iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tyler Kingkade
GET UPDATES FROM Tyler:

Robert Birgeneau Knew Of Baton Use By Campus Police And Made No Objection, Emails Reveal

Posted: 02/21/12 04:39 PM ET  |  Updated: 02/21/12 04:39 PM ET

Occupy Cal

NEW YORK -- Newly released emails show University of California, Berkeley officials did not initially object to the use of batons on nonviolent protesters during a November 2011 demonstration that ignited a national outrage.

Chancellor Robert Bigeneau not only knew batons were used against Occupy Cal protesters, but he encouraged officials "do not back down."

Birgeneau said at the time he was in "limited contact" with administration officials when students began an Occupy Cal protest at the UC Berkley campus on Nov. 9, 2011, while he was in Asia. Campus police were caught on video striking protesters who had linked arms and were standing still.

Emails sent to and from Birgeneau's account, obtained through a Freedom of Information request by the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California and shared with The Huffington Post, show Birgeneau was told that campus police had used batons, and that he did not call for a more passive approach in enforcing a "no encampments" policy.

Provost George Breslauer wrote to Birgeneau after the first round of baton blows from campus police: "Protestors locked arms to prevent police from getting to the tents. Police used batons to gain access to the tents." Breslauer told him hundreds of students and a number of reporters were present, and that he expected the protest would carry on for days.

"This is really unfortunate," Birgeneau wrote back using his BlackBerry. "However, our policies are absolutely clear. Obviously this group wanted exactly such a confrontation."

A short time later, Birgeneau wrote Breslauer again to say, "It is critical that we do not back down on our no encampment policy." Birgeneau then referenced the situation in which Oakland Mayor Jean Quan found herself consequent to her handling of Occupy Oakland, where protesters established a camp for a short time, then were kicked out.

Some UC students suffered injuries such as cracked ribs. A tenured UC English professor reported that police yanked her to the ground by her hair. The video sparked controversy, lawsuits, an online petition by instructors and faculty expressing "no confidence" in the administration, and multiple investigations.

Linda Lye, an attorney with the ACLU of Northern California, told HuffPost that the emails reveal it wasn't just a couple of "bad apples" on the police force.

"What this shows is [Birgeneau] was also responsible, in the additional sense of creating the environment," Lye said. "He set the tone, gave the directive ... This is a larger systemic problem."

On Nov. 28, 2011, Birgeneau told faculty at a meeting that he explicitly prohibited police from using tear gas or pepper spray, but that "unfortunately, we did not at the same time discuss the use of the baton."

UC Berkeley campus spokesperson Dan Mogulof said the emails didn't indicate what was authorized, but did tell HuffPost that "any authorization comes beforehand."

"His comments [in the emails] were neither an authorization for or a prohibition against future use," Mogulof said. "The policy itself [of no encampments] still stood without any entry into discussion of tactics."

Mogulof said "the track record since November is evidence" of how the administration has improved its handling of protests and of the chancellor's commitment to avoiding another clash.

Mogulof also said Birgeneau did offer an unqualified apology at the time, and the administration doesn't see any inconsistency between the emails and officials' public statements.

However, not everyone on campus is satisfied.

"No one believed Birgeneau at the time," insisted Wendy Brown, a UC Berkeley political science professor. "They have Internet, Skype and excellent cellphone connections in Asia. And chancellors are never out of contact with their other campus officers merely because they're on the road. The lameness of this claim only infuriated people more last November."

