iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Keeping Name After Marriage Makes Some See Wife As Less Committed To Husband, Study Says

Bridge Groom

First Posted: 02/25/2012 11:41 am Updated: 02/25/2012 11:41 am

By: Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer
Published: 02/24/2012 07:23 AM EST on LiveScience

Attitudes regarding whether women should take their husbands' names at marriage are becoming more conservative, at least among young Midwesterners.

According to a new study, one of the few to look at name-changing attitudes over time, Midwestern college students were three times more likely to say that women who don't take their husbands' names are less committed to the relationship in 2006 compared with when the same question was asked in 1990. Midwestern women are also less likely than women living in the Eastern U.S. to say they want to keep their birth name at marriage.

In both groups, name-keepers are the minority, however. No national statistics are kept, but previous research suggests at least 90 percent, and possibly up to 98 percent, of American women change their names upon marriage.

Changing names

Most studies on name-changing have been conducted on East Coast residents. And the very few studies that have looked at change over time have relied heavily on upper-income study subjects. One popular study method, for example, has been to track name-changing brides over the years through the pages of the New York Times wedding announcements.

Pennsylvania State University sociologists Laurie Scheuble and David Johnson, along with graduate student Katherine Johnson, wanted to look outside the realm of well-off East Coasters. So they took data from two surveys at a small Midwestern university with fewer than 1,000 students, one conducted in 1990 and the other in 2006. The first survey queried 258 men and women, and the second 246. Though the sample is not representative of America at large, it has the advantage of allowing for a comparison across time.

The researchers also collected 369 student surveys from their own university in 2006. The surveys asked the students whether they planned to keep their last name upon marriage and whether or not they thought that women who kept their name were less committed to their husbands. [6 Scientific Tips for a Successful Marriage]

Geographical differences

The results revealed that East Coast women are more likely to say they want to keep their names than their Midwestern counterparts, at 11.6 percent and 4.3 percent, respectively. (Men almost never said they'd change their name.)

The rates of actual name-change intentions in the Midwestern women between 1990 and 2006 stayed constant, perhaps because a woman keeping her own name is so rare in general, Johnson told LiveScience.

"It's a strong, traditional practice," Johnson said. "There's a lot of pressure from family members and parents. … And men tend to have pretty conservative attitudes about whether the person they marry should keep her own name."

Both men and women, however, seem to be becoming more conservative about name changes, at least at this university. In 1990, only 2.7 percent of students surveyed agreed with the statement that a woman keeping her name was less committed to her marriage. In 2006, that number jumped to 10.1 percent. (Easterners in 2006 had similar responses.)

It's hard to tell if that change represents an attitude change among young people or if a different demographic of students is now attending the college compared with that in 1990, Johnson said. But the researchers found few demographic differences between the samples and controlled for those they did find.

Women who did plan to keep their birth surnames did not believe that plan made them less committed to marriage, the data showed. Instead, the researchers reported in the journal Sex Roles, the attitude shift took place among women who didn't have any intention of keeping their name. In other words, these conservative women were becoming more conservative. The trend could trace back to the political polarization of American society over the last several decades, Johnson suggested.

"This might just be reflecting this increased polarization we're seeing in American society, and it's coming across in terms of family and gender values," he said.

You can follow LiveScience senior writer Stephanie Pappas on Twitter @sipappas.  Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter @livescience and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

By: Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer Published: 02/24/2012 07:23 AM EST on LiveScience Attitudes regarding whether women should take their husbands' names at marriage are becoming mor...
By: Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer Published: 02/24/2012 07:23 AM EST on LiveScience Attitudes regarding whether women should take their husbands' names at marriage are becoming mor...
Filed by David Freeman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 121
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:25 PM on 02/29/2012
I took my husband's name because I wanted to. Not because he made me--in fact, he asked me about a month before we wed if I was going to change my name or not. I wanted to, and I'm happy with my decision. But I could care less what other people do.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cashaww
01:06 AM on 02/29/2012
I actually told my wife she should keep her maiden name. I want to spend my life with her, not own her. Plus her credit is a little better than mine.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:42 AM on 02/27/2012
My daughter kept her name because she was known in her profession by that name. My son-in-law is proud of her and loves her by any name.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
12:47 PM on 02/27/2012
They're not talking about those in the marriage, or even the reality of how long the marriages last, just the reaction from those outside the marriage.

