iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Kim Dotcom, Megaupload Founder, Hits Digital Piracy Wall After Wild Online Ride

Kim Dotcom

By NICK PERRY   02/26/12 12:00 AM ET  AP

WELLINGTON, New Zealand -- On his way up, he fooled them all: judges, journalists, investors and companies.

Then the man who renamed himself Kim Dotcom finally did it. With an outsized ego and an eye for get-rich schemes, he parlayed his modest computing skills into an empire, becoming the fabulously wealthy computer maverick he had long claimed to be.

Now his wild ride may be over. Last month he was arrested in New Zealand for allegedly facilitating millions of illegal downloads of songs and movies through Megaupload, his once-popular website, now an important focus of the entertainment industry's war on online piracy.

U.S. prosecutors are seeking the 38-year-old German's extradition in what they say could be one of the largest copyright cases in history. Dotcom, who denies the charges, was freed on bail Wednesday after a month in jail, and authorities have seized, among other things, his twin giant TV sets, massive statue of the "Predator" movie monster, and Rolls-Royce (vanity plate: GOD).

His story is one of breathtaking audacity that spans both the globe and the modern computing era. Interviews conducted by The Associated Press and a review of court documents and other records indicate that Dotcom was able to create a legendary past, trade upon it by manipulating the news media and avoid serious consequences when he broke the law.

Dotcom makes for a larger-than-life defendant in almost every respect: U.S. court papers describe him as about 1.95m (6 feet, 5 inches) tall and weighing 146 kilograms (322 pounds). At various times, he has depicted himself online as a playboy surrounded by beautiful women, fast cars and guns; a terrorist hunter and a technology martyr ready to commit suicide.

Now he is confined to his home, has refused through his lawyers to grant interviews, and is forbidden to log on to the Internet.

Born Kim Schmitz in the German coastal town of Kiel, Dotcom grew up with an alcoholic father. As a teen, he created a mystique for himself that led the Sunday Telegraph of London to call him a "superhacker."

German hackers interviewed by the AP, However, say he did little of what he claimed.

"He was trying to make half a buck on every occasion offered him," said Dirk Engling, spokesman for the Chaos Computer Club, which eventually banned Schmitz from attending any of their events. "Not having some real skills of his own, he was always using other people's inventions to attack systems and then claim he did it."

Engling said Schmitz ended up putting club members in legal jeopardy through his recklessnes, but some wanted to work with him anyway because he radiated the social ease they lacked.

One of his first schemes, according to Engling, was selling pirated software from an online mailbox.

In 1998, a Munich court convicted Schmitz and an accomplice of computer fraud and of buying and selling stolen phone cards. They got off with a fine and probation for what the judge called "youthful foolishness." Schmitz came to court wearing a black suit and sunglasses, saying he loved "feeling like a spy."

Three years after his first conviction, he had resurfaced as a high-flying venture capitalist. He told reporters his company was worth $200 million and that he was rescuing the struggling online startup company "LetsBuyIt" with an initial cash injection of up to four million euros ($5 million) and a promise of another 50 million euros ($65 million).

Reporters published his bogus story, sending the stock skyrocketing. On the first day, LetsBuyIt leaped from 19 cents to 27 cents a share. The next day, it was up to 77 cents.

He appeared in an online video depicting himself living it up on a superyacht in Monaco, with beautiful women draped on his arms: "Kim Schmitz is a PR man's nightmare and a journalist's dream," wrote the Telegraph.

A German court would hear later that he had pulled a textbook "pump-and-dump" move, borrowing money to buy Letsbuyit shares, and then quickly selling them to those who swallowed his investment story, gaining himself a quick profit of 1.1 million euros ($1.4 million).

But before authorities could catch up with him on the LetsBuyIt scam came the Sept. 11 attacks, and he captured fresh headlines by offering $10 million for the capture of Osama bin Laden. He claimed to have formed Yihat – Young Intelligent Hackers Against Terrorism – to wage cyberwar against banks harboring terrorist money.

That one backfired on him when hacker pranksters calling themselves Fluffy Bunny posted a lewd picture on his website.

Sought by German authorities over the LetsBuyIt scam, he fled to Thailand In January 2002, writing on his website that "A German high-tech fairy tale is to end."

He then posted a troubling message suggesting he would commit suicide on his 28th birthday.

"Enough is Enough. Kim Schmitz will die next Monday. See it on this website live and for free. When the countdown is over, Kim steps into a new world and wants you to see it."

Authorities got to him first, arresting him at a Bangkok airport a few days before his birthday. He had meanwhile posted another strange message to his site: Henceforth he would answer to the title of "His Royal Highness King Kimble the First, Ruler of the Kimpire."

