More

HuffPost Social Reading

Obama 'HOPE' Poster Artist Pleads Guilty In NYC

Shepard Fairey

By LARRY NEUMEISTER   02/24/12 04:38 PM ET  AP

NEW YORK -- The creator of the Barack Obama "HOPE" poster pleaded guilty Friday to criminal contempt, saying he made a "terrible decision" in 2009 to destroy some documents and fabricate others in a civil lawsuit pertaining to The Associated Press photograph he relied upon to make the poster.

Shepard Fairey entered the plea in federal court to the misdemeanor charge, which carries a maximum potential penalty of up to six months in prison. Sentencing was set for July 16.

"Violating the court's trust was the worst thing I have ever done in my life," said Fairey, 42, of Los Angeles. "I was ashamed as I did all these things, and I remain ashamed."

The criminal case originated after the artist acknowledged he had fabricated information in a lawsuit he brought against the AP in February 2009. The lawsuit sought a court declaration that he did not violate AP's copyrights when he made the Obama image. The AP countersued, saying the uncredited, uncompensated use of its picture both violated copyright laws and was a threat to journalism.

That case was settled last year.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement Friday that Fairey "went to extreme lengths to obtain an unfair and illegal advantage in his civil litigation, creating fake documents and destroying others in an effort to subvert the civil discovery process."

"The justice system – civil and criminal – depends on the integrity of lawyers and non-lawyers alike to follow the rules," Bharara said. "Those who break the rules risk sanctions, including, in certain cases, criminal prosecution."

Fairey told Magistrate Judge Frank Maas that when he created the Obama poster in January 2008, he believed he was basing it on a cropped version of a photograph he had seen of the then-Illinois senator with actor George Clooney in front of an American flag at a public event. He said it was only a few days after his lawsuit was filed, when he saw a blog comparing the Clooney picture with another AP photograph, that he realized the image he had used was a different AP picture of Obama taken at the same event.

He said that before meeting with his lawyers six weeks later, he deleted the files showing he had used the Obama photo that did not include Clooney and printed documents to make it appear that he had used the picture with Clooney in it.

"I showed my lawyers the fake documents as I described my artistic process and told them that I had used the Clooney photo as a reference for the Obama `HOPE' poster," Fairey said.

"I was and am ashamed that I had done these things, and I knew I should have corrected my actions, but as time passed I found it more and more difficult to admit my actions," he said.

He said he continued to hide the truth for months, even arranging for a witness to support his false claim in a deposition with lawyers, before one of his employees searching for documents for his attorneys came across the files he thought he had deleted.

"I immediately confessed what I had done to my lawyers, and then to my wife, employees and friends," he said. "Days later, I authorized my lawyers to write a letter to the court and the AP explaining what I had done."

Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel W. Levy told the judge that the government plans to ask for "some term of imprisonment" at sentencing.

Maas rejected the government's request that bail be set at $100,000 for Fairey, saying he could be released on his own recognizance because the risk that he would flee was "extraordinarily low."

The AP and Fairey announced last year that they had settled their copyright infringement claims against each other and would work together in projects using the news agency's pictures. Fairey agreed not to use another AP photograph in his work without obtaining a license, and the two sides agreed to share the profits of posters and merchandise bearing the "HOPE" image.

A financial settlement also was reached, the terms of which were not disclosed, though Fairey said Friday during his plea that he "paid the AP an amount that I believe made it whole for the harm associated with my spoliation and fabrication of evidence."

AP President and CEO Tom Curley said in a statement: "Mr. Fairey started this case by suing the AP over copyright fair use issues. The AP never expected the case to take the turn that it did. The AP hopes that some good may come of this, by alerting judges and parties to the possibility that fake evidence may exist."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ARTS

NEW YORK -- The creator of the Barack Obama "HOPE" poster pleaded guilty Friday to criminal contempt, saying he made a "terrible decision" in 2009 to destroy some documents and fabricate others in a c...
NEW YORK -- The creator of the Barack Obama "HOPE" poster pleaded guilty Friday to criminal contempt, saying he made a "terrible decision" in 2009 to destroy some documents and fabricate others in a c...
Filed by Andrew Reilly  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 75
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J Rupel
Wake me up when November comes...
04:12 AM on 02/27/2012
Really speaks to the quality of people Obama has surrounded himself with. Lets hope Fairey does hard time, and hope that in a short time he'll be joined in prison by some of the real intriguers in the Obama admin. (Holder is first on my list)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:39 PM on 02/27/2012
Read the article. This has NOTHING to do with Obama. This is a copyright infringement suit by the photographer against the artist.

