More

HuffPost Social Reading

Ross Mirkarimi Wants Domestic Abuse Video Tossed From Trial

Ross Mirkarimi

First Posted: 02/23/2012 5:01 pm Updated: 02/23/2012 5:01 pm

In the latest development in the ongoing legal saga of San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi, Mirkarimi's lawyers moved to have a crucial video depicting Mirkarimi's wife, former Venezulean soap opera star Eliana Lopez sporting a fresh bruise on her arm from where Mirkarimi allegedly grabbed her during an altercation on New Year's Eve, ruled inadmissible as evidence in his domestic abuse trial.

During a pre-trial hearing on Wednesday, Mirkarimi's lawyer Lidia Stiglich argued that Lopez had neighbor Ivory Madison take the video of her injuries to later be used as evidence in case she and Mirkarimi were ever involved in a protracted child custody battle over their two-year old son Theo.

The video, taken on New Year's Day, is a key piece of evidence in the case against Mirkarimi, who has plead not guilty to misdemeanor charges of domestic violence battery, child endangerment and dissuading a witness.

It shows a very upset Lopez crying and telling Madison about the previous evening's incident. The San Jose Mercury News reported:

In the video, Lopez pointed to her arm and said, "This happened yesterday, um, the end of 2011, and this is the second time this is happening. And I tell Ross I want to work on the marriage, we need help, I have been telling him we need help, and I am going to use this just in case he wants to take Theo away from me. Because he did, he said that, that he's very powerful, and he can, he can do it," according to the filing. ... "I really thought that we would never have to use this video, uh, unless, (Mirkarimi) got nasty in the divorce proceedings," Madison said, according to the filing.

Lopez herself has subsequently denied that any domestic violence ever took place.

In an interview on Venezulean radio earlier this year, Lopez accused shadowy political forces of being behind the allegations against her husband and cast doubt on the reasons for Madison--who had previously hosted fundraisers for Mirkarimi--to release the video. "We're suspicious of her motives in calling the police four days after I talked to her about having a discussion with my husband," said Lopez, "which wasn't even a fight, nothing like that, it was a discussion like all couples have."

The San Francisco Chronicle reports that Stiglich went on to argue that, in addition to the video, the accounts of Madison and neighbor Callie Williams, who Lopez also told about the incident, should similarly be ruled inadmissible:

The neighbors' statements are hearsay, Stiglich argued. Lopez herself has denounced the case against her husband and has not cooperated with prosecutors.

A witness' recounting of a victim's spontaneous statement is often admissible in court, but Lopez's comments to her neighbors came 20 hours after the incident, Stiglich noted

Lopez's lawyer, Paula Canny, similarly asked to have the video ruled inadmissible because Lopez believed her conversions with Madison, who is a lawyer by training and once interned at the California Supreme Court, were subject to attorney-client privilege, even though Maidson is no longer a practicing attorney.

"Anybody who speaks to a trained attorney about a matter that might involve litigation would be under the impression that communication was confidential and privileged," Canny told ABC-7 News.

Both Mirkarimi and Lopez are expected to testify in the trial, but Lopez has stated she will only do so if granted immunity from prosecution.

The official trial date is set for this Friday; however, the actual proceedings aren't set to begin until next week. If convicted on all charges, Mirkarimi could face up to a year in jail and three years probation.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SAN FRANCISCO

In the latest development in the ongoing legal saga of San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi, Mirkarimi's lawyers moved to have a crucial video depicting Mirkarimi's wife, former Venezulean soap opera ...
In the latest development in the ongoing legal saga of San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi, Mirkarimi's lawyers moved to have a crucial video depicting Mirkarimi's wife, former Venezulean soap opera ...
Filed by Aaron Sankin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
duggal
11:06 AM on 02/26/2012
Flawed logic: attorney-client privilege, means just that, an individual retains an attorney and all conversations are therefore private. In this situation it was a discussion between neighbors, one which happened to have had a legal license at one time.