Full Text Of Emails Obtained By The ACLU of Northern California:


From: "George Breslauer"
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 16:28:52 -0800
To: [redacted]
Cc: Linda Williams; Claire Holmes
Subject:

Bob, Just back from Sproul Plaza, where about 300-400 people tried to set up an encampment on the lawn off the northwest side of Sproul Hall. After assessing the situation, the police moved in to remove the tents, enforcing campus policy of "no encampments.” Protestors locked arms to prevent police from getting to the tents. Police used batons to gain access to the tents. There are still 200-300 people gathered, watching, and, in some cases, screaming at the police., who have established a perimeter. Harry and Gibor, perhaps also Linda, are speaking to the Graduate Assembly in Anthony Hall. Helicopters and reporters are around. This is likely to continue for days, I suspect. I don't know yet whether there have been arrests. George

George W. Breslauer
Professor of Political Science

--

From: "Robert J. Birgeneau"
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 01:19:11 +0000
To: George Breslauer
ReplyTo: [redacted]
Cc: Linda Williams; Claire Holmes
Subject: Re:

This is really unfortunate. However, our policies are absolutely clear. Obviously this group wanted exactly such a confrontation.

Bob
Sent via BlackBerry

--

From: Robert J. Birgeneau
To: George Breslauer
Cc: Linda Williams; Claire Holmes; Beata Fitzpatrick; Harry Le Grande
Subject: Re:
Date: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 5:36:18 PM

George
It is critical that we do not back down on our no encampment policy. Otherwise, we will end up in Quan land.

Bob
Sent via BlackBerry

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW COLLEGE

From our partners


NEW YORK -- Newly released emails show University of California, Berkeley officials did not initially object to the use of batons on nonviolent protesters during a November 2011 demonstration that ign...
NEW YORK -- Newly released emails show University of California, Berkeley officials did not initially object to the use of batons on nonviolent protesters during a November 2011 demonstration that ign...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 142
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moravecglobal
11:33 PM on 06/06/2012
With the recommendations of Cal. Chancellor Birgeneau ($450,000 salary), Provost George Breslauer ($306,000 salary) allowed campus police to use excessive force - rammed baton jabs - on students protesting Birgeneau‘s doubling of instate tuition. Birgeneau resigned: sack Provost Breslauer.

Send a forceful message that this Cal. senior management decision is unacceptable: UC Board of Regents marsha.kelman@ucop.edu and Calif. State Senator and Assemblymember.

There was a 43 percent jump in the number of affluent foreign and affluent out-of-state students accepted by University of California Berkeley. The more non-Californians admitted, the fewer qualified Californians can be. Fall admit rate for Californians drops to record low 18%. Another shocking picture of inept Cal. senior management.

In spite of eligibility Cal. Chancellor Birgeneau ($450.000 salary), Provost Breslauer ($306,000 salary) shed thousands of instate applicants. Qualified instate applicants to public Cal. are replaced by a $50,600 payment from born abroad affluent foreign and affluent out of state students. And, Birgeneau subsidizes affluent foreign and affluent out of state tuition in the guise of diversity while he doubles instate tuition/fees. (Harvard is now less costly than Cal.)

Birgeneau/Breslauer accept affluent $50,600 foreign students that displace qualified instate Californians (When depreciation of tax funded assets are included (as they should be), out of state and foreign tuition is more than $100,000 and does NOT subsidize instate tuition.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moravecglobal
10:22 PM on 03/18/2012
Fire Chancellor Birgeneau of University of California Berkeley: do not allow him to resign. More recently, UC Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau’s campus police deployed excessive force - rammed baton jabs - on Cal. students protesting Birgeneau’s doubling of tuition. Tough choices must be made: the sky will not fall when Birgeneau and his $450,000 salary are ousted. Opinions make a difference; email UC Board of Regents marsha.kelman@ucop.edu
photo
graffitijoe
snowballs chance n SoCal
06:06 PM on 02/27/2012
Use of batons that "ignited a national outrage" - Really? In what nation?
05:11 PM on 02/27/2012
Flash bangs and beanbags would have been better to use on ows losers.
photo
Mark Cormier Arizona
2012 has put us on the path to Europe
02:24 PM on 02/27/2012
Only HP would dedicate a section of its site to OWS.......what a joke.
01:59 PM on 02/27/2012
Many of the very same people protested the Marine Corps recruitment center. They refused to allow anyone to leave the office, camped out in a direct parking space, didnt allow anyone in, mob assaulted people who tried to practice their rights to enter anyway, and many protesters also used the sticks from their picket signs as weapons. The same local politicians ordered the police to stand and watch and to only harass the individuals who had been blocked in/out and beaten by the terrorist democratic revolutionaries. The police were ordered to stand and watch as one 19 year old was beaten bloody with sticks by several revolutionaries.

