iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Stem Cells In Women's Ovaries Shown To Make New Eggs, Overturning Fertility 'Dogma'

Stem Cell

AP/The Huffington Post   First Posted: 02/27/2012 8:42 am Updated: 02/27/2012 8:42 am

WASHINGTON -- For 60 years, doctors have believed women were born with all the eggs they'll ever have. Now Harvard scientists are challenging that dogma, saying they've discovered the ovaries of young women harbor very rare stem cells capable of producing new eggs.

If Sunday's report is confirmed, harnessing those stem cells might one day lead to better treatments for women left infertile because of disease – or simply because they're getting older.

"Our current views of ovarian aging are incomplete. There's much more to the story than simply the trickling away of a fixed pool of eggs," said lead researcher Jonathan Tilly of Harvard's Massachusetts General Hospital, who has long hunted these cells in a series of controversial studies.

Tilly's previous work drew fierce skepticism, and independent experts urged caution about the latest findings.

A key next step is to see whether other laboratories can verify the work. If so, then it would take years of additional research to learn how to use the cells, said Teresa Woodruff, fertility preservation chief at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine.

Still, even a leading critic said such research may help dispel some of the enduring mystery surrounding how human eggs are born and mature.

"This is going to spark renewed interest, and more than anything else it's giving us some new directions to work in," said David Albertini, director of the University of Kansas' Center for Reproductive Sciences. While he has plenty of questions about the latest work, "I'm less skeptical," he said.

Scientists have long taught that all female mammals are born with a finite supply of egg cells, called ooctyes, that runs out in middle age. Tilly, Mass General's reproductive biology director, first challenged that notion in 2004, reporting that the ovaries of adult mice harbor some egg-producing stem cells. Recently, Tilly noted, a lab in China and another in the U.S. also have reported finding those rare cells in mice.

But do they exist in women? Enter the new work, reported Sunday in the journal Nature Medicine.

First Tilly had to find healthy human ovaries to study. He collaborated with scientists at Japan's Saitama Medical University, who were freezing ovaries donated for research by healthy 20-somethings who underwent a sex-change operation.

Tilly also had to address a criticism: How to tell if he was finding true stem cells or just very immature eggs. His team latched onto a protein believed to sit on the surface of only those purported stem cells and fished them out. To track what happened next, the researchers inserted a gene that makes some jellyfish glow green into those cells. If the cells made eggs, those would glow, too.

"Bang, it worked – cells popped right out" of the human tissue, Tilly said.

Researchers watched through a microscope as new eggs grew in a lab dish. Then came the pivotal experiment: They injected the stem cells into pieces of human ovary. They transplanted the human tissue under the skin of mice, to provide it a nourishing blood supply. Within two weeks, they reported telltale green-tinged egg cells forming.

That's still a long way from showing they'll mature into usable, quality eggs, Albertini said.

And more work is needed to tell exactly what these cells are, cautioned reproductive biologist Kyle Orwig of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, who has watched Tilly's work with great interest.

But if they're really competent stem cells, Orwig asked, then why would women undergo menopause? Indeed, something so rare wouldn't contribute much to a woman's natural reproductive capacity, added Northwestern's Woodruff.

Tilly argues that using stem cells to grow eggs in lab dishes might one day help preserve cancer patients' fertility. Today, Woodruff's lab and others freeze pieces of girls' ovaries before they undergo fertility-destroying chemotherapy or radiation. They're studying how to coax the immature eggs inside to mature so they could be used for in vitro fertilization years later when the girls are grown. If that eventually works, Tilly says stem cells might offer a better egg supply.

Further down the road, he wonders if it also might be possible to recharge an aging woman's ovaries.

The new research was funded largely by the National Institutes of Health. Tilly co-founded a company, OvaScience Inc., to try to develop the findings into fertility treatments.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