Should Lopez's attorney win that argument anything any attorney states to anyone would be held privileged and not admissible. Where did her attorney go to law school?
05:58 PM on 02/25/2012
I wasn't sure about this situation before - exactly what the evidence was going to show. However, now that I see how Sheriff Mirkarimi and his wife maneuver their way through the Court with behavior like this, it's clear that because he needs to do this to maintain his freedom he is unfit to perform his duties. How can he pretend to uphold the law while he, his family and his lawyer are doing everything they can to undermine the law?
05:47 PM on 02/25/2012
This tactic by Mirkarimi is transparent and obvious. How else could he "wiggle" out of this but to argue that his wife...(the victim) concocted and made this all up to gain leverage in future child custody disputes. Remember she refused to cooperate with authorities...but now is suddenly willing to testify...."if granted immunity".... This is about preserving a $200,000 dollar-plus salary.

I think he did it. But will walk... the interesting twist will be what is admissible in trial...as domestic violence laws are designed to allow evidence even when the victim is unavailable or uncooperative.. It will be interesting to watch it unfold legally.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
harrymudd
07:11 PM on 02/24/2012
My previous writing about the over politicization of this got censored.

I will be very surprised if this one does not get censored as well; I wonder if only anti Mirkarimi posts are allowed on this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xargaw
06:23 PM on 02/24/2012
It really isn't that uncommon for men in law enforcement to be guilty of domestic abuse, but they get a lot of cover from their departments and can easily intimidate their victums. So much goes unreported and unindicated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
06:54 PM on 02/24/2012
To say Mirkarimi worked in law enforcement is a stretch. He never worked patrol or on the line. He was an investigator for the DA's office, handling cases that had already been investigated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sadwitness
Haters have no effect on me. I'm idiot proof.
01:46 PM on 02/25/2012
So he had power over the powerful, no potential for intimidation there...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
harrymudd
05:17 AM on 02/25/2012
Are you now making a blanket statement against all police officers? By the way Mirkarimi was never a police officer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
harrymudd
03:00 PM on 02/24/2012
What is really amazing is how hard right is trying to get Mirkarimi. The degree of politicization in this is hard to believe. All of this to reverse an election for a mid level position in a city. So fine you people say you manage to railroad him. You are going to get another hard core liberal next election. Plus a lot of angry people ready to pay you back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fattrucker
02:28 PM on 02/24/2012
only the guilty ever want to throw out the evidence
photo
Ann Garrison
http://www.anngarrison.com/
02:17 PM on 02/24/2012
Who is handling the website at the Sheriff’s office?

Michael Hennessey is still listed, and pictured, as sheriff:

http://www.sfsheriff.com/sheriff.htm
http://www.sfsheriff.com/SHF%20Org%20Chrt%202-16-2010.pdf
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
02:17 PM on 02/24/2012
These people are both id*ots.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jennielake
Intellect is Learned... Wisdom Already Knows
11:49 AM on 02/24/2012
... welcome to how we deal with Domestic Violence in San Francisco

In the mean time, the children are run through it all and no mention to them getting help.

Our own Top Cop - "it was a discussion like all couples have"

... yeah, that is all "couples" who have an abusive partner

Thanks for showing us how Domestic Violence is dealt with in our little city

- now go arrest someone for doing what you do
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zombywulf
Pirate Captain Church of Saint Jerry
08:05 PM on 02/23/2012
Since the neighbor didn't force her to make the video or make the staetments it stay in
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coppersmom
09:09 PM on 02/23/2012
you don't know the hearsay rules... or the attorney-client privilege rules. .Also a videotape made for use in future litigation ..is not admissable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
12:55 PM on 02/24/2012
Was the attorney paid by Lopez? No. She wasn't on retainer and wasn't a member of the bar, so her claim for attorney-client privilege isn't valid.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
07:51 PM on 02/23/2012
Clearly Mirkarimi is guilty, and his wife is acting like a typical DV victim. She now stands by her abusive husband and is blaming the police.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:38 PM on 02/23/2012
Of course he wants incriminating evidence tossed out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
harrymudd
07:13 PM on 02/24/2012
We all know they have no real evidence against him and the videos are all hearsay. By the way why is most of his criticism coming from his political opponents anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sadwitness
Haters have no effect on me. I'm idiot proof.
01:50 PM on 02/25/2012
It is a video, it shows the abuse, to call that "hearsay" is simply living in denial. I'm not his supporter or his opponent but he is clearly an abusive man and he is being given power where he should be given punishment. Once again money talks and victims continue to be victims- what a farce
02:18 AM on 02/26/2012
The guilty always want evidence thrown out