In May that year he was back in a Munich court, convicted of manipulating stock prices in the LetsBuyIt scam. Again he got lucky, avoiding jail but drawing a fine of 100,000 euros ($130,000).

He also claimed to have learned something about the perils of the spotlight. "My mistake was that I embraced the media and gave them the stories they wanted," he wrote on the filesharing-news website TorrentFreak.

But it didn't take him long to get back in the fast lane. George Gurley, a reporter writing for Vanity Fair magazine, came across him at the 2004 Gumball 3000 rally, an unofficial European road race for jet-setters, driving at 250 kph (155 mph).

"He's a controversial figure here, part buffoon, part Dr. Evil, but a skilled and very fast driver," the reporter wrote.

The next year he launched his most significant venture, registering Megaupload.com in Hong Kong. And he reinvented himself, legally changing his name first to Kim Tim Jim Vestor, then to Kim Dotcom.

"Hong Kong, what an awesome place to do business and to host my new phantom persona," he wrote on TorrentFreak. "People there leave you alone and they are happy for your success."

It took a few years before authorities began paying attention to Megaupload.

In 2009, Forbes magazine wrote that little-known Carpathia Hosting had increased its business 100-fold almost overnight, and was suddenly generating 0.6 percent of all online traffic, at the time twice the bandwidth consumed by Facebook. It was because the hosting site had some new clients: Megaupload.com, Megarotic.com, Megaclick.com, Megavideo.com.

"Forbes readers probably haven't heard of them," Craig Labovitz of Arbor Networks, the Internet security provider, told the magazine. "Almost every teenager has."

The sites, Forbes said, were open to anyone with little or no money to download songs, TV shows or movies.

His notoriety again on the rise, Dotcom nevertheless managed to secure New Zealand residency in 2010, under a scheme to attract wealthy investors to the country. He invested 10 million New Zealand dollars ($8.4 million) in government bonds and sponsored a fireworks show in Auckland, the main city, to the delight of many including the mayor.

He leased one of the country's plushest mansions, worth $24 million. He also appeared to be settling down, having married Mona, a Filipina, and had three children with her.

In early 2011, U.S. porn site Perfect 10 sued Dotcom and Megaupload, claiming he was running a pirate site engaged in massive copyright infringement. Megaupload responded that it operated a virtual locker service, and had no control over what its users uploaded. The company added that it routinely removed any offending content whenever it received a notice of infringement.

The case was settled out of court. But Dotcom's problems were not over.

Kevin Suh, the senior vice president of content protection at the Motion Picture Association of America, said the association filed a detailed complaint against Megaupload in 2010, which triggered a federal investigation. Prosecutors claim the "mega conspiracy" netted Dotcom and others $175 million in illicit advertising revenue and download fees.

"He is the biggest copyright infringer in the world," Suh said to the AP.

Megaupload's lawyer, Ira Rothken, said the claims are without merit and will be fought vigorously.

He called the case an unwarranted show of force by authorities desperate to prove they are serious about battling copyright fraud. If federal authorities had a problem with Megaupload, Rothken said, they should have sued first in civil court rather than having people thrown in jail.

Dotcom now faces a series of charges in the U.S., including copyright fraud and money laundering. The racketeering charges alone carry a maximum sentence of 20 years.

In New Zealand last month, 10 years after threatening to kill himself on his 28th birthday, Dotcom planned a big celebration for his 38th. After all, those youthful fantasies of wealth and notoriety had come true.

But police were ready. On Jan. 20, the day before his birthday, they swooped down in helicopters onto the grounds of his mansion and cut their way into a safe room where they found Dotcom hiding. They also arrested three of his colleagues.

The party is on hold.

___

Associated Press writer David Rising in Berlin contributed to this story.

Check out the slideshow (below) for highlights from Kim Dotcom's legal fight since the Megaupload takedown.
Loading Slideshow...
  • New Zealand Arrests Web Baron

    This feed contains the video's "New Zealand Arrests Web Baron" info API

  • MegaUpload Founder's Lavish Lifestyle Interrupted By Arrest

    This feed contains the video's "MegaUpload Founder's Lavish Lifestyle Interrupted by Arrest" info API

  • Megaupload Founder Held In Custody

    This feed contains the video's "Megaupload Founder Held in Custody" info API

  • Bail Ruling To Come For Dotcom In New Zealand

    This feed contains the video's "Bail Ruling to Come For Dotcom in New Zealand" info API

