iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.S., North Korea Nuclear Talks Reopen For First Time Since Kim Jong Il's Death

By ALEXA OLESEN 02/23/12 11:40 PM ET AP

Usnorth Korea Nuclear Talks
U.S. Special Representative for North Korea Affairs Glyn Davies speaks to journalists at a hotel in Beijing, China, Wednesday, Feb. 22, 2012. (AP Photo/Andy Wong)

BEIJING — The United States and North Korea met for a second day of talks Friday on restarting nuclear disarmament in return for aid, negotiations that were delayed by the death of North Korea's longtime leader Kim Jong Il two months ago.

The discussions, which ran all day Thursday, could signal whether North Korea under new leader Kim Jong Un is ready to agree to steps demanded by Washington and Pyongyang's neighbors to return to broader multinational disarmament talks. More than three years have passed since the last six-nation discussions, which are meant to provide aid and diplomatic concessions in return for the North taking verifiable steps to mothball its nuclear weapons programs.

Kim's Dec. 17 death upended a tentative deal between the United States and North Korea in which Pyongyang would have suspended its uranium enrichment in return for food.

U.S. envoy Glyn Davies told reporters before meeting his counterpart Kim Kye Gwan on Friday that the talks had covered all major areas.

"All those same issues, that begin with de-nuclearization but go on to non-proliferation, humanitarian affairs, human rights, all of those issues are on the table," Davies told reporters.

He and Kim met for three hours Friday morning. There was no immediate word on whether they would hold a second session that afternoon.

The U.S.-North Korea talks in Beijing are the third round since July aimed at restarting the broader negotiations that began in 2003 and also involve China, Japan, Russia and South Korea. The six-party talks were last held in December 2008. Pyongyang walked away from those talks in 2009 and later exploded its second nuclear device.

Additional steps may be needed before a resumption of the six-nation talks. The North may first request food shipments, while the U.S. and its allies want assurances Pyongyang is committed to making progress on past nuclear commitments.

Questioned on what agreements were needed to restart the six-nation talks, State Department spokesman Mark Toner said the North Koreans "need to still come back and answer some of the questions and issues that we've raised previously."

"But we are also steadfast in what we're asking for North Korea to do, which is live up its prior commitments, and we're going to continue to talk with them," Toner told reporters at a Thursday briefing in Washington.

The United States has also said that better ties between North Korea and U.S. ally South Korea are crucial. North Korea has rejected South Korean offers to talk in recent weeks, and animosity between the rivals still lingers from violence in 2010: a North Korean artillery attack in November killed four South Koreans on a front-line island, and Seoul blames North Korea for the sinking of a warship that killed 46 sailors earlier that year. Pyongyang denies sinking the ship and says a South Korean live-fire drill provoked the artillery attack.

The six-nation talks, once restarted, would be aimed at dismantling North Korea's remaining nuclear programs in exchange for what would likely involve even greater donations of aid.

Worries about North Korea's nuclear capability took on renewed urgency in November 2010 when the country disclosed a uranium enrichment facility that could give it a second route to manufacture nuclear weapons, in addition to its existing plutonium-based program.

FOLLOW WORLD

Filed by Jade Walker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 88
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
04:59 PM on 02/24/2012
First off Kim is just a figurehead much like the queen is to England and nothing more.The military runs North Korea and their not going to budge on disarming any time soon
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctor pangloss
the best of all possible worlds
01:46 PM on 02/23/2012
Meaning we will supply them with tons of food that will feed their military and not their starving civilian population if they cease to build more bombs,which they will totally ignore.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tyger
01:26 PM on 02/23/2012
It will not work. They will get the money and run.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mebecarl
01:00 PM on 02/23/2012
Again... Little Kim will do what his father told him to do, else he'll be ousted.
dveloperz
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may co
11:38 AM on 02/23/2012
Hmmm...."According to a statement by EPIC, DHS paid more than $11 million to General Dynamics to monitor and prepare surveillance reports on public reaction posted on Facebook and Twitter as well as in comment sections of THE HUFFINGTON POST, The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, Drudge, Wired and other media outlets. The intention, it said, was to "capture public reaction to major government proposals" by DHS as well as "positive and negative reports" on FEMA, the CIA and other federal agencies."
11:06 AM on 02/23/2012
do any posters think that yours or my posts amount to a hill of beans? This is a way H.P makes itself seem relevant. Guess what the more people post with this money grubber is just lining their pockets through advertisers. Nothing will change except more $$$ out of our pockets and more $$$ to our enemies. If any one thinks what are comments accomplish than you are dumber than the politicians that run (ruin) our way of life.
10:45 AM on 02/23/2012
Another round eh... I'm sure this one has about as much potential for great diplomatic break throughs as the last ones
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertstone1robert
My micro bio is too big.
10:40 AM on 02/23/2012
This is a waste of time. We are going to devise novel ways of paying off the N Korean blackmailers. This is the failed policies of Bill Clinton. Now we're getting them courtesy of Hillary Clinton.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mynamesyow
Scientist, Gonzo, Champion of the Poor
11:19 AM on 02/23/2012
We have been devising novel ways to pay off countries for a loonngg time....its cheaper than military intervention in both $$$ and American Lives.
And Clinton oversaw a Golden Age of Peace and Prosperity in this Country.
It wasnt until we got some NeoConservative Republicans in Power that the Fit hit the Shan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertstone1robert
My micro bio is too big.
12:12 PM on 02/23/2012
Under Clinton we paid off the N. Koreans not to build nuclear weapons. They took our aid and built nuclear weapons, anyway.
You seem to be forgetting that period when Clinton was feeling his oats and started to bomb Serbia. I guess it's ok. if you pick on somebody small who has no quarrel with you.
01:39 PM on 02/23/2012
hear! hear!
dveloperz
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may co
10:36 AM on 02/23/2012
God forbid we "talk" to Iran. We'll just attack. Same OLD story: Iraq, Libya.... amazing to me that liberals blame Bush for wars based upon lies, but the lies continue, as do the wars based upon them. Where is the outrage of the anti-war liberal?? Why, why, why does the same group continually support this current administration? The Bush tax cuts just keep on getting extended. Would the true liberal, peace loving, Democrats please stand up?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shaun West
04:07 PM on 02/23/2012
Great advice. It's so great that Obama has been trying to do just that for years now. He went on Iranian TV, sent a letter to their leadership, used intermediates, etc etc etc. There's been no response from Iran's end. So the "talk" option has clearly failed.
In fact, Obama - a anti-war liberal - has made that clear. He's now trying to apply sanctions in the hope that Iran will stop its nuclear ambitions. So far, that's also been a failure.
At this point we have 2 options: (1) Inaction. This would allow Iran (and its terr.orist proxies) to attain nuclear weapons and likely cause an arms race in the region with Gulf States leaving the region and the world as a more unstable and unsafe place. (2) Stop Iran from attaining nuclear weapons, which will in the long run be beneficial to us - both in our security and economy.

