday after the Chinese company that claims ownership of the name said it won a court ruling against sales of the popular tablet comp...
Filed by Ramona Emerson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 782
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
No Yards
I never said most of the things I said.
06:34 PM on 02/21/2012
Apple hit with a frivolous lawsuit? ... If Apple's name was "Frivolous Lawsuit Inc." it wouldn't be any more ironically delicious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DaniFoxy
Crazy girl from LA
02:48 PM on 02/21/2012
A Chinese court rules in favor of Chinese company on Chinese ground? There's a shocker...
12:10 PM on 02/21/2012
If Apple has a superior product and name reconition in most other markets then let China stew in their own juices. Stop doing anything in China. China mainland can not market in Great Britian or any where outside China mainland. Apple should not pay China for anything. Some day China may come to Apple for the right to market their product and if not...Sa-la-vie
09:41 AM on 02/22/2012
This is a great post and good timing too as i just read an article that stated that smart phones now outsell all computers, tablets, etc. If you do not have your sites optimized for mobile you are definitely missing out.latest new technology
10:04 AM on 02/21/2012
Apple.....BRING THE JOBS TO AMERICA! http://cnsnews.com/news/article/gallup-finds-unemployment-climbing-nine-percent-february
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jstplnefedup
The chickens have come home to roost-at least Ill
05:55 PM on 02/21/2012
where is your disdain for Wal-Mart?
09:41 AM on 02/21/2012
Can't feel sorry for Apple! If you build plants in a foreign country and send your work to a foreign country, then you deserve whatever happens! If Apple would have produce their products in AMERICA they wouldn't have this problem$
09:51 AM on 02/21/2012
Please explain how Apple's manufacturing their products in the US instead of in China (just like every other tech hardware company) would have prevented Apple from being sued over the rights to the iPad name in mainland China?
10:12 AM on 02/21/2012
If Apple produced its goods in the US, this chinese company would have to of filed suit in the US and not china! In the US courts, Apple would have a chance of winning the suit, if the chinese company would have even filed it!
09:37 AM on 02/21/2012
rename it "China Pad" specially for the Chinese market and save a fortune in legal costs. It is a trade name, not a patent.
09:51 AM on 02/21/2012
ChiPad?
jlfenton
Common sense is not that common
09:28 AM on 02/21/2012
"What goes around, comes around" LOL I love it!
09:26 AM on 02/21/2012
hey china , all your " stuff" stays in containers at port until this is reviewed by an international court. hey apple , stop outsourseing jobs . the us consumer is going to start to read labels.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rocketmanonline
09:09 AM on 02/21/2012
China has become what Japan was in the late 50s and 60s, the Japanese would buy American Products take them apart and make their own Version with Improvements. Ever use a product from Japan called Sony. Rocketman St. Louie, Mo.
09:04 AM on 02/21/2012
This is interesting stuff and reading the comments I don't think many have bothered to read through the whole article.

Apparently the name iPad was trademarked in China from over a decade ago. Before the iPad came out, Apple has been quietly buying the logo from around the world via a shell company. Since Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China have different legal systems, Apple only bought the trademark from the Taiwan affiliate of Proview (the parent company is located in HK) thinking that it was for all of China.
09:53 AM on 02/21/2012
Agreed - most respondents here have no clue what the suit is even about, but instead want to slam Apple for doing exactly what every other tech company does... pay Chinese companies to do their manufacturing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CSDofNM
I speak lolcat
09:00 AM on 02/21/2012
Oh wow.

Apple really doesn't know anything about China if they think a ruling in Hong Kong is going to stand up in Guangdong.

Trying to buy the rights in secret through a third party isn't going to sit well with them either.
photo
sporty1jro
Pro gun Liberal. Deal with it!
08:45 AM on 02/21/2012
Apple the bully is being beat up. Apple sued other companies for insignificant infringements, and now the tables are turned on Apple as more and more companies are suing/countersuing Apple and are starting to win. But I don't think that Apple's idea will change that free market enterprise, in Apple's view, means they try to shut down competition through legal exploitation of patent and copyright laws.
09:04 AM on 02/21/2012
Any proof to any of that rant...? What I see is a smart company which, using a pseudonym, bought the iPad name from a flaky smaller company.... and now that the flaky little company is struggling financially, and has seller's remorse now that they see how much value Apple has harvested from that name, they are greedily wanting more.

