iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Contraception Rule: 7 States File Lawsuit Challenging Administration Mandate

Obama Contraception Rule

GRANT SCHULTE   02/23/12 06:17 PM ET  AP

LINCOLN, Neb. — Seven states asked a federal judge Thursday to block an Obama administration mandate that requires birth control coverage for employees of religious-affiliated hospitals, schools and outreach programs.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court of Nebraska, alleges that the new rule violates the First Amendment rights of groups that object to the use of contraceptives.

It marks the first legal challenge filed by states.

The rule, announced as part of the federal health care law, has come under fire from religious groups that object to the use of contraceptives, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs. In response to the criticism, Obama administration officials have said they will shift the requirement from the employers to health insurers themselves.

The lawsuit was filed by attorneys general from Nebraska, Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas. Three Nebraska-based groups – Catholic Social Services, Pius X Catholic High School and the Catholic Mutual Relief Society of America – are also plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning, a Republican who is running for U.S. Senate, said the administration's regulation "forces of millions of Americans to choose between following religious convictions and complying with federal law.

"We will not stand idly by while out constitutionally guaranteed liberties are discarded by an administration that has sworn to uphold them," he said.

The lawsuit alleges that the rule will effectively force religious employers and organizations to drop health insurance coverage, which will raise enrollment in state Medicaid programs and increase patient numbers at state-subsidized hospitals and medical centers.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is named as a defendant. A phone message left with the agency on Thursday wasn't immediately returned.

The contentious issue has pushed social issues to the forefront in a presidential election year that has been dominated by the economy. Issues such as abortion, contraception and requirements of President Barack Obama's health care law have the potential to galvanize the Republicans' conservative base, which is critical to voter turnout in the presidential and congressional races.

The new policy has angered some religious groups, including the Roman Catholic Church, who say the requirement would force them to violate their stances against contraception. It has also drawn a sharp response from congressional Republicans.

Obama administration officials have said they don't want to abridge anyone's religious freedom, but want to give women access to important preventive care. Supporters of the rule, including the ACLU and women's advocacy groups, say the measure is about female health.

Republican lawmakers in a handful of states have seized on the contentious issue, presenting bills that would allow insurance companies to ignore the federal rules. Measures in Idaho, Missouri and Arizona would expand the exemptions to secular insurers or businesses that object to covering contraception, abortion or sterilization.

Officials have said the Obama administration's ruling was carefully considered, after reviewing more than 200,000 comments from interested parties and the public. The one-year extension, they said, responds to concerns raised by religious employers about making adjustments.

