iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.S.: North Korea Agrees To Suspend Nuclear Activities

AP  |  By Posted: 02/29/2012 9:14 am Updated: 03/ 2/2012 10:59 am

WASHINGTON (AP) — North Korea raised hopes Wednesday for a major easing in nuclear tensions under its youthful new leader, agreeing to suspend uranium enrichment at a major facility and refrain from missile and nuclear tests in exchange for a mountain of critically needed U.S. food aid.

It was only a preliminary step but a necessary one to restart broader six-nation negotiations that would lay down terms for what the North could get in return for abandoning its nuclear weapons program. Pyongyang pulled out of those talks in 2009 and seemingly has viewed the nuclear program as key to the survival of its dynastic, communist regime, now entering its third generation.

The announcement, just over two months after the death of longtime ruler Kim Jong Il, opened a door for the secretive government under his untested youngest son, Kim Jong Un, to improve ties with the United States and win critically needed aid and international acceptance.

It also opened the way for international inspections for the North's nuclear program, which has gone unmonitored for years.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the agreement, announced at separate but simultaneous statements by the longtime adversaries, was a modest step but also "a reminder that the world is transforming around us."

"We, of course, will be watching closely and judging North Korea's new leaders by their actions," Clinton told a congressional hearing.

The U.S. has accused North Korea of reneging on past nuclear commitments. An accord under the six-party talks collapsed in 2008 when Pyongyang refused to abide by verification that U.S. diplomats claimed had been agreed upon.

The North Korean Foreign Ministry's statement, issued by the state-run news agency, said the North had agreed to the nuclear moratoriums and U.N. inspectors "with a view to maintaining positive atmosphere" for the U.S.-North Korea talks.

North Korea faces tough U.N. sanctions that were tightened in 2009 when it conducted its second nuclear test and fired a long-range rocket. In late 2010, it unveiled a uranium enrichment facility that could give North Korea a second route to manufacture nuclear weapons in addition to its existing plutonium-based program.

In the meantime, its people have continued to go hungry. The North suffered a famine in the 1990s that killed hundreds of thousands of people, and chronic food shortages persist. U.S. charities reported after a trip to North Korea late last year that children were suffering "slow starvation."

Pyongyang appealed for U.S. food aid a year ago, and the two countries had been moving toward a deal at the time of Kim Jong Il's death.

Clinton said North Korea and the U.S. will meet to finalize details for a proposed package totaling 240,000 metric tons of food aid. She said intensive monitoring of the aid would be required, a reflection of U.S. concerns that food could be diverted to the North's powerful military.

A senior Obama administration official said it was only last week, in talks in Beijing that presaged Wednesday's announcement, that the North dropped its demand for rice and grains — viewed as easier to divert — and agreed to accept the U.S. "nutritional assistance" such as corn-soy blend and other food targeted to young children and pregnant women.

The official spoke to reporters on condition of anonymity because of diplomatic sensitivity.

North Korea's chief rival, South Korea, a staunch U.S. ally supported by 28,000 American troops, welcomed the agreement, although it has yet to receive the apology it wants from the North for two military attacks that killed 50 South Koreans in 2010.

Those hostilities nearly pitched the divided peninsula into war. The elder Kim's Dec. 17 death fueled concern that the North could attack again and conduct another nuclear test.

Wednesday's announcement should ease those concerns, and was a welcome development for President Barack Obama in an election year when he will be looking to avoid another security crisis to add to the pressing list of urgent U.S. foreign policy concerns. Those include Iran's nuclear program, the bloodshed in Syria and a deeply unstable Afghanistan.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said he hoped North Korea would move toward "a verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula." Britain's Foreign Secretary William Hague said it was positive news, and that the change in North Korean leadership offered a chance for "renewed engagement with the international community."

Outsiders have been closely watching how Kim Jong Un, believed to be in his late 20s, handles nuclear diplomacy with the United States and delicate relations with South Korea. His consolidation of power, with the help of senior advisers who worked with his father and grandfather, appears to be going smoothly, although determining the intentions and internal dynamics in Pyongyang is notoriously difficult.

Many observers doubt that North Korea will ever give up its nuclear program. Since Kim Jong Il's death, North Korea has vowed to maintain the late leader's policies and has linked its nuclear program to his legacy.

"North Korea uses (the nuclear program) as leverage to win concessions in return for disarmament measures. Since Kim Jong Il's death, it has called (the program) the country's most important achievement," said Baek Seung-joo, an analyst at the state-run Korea Institute for Defense Analyses in South Korea. "There is still a long way to go."

