More

HuffPost Social Reading

Jim Towey, Former Bush Official, Files Lawsuit Against Birth Control Rule

Jim Towey

First Posted: 02/21/2012 3:58 pm Updated: 02/22/2012 8:34 am

Jim Towey, the former director of George W. Bush’s Office of Faith-Based & Community Initiatives, slapped that same office with a federal lawsuit and a few sharp words on Tuesday over the Obama Administration's birth control coverage mandate.

"It is a sad day when an American citizen or organization has no choice but to sue its own government in order to exercise religious liberty rights guaranteed by our nation’s Constitution," Towey, who is now the president of Florida's Ave Maria University, said in a conference call on Tuesday.

The legal advocacy group Becket Fund for Religious Liberty filed the lawsuit, on behalf of Ave Maria, in response to a new rule requiring most insurance plans to cover contraception with no co-pay, arguing that the school should not be forced to pay an insurance company that will then turn around and offer contraception coverage to its employees for free.

Under the new rule, which President Barack Obama announced February 10, if Ave Maria objects to the requirement on religious grounds, the school's insurance company will have to cover the costs of contraception for school employees, rather than the school itself. But Towey said the rule still requires the university to make a "false choice between being a good Catholic and a good citizen" by allowing its employees to receive birth control coverage through an organization it pays. He said the school administration would rather pay the $2,000 per employee, per year fine for discontinuing its entire employee health plan than allow that plan to cover birth control.

Towey also took the opportunity to publicly criticize the current incarnation of the White House Faith-Based Office, which has said has "failed President Obama badly."

"I've been sorely disappointed by the failure of the faith-based office at the White House to be helping organizations like ours be heard in this policy debate," he said. "In fact, the faith-based office seems to be leading the stampede to trample religious rights. They've been organizing conference calls and been working in ways that's just shocking to me to see how politicized that office is."

"I met with the ACLU, I met with the Americans United for Separation of Church and State, I met with a lot of people that hated the faith-based initiative and had opposing views to the president, but this administration will not listen to groups that do not share that ideology and I think the faith-based office has failed President Obama badly," he added.

In fact, the Faith-Based Office Towey ran under Bush was far more embroiled in political controversy than Obama's has been. Obama Administration officials met with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, whose views on abortion and contraception strongly oppose the president's, several times before announcing the new birth control rule and worked on a compromise based on the response he received from religious organizations around the country.

“We are proud of our effective partnerships with faith-based organizations," a White House official told HuffPost on Tuesday. "We will continue to work with a wide range of organizations to promote the common good.”

Ave Maria, an extremely conservative Catholic university started by Domino's Pizza founder Thomas Monaghan, is one of many religious groups in the nation that vehemently opposes contraception coverage even if it doesn't have to pay for it. Monaghan said that he founded the school to be a "saint factory," not a "diploma factory," and the school thus prohibits birth control, premarital sex, abortion, divorce and homosexuality. Rick Santorum delivered a controversial speech there in 2008, in which he denounced Protestantism as a whole.

The religious liberty argument is likely to be a stretch in court, given the fact that the school will be exempt from having to cover birth control under the new accommodation, which shifts the burden of coverage to the insurer. But Kyle Duncan, general counsel for the Becket Fund, said he feels the lawsuit has a leg to stand on because the revised rule has not yet gone into effect.

"All this talk of accommodation is a promise in the future by the administration to maybe engage in some additional rule making -- that's not the law," he told reporters on Tuesday.

The Becket Fund has filed three similar lawsuits, on behalf of Belmont Abbey College, Colorado Christian University and the Eternal Word Television Network, in hopes of repealing the contraception policy.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Jim Towey, the former director of George W. Bush’s Office of Faith-Based & Community Initiatives, slapped that same office with a federal lawsuit and a few sharp words on Tuesday over the Obama Admi...
Jim Towey, the former director of George W. Bush’s Office of Faith-Based & Community Initiatives, slapped that same office with a federal lawsuit and a few sharp words on Tuesday over the Obama Admi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,162
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (48 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
msgirlintn 06:51 PM on 02/21/2012
The Republican Party picked a fight about tax cuts for the middle class.  They lost.

