More

HuffPost Social Reading

As FDA Panel Backs Qnexa Diet Pill, A Look At Why A Safe Drug Is Elusive

Diet Pill

MATTHEW PERRONE   02/24/12 02:41 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — The battle of the bulge has been a big, fat failure for U.S. drugmakers. But that hasn't stopped them from trying.

For nearly a century, scientists have struggled to make a diet pill that helps people lose weight without side effects that range from embarrassing digestive issues to dangerous heart problems.

Earlier this week, a government panel recommended the FDA approve the latest diet drug Qnexa. The recommendation raises hopes that the U.S. could approve the first anti-obesity drug in more than a decade. It also highlights how challenging it is to create a pill that fights fat in a variety of people without negative side effects. Even Qnexa was previously rejected over concerns that it can cause heart palpitations and birth defects if taken by pregnant women.

"Having a drug for obesity would be like telling me you had a drug for the fever," said Dr. Mitchell Roslin, chief of bariatric surgery at Northern Westchester Hospital in New York. "There can be millions of different reasons why someone is obese; it's really a symptom of various underlying mechanisms."

An effective and safe diet pill would be an easy sale in the U.S.: With more than 75 million obese adults, the nation's obesity rate is nearing 35 percent. But the biggest problem in creating a weight-loss drug is that there appears to be no safe way to turn off one of the human body's most fundamental functions.

For millions of years, humans have been programmed to consume calories and store them as energy, or fat. It's this biological mechanism that makes it almost impossible to quickly lose weight by not eating. Cutting down on food instead sends stronger signals to the body to store more calories.

"Throughout most of human history calories were scarce and hard to get, so we have numerous natural defenses against starvation," said Dr. David Katz of Yale University's Prevention Research Center. "We have no defenses against overeating because we never needed them before."

So, the drug industry has been on a nearly 100-year search for a drug that can help the body shed pounds. It has mostly failed to come up with an effective one and many of the experiments have proven fatal to patients:

_ Early attempts focused on speeding up metabolism, or the body's method for breaking down food into energy. The speed of metabolism controls how quickly or slowly we burn calories and ultimately how much weight we take on

In the 1930s, doctors prescribed an industrial chemical called dinitrophenol, which accelerated metabolism, but also caused fever, swelling and deadly toxicity in some patients. The 1938 law establishing the Food and Drug Administration was a response to untested drugs like dinitrophenol.

_ In the `50s and `60s, amphetamines became popular drugs because they boost metabolism and suppress appetite. But the pills proved to be highly addictive, and doctors discovered they increase blood pressure and heart rate. The amphetamine phentermine is approved for short-term weight loss, usually less than 12 weeks, though it is seldom prescribed because of the potential for addiction.

_ Perhaps the worst diet pill safety debacle came in the 1990s and involved the combination of phentermine and another weight loss drug marketed by Wyeth called fenfluramine. The combination of the two pills, dubbed fen-phen, was never approved by the FDA. But because the agency doesn't regulate doctors' decisions about prescribing various combinations of drugs, more than 18 million fen-phen prescriptions were written by 1996.

One year later, studies suggested that up to a third of patients taking fen-phen experienced heart valve damage. In 1997, Wyeth was forced to recall two versions of fenfluramine and eventually paid more than $13 billion to settle tens of thousands of personal injury lawsuits.

_ In the last decade, drugmakers have moved toward other weight loss concoctions. Currently, the only drug approved for long-term weight loss in the U.S. is orlistat, which is sold as the prescription drug Xenical and over the counter as alli. The drug works by blocking the absorption of fat.

When launched in 2007, alli received a high-profile marketing push from drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline, complete with TV ads and a celebrity endorsement by country singer Wynonna Judd. But it never took off due to unpleasant side effects, including loose bowel movements. Educational pamphlets for alli even recommend people start the program when they have a few days off work, or bring an extra pair of pants to the office.

_ Most drugmakers now are focusing on medications that block brain signals associated with food craving and appetite. Vivus' Qnexa is one of a trio of drugs seeking FDA approval. The diet pill, which was initially rejected due to the risks of heart palpitations and other safety issues, is a combination of two older drugs.

It uses phentermine, the appetite suppressant. The other drug is topiramate, an anticonvulsant sold by Johnson & Johnson as Topamax. Topiramate is believed to make patients feel more satiated, though it's unclear exactly how. J&J initially studied Topamax alone as a weight loss treatment but concluded the psychiatric side effects, such as memory loss and difficulty concentrating, were too significant.

Still, on Wednesday, a panel of FDA doctors and other advisers voted 20-2 in favor of approving Vivus' Qnexa pill, which the drugmaker has resubmitted to the FDA for a second review.

The group touted the drug's benefits, which include weight loss of nearly 10 percent for most patients taking the drug over a year – the highest reduction reported with any recent diet pill. But panelists stressed that the drugmaker must be required to conduct a large, follow-up study of the pill's effects on the heart.