  • Kim Dotcom Bail Denied In NZ

    This feed contains the video's "Kim Dotcom Bail Denied in NZ" info API

  • Kim Dotcom Wins Bail

  • Megaupload Founder Will Fight Piracy Charges

  • Kim Dotcom Granted Internet Access

  • Original Megaupload Search Warrants Ruled Invalid

    A New Zealand judge has ruled the warrants police used to raid Kim Dotcom's estate in January were invalid.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

WELLINGTON, New Zealand -- On his way up, he fooled them all: judges, journalists, investors and companies. Then the man who renamed himself Kim Dotcom finally did it. With an outsized ego and an eye...
WELLINGTON, New Zealand -- On his way up, he fooled them all: judges, journalists, investors and companies. Then the man who renamed himself Kim Dotcom finally did it. With an outsized ego and an eye...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 141
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dean M Miller
I Feed On The Tears Of Liberals
08:06 PM on 02/27/2012
watch out for the greedy pig american government! if you should happen to be smart enough to get rich then the federal government considers you public enemy #1 and they will spend millions of dollars to hunt you down across the globe, as they pretend they "protecting" the american people, then they seize everything with their slimy little claws and freeze your assets and find some way to trump up charges against you so that they can take all your money.
America: land of the free, home of the brave, and every tiny measly aspect of your very existence controlled by big government.
12:01 PM on 02/27/2012
Hail to the Chief. This man is simply a genius. How long did he manipulate people while fooling most of the world that Megaupload was a simple fileshare site? AND GOT RICH OFF IT? Hail to the King, baby.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omegas3
Is it an android you are or are you a quasar?
11:55 AM on 02/27/2012
thanks for the free stuff, while it lasted. mediafire, here I come!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
littlepuffycloud
I propose a toast to my self control...
11:16 AM on 02/27/2012
Newt's lovechild with mistress number 32?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NOCELL
Hang Up and DRIVE!!
10:31 AM on 02/27/2012
Next up on the table, authorities will once again go after Bill Gates for making ALLLLLLL of these issues possible............
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shawn Kelloway
10:24 AM on 02/27/2012
I don't understand the piracy thing anymore. How is this different than day traders on Wall Street. In simple terms and universal simplicity the process looks amazingly similar.

I make something which increases in value the more people buy it.

Given time, my "product" increases or decreases in value or demand.

People then buy or sell based on that demand but I don't see any of the money made from this process.

I am left, as the creator of the "product," to either make new products consumers demand or drive demand to my old products.

In the end, I don't see the money, as the product owner, from the sale of speculative demand on my product.

People aren't copying my product but people who copy music aren't passing it off as their own either?

Confusing....yes
photo
KarmaPatrol
Riverboat Gambler, satellite whisperer. Independe
09:57 AM on 02/27/2012
Anyone can do it if willing to break the law (copyright piracy, indoor grow of Mary Jane, boiler room stock sales and other financial instruments), but eventually the authorities find out. If not willing to leave the western world with a new identity and a suitcase full of belongings: "don't do the crime if you can't do the time". .. or just get a law degree and work in banking.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tonyjim
04:07 PM on 02/28/2012
Or just go to the Library, or down load your 5 free audios a week from Freegal.
09:49 AM on 02/27/2012
Is this a news piece or an opinion piece? Your story reads like the dialogue of a couple of guys in a bar. Keep your personal views, opinions and observations out of the story and just report the facts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tonyjim
04:10 PM on 02/28/2012
I was wondering about that, it sounds like the FBI or the Justice Dept. is trying to gain support for their case from U.S. citizens. This is where people need to dig a little deeper into the story, eventually this case might make its' way to the Supreme Court.
09:38 AM on 02/27/2012
Condemning Dotcom because there was pirated material uploaded to his site is like condemning a bank because stolen money was deposited.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
02:11 PM on 02/27/2012
If a bank KNOWS that a particular deposit is stolen money then they can be charged with money laundering or being an accessory after the fact.

Megaupload, even after being informed that a particular file was infringing continued to keep and serve the file through alternate URLs.

If they instead had deleted the file and invalidated all links to it then they most likely would still be in business, but vastly less popular..
02:23 PM on 02/27/2012
If a link were reported, it would be analyzed and if found to be a legitimate case of privacy, removed. Most links were never reported.

