iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ohio Shale Drilling Could Boost Economy, Study Claims

First Posted: 02/29/2012 3:10 pm Updated: 02/29/2012 3:10 pm

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — An academic team enlisted by Ohio's business sector released a study Tuesday that finds oil and gas drilling will mean more than 65,000 jobs and an almost $4.9 billion investment in the state's economy by 2014.

Findings of the eight-month study were released to the media and members of the Ohio Shale Coalition, a partnership of energy interests spearheaded by the Ohio Chamber of Commerce.

The group commissioned the study in hopes of displaying the benefits to Ohio's ailing economy of a boom in shale drilling, including the controversial practice of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.

A team of economics, energy and geology experts from Cleveland State University, Ohio State University and Marietta College's Department of Petroleum put together the report.

It found that by 2014, about $4.9 billion would be invested in Ohio's economy by the industry; almost 66,000 jobs would be created or "supported" by industry growth; $433 million in local and state taxes would be generated; and energy companies would be paying wages and benefits totaling $3.3 billion.

Altogether, the industry will generate $1.7 billion for Ohio's economy this year, $5.8 billion next year, and nearly $10 billion in 2014, the research found. Gross state product could grow by 1 percent, a significant increase from the 0.6 percent average for the past 13 years.

"This really has the potential of being transformational," said Ned Hill, dean of the urban affairs college at Cleveland State University and one of the researchers.

State Rep. Robert Hagan, a Youngstown Democrat, said he is hopeful for the benefits that will come to his northeast Ohio region from the new industry — but the industry is moving too fast, and without checks and balances.

He announced Tuesday that he has gathered 1,500 signatures from his constituents — whose area has been struck by a series of 11 earthquakes potentially linked to high-pressure injection of fracking wastewater into the earth. The petitions seek legislative hearings on fracking. The practice stimulates gas production by blasting millions of gallons of chemically treated water into a well drilled horizontally through shale about a mile underground.

"We admit that it's moving, but we will not say that we are going to ignore the safety factors, the environmental factors," he said.

Ohio Department of Natural Resources spokesman Carlo LoParo said the state is tripling the budget of its oil and gas division this year, due to increased drilling activity.

"We will have more than 110 inspectors and field staff in our oil and gas division to make sure all laws and environmental regulations are observed and enforced," he said. Money for that endeavor comes from fees assessed on the oil and gas industry, he said.

Employment projections contained in the report include both new and "supported" jobs, 16,000 in the service sector. That sector includes hotels, restaurants, doctors and other personal services. It anticipates 1,000 environmental compliance officers, construction jobs

Douglas Southgate, co-director of the Subsurface Energy Resource Center at Ohio State University, said the shale industry plays to Ohio's economic strengths, in the areas of manufacturing, plastics, and R&D.

Hagan, and fellow Democratic Reps. Mike Foley and Kenny Yuko are backing a proposal raising the state severance tax on recovery gas wells to 7 percent. The new rate would eventually raise proceeds from $2.6 million to $500 million. Some of that would be earmarked for local communities and alternative energy development.

Gov. John Kasich has called a moratorium within a 5-mile radius of a deep-injection well shut down after the Youngstown quakes, awaiting results of a state investigation into the cause. Deep-injection wells are for wastewater, and are not the same as wells for exploring or extracting oil and natural gas.

___

Online:

Ohio Shale Coalition Study: http://tinyurl.com/6pq2kvk

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Filed by Jessica Leader  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
07:31 AM on 03/02/2012
ENERGY!
-me-
D to go forward, R to go backwards
11:50 PM on 03/01/2012
Bruch of fracking liers!
Turning vast stretches of Pennsylvania into a pincushion in order to ship gas to China

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-big-fracking-bubble-the-scam-behind-the-gas-boom-20120301#ixzz1nvpuJFW2
09:32 PM on 03/01/2012
Are you kidding me, HuffPo? You post a shale coalition study that is a "partnership of energy interests" about the job impacts of shale to Ohio but completely miss the unbiased and more objective (non-industry funded) study released just months prior? Wow, money really can buy you better press.

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/business/2011/12/15/study-doubts-shale-gas-will-create-many-jobs.html
photo
rak6748
Love-Respect-Integrity
02:51 AM on 03/02/2012
'A team of economics, energy and geology experts from Cleveland State University, Ohio State University and Marietta College's Department of Petroleum put together the report.'
01:05 PM on 03/02/2012
Yes. Hired by and funded by the Ohio Shale Coalition, a partnership between the Ohio Chamber of commerce and various members of the business sector with "energy interests". What businesses do you think have the most interest in energy in Ohio?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:06 PM on 03/01/2012
yeah most of those jobs are good "career" jobs for our kids trucking all that toxic cra*****p all over the place.....not.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dallas Dunlap
03:36 PM on 03/01/2012
I'm sure that the fracking industry will produce some jobs...at least until such time as the gas runs out. But what about the externalities? What are the costs of polluted water and damaged farmland, or business opportunities foregone because of potential earthquakes, etc?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markspence
05:30 PM on 03/01/2012
Current estimates are a 100 year supply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
12:00 PM on 03/01/2012
"An academic team enlisted by Ohio's business sector released a study Tuesday that finds oil and gas drilling will mean more than 65,000 jobs and an almost $4.9 billion investment in the state's economy by 2014."