The Republican Party through SGK picked a fight about women's health.  They lost and so did SGK for listening to them.

The Republican Party is picking a fight about contraceptives.  They will lose.   98% of American women use contraceptives as preventive medicine or for birth  Read More...
01:27 AM on 02/23/2012
As an AMU alumna I would like to point out the absurdity of the claim that "the school thus prohibits birth control, premarital sex, abortion, divorce and homosexuality". Such a prohibition is beyond the realm of possibility, even if it were desirable.

In addition, Tom Monaghan, while an extremely generous man who has, I imagine, a good heart, is not an academic and has an extremely limited understanding of academia. Thankfully, however, the many outstanding faculty members, who somehow found their way to the swamps of SW Florida, hail from Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, Yale and the like, and they are the ones who really run the show when you get to the classroom.
03:17 PM on 02/22/2012
It is 2012, I cannot believe we are having this discussion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Duderino 791
The Chinaman is not the issue.
01:15 PM on 02/22/2012
This is not about religious liberty, except perhaps for a few misguided but sincere and piouis Catholic leaders. No, for Republican politicians it is just one part of the GOPs perpetual War on Hoo-Haws. Consider also the Republican-proposed Virginia law mandating unneeded vaginal probes and various state efforts to ban IUDs and the morning after pill.

Why they feel that the War on Hoo-Haws is a political winner for them is beyond me. 51% of Americans have hoo-haws, and much of the minority that don't have hoo-haws like to have sex with the ones who do.
01:24 PM on 02/22/2012
Thanks for the much needed laugh this morning...you are 100% correct...and everyone wants a healthy Hoo-Haw too!
01:12 PM on 02/22/2012
This is a horrific assault on the Consitituion and relgious liberty. Liberal fascism. No realm of our life --sex, speech, food -- is outside the polticial arena. They use science to discredit traditional relgious belief and authority. The nanny state knows best.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gwens
Well done is better than well said."
01:39 PM on 02/22/2012
Please explain how it is an assault on Constitution and religious liberty?
05:22 PM on 02/22/2012
"This is a horrific assault on the Consitituion and relgious liberty." [sic]

Not even close to true. It is standard employment law that is already well-tested in the courts.

"Liberal fascism."

That's a contradiction in terms... fascism is at the extreme right-wing of the political spectrum, while liberalism is just to the left of center.

"They use science to discredit traditional relgious belief and authority." [sic]

Religious belief and its purported "authority" are self-discrediting... no science needed. Science merely confirms what anyone of average intelligence and normal emotional stability has already figured out for themselves.

"The nanny state knows best."