WASHINGTON -- For 60 years, doctors have believed women were born with all the eggs they'll ever have. Now Harvard scientists are challenging that dogma, saying they've discovered the ovaries of young...
WASHINGTON -- For 60 years, doctors have believed women were born with all the eggs they'll ever have. Now Harvard scientists are challenging that dogma, saying they've discovered the ovaries of young...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 143
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:56 PM on 02/28/2012
The stem cells shown are either embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells, along with feeder cells. I know its a stock photo but as a scientist it isn't an accurate representation of the phenomenon detailed in the article. As a stem cell scientist, I had a chuckle :)
krist6804
retired, tired and been retreaded 3x
03:10 PM on 02/28/2012
Should the GOP birth control police and especially Mr. Santorum find out about this information, they most likely will pass a law making it mandatory for all women under 75 to have their ovaries recharged prior to qualifying for social security benefits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George Dayton
1st Supply Battalion
01:59 PM on 02/28/2012
Don't tell republicans, the eggs will be outlawed...
03:23 PM on 02/28/2012
Yea with them around you can never go far
04:54 AM on 02/28/2012
There may be opportunity for great sport in disparaging the reproductive rights of others, but unless you or someone you love is dealing with the problem, you just can not appreciate the importance of this breakthrough. I tip my hat to the scientists for their progress and wish them future luck. To the makers of insensitive comments goes my profound sympathy for your juvenile mental development. May you live your life in ignorance and never be challenged by grief.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
littlepuffycloud
I propose a toast to my self control...
11:13 AM on 02/28/2012
f&f for your compassion, kindness and understanding.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LuLuismoir
11:28 PM on 02/27/2012
Ha! I've been saying this for years. I never believed a woman was born with all her eggs and the eggs were still viable at age 42 but not at age 43. Come on. It's obvious to me that something either turns on or turns off as a woman approaches perimenopause, thus causing the deterioration of any remaining eggs and/or no new ones to be produced. I think this fellow is on the right track.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
J0E1
Don't blame me, I'm not a republicrat.
10:55 AM on 02/28/2012
What do you mean "still viable at 42 but not at 43"?  If women are born with all their eggs, they can no longer have children at 43 because the last of the eggs was released when they were 42.  I'm not saying either theory is correct but your reason for why the original theory can't be is flawed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LuLuismoir
01:59 PM on 02/28/2012
Many women are able to have a healthy pregnancy at age 42 but generally by 43 and beyond, that ability dramatically drops (I know this from personal and anecdotal evidence). My OB/GYN agreed it's far easier to get pregnant at 41 or 42 than at 43 or 44. If it's true that it's because eggs age, then why would a year or two make such a dramatic difference? Of course, I'm referring to women of robust fertility. It seems to indicate a change that begins when a woman enters perimenopause that either turns something on or off that corrupts the cell division of eggs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George Dayton
1st Supply Battalion
02:00 PM on 02/28/2012
he's just relitivly speaking...jeez
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mtka
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the
10:55 PM on 02/27/2012
Couldn't this time and money be spent more wisely on finding homes for children who need parents and not on further overpopulation of this little planet?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Margaret Penny Wood
12:00 AM on 02/28/2012
Obviously you have never experienced the sadness of infertility - a problem that causes devastation for many people. It is research like this that can lead to medical breakthroughs we have never dreamed of.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mtka
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the
12:07 AM on 02/28/2012
So deal with it! It wasn't meant to be! Give love to a child without parents, or who was unwanted! You don't need little copies of yourself to be a complete human being.
10:27 PM on 02/27/2012
My grandmother had her last child when she was 51. My mother is 77 now and I think alot of problems are because of the medicines we take and the food we eat with all the extras that are added to them. She had 13 kids total and no problems at all. Just a thought
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mtka
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the
10:58 PM on 02/27/2012
So, in other words, your grandmother bred like a rabbit. So?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Ipswich, Mass. 1641
07:58 AM on 02/28/2012
you're kind of aDick
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
propackage
01:08 AM on 02/28/2012
The chronic medicine delivery in the world today is a problem. Just look at the contraindications that follow the adds. It seems that the cures are worse than the diseases.
10:23 PM on 02/27/2012
maybe I missed it. Are these enbrionic or adult stem cells? there is a big difference and no ethical issues with adult stem cells
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nix28
Ignorance stirs my inner demon...Sorry.
12:01 AM on 02/28/2012
These were adult stem cells from women that underwent female-to-male gender reassignment surgery which includes removal of the ovaries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Margaret Penny Wood
12:04 AM on 02/28/2012
They are egg-producing cells. They could not possibly be embryonic cells that have been fertilized. These are cells that can produce the eggs women have in their ovaries, but may have stopped or a problem has caused premature lack of egg production. An egg is the same thing that is shed every month that a woman is not pregnant.
08:24 PM on 02/27/2012
Lets all put aside our scientific, religious, and political differences for just a moment. I am sure we can all agree that the world would be better off if certain individuals do not reproduce. A few minutes at Walmart on any given afternoon will affirm that particular notion. I do not believe that is the intent of this study. Does anyone out there really believe that we could possibly have too much information about the reproduction and preservation of our species?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George Dayton
1st Supply Battalion
02:04 PM on 02/28/2012
thanks for the reminder....gotta run to walmart..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:39 AM on 02/29/2012
So you go to walmart?
cireneed
looking for some light...even a little
08:14 PM on 02/27/2012
I won't form an opinion on this until I find out what Rick Sanitarium has to say about the biblical view.
photo
Computer Geek
Logician Atheist Lefty
08:00 PM on 02/27/2012
But didn't I read another article where doctors speculated that the aging process was because of the elimination of stem cells and therefore normal somatic cells weren't able to keep 'repairing' damaged cells thus leading to heart disease, cancer and all the other effects that seem to be associated with aging and death? If so, it would appear that a whole host of human disease and death might lead to a very simple cure - fix and/or replace the stem cells and the body then recovers the ability to fix itself and continue. There are some ethics questions raised by women having the opportunity for childbirth at 70 (not to mention the ethics of people living to 200 years or more overall) but also the problem of overpopulation as addressed by many other commenters on here. But perhaps we could develop a protocol where if people were given stem cells to increase their longevity, they would commit to sterilization after a certain age (just one possibility and one that would have its own ethics discussion by itself!).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Cash
Enlisted in 1971 - Retired in 1996
10:14 PM on 02/27/2012
There are several theories regarding the cause of aging. The most convincing is the discovery that chromosomal telomeres (a protein tag at the ends of chromosomes) become shorter and shorter through every generation of cell division. The length of these telomeres seems to determine how often and how successfully a cell divides. Eventually the telomeres become so short that the cells are unable to divide at all and the cells simply age and die. Stem cells have the potential to provide cells that have chromosomes with undamaged telomeres thus reversing the aging process.
07:01 PM on 02/28/2012
A telomere is a repetitive sequence of DNA found on the end of a chromosome, it is not a protein. Also cells have the ability to repair and extend their telomeres via telomerase, a protein that adds the repetitive DNA sequence to the ends of the chromosomes using an RNA template.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanJake
Just another all-American blend
07:51 PM on 02/27/2012
Count your blessings. If some of the highly egotistic billionaire or celebrity males found a way to clone themselves by placing their stem cells in eggs, I can hardly imagine the full consequences of that action.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tomtom2
SomeOligarchs need a good old fashion Vulcan Pinch
07:43 PM on 02/27/2012
Great. Now we can over populate the world much quicker. Doesn't anybody get it yet?