Nobodies human rights mattered then, it was individuals whos most basic rights were violated by the revolutionary democratic youth collectives of the region. Now the same hardcore militant revolutionaries cry like little girls when their police are ordered to turn on them? It is wrong to mob assault people? It is wrong to beat them with weapons? It is wrong to chase them from public places with threats of violence? Since when? It wasnt wrong when the democratic peoples collectives did it to individuals who dared to stand for their individual rights and disagree.
You reap what you sow.
photo
mcmutter
A Groover has to expect a few setbacks .....
04:51 PM on 02/27/2012
oh ! the humaanity ....

ever notice .... conservatives are always victims.....
11:59 AM on 02/28/2012
You struggled in school right?

I asked fair questions. Since when was it wrong to mob assault people, beat them with weapons, and chase them from public places with threats of violence? Up until now it was both democratic and legal to do all of those things. Can you please tell me what changed?

The past victims of the revolutionary leading light democratic youth collectives were just individuals seeking employment, you really cant know their political faith. Most people I know in the military hate the parties with a passion so its hard for you to claim that agents of your party have proof that your victims were in fact republican secret agents. If you do have proof that they were enemy party members sent as secret agents can you post it? All I saw were ordinary individuals being wronged by an empowered democratic majority. Such a thing is always the only outcome of a democracy.

Feel lucky none of you ever violated any of my rights like you did theirs. My reactions are a little more extreme as I hate democratic empowered majorities as it is. Hitting me with a stick and shouting democratic peoples death threats would have resulted in me walking away, then coming back within about 20 minutes with something alot better than a stick. Those poorly trained blue suited meter maids protecting you would not have been able to present me with a serious challenge at all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:09 AM on 02/27/2012
Call for Mass Action Against the Suppression of the Occupy Movement - February 28. Please share.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xMxzGEDQh4
photo
Crisdean Wulver
We've got our priorities screwed up.
02:06 AM on 02/27/2012
Gandhi would not have waged a campaign of political action without making come kind of specific demand. Making continual protests without making specific demands frustrates one's opponents----the people in positions of power----and leads them to disrespect the movement and see participants as just a lot of troublemakers who can't be satisfied. The OWS movement is bringing a lot of this on themselves.
photo
Crisdean Wulver
We've got our priorities screwed up.
01:56 AM on 02/27/2012
There's a lot of passive-agressive taunting going on, on the part of some OWS protestors. Jeremy Lin, the new basketball sensation, has been taunted. His opponents hoped to lure him into committing a foul. Some OWS protestors have been guilty of similar behavior. Gandhi wouldn't have tolerated that. Police are only human. They can lose their temper. It doesn't justify their response, but it partially explains it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
niumarmion
a temporary being
12:32 PM on 02/26/2012
The people at the top NEVER want the attention to be focused on them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Acebass
Progressive Liberal any questions?
10:20 AM on 02/26/2012
New video from Occupy Louisville... http://youtu.be/xouJSCs_aVA
sgtscottm2
Partisan blindness is a disease
09:40 AM on 02/26/2012
lol..."they're coming right for us!"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:32 AM on 02/26/2012
An open letter from an Occupier.

otober2011.org/blogs/margaret-flowers/what-do-you-say-relatives-who-wonder-why-you-occupy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Los Pepes
fearless bon vivant
03:21 AM on 02/26/2012
I don't see what was wrong with it. They were intentionally blocking the police from doing their job and I'm sure they were odered several times to move. What were the police supposed to do peper spray perhaps? It certainly has a lower risk of injury but noting moves people back and takes the fight out of them like a baton jab to the ribs.