More

HuffPost Social Reading

Lunar Surface 'Scars' Called Graben Cast Doubt On Theory Of How Moon Formed, Evolved

Lunar Surface

First Posted: 02/21/2012 8:49 am Updated: 02/21/2012 8:49 am

By: Charles Q. Choi
Published: 02/21/2012 07:17 AM EST on SPACE.com

The moon's crust was apparently active far more recently than previously believed, scientists say.

These new findings raise questions about how the moon formed and evolved, researchers said.

Although the Earth's crust is still shifting, driven by the churning semimolten rock underneath it, researchers had thought the moon had cooled off much too long ago to still have any such tectonic activity. For instance, the youngest known tectonic features on the lunar landscape until now — small cliffs in the lunar highlands resulting from wrinkling of the surface as the moon's interior cooled and shrunk — are thought to be less than 1 billion years old, although by how much is uncertain.

Now, images collected by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter hints the moon has probably seen tectonic activity within the last 50 million years.

In these photos, researchers spotted a dozen or so narrow, trenchlike features known as graben in the lunar highlands and in the dark plains of volcanic rock known as the mare basalts. Graben are essentially troughs with two faults or cracks in the surface on either side of them. They are thought to have formed as the lunar crust was stretched. [10 Coolest Moon Discoveries]

"Overall on the moon, you have this contracting, shrinking environment, but in some places, apparently there's this stretching extension of the crust," said study lead author Thomas Watters, a planetary scientist at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington.

 

The graben the scientists detected, which reach up to about 1,640 feet (500 meters) wide and 1.1 miles (1.8 kilometers) long, appear relatively pristine. This suggests they formed recently — otherwise, they would be marred more often by craters from meteor impacts over time.

"We think they're less than 50 million years old, but they could be 10 million years old, could be 1 million years old, could have happened 40 years ago," Watters told SPACE.com. "The intriguing picture that's emerging of the moon is that there is recent geological activity going on."

Moonquakes detected by seismic sensors installed during the Apollo missions support the notion of recent activity on the moon, researchers added. All in all, the moon's interior may still be hot.

"The moon may not only have been tectonically active recently, but may still be tectonically active today," Watters said.

Models of how the moon cooled over time suggest it was totally molten after its formation, and that it should now be contracting as it cools, forcing the surface to wrinkle. However, if this was true, such compression would have suppressed the creation of graben — these ditches typically form when the crust stretches, not crinkles.

Instead, these findings suggest the moon was not completely molten after it was formed. If this were the case, the moon would not contract strongly enough to suppress the emergence of graben.

"Currently, a popular idea for how the moon formed is that it was completely molten in the beginning— after a Mars-size object hit Earth very early in its history, the debris cloud from the surviving material formed the moon," Watters said. "This may lend support to alternative scenarios that the moon was not completely molten when it formed, that only part of it was, forming a magma ocean."

Future research can look for more graben in Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter photos once the satellite finishes imaging the moon, Watters said. He and his colleagues detailed their findings online Feb. 19 in the journal Nature Geoscience.

Follow SPACE.com for the latest in space science and exploration news on Twitter@Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

By: Charles Q. Choi Published: 02/21/2012 07:17 AM EST on SPACE.com The moon's crust was apparently active far more recently than previously believed, scientists say. These new findings raise q...
By: Charles Q. Choi Published: 02/21/2012 07:17 AM EST on SPACE.com The moon's crust was apparently active far more recently than previously believed, scientists say. These new findings raise q...
Filed by David Freeman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xtruth04
03:15 PM on 02/22/2012
Read the book "Secrets of Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon" By Don Wilson
03:01 PM on 02/22/2012
When G-d decides to change things....humans will go the way that those big lizards went....into obliviation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bccmeteorites
Don't believe everything NASA says.
06:10 AM on 02/22/2012
People in charge of the levers are so romantic, contrary to the evidence they still believe in the Jules Verne epic notion that the Moon is a piece of the Earth knocked away in a collision by a Mars size planet.
Congratulations John Glenn and as a gift this month marks the 8th anniversary the eight anniversary of our discovery of a stellar grain hand sample, the very first meteorite of its kind.
http://bccmeteorites.com/StellarGrainComposition.html
12:20 AM on 02/22/2012
Gee if we could just be convinced by the spin doctors that there was oil underground, I'm sure the chants of "Drill baby, drill" would be echoing down the halls of congress and we might reignite, pun intended, the space program. Why would it matter if the moon was youngr or older? Now if they proved this was actualy a Death Star like observatbion post that was keeping tabs on us to make sure we never venture out into the universe to spread " freedom and democracy", and Einstein was visited by one of these folks and told to make up the theory that faster than light speed was impossible to make sure we would never achieve such ends, That would be interesting.
Al Schrader
Some overnight ideas take decades
07:59 PM on 02/21/2012
If you look closely, there are craters filled in with dust, and fresh craters....a very imoportant feature...Alfie-
05:28 PM on 02/21/2012
I don't see why it isn't compatible with shrinking. If internal feature and external forces are not distributed evenly, then as one area contracts due to cooling it can stretch another area to produce these. It's like a lake bed drying to produce cracks.
01:41 PM on 02/21/2012
I don't think this is evidence enough to suggest a new mechanism for the formation of the Moon. It is certainly evidence enough to call for more research.

Unfortunately, there is no budget for lunar research with wheels on the ground available right now. But a lunar geology rover would be a great thing!
photo
Max Headroom
Your micro-bio is empty
03:23 PM on 02/21/2012
From my reading of this article, the only doubt on the formation theory seems to be the part about a completely molten beginning, the rest of the theory seems intact.
09:34 PM on 02/21/2012
I understand, but I am having a lot more of a problem picturing a Mars size impactor that leaves a piece of mantle solid while it flies away after the collision than I am having with different scenarios of a fully molten Moon which, nevertheless, creates these formations. It's more of a "Occam called and wants his razor back" kind of a feeling.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
12:40 PM on 02/21/2012
I wonder how the Moon is being heated from the inside? Nuclear decay? Tidal forces? Could there be flows of heavy metals such of gold and other goodies spreading out over it's surface in places underneith all that moondust? If we drill into the Moon, could we reach of pockets of air, or methane? We need a core sample of the Moon going down for a mile. We need to place telerobotic moonbots there to operate a drilling rig.
12:17 PM on 02/21/2012
If we had never left, we'd likely already have known this, the causes; and answers to many other questions that we don't have enough information now to even ask. Why is it important? We'll never know until we ask the questions and begin to find the answers. Increasing our understanding of the universe has often led to unexpected answers to seemingly unrelated questions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cuoi
The obstacle is the path
12:13 PM on 02/21/2012
Are there any residual boulders?

(Name that movie)
photo
MaryJane
Corruptio optimi pessima
10:04 AM on 02/21/2012
This is cool...or hot news. Whichever the case may be.