iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.S., North Korea Nuclear Talks To Reopen

Us North Korea Nuclear Talks

First Posted: 02/22/2012 12:18 am Updated: 02/22/2012 7:28 am

BEIJING (AP) — The U.S. and North Korea reopen nuclear talks Thursday that will provide a glimpse into where Pyongyang's opaque government is heading after Kim Jong Il's death and test its readiness to dismantle nuclear programs for much-needed aid.

The countries were on the verge of a deal to have Washington provide food in return for Pyongyang suspending uranium enrichment when it was upended by the longtime leader's death on Dec. 17.

That North Korea has agreed to re-enter talks so soon afterward could signal a measure of cohesion and a continuation of Kim Jong Il's policies as the country transfers power to his young son and a coterie of advisers.

However, stonewalling could point to disagreement within the new leadership or unpredictable directions in policy for a government that has long sought to develop viable nuclear weapons and already has detonated two nuclear test blasts.

The workings of North Korea's government are difficult for outsiders to discern, so analysts and foreign government officials alike will closely monitor Thursday's talks in Beijing.

"The fact that North Korea has come to the negotiating table means the country is enjoying a level of internal stability," said Kim Keun-sik, a North Korea expert at Kyungnam University in South Korea.

"But we can't immediately link North Korea's stability to how fruitful the talks will be," he said.

It is a sensitive time for North Korea's new leader, Kim Jong Un, who is believed to be in his late 20s. The country suffers from chronic food shortages that complicate its vow to start becoming a thriving nation during this year's centennial of the birth of North Korean founder Kim Il Sung.

U.S. envoy Glyn Davies said after arriving in Beijing on Wednesday that he was looking for signs of Kim Jong Un's policies and what direction he wanted to take his country.

"All of these are a bit unknown at this stage. I find it a positive sign that relatively soon after the beginning of the transition in North Korea, the (country) has chosen to get back to the table with us. I think that is a good thing."

Davies said that the U.S. needs to see if North Korea is willing to "take steps to reassure all of us ... that they are sincere in getting back to fulfilling obligations" made in a joint statement in September 2005, which committed North Korea to abandoning its nuclear program in exchange for aid and pledges that Washington wouldn't seek the regime's ouster.

"Are they ready to get back to that conversation and carry it forward into the future and not spend too much time re-fighting some of the battles of the past?" he said.

North Korea is also locked in a long-running standoff with its neighbors and Washington, who want to see the North's nuclear program permanently dismantled.

The talks in Beijing, the third round since July, ostensibly are aimed at restarting wider six-nation disarmament negotiations that also involve China, Japan, Russia and South Korea. Pyongyang walked away from those talks in 2009 and later exploded its second nuclear device.

However, in mid-December hopes were high when outlines emerged of a U.S.-North Korean nuclear agreement.

The Associated Press reported then that the U.S. was poised to announce a significant donation of food aid to North Korea. That would have been followed within days by an agreement to suspend North Korea's uranium enrichment program, according to a broad outline of the agreement made known to the AP by people close to the negotiations.

Then Kim Jong Il died, and everything went on hold.

The six-nation talks, once restarted, would be aimed at dismantling North Korea's remaining nuclear programs in exchange for what would likely involve even greater donations of aid.

Victor Cha, a Korea expert and White House director of Asian affairs during the George. W. Bush presidency, said he was concerned that the U.S. side may now be overly eager for a deal in hopes of avoiding any Korean security crisis during this year's presidential election campaign.

"The last thing you want is (to want) a deal more than the North Koreans do," Cha said.

A key success would be gaining North Korea's agreement to have U.N. watchdogs monitor any freeze of its uranium enrichment, Cha said. Otherwise the country might backtrack — as it has done with previous agreements — and use the enrichment program to leverage additional concessions.

Without monitoring, a nuclear freeze would be like "selling the same horse" over and over again, Cha said.

Worries about North Korea's nuclear capability took on renewed urgency in November 2010 when the country disclosed a uranium enrichment facility that could give it a second route to manufacture nuclear weapons, in addition to its existing plutonium-based program.

The divided Korean Peninsula is still tense from a bloody 2010, which saw the North's shelling of a front-line island that killed four South Koreans and a deadly warship sinking blamed on the North that killed 46 South Korean sailors.

Kim Jong Il's death raised fears of even greater uncertainty, although the South's president, Lee Myung-bak, said Wednesday his country was ready to talk with the North "with an open heart" if it shows a "sincere" attitude.

The United States has said that it favors a diplomatic solution to the North Korean nuclear standoff, but only if Pyongyang improves ties with Seoul first. North Korea has rejected South Korea's calls for talks since Kim's death.

__

AP reporters Matthew Pennington, in Washington, and Sam Kim, in Seoul, South Korea, contributed.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BEIJING (AP) — The United States and North Korea met for a second day of talks Friday on restarting nuclear disarmament in return for aid, negotiations that were delayed by the death of North Korea'...
BEIJING (AP) — The United States and North Korea met for a second day of talks Friday on restarting nuclear disarmament in return for aid, negotiations that were delayed by the death of North Korea'...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 105
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
uk progressive
He took a face from the ancient gallery
02:50 AM on 02/23/2012
As churchill said jaw,jaw is better than war,war. The key to this problem is china they do more trade and make more money from south korea than north korea, but use north korea as leverage over the US regarding US interference in taiwan,tibet,US bases in south korea,japan,okinawa and guam.
10:39 PM on 02/22/2012
Why are we putting up with these people? If the "free" world put their minds to it this half a country would be finished extremely quickly. Shame they do not have oil or things would be sorted a hell of a lot quicker. Nuke them! If China objects nuke them too! After all there are so many of them they would not be able to maintain a war for very long or they'd all starve! Russia will do nothing as it hasn't the clout or will power to take on the rest of the world for some halfpenny dictatorship!
04:46 PM on 02/22/2012
The talks are a waste of time if the objective is really to get North Korea to give up nuclear arms. The North Koreans may be motivated by a world view much different that that which prevails in the West but they are not stupid. Look what happened to Qaddaffi in Libya when he renounced weapons of mass destruction in order to make nice with the Western powers. This lesson is not lost on the North Koreans. Or Iran.
Nightangle
NPA - no party affiliation
04:32 PM on 02/22/2012
HOPEFUL STEPS TOWARDS UNIFICATION -