It's the Republican "Daddy State" that is mandating the non-consensual violation of women in Virginia.
01:00 PM on 02/22/2012
When an institution hires people, they are no longer a religion, they are employers and as such are subject to the same laws and rules as all employers. Well maybe if they don't want to follow the rules they could give up any federal monies they are now getting. For Catholic Charities that's about 60 % of their income but they still claim tax exempt status.
01:14 PM on 02/22/2012
This is the argument of liberal fascism. State knows best. Religious authority and traditions have no standing. The Founders are spinning in their graves.
01:31 PM on 02/22/2012
No one is saying the state knows best....medical facts, common sense and history are guiding our decisions....keep looking up to the sky (or the Vatican) for answers, the rest of us will offer real solutions to real issues right here, right now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gwens
Well done is better than well said."
01:42 PM on 02/22/2012
Sorry to tell you the "founders" are dead and therefore cannot spin in their graves. Maybe if you had just a little common sense you would understand that. Dead is dead, plain and simple
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seymourhiney
12:56 PM on 02/22/2012
This has nothing to do with religious liberty, it is about their anti birth control dogma, based in the stone ages.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Maria Korovessis Sewell
The pillars of the community are suspect
12:45 PM on 02/22/2012
Between the disgraceful episode with respect to protecting pedophiles, to this birth control PR calamity, there may be more bishops than parishioners in a few years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Admiral Farragut
"Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!
12:36 PM on 02/22/2012
This is about religious liberty, not contraception. That threat is from the left.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Duderino 791
The Chinaman is not the issue.
01:03 PM on 02/22/2012
Who exactly is being forced to use contraceptives against their religious beliefs?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Admiral Farragut
"Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!
01:10 PM on 02/22/2012
C'mon, dud....think! Do you have ANY idea of what this discussion is about?
Cripes, why did I just ask that? The answer is obvious.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:16 PM on 02/22/2012
Nobody is forced to use contraceptives against their religious beliefs. This is about employers having to provide contraceptives, or contraceptive services, either directly, or indirectly to their employees, regardless of faith or none, even though the employer's faith, or consciene, prohibits them from doing so. If it is wrong for an employer (or a religious organization) to use contraceptives, then, it stands to reason, that they cannot be complicit in others engaging in that practice. This is a Constitutional issue. Of course, you know that already. The 'law of the land' does not supersede the law of God, or my conscience!
01:07 PM on 02/22/2012
It doesn't have a dang thing to do with "religious liberty"... not according to U.S. constitutional law, it doesn't. Maybe in that alternative reality that you inhabit... but not in the world of empirically-verifiable fact-based reality, it doesn't.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Admiral Farragut
"Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!
01:10 PM on 02/22/2012
So why are faith based health care and social providers exempt now?
No-name-plz
Social Justice starts with giving me your money
12:26 PM on 02/22/2012
Why is prescription based contraception being excluded from co-pay charges?

These are convenience drugs and there are plenty of non prescription products out there.
12:35 PM on 02/22/2012
Get an education. They're not "convenience drugs." Viagra is the only "convenience" drug -- or, actually, "inconvenience" drug -- in this conversation.
No-name-plz
Social Justice starts with giving me your money
12:57 PM on 02/22/2012
So you don't know why these drugs don't have a co-pay?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:18 PM on 02/22/2012
Viagra may be an 'incovenience' drug for you, I suspect you're a female, my suggestion is to just say no to sex, then you don't have to worry about that little blue pill.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seymourhiney
12:58 PM on 02/22/2012
No. No, you don't get it.Contrception is not a convenience medication.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Admiral Farragut
"Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!
12:18 PM on 02/22/2012
So, to avoid pregnancy, instead of non-hormonal methods of BC, all women will gladly accept the increased risk of breast, cervical, and liver cancers.
I see. How cool is that?
They ought to be thanking the church.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gwens
Well done is better than well said."
01:55 PM on 02/22/2012
you are a warped person
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Admiral Farragut
"Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!
04:41 PM on 02/22/2012
It's called relative risk, young lady. It's my duty to inform people. Want to know the contraindications?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Admiral Farragut
"Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!
12:04 PM on 02/22/2012
It's difficult to think that, with all the feminist hate, resentment towards men, and vitriole in their words, they even need contraception in the first place. I've never seen such gender hostility in my life! They'd be off limits in my book, too much bagage.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gwens
Well done is better than well said."
12:17 PM on 02/22/2012
I think you have that backwards. The GOP has proved time and time again that they are against women. Now someone is finally standing up for us. Your time is over.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Admiral Farragut
"Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!
12:31 PM on 02/22/2012
So what is it you're asking?
12:37 PM on 02/22/2012
Feminist hate? We want fair insurance coverage for contraception...
I personally advocate vasectomy as the best form of birth control, and I think it should be free.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Admiral Farragut
"Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!
01:02 PM on 02/22/2012
Nothin in life is free.
You have fair insurance coverage for contraception when that is provided by non-faith based providers. Do you routinely use non-faith based providers?
As per the EEOC: Respondents may not discriminate in their health insurance plan by denying benefits for prescription contraceptives when they provide benefits for comparable drugs and devices.
What's the beef?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Admiral Farragut
"Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!
11:54 AM on 02/22/2012
Great action!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spike5
Let's go forward, not back to an imaginary past
11:38 AM on 02/22/2012
When JFK was running for President, there was a lot of discussion about whether his Catholic faith would interfere with his ability to be objective about the needs of the country as a whole. He actually made a speech where he insisted that he did not believe that the tenets of one religion should determine public policy. And once in office, he proved that he was, in fact, independent of 'Rome.' And after that, the question was laid to rest--apparently.