The FDA is expected to issue its decision on Qnexa by mid-April.

"The potential benefits of this medication seem to trump the side effects," said FDA panel member Dr. Kenneth Burman of the Washington Hospital Center in Washington DC. "But in truth, only time will tell."

Tammy Wade of McCalla, Ala., is confident that the diet pill works. She lost nearly 40 pounds, dropping down to 167 while in a two-year Qnexa study.

"I never lost that much weight on any of the programs I've tried," said Wade, who's done everything from Weight Watchers to work out with a personal trainer.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

Filed by Amanda L. Chan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Anderson LMHC
Licensed Psychotherapist, Weight Control Expert
10:12 AM on 02/26/2012
As an obesity treatment expert, let me emphasize that weight loss cannot be achieved without behavior change, establishing habits that result in eating fewer calories than used. If a medication can help a person to do this, without adverse risk, I am all for it.

I suffered the misery of obesity for 25 years before I established a successful solution through Behavioral Medicine and lost 140 pounds. I have maintained my ideal body weight for over 25 years and have been helping others since.

As a Licensed Mental Health Counselor with a lifetime of treating mental disorders, let me make it clear that an array of thought and behavior disorders are affected by disorder in brain chemistry, and the effective treatment is medication. Good examples are depression and OCD, a relative of compulsive overeating. Treatment with medication alters the brain chemistry to relieve depression and OCD symptoms. We know that medications can reduce appetite and eating compulsions. Are drugs the solution to obesity? No. Behavior change is. But in some cases, drugs help, and in some cases, it seems behavior change is not possible without drugs.

Let's not forget that the solution to obesity is in behavior change. Sometimes, drugs can help, but drugs can only be a part of the answer. Most of the time, drugs play no part. Always, the answer is in Behavioral Medicine.

William Anderson, LMHC
Author of 'The Anderson Method - Secrets of Permanent Weight Loss'
www.TheAndersonMethod.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ranveig Elvebakk
Innovator, author and lecturer on weight and nutri
05:12 PM on 02/24/2012
Sad that those of us who call ourselves scientists never learn better than to think Mother Nature will tolerate all this self-abuse we are expressing in our eating, and is just waiting to be beaten by a pill--. Appetite is associated with a most complicated cascade of intertwined biological molecules and pathways, as is obesity. Aside form being multi-layered, biological pathways are redundant. This means that if you attempt to block one pathway, you open or close others that are intrinsically connected to the first one but might have opposing or unrelated effects. In medicine we call this side effects.This is why miracle-pills are short lived, and surgery is a stop-gap measure.
The quest for the silver bullet is simply an expression that medicine is lagging behind in understanding of the principles involved here.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
12:46 PM on 02/24/2012
"We have no defenses against overeating because we never needed them before."

It's important to realize that we are not likely to ever develop this through the natural course of evolution. There is no evolutionary advantage to doing so. Most of the negative affects from obesity hit us past the age of procreation. Humans are not going to grow out of this biologically. It will have to be socially.
12:36 PM on 02/24/2012
Okay, so as I understand it this drug allowed patients on it to lose 10% of their body weight within a year of being on the drug. Could they not have gotten the same results by watching what they eat, portion control and some daily exercise? I would be they would have lost more in a year's time. Why do we need to have the quick fix? Are the side effects not dangerous enough? Someone is paying off members of the FDA to give this quick approval. There is no integrity in any government agency.
02:26 PM on 02/24/2012
That's the point. We're lazy so we get fat and we're too lazy to exercise to get rid of it so we hope that we can have the same fatty diets but lose weight with this magic pill.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
alwysonit
Captain Chaos, at your service.
11:29 AM on 02/24/2012
Eat sensibly and exercise. There never was, nor will there ever be, a substitute for lean muscle tissue when discussing metabolic rates and weight management. Why is everyone looking for a miracle that will enable them to sit on their butts every day and stay lean? Being capable of physcal activity is part of life.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
12:45 PM on 02/24/2012
Sing it. I gave up on cardio (for weight loss) a long time ago. I do some for my heart. But building muscle mass to keep up metabolic rates and control weight is THE way to go.

Here's one reason why. Let's say I run three times a week and burn 500 calories each run. And let's say that I'm fit and on a weight stable diet (ie, taking in the same calories I'm burning). But I get sick for three weeks...or 'life happens' for three weeks and I can't run. That's 4500 calories that I would ordinarily be burning and now I'm not. Now it's excess calories. Switch over to a weight stable diet based on muscle-building exercise. I get sick or indisposed for three weeks. How much muscles mass do I lose? Barely anything in that time period. My metabolism stays high. My weight stays stable. I don't 'fall off the wagon' in terms of keeping a target weight. That keeps me motivated to stick with it.
11:11 AM on 02/24/2012
I run and I watch my diet. It is amazing how well this works.