The knowledge of mega upload would be equivalent of a banks if illegitimate deposits were a statistical probability. The prosecution of banks relies on knowledge of a specific case and failure to act. Dotcom's relies on the knowledge that something, somewhere, was happening.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rMatey
old, recovered Xtian, Liberal
09:16 AM on 02/27/2012
He looks like a younger Rush Limp-paw walrus clone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
barkingcat
Woof?
08:37 AM on 02/27/2012
This guy looks like a very bloated Quentin Tarantino.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jordan Kratz
08:21 AM on 02/27/2012
I will side with Kim Dotcom.Sure they made mistakes at megaupload but they also had a large amount of legal users and they had a business where Artists got money directly from mega instead of a large record label.
These guys were a danger for large labels as they had a great competing system so they had to be taken out.RIAA pays off Washington is the real story.
08:06 AM on 02/27/2012
Hmm....Looks like this guy is the scapegoat. When are gonna get the ELEPHANT?

Youtube has tons of copyrighted videos uploaded without owner's permission. Even the user generated ones have tons of subtle copyright violations - like imitating a scene, singing a song, using dialogues from popular movie etc. Not just Hollywood, there are countless copyright protected foreign videos (like Chinese, Korean & Indian film Industries) shared without their permission.

Youtube only blocks the contents of Big, rich copyright corporations like Sony, Columbia etc...not ALL.


Is the Youtube president going to be arrested like this guy? Probably not.
doctorzap
Lies to the left of me, jokers to the right...
12:23 PM on 02/27/2012
The Elephant gets got come November. But you're right. This does sound like a case of scapegoating because this guy came up with a way to game the system. It sure doesn't sound like the users of his site are bringing him down, just those who are jealous of his business model.

As soon as they put him away, they'll take his ideas and try to cash in on them. That's how big biz works, isn't it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
galvestonguy68
03:24 PM on 02/27/2012
Having intimate knowledge of how this got started, Mathias basically copied YouTube for Kim. And when I say copied I mean he wrote software that walked all of YouTube's content and used it to start MegaVideo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Errant
Sic Transit Gloria Mundi
03:02 AM on 02/27/2012
Blah blah blah. I'd rather side with Megaupload against Hollywood. Piracy is illegal and probably bad but Hollywood is itself is a corrupt and mismanaged thing that has stagnated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Todd Sullivan
02:50 AM on 02/27/2012
i simply wish people would stop coming up with all the excuses of why they support sites like megaupload. look. just say the truth: instead of having to pay for content, you prefer getting it for free. every other rationalization people offer is pure garbage. just admit you want to get content for free and be done with it.

and of course, the second biggest reason close behind that one is that as long as no one is managing to exploit your services for free onto the world, then you're cool with it.

the rhetoric you hear on the subject of stolen content is absurd.
photo
crimghost
My bleeding heart? you should see the other guy's.
04:18 AM on 02/27/2012
megaupload was a virtual locker system. For him to be held accountable for what every user uploaded to his site you'd also have to hold the US gov't accountable for providing DNS servers allowing it's citizens to connect to megaupload and download content. He didn't upload the offending content. His service was abused and terms of service were broken by individual users from all over the world. DNS services are also being abused technically should the US gov't he held as accountable as Kim? Every ISP would also be legally responsible for what all of it's users do online. Television, monitor, and computer manufacturers should be held responsible for what customers watch on them? ISP's? If not, why not, their services facilitated an illegal act, no different than Kim's.

If he's found guilty this opens far too many doors for whoever the MPAA and RIAA want to be paid for "losses" from in the future.

Kim Dotcom is a scapegoat because the MPAA and RIAA want to put a face on an enemy and set an example with him. They shouldn't be allowed to.
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
05:37 AM on 02/27/2012
"megaupload was a virtual locker system. For him to be held accountable for what every user uploaded"

He is accountable if asked to remove the content, but doesn't.

"scapegoat because the MPAA and RIAA"
This isn't just about the MPAA/RIAA. This is also about the millions of other independent media producers (various media) who depend on their work for a living. It has to be the artist's, or the rights holder's, decision whether they allow "free" access to their material and/or 3rd party replication/distribution, not the general public to decide.

As a content producer, I invest much time and money (including equipment) in the process. It's hardly fair to allow the likes of Kim to knowingly facilitate theft of an artist's/producer's rightful content.

You can spin it any way you want, but if you don't have the rightful owner's permission, it's theft.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tonyjim
04:23 PM on 02/28/2012
Within this scheme, a Library will be held accountable for people who watch DVDs with visiting relatives or friends, they'll be accountable if someone checks out a CD and makes a backup copy for himself and his kids make an mp3 for their own pleasure. The MPAA and RIAA are only interested in the take down, but I hope they understand the ramifications, this could lead to a whole revamp of copyright laws and fair use.

The old business models will be destroyed, and producers and distributors will be pulled kicking and screaming and dragging, changing the way they do business forever, instead of waiting for another Whitney Houston to keel over and jacking up the prices on audios and videos to capitalize on the tiny incremental profit.