iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Birth Control Measure Gets Senate Vote On Thursday

Harry Reid Blunt Amendment

First Posted: 02/28/2012 5:36 pm Updated: 03/ 1/2012 12:37 pm

WASHINGTON -- The Senate will vote Thursday on a contentious Republican measure that would allow any employer to refuse to insure birth control or any other health service for any moral reason. And for the most part, Democrats couldn't be happier.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Tuesday that he has agreed to attach Sen. Roy Blunt's (R-Mo.) amendment to an unrelated transportation bill when that measure comes to a vote on Thursday. Reid said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) "insisted" on tying the amendment to the legislation if Democrats wanted to advance the bill, which Reid said is "extremely important" because it would save or create 1.8 million jobs.

"It's hard to understand why my Republican colleagues think this topic deserves to be debated in the first place," Reid told reporters. "Once we put this extreme, distracting proposal behind us, I'm hoping my Republican colleagues will stop living in the past and join us this year, 2012, and help us create jobs."

Blunt applauded Reid for bringing forward his amendment, which he has argued includes the same conscience protection language that has been part of law for almost 40 years.

"Glad Sen Reid is going to allow a vote on my bipartisan amdt to protect religious freedom this Thursday. #HHSMandate," Blunt tweeted Tuesday.

Senate Democrats have railed against the proposed amendment because it would water down or nullify many of the landmark reforms they voted in with the Affordable Care Act. They have also charged Republicans with playing politics with women's health.

"Every woman has the right to make decisions about her own health and for her family," Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) said on the Senate floor. "We've seen proposal after proposal that would inject politics into the decisions women make with their doctors. Now we're seeing an all-out attack on a woman's right to protect her health by buying contraceptives."

"We're in a situation in the 21st century where, in order to move forward on a highway bill that funds our highways, our roads, our bridges, our transit systems, in order to move forward on that jobs bill, where 2.8 million jobs are at stake in this great nation, we have to have a vote on birth control," Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said on the Senate floor. "I just want to say to my friends on the other side of the aisle, what are you thinking?"

But for all their outrage, most can't wait to cast their votes on a women's health issue that continues to fire up their base and bring in more money for their party.

Democrats are "literally thrilled," said a senior Senate Democratic aide. "Reid said three weeks ago that he'd be happy to vote on it at a time of [Republicans'] choosing."

In fact, in recent days, Democrats have done anything but shy away from a chance keep the issue in the spotlight ahead of the November elections. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has been circulating a petition that calls on supporters to reject the Blunt amendment "and its assault on health care reform." Over in the House, Rep. Diane DeGette (D-Colo.) is just the latest Democratic lawmaker to send out an email, via the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, urging supporters to give money to help combat Republicans' "war on women."

"Never in my lifetime have I seen Republicans in Congress so determined to silence women and deny us access to basic preventative health care. The most powerful and important thing we can do is hold them accountable and defeat them," DeGette wrote in a Tuesday email.

"With the critical February Federal Election Commission deadline approaching, we are still $148,000 short of our $1 million grassroots goal. Will you help put us over the top?"

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The Senate will vote Thursday on a contentious Republican measure that would allow any employer to refuse to insure birth control or any other health service for any moral reason. And fo...
WASHINGTON -- The Senate will vote Thursday on a contentious Republican measure that would allow any employer to refuse to insure birth control or any other health service for any moral reason. And fo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,555
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:01 PM on 03/01/2012
Hey all. Planned parenthood has a website to 'check in' when you have sex and rate it, and tell them if you used the condoms with the chips on it they handed out. The site is cute and set up to attract young people, even if they are 12. I guess they want them to use their condoms. Another hands up for the Obama administration and his love of taking over the position of molding our children!!! site is called Where did you wear it. Look it up. I am sure that word will get around to the ten year olds who are computer savvy and who knows how that will influence them. But then again, the Obamas would not want us to influence our children with good morals. That is only reserved for them. And don't worry. Abortions are coming soon to your local school and the kids don't even have to tell the parents. Just fill up the bucket with more dead babies. They have no value, according to them.
09:22 PM on 02/29/2012
What if an employer is a believer in faith healing? No coverage of anything at all? I bet if this passes, lots of employers will suddenly become big believers in faith healing.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Helloise
Healthy skeptic admires reason, trusts intuition
04:32 PM on 02/29/2012
Every day is groundhog day for the right, except in this case, they had to dig up the groundhog, who died half a century ago.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dancenownzen
03:06 PM on 02/29/2012
First of all Birth Control should be renamed to PREGNANCY PREVENTION.