But perhaps we need to have that discussion again. In the 60's, half a century ago, we worried about the impact of a President's private religious beliefs on his public actions. Now we have politicians who are out there screaming that their religion IS determining their policies and they think that it should.

Why was that a question 50 years ago when Kennedy was running and not now when Santorum and Romney and Bachmann etc are all saying that their religious beliefs and their intention to enforce them on the rest of us are the REASON to vote for them? I don't care what religion a politician follows--but I care a lot when he wants to use that as a basis for public policy instead of the Constitution.
12:05 PM on 02/22/2012
You are 100% right.
12:53 PM on 02/22/2012
Personal religion needs to be kept out of politics. No one is forcing Catholics and others to use birth control. Prescription drugs need to be covered. Some people do not believe that depression is real and one should not take anti depressants. What next, they won't be allowed to by anti depressant and they will not be covered by insurance? I thought we had separation of church and state. If so, the Catholic Church and others need to tend to their own and leave the rest of us to our alone. A thought. How is it that Catholics and Mormons used to have such large families, and now you see them with only two or three children?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spike5
Let's go forward, not back to an imaginary past
01:08 PM on 02/22/2012
Aspirin between the knees, of course.
11:31 AM on 02/22/2012
Way to go Jim Towey:

Some body in this country has to stand up for the US Constitution because Obama is not.

Obama the Socialist only wants to destroy the constitution:

Obamacare is unconstitutional.

With his new mandates he wants to destroy Amendemnts1 to the constitution.

He has tried to destroy Amendment 2 with Fast & Furious operation, but it back fired on him.

He wants the EPA to mandate new regulations with out going through congress, since even the democrats do not want cap and trade.

His regulations are killing the economy.

Obama sounds a lot like a socialist/Dictator.

The Democrats voted against Obama Budget of 2010 and may do sop again for 2012.

Democrats/Obama does not want a budget because they want to dictate how the money is being spent without now guidelines.

Obama wants people dependent on government so they can buy their votes.

Wake up America your elected official Obama is and will to continue to try to destroy this country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Admiral Farragut
"Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!
11:55 AM on 02/22/2012
Outstanding!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gwens
Well done is better than well said."
12:03 PM on 02/22/2012
Sorry renner Obama is protecting MY Constitutional rights and the rights of women across the country. Religion has no place in politics. Obama was elected to represent ALL people not just the supposed Christians.
01:05 PM on 02/22/2012
you just spoke the words that every american should never forget and that is that we are a democratic country where EVERYONE matters..not just the few who want to dictate to everyone else...you know the kind...they killed jews simply because of their ethnic heritage!!
Rexter
Question everything.
11:20 AM on 02/22/2012
A nation run by lawyers whose sole means of survival is contention and conflict of any kind.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Admiral Farragut
"Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead!
11:55 AM on 02/22/2012
As in #1?
Rexter
Question everything.
12:11 PM on 02/22/2012
They feed off of conflict, whether in congress, divorce court, law suits, anywhere there is conflict and a chance to profit from same.
06:12 PM on 02/22/2012
Gee... lawyers working with laws.

Who'd have seen that one coming?

What will they think of next... plumbers working with plumbing, I suppose?
Rexter
Question everything.
07:57 AM on 02/23/2012
I know, I was blind-sided by it too.