Any and all high school student should be made to read this article. It is a good example of how seriously we take the right to intellectual property in the US.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J Rupel
Wake me up when November comes...
08:11 PM on 02/27/2012
Actually, I think it has a lot to do with him. The Obama hope poster is a perfect metaphor for the Obama presidency: a nice facade, but behind it all dishonesty without substance, and compromise without hard work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oxjr
04:48 AM on 02/26/2012
It is a copyright infringement to paint a picture from a photo??? Really???? Man, my college art teachers are serious criminals.
05:54 AM on 02/26/2012
if u dont have permission and its not fair use, its theft of intellectual property.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
halfassedfilms
02:56 PM on 02/27/2012
That's an incredibly simplistic take on it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
08:52 AM on 02/26/2012
It also depends if you are making a profit from using the copy written works.
04:19 PM on 02/26/2012
Not necessarily. If its copyrighted property, you need permission to use it, unless its used for parody or satire. Just because I don't make money off of something, does not mean I can use or share it.
04:26 AM on 02/26/2012
Watch a documentary with Farley, Banksy and a few other graffiti artists called Exit through the giftshop.
10:00 PM on 02/27/2012
Great doc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
02:06 AM on 02/26/2012
This was a simple civil copyright/trademark dispute, but this knucklehead had to try to manipulate the justice system. That is why he is being charged, and rightfully so.
09:45 PM on 02/25/2012
What did I tell you in November 2008? http://obamahopescam.com
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
12:53 PM on 02/28/2012
Nothing, I didn't know you back then. Before you get too high and mighty, this is not something Obama did, unlike all of the Republican candidates who have illegally used songs for their campaigns without the recording artists' permission.
08:52 PM on 02/25/2012
Modern Art... if only we could remember how to drawn from our minds like the old guys before modern images corrupted us

Mr. NOBODY on kickstarter
http://haiti.fm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
hiredshoe
Never been P.C.and don't intend to start
07:32 PM on 02/25/2012
Another criminal linked to Obama,at least this one didn't have a cabinet post.
08:09 PM on 02/25/2012
How incredibly stupid.
11:16 PM on 02/25/2012
Second that motion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
hiredshoe
Never been P.C.and don't intend to start
09:57 AM on 02/27/2012
I reject your kool-aid sodden reality,and substitute it with the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
08:54 AM on 02/26/2012
They don't believe in Private property. ( or that the laws pertain to them )
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
12:56 PM on 02/28/2012
Like all the GOP candidates who have been sued and threatened with lawsuits for illegally using songs in their campaigns without the recording artists' permission? That kind of intellectual property laws? Like the laws that Newt and Romney just got in trouble for (http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/community/blogs/applesauce/x123147570/Almost-every-time-Republican-candidates-try-to-use-cool-music-the-artists-sue-them).
photo
Red45
We can turn the tide
07:11 PM on 02/25/2012
Wow. Since when do we take action on someone's "threat to journalism"? And why not?
photo
bridgeman
Jesus was a Jazz fan
06:15 PM on 02/25/2012
Hope and Chains
02:36 PM on 02/25/2012
To bad Shepard...Probably should have taken a job at Goldman Sachs...
photo
elbeas
Pragmatista sinistra
12:18 PM on 02/26/2012
Fanned for that.
12:15 PM on 02/25/2012
Wouldn't it be nice if the U.S. Attorneys had this same attitude towards Wall Street's shenanigans?

"The justice system – civil and criminal – depends on the integrity of lawyers and non-lawyers alike to follow the rules," Bharara said. "Those who break the rules risk sanctions, including, in certain cases, criminal prosecution."

Fat chance. Wall Street owns their bosses.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
02:05 AM on 02/26/2012
They do. Have you seen the sentences handed out to the insider traders?
11:18 AM on 02/25/2012
What kind of country will we become when the big industries have tied all the creativity of our citizens up in their trademark and copyright knot?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:55 PM on 02/27/2012
We are there now. Most copyrighted material that is pirated, or used without permission is so under the radar, it never gets noticed. There was a tavern on a country road 50 miles from any city called "The Mickey Mouse Tavern." I used to pass it once in a while. It had been there for about 65 years. First sign of trouble for the tavern was a new piece of art on their sign, which had what looked like a painting of Mickey Mouse on it, changing the look of the mouse. After a year or so, the mouse changed again. Finally, the name changed to "The Mouse Tavern" with no art of a mouse. Copyright infringement case brought by Disney - case closed.

It is nice to know those laws are there when we need them, if we are artists, photographers, writers, musicians......etc. etc.
09:36 PM on 02/27/2012
Sure, there needs to be a balance between allowing the individual artist recompense for her work and ideas and letting other artists morph those ideas in new ways. After all, each new idea is really some version of the original cave paintings.
08:32 AM on 02/25/2012
GOOD! So sick of Shepard stealing other peoples art and selling it as his own. He is the most unoriginal artist in history.

This is just the tip of the iceberg.
http://www.brghtnghts.com/blog/?page_id=46

Check here to see where he STEALS all his artwork.
http://www.thegiant.org/wiki/index.php/Category:References
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pax333
12:18 PM on 02/25/2012
I checked both out and some of it I can see clearly but some is really a stretch....Mao in profile reminded me a photo I'd seen before so I went and found it as it's used so often it was easy

http://www.frankrank.com/item/Mao-ZeDong/661

On the other hand on 'the giant' I did see a number of pieces that borrowed enthusiastically from other artists as well.

Shepard may irk you but even when it comes to reinterpreting other work he's not original. ;o)
Sableknows
Button Pusher
11:44 PM on 02/24/2012
Switch first and last names around and that would be about right.
10:17 PM on 02/24/2012
if he's getting nailed for this, music samplers that use prior-popular songs and egotistically boast and self promote over the top of them should get the chair
03:25 PM on 02/25/2012
true that.
12:32 AM on 02/26/2012
Now that is funny.