More

HuffPost Social Reading

Syria Crisis: U.S. Arming Opposition May Be Possibility

Syria Crisis

First Posted: 02/21/2012 4:00 pm Updated: 02/22/2012 2:10 pm


By Andrew Quinn and Arshad Mohammed

WASHINGTON, Feb 21 (Reuters) - The United States on Tuesday appeared to open the door to eventually arming the Syrian opposition, saying if a political solution to the crisis were impossible it might have to consider other options.

The comments, made by officials at both the White House and the State Department, marked a shift in emphasis by Washington, which thus far has stressed its policy of not arming the opposition and has said little about alternatives.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will meet with representatives of some 70 countries in Tunis on Friday for the first "Friends of Syria" meeting to coordinate the international community's next steps to respond the nearly year-long uprising against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

"We still believe that a political solution is what's needed in Syria," White House spokesman Jay Carney said.

"We don't want to take actions that would contribute to the further militarization of Syria, because that could take the country down a dangerous path. But we don't rule out additional measures."

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, asked if the United States was shifting its stance on arming the rebels, said Washington did not want to see the violence increase and was concentrating on political efforts to halt the bloodshed.

"That said ... if we can't get Assad to yield to the pressure that we are all bringing to bear, we may have to consider additional measures."

She declined to elaborate on what those measures might be.

The official comments on Tuesday followed a cautious assessment from General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, who told CNN over the weekend that Washington still did not know enough about Assad's opponents.

"Until we're a lot clearer about who they are and what they are, I think it would be premature to talk about arming them," Dempsey said.

INCREASING PRESSURE

Syrian government forces killed more than 60 people on Tuesday in assaults on villages and an artillery barrage on the restive city of Homs, activists said. The Red Cross called for daily ceasefires to allow in urgently needed aid.

The United States and its allies hope this week's Tunis meeting will allow them to begin drawing up a plan for Syria after Russia and China vetoed a Western-backed Arab League peace plan at the U.N. Security Council.

U.S. officials suggest the meeting will focus on ways to increase economic pressure on Assad through additional sanctions and to ramp up humanitarian relief for victims of the repression.

But Arab diplomats have suggested that formal or informal moves to arm the rebels may also be discussed.

Some U.S. politicians such as Republican Senator John McCain support efforts to arm the Syrian rebels - if not directly by the United States, then by other countries or third parties.

"There are ways to get weapons to people who are fighting against this kind of oppression, we showed that in Libya," McCain told reporters on a visit to Jerusalem.

"To somehow sit by and watch this massacre continue without exploring and employing every option that we possibly can to stop it is a betrayal of everything the United States stands for and believes in."

With both Russia and Iran firmly backing Assad's government, political analysts say tacit U.S. support for arming rebel fighters could be risky given Syria's complex ethnic and religious makeup and strategically important position.

"Force employed by the Friends of Syria should be the last step of an escalatory ladder," Robert Danin, a Middle East expert at the Council on Foreign Relations, wrote in an opinion piece on Tuesday.

"Arming the Free Syrian Army and other opposition groups may eventually help topple Assad, but it also increases the potential for a fractured or failed state." (Additional reporting by Phil Stewart in Washington and Dan Williams in Jerusalem; Editing by Vicki Allen and Mohammad Zargham)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

By Andrew Quinn and Arshad Mohammed WASHINGTON, Feb 21 (Reuters) - The United States on Tuesday appeared to open the door to eventually arming the Syrian opposition, saying if a polit...
By Andrew Quinn and Arshad Mohammed WASHINGTON, Feb 21 (Reuters) - The United States on Tuesday appeared to open the door to eventually arming the Syrian opposition, saying if a polit...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
leonel
MA, Pol.Sci.; MA, Ed.; JD. Veteran.
07:25 PM on 02/22/2012
The US has an opportunity to coalesce its strategy in the Middle East and no longer be using ground forces. The US has to finish removing ground forces in Iraq and Afghanistan and have an indirect position in those countries, while also helping in Pakistan, Africa and many other countries.