Not only that North Korea is enjoying a level of stability, it has established formal diplomacy with Russia as well as an opportunity to talk with the North, Both parcels of the 38th parallel realizing an inter-Korean dialogue for the sake of peace and stability on the divided Korean Peninsula.

One sign that US brand of democracy is winding down in South Korea - populist welfare policies will not be in his agenda for the rest of his term, unlike the US brand of going too far in trying to win votes with promises of high-priced welfare programs.

The US should not meddle.
10:42 PM on 02/22/2012
Wow! I thought Marx and Engels passed away years ago, obviously I was wrong, either that or you are some kind of dinosaur!
03:53 PM on 02/22/2012
Great news.........guess the son is smarter than the father.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tin soldier
No more Mr. nice guy
02:52 PM on 02/22/2012
Obviously North Korea needs or wants something. Didn't the Obama have a deal with Kim Jong Il, that if the US

unfroze $21 million dollars of Korean assets,the Koreans would scale back their nuclear program and allow inspections?? Well the North Koreans got their assets, but so far no inspectors abnd no scale back. But this being an election year I'm sure Obama will negotiate in order to pick up political points.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
docsong
just waisting time?
02:59 PM on 02/22/2012
Kim probably uesd that loot for some more sungalsses and porn movies, but I don't think he would feed his public before his military.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ravatar252
04:39 PM on 02/22/2012
No wonder the market price of Lobster went up,,What a party animal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grittyreboot
LOLitical activist
03:51 PM on 02/22/2012
1) Link, proof for this alleged deal that you claim?

2) You dont want him to do the right thing, just because its an election year? My my, what a flag pin patriot you are. The irony of what you claim in your micro bio must be lost on you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tin soldier
No more Mr. nice guy
05:02 PM on 02/22/2012
Just google it . and I wrong, it wasn't 21 million ---it was 25 million. look I don't want Obama of anyone making concessions to the North Koreans just to make political points. I wouldn't care if it was Reagan. North Korea won't keep its promises any more than Iran will.
and negotiating with them will have no benifit for anyone except North Korea
photo
gochenaur8
who said that, I said that
02:51 PM on 02/22/2012
all the talks about North Korea and Iran about their nuclear programs, whatever, instead of talks, get it done, and stop the programs, no matter what it takes. It is bull just to talk, these people know onething, force, we have it and can get it done and if the rest of the world don't like it, tough.
The countries of this world have to understand onething, we all share this planet, either get along or face being taken from the world by force. None will ever risk a nuclear war, no winners, but one country can not run it all.
04:49 PM on 02/22/2012
Assuming you are not being intentionally sarcastic I would observe that the attitude you express did not work out well in Iraq and Afghanistan and, at least to date, in Libya.
photo
Ferrariqx
Who's NEXT?
05:48 PM on 02/22/2012
We can all thank the stars that you are not in charge of ANYTHING! It's pretty clear, that foreign policy is hardly your strong point.

NEXT!
photo
grundoboy
I aint scared of no ghost(writer)
02:49 PM on 02/22/2012
"Let the Lieing begin"
photo
shanefox
"Follow your bliss..."
02:49 PM on 02/22/2012
Sending aid to belligerent countries is akin to sending weapons to Hitler or to the Soviet Union.

If a burgular breaks into your home, would you hand him a gun?
05:58 PM on 02/22/2012
a small minority of powerful elites run this country. Providing food and aid to a starving population is not the same thing as giving Hitler a gun.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:38 PM on 02/22/2012
The first and best indicator of how willing/serious N Korea is in talks will be whether they allow S Korea to participate. They don't recognize S Korea as a separate country and rarely allow the S Korean government delegates to participate in discussions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnash26170
02:19 PM on 02/22/2012
Talks again! Talking? I thought we were supposed to shoot first. Oh, that's right, we now have an adult in office.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Unca Allen
Tyranny will rise when you do nothing
02:17 PM on 02/22/2012
I'm finding it diificult to believe there's no news about muslims killing, or threatening someone or doing something reprehensible. Wait! I see something...
lynniemiller
Aware, alert and listening
08:01 PM on 02/22/2012
Must be a slow day, here.

Best wishes to you , as always
02:16 PM on 02/22/2012
I guess the Madeleine Albright blackmail payoff to North Korea needs renewing. Great Sec of State, just pay them many dollars and they will stop! How many times are we going to do this???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
docsong
just waisting time?
02:12 PM on 02/22/2012
OK HUFF POST I am getting tired of the long wait for you to clear my posts, I don't need to do this and can do it else where, whats up with this
photo
Ferrariqx
Who's NEXT?
05:49 PM on 02/22/2012
I think HuffPost specific reply is: "Don't let the door knob hit ya where the good lord split ya!"

NEXT!
02:11 PM on 02/22/2012
Deja vu! Has the same chance as talks with Iran! None!