iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

New York Fracking Ban: Judge Rules Towns Can Prohibit Drilling


First Posted: 02/21/2012 9:11 pm Updated: 02/23/2012 11:34 am


By Dan Wiessner

NEW YORK, Feb 21 (Reuters) - In a blow to the oil and gas industry, a judge has ruled small towns in New York have the authority to ban drilling - including the controversial method known as fracking - within their borders.

In a ruling released late Tuesday, state Supreme Court Justice Phillip Rumsey held that the Ithaca suburb of Dryden's recent ban on gas drilling falls within the authority of local governments to regulate local land use.

Anschutz Exploration Corporation, which owns leases on more than 22,000 acres (8,900 hectares) in the town and has invested $5.1 million in drilling operations there, argued the ban violated a state law designed to create uniform regulations for oil and gas drilling and encourage the extraction of those resources.

Rumsey disagreed, holding the law was not written to favor the industry, but to regulate it in such a way that "prevents waste ... and protects the rights of all persons."

"Nowhere in the legislative history (of the state oil and gas law) is there any suggestion that the legislature intended - as argued by Anschutz - to encourage the maximum ultimate recovery of oil and gas ... or to preempt local zoning authority," Rumsey wrote.

Fracking is a process in which chemical-laced water and sand are blasted deep below ground to release oil and natural gas trapped within rock formations. It has allowed companies to tap a wealth of new natural gas reserves but critics say the procedure has polluted water and air.

Municipal control is a top issue in the heated debate over whether to allow fracking in the Marcellus Shale, a massive rock formation believed by some industry officials to contain enough natural gas to power New York for more than 400 years.

Whether the state will allow fracking is ultimately a decision for Governor Andrew Cuomo, who has said he will only approve the method if it can be done safely.

The state Department of Environmental Conservation last year issued a 1,500-page report and set of draft regulations that prompted more than 45,000 public comments. Once the agency has finished sifting through them, it will release a final report for Cuomo's consideration.

Mahlon Perkins, the town attorney for Dryden, argued courts have recognized local authority in cases related to the state's mining law, which is similar to the oil and gas law.

Anschutz' attorney, Tom West, said in an interview last month that a ruling in favor of local government control would be "the kiss of death" for drilling in New York. But on Tuesday, he said he was optimistic about the appellate process if Anschutz decides to appeal Rumsey's decision.

"For the 'fracktivists' it's a significant ruling, but it's only the first step in the court process," West said, referring to the large number of vocal opponents to fracking, particularly in some upstate communities.

Perkins was not available for comment. Anschutz has 30 days to appeal the ruling.

Environmental groups applauded Rumsey's ruling.

"The communities targeted for drilling need the power to determine for themselves when, where, and if fracking is permitted," Katherine Nadeau, a program director at Environmental Advocates of New York said in a statement.

The case is Anschutz Exploration Corp. v. Town of Dryden, New York State Supreme Court, Tompkins County No. 2011-0902.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

By Dan Wiessner NEW YORK, Feb 21 (Reuters) - In a blow to the oil and gas industry, a judge has ruled small towns in New York have the authority to ban drilling - including the contro...
By Dan Wiessner NEW YORK, Feb 21 (Reuters) - In a blow to the oil and gas industry, a judge has ruled small towns in New York have the authority to ban drilling - including the contro...
By Dan Wiessner NEW YORK, Feb 21 (Reuters) - In a blow to the oil and gas industry, a judge has ruled small towns in New York have the authority to ban drilling - including the contro...
By Dan Wiessner NEW YORK, Feb 21 (Reuters) - In a blow to the oil and gas industry, a judge has ruled small towns in New York have the authority to ban drilling - including the contro...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:07 PM on 02/26/2012
This case seems to set a clear "pro-drilling" precedent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Coal_Co._v._Mahon
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:41 PM on 02/23/2012
Just to be clear, the term "Supreme court judge" is used in a confusing way in NY state.

This case wasn't brought before the highest court in the land, there is still a long appeals process to go. I doubt this sort of nonesense will stand when brought under serious scrutiny,
03:18 PM on 02/23/2012
In other words, screw what the people of the town want. The only thing that's important is what the natural gas industry wants. If the town and the people in it don't want an industry until that industry agrees to do what every other industry must do, which is abide by Safe Drinking Water Act, screw those people. They aren't important. Only the Waste Resources for Profit business of Natural Gas is important.

Natural gas is a net loss, easy. Natural gas is a stupid investment. It's costly to get, it's costly to the environment, it's costly to use. It already makes much more sense to invest in solar energy if you are in most of the U.S.

The reason why realityCheckInTheMail is here is because the fossil fuel industry is on their way out and he and his polluting overlords know it. His job is to maintain the mythology that fossil fuels are necessary.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grid_parity - Fact: Solar energy is already cheaper to purchase than any other grid energy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algae_fuel - Fact: DARPA can already create fuel from Algae at $5.00 per gallon, 1000 gallons per acre.

In the same amount of square miles that is being destroyed extracting oil from tar sands we could be farming 60 billion gallons of carbon neutral fuel every year.

realityCheckInTheMail is only here to keep the mythology alive that fossil fuels are still necessary because he knows they aren't.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:54 PM on 02/23/2012
This is a mineral rights issue (which is a more general form of property rights)

The gas industry is a relevant player, and they have resources and standing to litigate, but essentially the court is being asked who can regulate the mineral rights of the individual owners.

Mineral rights have a long history in this country of being decided in favor of the miner/driller, and not in favor of neighbors who wish to keep the resource in the ground for their own aesthetic concerns.

I doubt we'll see anything different in NY state. Of course, right now the price of natural gas is so low that this particular case might lapse for lack of industry interest. But that would only be re: as a "victory" by the legally uninformed - the precedent will be contested at some point, if/when the price of gas rises, the Marcellus in NY state will be pursused more vigorously and the management of mineral rights will revert to the state, just like it has for the last 200 years.
02:45 AM on 02/25/2012
You have fun seeing me get worked up? Well, I must tell you it's hilarious to see how desperate the pollution lobby is getting. Renewable is cheaper, cleaner, smarter, ... better, which is why it's so funny to watch the pro-pollution for profit lobby (Big Oil, Natural Gas, Coal and Nuclear) who have been in the energy business for 150 years and still haven't figured out how to create a clean energy economy. LOL!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:25 PM on 02/25/2012
No-one has figured out a clean energy economy. A clean energy economy doesn't exist.

(Except perhaps in Iceland, before they went bankrupt).