People complain about pollution, global warming and all the other myriad environmental problems but they never look inward as they keep pumping out the little statues of themselves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FEsrigoHL
06:49 PM on 02/27/2012
Nature is telling you something when you are infertile. mistakes in replication cause defects. People should be more PRODUCTIVE rather than reproductive. Only the most fit ( smart, healthy, SANE) should reproduce. In times past families would not allow their kids to marry into families witrh big defects if they loved the kids. They understood such unions were BAD NEWS. High birth rates were necessary prior to the 20th century due to disease and famines & wars, etc. It is now counterproductive. Things should not be done just because they can be.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rich Cash
Enlisted in 1971 - Retired in 1996
10:19 PM on 02/27/2012
Wow...have you ever heard of the "eugenics" programs espoused by racist American biologists in the early 20th century? The Nazi's certainly did and carried the program to extremes in WWII. Who decides who has the right to reproduce? You?
photo
metmedvid
What you know isn't always what you should know
03:48 AM on 02/28/2012
9 billion is the number mathmeticians and scientists have determined is the breaking point. After 9 billion the planet can no longer indefinitly reproduce enough resources. Curious as to your answer to that since we will hit 9 billion in less than 20 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Margaret Penny Wood
12:07 AM on 02/28/2012
Some couples simply want the joy of having one child. It is not up to others to make that decision for them unless you want to go back to those days in China, but wait, even the Chinese in those times allowed one child!
06:43 PM on 02/27/2012
This may complete the liberal cycle of death.....
Stem cell procedures to cure infertility followed by pregnancy, and finally
the heartless murdering of the fetus.
Who says you can't have your cake and eat it, too???
Just vote the party line.
photo
metmedvid
What you know isn't always what you should know
03:54 AM on 02/28/2012
Now this has got to get the rediculous award for the month.