More

HuffPost Social Reading

San Francisco Public Art Fee Funds Public Art Though Building Construction (PHOTOS)

San Francisco Public Art Fee

First Posted: 02/27/2012 8:02 pm Updated: 02/28/2012 12:32 am

If there's one thing San Francisco loves, it's large-scale public art projects.

From Cupid's partly-submerged bow and arrow perched at the edge of the Embarcadero to legendary landscape architect Lawrence Halprin's iconic fountain at U.N. Plaza, the city is dotted with visionary sculptures and installations. Many of these pieces were funded by a law mandating downtown developers of projects over 25,000 square feet spend at least one percent of construction costs on public art that can be viewed, for free, by anyone.

(SCROLL DOWN FOR PHOTOS)

There's now legislation slated to go before the city's Board of Supervisors greatly expanding both the program's scope and impact.

The bill, introduced by Board of Supervisors President David Chiu, would require the one percent fee be applied to all large-scale development projects both Downtown and in SoMa, and also create a public art trust fund that developers could donate to in lieu of having to commission the art themselves.

"With this proposal, we are building on the success of the downtown public art fee and expanding its scope to enhance the arts in our densest neighborhood," Chiu told the San Francisco Examiner when he first proposed the bill in July. "We are also supporting local artists and arts organizations, who often struggle to create art in San Francisco in a challenging economic era."

Chiu, who pushed a similar idea on the campaign trail during his ultimately unsuccessful mayoral run, initially hoped to have the bill expand the fee to all new developments over 75,000 across the entire city. But he changed his tune after receiving some pushback both from local real estate developers and from City Hall, instead restricting the expansion exclusively to the tech hub located South of Market while shrinking the threshold to 25,000 square feet.

"I would have been fine to the one percent fee and apply it citywide," said Chiu during Monday afternoon's meeting of the Land Use Committee, "but I heard from a lot of folks around the city who said that it applying it everywhere would have disincentivized a lot of affordable housing from being built."

In addition to shrinking the area for the fee, Chiu also amended his proposed bill to only apply to new commercial developments in the expanded zone--leaving residential developments in SoMa unencumbered.

The trust fund, which developers could apply their mandated one percent fee to instead of commissioning the art themselves, would be overseen by the San Francisco Arts Commission and be applied toward not only creating the type of installations that traditionally come to mind when one thinks of "public art," but also commissioning outdoor performance pieces and giving money toward capital improvements at nearby arts organizations.

There was some talk last year about individual buildings losing final say to the Arts Commission in selecting the art that would be required on their premises, but those fears were scuttled by Chiu, who insisted at Monday's meeting that the Arts Commission would play no role in the selection process.

Jill Manton, director of policy and planning at the Arts Commission, told The Huffington Post that most residential buildings don't have big, publically accessible spaces to put public art, so the trust fund would be an easy way for them to fulfill their one percent requirement.

"It could really help a lot of arts organizations," said Manton.

While Manton noted that some people have expressed concern that developers opting to donate to the trust fund could prove a rarity because most would likely spend every possible cent directly increasing the value of their own buildings, she hopes that developers' potential association with a successful art project would pay for itself in good publicity.

The motion is going to be re-considered by the Land Use & Economic Development Commission at next week's meeting. If approved, it would then move to a vote before the full Board of Supervisors.

Take a look at some of our favorite pieces of public art around town below:

Launch Slideshow
 HIDE THUMBNAILS
SHARE
BACK TO ARTICLE
1 of 10
PLAY ALL
VOTE ON THIS SLIDE

ADVERTISEMENT

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SAN FRANCISCO

If there's one thing San Francisco loves, it's large-scale public art projects. From Cupid's partly-submerged bow and arrow perched at the edge of the Embarcadero to legendary landscape architect ...
If there's one thing San Francisco loves, it's large-scale public art projects. From Cupid's partly-submerged bow and arrow perched at the edge of the Embarcadero to legendary landscape architect ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:28 AM on 02/29/2012
There's a wonderful sculpture by Terry Allen of a headless man, attache case in hand, leaning into the wall of a SOMA office building (Harrison? near Rincon Center?)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:53 PM on 02/28/2012
I miss Jean Dubuffet's sculpture at the Embarcadero. It was always my favorite when I visited S.F.
Is it not there anymore?
There are just too many pics on that slide show, and they do not seem to be related to the subject.
I love all cities with a lot of public art. Public art is accessible for everybody, while the galleries and museums create an elitist atmosphere and keep a lot of regular people out.
photo
Politidelic
Death & Taxes
12:20 PM on 02/28/2012
I cannot stand that bow and arrow but I like all the rest of them. The bow and arrow is nothing more than an eye sore, I'd love to see it dismantled.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chi01
11:37 AM on 02/28/2012
Great works! Love almost all of them, i think they forgot about the giant rocket ship on the Embarcadero.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarilynBB
Marilyn Barnicke Belleghem M.Ed.
10:10 AM on 02/28/2012
Public art is something that stimulated thoughts and feelings that often leads to discussions. The individual reaction reveals a lot about the person. Some very nice pieces here! Children and those with their inner kid still alive love Keith Haring. I was sad when our city lost the chance to have one of his large pieces here.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrm3
09:59 AM on 02/28/2012
looks like a Keith Haring on the top

All I can say is 'meh'

I never really saw a proper sculpture park in this country until I moved to Des Moines, Iowa.

Pappajohn park for the win. More interesting and beautiful art in a small inner-city park than everything in these photos combined
photo
Politidelic
Death & Taxes
12:23 PM on 02/28/2012
Yeah but you're in Des Moines, Iowa. Meh.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrm3
01:33 PM on 02/28/2012
don't be so ignorant. i chose to live here from SF
05:41 AM on 02/28/2012
Really? How about paying for the reclamation of foreclosed homes and letting sweat equity/ homeless people live and work in those properties? I have an MFA but would never expect the People to pay for my poems.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:33 AM on 02/28/2012
Overall public art is San Francisco is a disgrace. Simple-minded, literal, political, probably cheap, and not often mindful of it's location/place.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:34 AM on 02/28/2012
...and in short, not beautiful.
11:56 PM on 02/27/2012
Wow, those people sculptures look like a child's Crayon drawing ...

...its San Francisco .. well, at least these public artworks didn't have giant dongs on em ..
photo
Pectin
Lie to me...
10:30 PM on 02/27/2012
Assisted in the installation of some of those pictured. The city has some nice pieces.