Proview needs to realize it was out-dealed and just go away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ur2nutty4me
08:17 AM on 02/21/2012
“This Week In Apple Rumors"

Do to recent legal and labor changes occurring in our offshore manufacturing facilities, We at
Apple have decided that with the prospect of more than doubling it's 15 billion profit from 2011 for 2012, it feels it's duty is now to bring back to America the 450,000 thousand plus jobs now being held in China. They feel the company can afford a little less profit for the benifit of the country and it's people and help protect itself in the future from technology loss and copyright issues. And if lucky more people working may mean an increase in American sales that might slightly offset any added manufactur­ing labor costs. Additional­ly other company's may follow this example in the future if someone takes the lead.

Apple Managment”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jstplnefedup
The chickens have come home to roost-at least Ill
05:58 PM on 02/21/2012
LOL...yea and when Apples profits plunge so will their stock and then they will lose their dominance in the market, profits go down and Apple will need to lay people off. Of course in th meantime Wal Mart cleans up by buying cheap offshore products
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ur2nutty4me
07:17 PM on 02/21/2012
Please explain to the world how this assumed drop will effect this dominance in the market. You seem to have missed the point but I knew the limited would.

Please read this before speaking from ignorance:

http://www.outsaurus.com/2011/08/01/outsourced-apple-500000-jobs/:
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ur2nutty4me
08:46 PM on 02/22/2012
Part 1

First of all it was you who went off topic from the beginning. As for Walmart shoppers, they are their because they have to be and not just for a bargain. As for Motorola which I am no longer working for, I do not agree now nor did I agree then that off shoring was a good thing. If you were as informed as you pretend, you would be more then familiar with their layoffs of thousands and thousands of employees not just working the lines but many with advanced degrees who now probably are Walmart patrons. It appears what we have here is a person that has contempt for the people that got severely effected by the so called free capitalistic market and the wonderful ideas of open and free trade that brought the middle class to it's knees. Education was no antibiotic for this infection. Further you hatred for the middle class and poor surely shows in your comments.

And let me just say that the sale of Motorola to Google was made for two reasons your posting shows complete ignorance of. It made sense for their phones and above that it was for Motorola Patents they would need for their legal battles with Apple. AS far as your shots at Motorola......Be my guest it's no skin off my back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ur2nutty4me
09:10 PM on 02/22/2012
You stand by your statement that I worked for a massive corporation that decided to offshore their jobs dispite objections I might have.

You are histerical my friend........Please tell me more............
08:07 AM on 02/21/2012
And you mean to tell me that nobody saw this coming when the simple "greed" of the American corporate/ shareholder sent these jobs with their "Proprietary" information to China that China was going to steal everything they possibly could so they could eventually send all these companies back home with all their secrets in the hands of the Chinese government? It won't be long before they are opening their own Chinese Companies building all these goods that they have stolen the technologies for and it will all be do to our own greed. Our leaders must have lined their pockets nicely with Chinese bribes.
09:56 AM on 02/21/2012
Do you even know what this lawsuit is about...? Did you even read the article...?

Apple bought the name 'IPAD' from Proview... now Proview claims that Apple's purchase did not include the rights the name in Mainland China, and Proview wants iPad's blocked there or they want lot soy money for the name.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:26 PM on 02/21/2012
" a lot soy money... " i know it was a typo, but it made me laugh.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pine Island Joe
08:05 AM on 02/21/2012
Chinese company, Chinese court, Chinese judges? To me, that's a stacked deck.

Apple ain't gonna win!
09:56 AM on 02/21/2012
Apple drives LOTS of jobs in China... they have clout... Proview has none.