The US and Israel are, in effect, starting to lay a siege on Iran so that it does not develop nuclear weapons. Israel just has to be patient and let the economic "siege" succeed. The rest of the Arab countries are on the side of the US, but not on the side of Israel because of their separate "war" where Israel is, in effect, holding the Palestinians hostages or in siege in order to try to keep from being overrun.

There is a way out of all these problems and very likely to work if Israel is patient and the US is more focused and proactive. Syria has been controlled for a few decades by a minority group of Shia Muslims and Baathists (quasi-communists) while the majority of Syrians are Sunnis who are receiving the support of the rest of the Arab countries.

The Arab countries and the US have to help the Syrian rebels prevail. The Syrian and Iranian problems are completely connected. If the US does not take a strong position in Syria it will delay resolving the Iranian problem, and also delay solving the Palestinian situation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:24 AM on 02/22/2012
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has become the world's leading advocate for violent regime change and use of military force over diplomacy. The escalation of her warnings on Syria, now a threat to arm rebels, supposedly a way to "prevent" civil war, seems reckless and at odds with the cause of peace in the world.

It should be of great concern that Al Qaeda is also calling on its members to join the Syrian rebellions and to arm them.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57376121/al-qaeda-urges-muslims-to-help-syria-rebels/

Secretary Clinton's new efforts now include "meeting with representatives of some 70 countries in Tunis on Friday for the first 'Friends of Syria.' " Will Al Qeada too be represented among this gathering of "friends"?

Today's AP headline on Mrs. Clinton's latest foray is all too telling: "Clinton heads abroad to push Syria diplomacy" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/21/us-hints-at-possibility_n_1291894.html

Mrs. Clinton does seem to push, lecture, chastise, threaten a great deal reflective more of personal ego and confrontational style than skilled diplomacy. Let's hope her intent and outcome are not "push Syria diplomacy" out of the way in order to pursue yet another use of military force.
photo
wom122
Primum non nocere
11:02 PM on 02/21/2012
US proxies have been arming and providing the Syrian rebels with logistical support for quite a while.
banana republican
Provoking Progressives with unwelcome perspectives
08:32 PM on 02/21/2012
The Obama Regime's decision to stay out of this will have two profound and lasting effects worldwide. (1) Oppressed peoples will be much more reluctant to revolt and, (2) Oppressive leaders will be emboldened to use violence to stifle dissension. Another page to Obama's legacy.
hgus
It's not about the economy, stupid
12:59 AM on 02/22/2012
What would you have Obama do?

Invade? Have you heard we have a budget crisis? The last time we followed this type of neoconservative craziness, we ended up with hundreds of thousands dead in injured and a trillion dollar expense.

If Obama did exactly what you wanted, you would change your mind and say he shouldn't have done that.
photo
JDM73
male, 38, writer/draughtsman/ex-musician
07:22 PM on 02/21/2012
No one can dispute our government's caring, compassionate nature. It cares about Syria, it cares about Iran, it cares about Libya, it cares about Iraq and Afghanistan and Yemen--such massive, undeniable kindheartedness. It just doesn't give a damn about Sudan, is all.
Hey...nobody's perfect, right?
banderson2
82nd ABN Div Paratrooper Ret
06:57 PM on 02/21/2012
I find it interesting this story about Syria is not on the front page of HP. Is it possible because the U.S. is getting ready to start WWIII. This situation is just like Libya except this time the Iranians and Russians will be there to help Syria. How can you be working for peace when you are intentionally arming the opposition even though you admit you don't know who the so called opposition is.
banana republican
Provoking Progressives with unwelcome perspectives
08:33 PM on 02/21/2012
It's not on the front page because reflects poorly on the Obama administration.
banderson2
82nd ABN Div Paratrooper Ret
09:34 PM on 02/21/2012
You are probably right.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:31 AM on 02/22/2012
Let's hope someone can hold off WWIII until Hillary Clinton leaves the State Department and her post as Secretary of War and Defense Contracting. It's time for her to cash in from the corporations she serves, and hopefully, give President Obama the opportunity to appoint a Secretary of State with integrity, good judgment and the commitment to human rights and economic justice to be a champion of the cause of PEACE in the world.