Second. If people are "smart" they will freeze their eggs / sperm and have their tubes tied or get a vasectomy. This insures no need for contraception or an abortion what ever these REPUBLICANS do to destroy free choice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Killermolls44
The night is dark and full of terrors.
11:48 PM on 02/29/2012
For us women, especially women who are young like me it is difficult to get our tubes tied. Doctors often refuse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:41 PM on 03/01/2012
Got a solution that the dems would love. Force the doctors to do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roroma
My offer is this: nothing.
02:13 PM on 02/29/2012
Let me first say that I am a Catholic - born, baptized, penanced, communioned, confirmed, married, awaiting last rites. Please tell me how I defend my Church in this controversy. The issue is dividing us, taking precious time from the business of the country, creating resentment & anger - all because the Catholic Church, even in its affiliated businesses, is hysterically screaming that their most sacred beliefs are being assaulted by requirements to comply with the same secular laws that all businesses must follow. The church-affiilated businesses, not the Church. And yet, it is well-known that the Vatican orders (as it has done in the past) nuns in war zones to take birth control pills. I ask my Church - could you not have saved us all this grief by keeping your hypocrisy in check? Just this once?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:51 PM on 03/01/2012
Dont you see how evil the current administration is? Since Obama took office, there are no longer normal days. Instead, days are spent wondering what control measures they are going to inflict on us next. Conversations are spent talking politics. Then he signs the NDAA a further threat to our freedom. All of his czars are like Hitlers buddies. I have never seen anything like this. HUGE government of cronies. Dictators do this. It becomes them against us. Now they attack religion. I would love to see him attack the Muslim religion like this and order them to do something that is against their beliefs. HE WOULD NOT DARE> THEY HAVE MORE RIGHTS THAN US. Obama is taking the right of religion away from American citizens. He started this whole mess and they spun it by saying that the right is attacking womens rights. His bull-s... spin is what got him into office. All of you better wake up. THE PROBLEM IS THAT CHRISTIANS JEWS AND OTHER RELIGION SECTS ARE NOT STANDING UP FOR THEIR RIGHTS STRONGLY ENOUGH. YOU ARE ALL AFRAID OF HIM. Women and men have personally taken care of their bedroom affairs without his help. Tell him and Michelle to stay in their own bedroom and not in the church buildings. All this man is a bout is creating division. hate anger. that is their ploy to destroy us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coyotefever105
A Conservative/Libertarian Rogue
01:44 PM on 02/29/2012
What a weasel move! Using jobs to push a birth control legislation.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
bklynsparrow
creating reality from unreal things
01:44 PM on 02/29/2012
I wonder if the Republicans have even fathomed the insanity they will unleash if their amendment passes. The implications of the bill are far beyond employers and health insurance. It gives individuals the right to give or with hold medical care based on their individual beliefs- we already see that now with idiot pharmacists who object to birth control pills refusing to fill prescriptions, and in one case, even refusing to give back the prescription to the customer. So think about that getting extended to every business and service. We should just toss in the towel, throw out the Constitution and become Uganda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roroma
My offer is this: nothing.
02:45 PM on 02/29/2012
Hi, bklynsparrow. F & F.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
bklynsparrow
creating reality from unreal things
05:08 PM on 02/29/2012
And to you, roroma. Love your puppy! :)
photo
1oldhippie
yes, WE can again!
01:36 PM on 02/29/2012
Help me out...
If this amendment is to 'fail', so too does the highway bill?
So to pass the highway bill, this pos amendment becomes law?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhoenixLady
01:27 PM on 02/29/2012
This doesn't protect "religious freedom" it grants a special privilege to discriminate for any reason you would like, unquestioned. Naw...that won't be abused...not at all.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
rtgmath
There has got to be a better way!
12:29 PM on 02/29/2012
Dear HP moderators. My comment was timely and accurate, noting that any objection for any reason just or unjust would serve as a moral objection. Please post my comment!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Downrivers
Siskiyou Mountains
11:44 AM on 02/29/2012
According to Roy Blunt's Bill decisions concerning the taxpayer's healthcare can be based on Sharia Law.....time to cleanse Capitol Hill of the Taliban. This means you, Scott Brown
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roroma
My offer is this: nothing.
11:28 AM on 02/29/2012
I have a question, and I would appreciate comments from those who know more about this than I do: when a religious organization operates (or is affiliated with) a business, do they have to follow federal laws and guidelines such as EEOC mandates, labor laws, environmental regulations, etc.? Suppose the church has a moral objection on the grounds that with ANY regulation, the government would be infringing on the authority of the church to run its organizations as it sees fit? Or suppose, since the Vatican does not consider females equal to males (the submission doctrine), a church-run business decides to pay women less for the same work (just an example)? How far could the moral objection clause reach?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Downrivers
Siskiyou Mountains
11:51 AM on 02/29/2012
The court has ruled that when a church charters a business with the state, then that business becomes secular

Bradfield v. Roberts, 1899 "The Court held that the secular charter granted to the (catholic) hospital and controlled by Congress made the hospital a secular corporation, regardless of who actually operated it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roroma
My offer is this: nothing.
12:20 PM on 02/29/2012
Then . . . why all this controversy? And thank you for the information. I tried to research this, but was unsuccessful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bluepond
person
10:41 AM on 02/29/2012
Look at what is behind these anti-family-planning initiatives. Industry needs to avoid falling birth rates to keep demand going (witness Japan) and to supply the next generation of burger-flippers and low-wage servants. Racists to keep up the supply of anglos. Republicans need to keep up the supply of little conservatives. Sexists need to get women trapped back in their houses and to get them out of the workforce in order to gain back their old dominating roles.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ennis438
10:38 AM on 02/29/2012
Good. now if this passes then i can withhold my share of taxes that goes to fighting Bush the Terrible wars that i morally oppose, as well as foreign aid for israel,Egypt, Saudi Arabia etc, as well as corporate welfare. I should get quite a break in taxes and I am sure the Republipunks will be behind me because they want to withhold funding for things they don't like.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roroma
My offer is this: nothing.
11:02 AM on 02/29/2012
Outstanding. Awesome.
03:40 PM on 02/29/2012
Can I withhold my taxes from funding Congress?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ennis438
10:56 AM on 03/01/2012
Why not .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
linnwood
10:22 AM on 02/29/2012
Great move Sen Blunt....As an employer it is against my beliefs to cover anything having to do with prostate problems,or getitup problems.....but I will agree to cover castration.