My motto...screw 'em. Who care what they think.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
12:27 AM on 02/27/2012
My wife says that by not having my last name, she can easily deny having anything to do with me when I am stupid in public. Then again, I can do the same with her too..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cashaww
12:59 AM on 02/29/2012
Your wife must know my wife.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:13 PM on 02/26/2012
I was ready to marry a divorced woman who had taken her husband's name. It then became her "brand" as she became well known in her field.
I wouldn't have minded being mistakenly called by her original last name, as people sometimes do. But I didn't like the prospect of being called her first husband's name.

I like the kind of woman who would want to keep her own name.
07:22 PM on 02/26/2012
I say it's a spousal decision and, therefore, nobody's business but theirs. No other reason to comment.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Jamie Kowalski
Composer
05:16 PM on 02/26/2012
The only thing that happened when my wife decided not to take my last name was that she gained even more respect from me.
09:24 AM on 02/26/2012
if this is in the "science" category, then i think it has to do with the planetary alignment of either the individuals or at the moment of proposal & commitment in conjuncture with the individual aspects.
photo
catsanon
Humans... Such silly creatures.
07:28 AM on 02/26/2012
"Keeping Name After Marriage Makes Some See Husband As Less Committed To Wife"
07:24 AM on 02/26/2012
Both my daughters kept their last name when they married. Neither we, nor their husbands, thought anything of it. Any real issues today?
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
11:53 PM on 02/25/2012
My divorced relatives involved women who took their husband's name. On the other hand my sister does not have her husband's name and has been married to him many years. Likewise my cousin Miloš has been married many years to his wife who has kept her name.
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
11:41 PM on 02/25/2012
I would not want to marry a woman who would want to lose her name.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
abbyj
Always tolerate difference.
11:34 PM on 02/25/2012
This idea of "taking a husband's name" vs. "keeping her own name" is a bogus argument. If you think about it, there are no "women's" surnames. Every woman has her father's name, and he has his father's name, and the grandfather has his own father's surname. The only surnames passed down are men's names so, when a woman "keeps her own name," she's merely choosing which man's name she wants: a husband's name vs. the men's names from her family.

Especially among African Americans where their original last names were lost, the family connection is often kept by (using the first names) naming their girls after their grandmothers, aunts, and other favored women relatives.

In Iceland, surnames are not the primary means of ID, either. Historically, women take their mothers' first names and become the "daughter of . . . [mom]." For example, young a woman named Helena, with a mother named Ingrid would be known as Helena Ingridsdottir (Ingrid's daughter) throughout her life. She would not take her husband's name since he himself would have a surname based on his dad's first name: Sven Erikson (his dad being Erik). Recently, some women take their dad's name, like Helena Erikson, but you can see how this doesn't work as well, calling her a son.

So, a woman's only choice is to pick the name of the man she loves most, or to invent one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
poeticgyrl
10:38 AM on 02/26/2012
lol
10:59 PM on 02/25/2012
What about the wives who not only want to keep their maiden name but want the children to have the maiden name as well. Sort of makes the husband feel really left out doesn't it?
11:44 PM on 02/25/2012
Hasn't that always been what's happened with women?
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
11:44 PM on 02/25/2012
I guess if the husband wants the kids to have his name, that can make the wife feel left out. So they should throw a coin instead to determine whose name the kids will have.
photo
catsanon
Humans... Such silly creatures.
07:40 AM on 02/26/2012
Ot they could let the kids decide when they get older which surname they want to keep, instead of choosing for them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:28 PM on 02/25/2012
My wife has kept her maiden name, and I have no reason to question her commitment.
What a ridiculous idea.