Operative words: 'enlisted by Ohio's business sector'.

Not buying it for a second. This is about priming the field to get a desperate public to accept this type of environmental devastation, ignoring the consequences to enrich this sector, period.

It's also kicking the can down the road as this also will prove to be a short term venture for our energy needs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
observingstupiditydaily
Nice to be important,but more important to be nice
02:08 PM on 03/01/2012
F & F Might as well have said the Chamber of Commerce!
photo
psandysdad
The older you get, the more excuses you have.
11:36 AM on 03/01/2012
Ohio is dying. We have to try something. Else before long only those who are too poor or too old to move will be left.

We need jobs like this to support other jobs: we have world-class hospitals in NE Ohio, but if you can't afford to use them.....what good are they? Only good jobs carry medical benefits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
observingstupiditydaily
Nice to be important,but more important to be nice
02:23 PM on 03/01/2012
So what's living worth when your water is fouled and your air is toxic? The earthquakes that have occurred and attributed to drilling, are you prepared to lose everything? At the epicenter of a spill, will the doctors at the hospitals have access to the chemicals that you've been exposed to? In PA the doctors must request the oil companies divulge the chemicals, how long does that take?
Ohio already takes a majority of the "brine" from Pennsylvania, you know the chemically laced fracking fluid that has to be dumped somewhere like in your backyard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
organicconnect
11:35 AM on 03/01/2012
The claim that fracking will increase employment may well be true, but not in the sense that this "study" wants us to believe. The increased employment will be in the toxic remediation sector, a growing field that follows behind our fossil fuel obsession. Another sector that will see job growth with the expansion of fracking is health care. Poison more water, land and livestock and you will naturally have more sick people to care for. http://organicconnectmag.com/wp/the-detoxification-of-america/
photo
freedom1947
San Juan River Fishin'
11:11 AM on 03/01/2012
Make that dollar and to hell with the future of your children.
04:40 AM on 03/01/2012
And who is paying these 'experts' to make such claims??? Here we go again...the lying game for the sake of profits and to hell with people's health. We never learn, do we? Make these 'experts' drink the water once it has been contaminated because of the chemicals being used to 'frack' have seeped into the water tables.
photo
Cunningham
I intend to live forever, or die trying. GrouchoM
04:03 AM on 03/01/2012
If you do it, Ohio, you'll be poisoning your land and yourselves. What are you going to do when neighboring States sue you for the damage you'll do to them as well?
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
10:54 PM on 02/29/2012
Their has got to be something wrong with any person who would drill
a hole under themselves, put a bomb down there and blow it up.
Their is no better example of a roadrunner cartoon than that.
How do they know what the future might hold for that land and
resources. I have a wonderful well on my proprerty that provides me
with spring water that was a natural watering place even for the Indians
wh lived here for thousands of years. These nutcases would totaly
ruin that for some gas that might or might not be there and then just
leave to go ruin someone elses life.
I also have water from the municiple water company. I do not drink or cook
with it though. The well water is hooked to the sprayer hose.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
11:15 PM on 02/29/2012
What I really need is solar panels on my pump house to run
the pump with. In emergency cases I could even provide my
neighbors with water. Some do bring gallon milk jugs when
the water is cut of for repairs and such. I do have a hand pump
in the pumphouse also.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
12:33 AM on 03/01/2012
you talking about gas stations?
08:40 PM on 02/29/2012
How can state inspectors monitor what is going on if the oil/gas companies refuse to divulge what chemicals they are pumping into their wells? In addition, nobody knows what pumping all that chemical infused water will do in any respect. Basically, there is only the oil/gas companies' say-so that the practice is totally safe.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
07:36 AM on 03/02/2012
Fracking ingredients are required by federal law to be listed on job sites. They can be found on any MSDS sheet available to anyone who wants them under the Right to Know Act. You can also get them at any state DEP website if you bother to look:

www.dep.wv.gov/oil-and-gas/Documents/SLB%20WV%20Fracture%20Solutions.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Fanney
Scribbler
08:21 PM on 02/29/2012
Short term gain, long term loss. We'd be far, far better served investing in alternative energy jobs.
07:22 PM on 02/29/2012
Economic Benefits At What Price?

At first glance, fracking natural gas seems like an ideal answer to the need for cleaner energy, lower fuel prices, new jobs, and a boost to local economies. However, these economic benefits come at a high price. The hazardous and carcinogenic chemicals used in fracturing fluids are not regulated because fracking was exempted from the Safe Drinking Water Act in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 – the infamous “Halliburton Loophole.” It is becoming increasing clear that current fracking practices, which are not adequately regulated, create environmental problems, such as contaminated groundwater, pipeline leaks, and health risks, such as skin rashes, respiratory infections, tumors.

Given the notable risks to public health and the environment, until there is greater scientific certainty that fracking is not harmful, all players should follow the “precautionary principle”. This means that the burden of proof is on energy companies to prove that fracking is safe. If fracking is as safe as energy companies claim, then complying with national standards for clean drinking water should not be an issue.

While states are often the best suited to deal with local geology and drilling issues, many question some states’ ability to manage fracking activities in light of too few resources for enforcement and susceptibility to lobbying by big business.

- Vreni Hommes