Conservatives know this, Liberals know this, Arabs know this and Israeli know this. The only people that deny this reality are the Russians and Chinese (who clearly have vested interest in Iran's oil).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omensofaries
10:34 AM on 02/23/2012
We would all like to think that these talks will have positive results, but from past experiences they have been nothing more than a 'photo shot' of a bunch of guys sitting around a table, only to have the North Koreans walk off again and set off another nuclear weapon. And we'll end up sending them tons of food which will be used to feed their army and not the poor people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mistahshow
10:33 AM on 02/23/2012
Watch the GOP's head explode on hearing this news, since they want to bomb everybody they don't like.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
10:01 AM on 02/23/2012
If North Korea is "negotiating" again, there must be another major famine coming and not just the usual level of malnutrition for the proletariat. Their dictators of the proletariat must be getting hungry too.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:57 AM on 02/23/2012
The dictators of the proletariat are never hungry.
photo
Cory111
Life is truly good...
09:46 AM on 02/23/2012
Here is another money waster, Korea. North Korea is absolutely no threat to out country. North Korea is South Koreas problem, not ours.
I’d like one good reason why we keep our troops in South Korea other then it’s good for that countries economy and it gives the pentagon a bit more job security.
Much like Iran, what that country does has no direct affect on our countries security. Iran is a problem to countries in that region. We don’t buy oil from Iran, the only reason gas prices are going up is because oil companies can use the slightest excuse to raise gas prices and they get away with it.
09:38 AM on 02/23/2012
Hmmmmm!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:29 AM on 02/23/2012
When W. pushed for war in Iraq, 36 Senior diplomats resigned in protest. He completely shut off communication in the most critical areas of the World, cutting off networking contacts that are essential to negotiations. These are delicate dealings, requiring profound knowledge of culture, history, personalities. It's not a damn 60 minute drama; this takes real grown ups in the room. And the reason that diplomacy is a good thing, the reason that the rest of the world opts to "talk, talk, and talk some more" is that their experience with terrorism doesn't encompass several buildings and thousands of innocents. Their experience of terrorism flattened entire cities and countries. Their experience encompasses MILLIONS dead and disabled. It's long past time for the grown-ups to enter the room.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
noavailusernames
11:01 AM on 02/23/2012
We should just let everyone have nukes. If they bother our allies or us, we turn them into glass. Providing aid to dictators simply guarantees they will stay in power and be able to continue torturing their people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:39 PM on 02/23/2012
Aid? Who is discussing AID?!? I am talking diplomacy. Statesmanship.International Summits. These are concepts that W Bush deleted from our international lexicon to the enormous detriment of thousands of American milies, and hundreds of thousands of Middle Easterners and Afghanis, cheered on by "YAAAA-HOOO" shoot-em-ups. These are practical on-going outreach efforts that take time, that take intelligence, that don't advocate turning millions of individuals and the ancient cultures and art treasures that they have created over thousands of generations "into glass."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mynamesyow
Scientist, Gonzo, Champion of the Poor
11:22 AM on 02/23/2012
Agreed. The Iraq Sham was one of the biggest frauds in american History and resulted in not only the public outting of a deep cover CIA WMD officer in Valerie Plame but a diminishing of a great man like General colin Powell when he was given shoddy intelligence, carefully crafted by Cheney and Rumsfeld, to present to the world as 'evidence'...
And all the Repubs in Congress (most of them still there) Applauded and Cheered !