Administration officials stress that individual decisions about whether to use birth control, and what kind, remain in the hands of women and their doctors.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
LINCOLN, Neb. — Seven states asked a federal judge Thursday to block an Obama administration mandate that requires birth control coverage for employees of religious-affiliated hospitals, schools...
LINCOLN, Neb. — Seven states asked a federal judge Thursday to block an Obama administration mandate that requires birth control coverage for employees of religious-affiliated hospitals, schools...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:43 PM on 02/26/2012
Praise God for the 7 God-honoring states challenging mandated abortion ~ Obama claims "Jesus Christ spoke to me in terms of being my brothers' and sisters' keeper." Yet, Obama supports murdering unborn life in a mother's womb ~ "And Jesus said, 'I am about to spit you out of my mouth." Revelation 3:16
08:09 PM on 02/25/2012
I don't understand why you are censoring comments. I replied to a comment I did not agree with, but it certainly was not out of line. You removed that comment and my reply. You also refused to post another comment I made, which was in no way abusive. Is it a mistake that the links on your FAQ page that give us an opportunity to contact you are dead links which lead nowhere? If you have personal biases towards a subject, you should not be monitoring comments.
06:45 PM on 02/26/2012
The intolerant, liberal, non-God-honoring HP Monitors censor any comment not aligning w/ their misguided worldview ~
01:51 AM on 02/25/2012
These "faith-based institutions" are businesses NOT churches....BIG businesses. Their varied employees should not be made to involuntarily kneel at the altar of religion... a flat-out violation of the First Amendment. The government is trying to protect the freedom of these employees, not to limit it! Seriously: The bottom line is that absolutely NO ONE is coming into our Churches or places of worship and telling believers what to believe.....or forcing them to use contraception. BUT If the Bishops (and other denominations) want to continue running businesses outside of their places of worship...businesses that employ millions of people of varying faiths -or no "faith" at all- THEN they must play by the same rules and rights that other workers live by and enjoy (especially if their businesses use our tax dollars, and skip paying taxes, in the process). If the Jehovah's Witnesses church hires me, can they alter my health insurance to exclude blood transfusions? Even worse- what if they operated a hospital by their “rules”? This is not a “war on religion”. Never was. However, it IS a war BY some religions... on women and men who simply want to plan their families, to control their futures, to keep their jobs, and to have health insurance that allows them to do that.
09:29 PM on 02/24/2012
This country is going deeper into debt just fighting all the lawsuits this pathetic fake president is causing.
Time to stop playing big daddy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Neal Feldman
42
12:07 PM on 02/24/2012
What the zealots miss is that they do not have a 'liberty' to force their religious views onto others,and that is exact;y what they are trying to do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Khaos Spence
12:40 AM on 02/24/2012
I'm disappointed in Michigan right now...honestly someone who knows the catholic faith better than I, where in the bible say no birth control for you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Calvin Watlington
11:08 PM on 02/23/2012
There are at least 18 States that already have similar mandates and one them was signed by (fallen off the weight wagon" guru Mike Huckabee. Just another case of Republicans saying when we do it it's good when Obama does it it's horrific, no change that to apocalyptic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Calvin Watlington
11:04 PM on 02/23/2012
They are wasting their taxpayers' money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Don Hastie Cain
Wish them into the cornfield
08:49 PM on 02/23/2012
What IS the big deal with Republicans and birth control. They don't want people paying for something they get for free. Yep! Republicans get free birth control. All the Republican woman has to do for birth control is TAKE THE BAG OFF when she gets into bed. = Free!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rene S Pintor
I disappove the GOPs ideologies!!!!!!
09:35 PM on 02/23/2012
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Seeing Jan Brewer's face and her naked body is the ultimate birth control that would guaranteed to work!!
08:47 PM on 02/23/2012
Go figure, all 7 states are Republican controlled. The mandate does not violate the first amendment. The republicans do not want to violate religious organizations rights but have no problem violating women's rights. They want women to keep mass producing children they can't afford and refuse to help once they are here. They talk out both sides of their mouths. Pro-life but for executions. Keep the baby but do everything to make it harder for the parents and child once it is here. Unless the child is fortunate to be born into the 1%, then they are good.
10:55 AM on 02/24/2012
Forget about abortion. Do you believe Big Brother should mandate you to do anything you don't believe in? This was never supposed to be the domain of government. A government with a single digit approval rating telling you and I what to do? I don't get it. Physician heal thyself.
09:06 PM on 02/26/2012
I believe that if you want to get into the business world then the rules apply to you as well. The church is exempt, and now the hospitals and colleges they run as well. The insurance companies have to foot the bill instead of the employer. It is a shame that in this day and age we are even having this argument about birth control. Men wouldn't want their sexual organs mandated so why is it ok for a woman's to be? Would you want to be mandated to have a probe inserted into you for no medical reason other than the government said so? I think not. My uterus is my business and no one elses. This country already has to many children going to bed hungry as it is, so why force more unwanted pregnancies to term. Plus how about passing a mandate against all the deadbeat fathers that walk away from their responsibilities and leave the women hanging to provide? There is more than just big brother telling you what to do here. Because they are telling women what to do, but I suppose that is acceptable the some that don't have to carry the child.
08:21 PM on 02/23/2012
Apparently Regressives are carrying out their own Stimulus package. They're using tax payer dollars to litigate the separation of Church and State, an issue that was already decided by the Supreme Court in several cases. Still, it is strange that Regressives call for austerity and then spend all this tax payer money. I am not sure how this will balance the deficit, all this frivolous spending. You can read how conservative Justice Scalia helped decided the contraception debate here: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/10/1063513/-Justice-Scalia-solves-the-contraception-debate
09:08 PM on 02/23/2012
Good article catch!

I'll return ya one that seemed well done, also... from RH Reality Check:

Religious Exemptions and Contraceptive Coverage: How Far Can Denial Go and Still Be Constitutional?
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2011/09/30/religious-exemptions-contraceptive-coverage-denial-still-constitutional
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PierreSD
08:15 PM on 02/23/2012
Okay.... look... does this mandate apply to all other employers?

Was the rule passed with any animus towards a religion or religious practice?

If the answer to the first question is "yes" and the second "no", there is NO violation of the First Amendment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Montana 123
Mama to Three Little Monkeys
08:15 PM on 02/23/2012
What about my rights?
10:37 AM on 02/24/2012
What about your rights?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tclayjr
Republican Slayer
08:13 PM on 02/23/2012
Anyone notice that the religion businesses are the ones most opposed to anything that taxes their bottom line? They don't want to pay for anything. We should start separating them from the evils of the fire department and police. They can pray to their magic imaginary friend in the sky for help.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Effren Hernandez
Now go, tell the others
08:11 PM on 02/23/2012
One day even Pole Dancing accidents suffered by women will be covered by their insurance. America, the land of silluness...