While Democratic lawmakers in the U.S. welcomed the agreement, some Republicans reacted with skepticism.

"Pyongyang will likely continue its clandestine nuclear weapons program right under our noses. We have bought this bridge several times before," said Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, chairwoman of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee.

The administration official who spoke on condition of anonymity echoed some of that caution. But he also said the U.S. took it as a positive sign that the new North Korean leadership had carried on with a policy set in train before Kim Jong Il's death, and had shown some swiftness in reaching the accord before the official 100-day mourning period was over.

While North Korea's commitments meet the pre-steps set by the U.S. for the resumption of six-party disarmament-for-aid talks, the official said the U.S. had made no promise to restart them. He said North Korea would first have to make good on its latest commitments. The U.S. would also have to map out a strategy with the other parties in the talks — China, Japan, Russia and South Korea — on what they could offer the North in return for the irreversible dismantling of its nuclear weapons program.

The U.S. and North Korean statements on the agreement differed on some details, including whether inspectors from U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency would be allowed into both the uranium enrichment and plutonium-based programs. The North Korean statement referred only to uranium enrichment.

A senior Obama administration official acknowledged that omission but said the U.S. was in no doubt that the North had agreed to let IAEA inspectors in to confirm the disabling of plutonium-producing reactor at its main nuclear complex in Yongbyon.

___

Online:

http://hosted.ap.org/interactives/2011/koreas-crisis/index.html

____

Foster Klug reported from Seoul. Associated Press writers Hyung-jin Kim in Seoul and Edith Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.


FOLLOW WORLD

Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,275
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (84 total)
12:20 AM on 03/09/2012
I think that this is a great step toward establishing another six-party talk with North Korea. Previously, there has been argument whether or not bilateral talks would be useful between the US and North Korea, because there were possibilities that North Korea would be selling nuclear weapons underhandedly. In 2001, Israeli planes bombed Syria, and the US discovered that this site was an unfinished nuclear reactor. There have been suspicions that this was created with the assistance of Yongbyun, which is why suspicion could be raised about how reliable North Korea would be. In addition, although North Korea has agreed to shut down one of its plants, it still hasn't agreed to shut down its other clandestine plant. Yet, articles in the New York Times have quoted North Korea has "long demanded more bilateral contact with the US as part of any solution." I think this is a great start to a more diplomatic relationship between the US and North Korea, and a step towards six-party talks. As Kim Jong Il said, he was ready to return to six-nation talks on its nuclear weapons program if it sees progress in bilateral talks with the US. This, I believe, is a step towards the right direction. - Jisoo Lee
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
passingthru
10:28 PM on 03/04/2012
I don't believe the N Korean's motives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ferdinand Berkhof
ratio & respect
07:26 AM on 03/02/2012
A positive development. Under a GOP administration, the tension would only have risen until we would have had yet another conflict in Asia.
photo
mhsden
If my dogs dont like you somethings Wrong !
04:21 AM on 03/02/2012
If they stop spending money on there nuke program and spend it on food problem solved.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whitneygre
Crotchety contrarian interested in historical cyle
10:18 AM on 03/04/2012
No, no--that's not how our State Department works: Hillary will give them the food AND they will continue the nuclear program. When they promise "scout's honor" to stop their nuclear program, wink-wink, she will sign the "agreement" and the MSM will banner the photo-op in every major American city. News commentators will praise the administration for defusing the problem and implementing a positive foreign policy!
06:11 PM on 03/01/2012
This is great but what about people in our country who don't have enough to eat?
02:49 AM on 03/02/2012
hmmmm, well, if the GOP quits trying to take away things from the people and then call our support for our people "ENTITLEMENTS" like its some disease, then you wouldnt have a reason to complain about this, am i right?
10:11 AM on 03/01/2012
Heck, we could offer them healthcare, we give it free to everybody but the working man.
10:09 AM on 03/01/2012
Now we try bribery? Same old story with no gains.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ksam62
10:05 AM on 03/01/2012
This is a bunch of bull S*^@! we don't know what the average wage is in North Korea but I guess it is far below the US. While our food prices are going up, and a lot of things are priced
where our own people can't afford them. Should we really GIVE food to North Korea that they will in turn sell to their people at a price they can afford, not just no but HELL NO. There would be things (say) that cost us $1.00 it would cost them maybe 10 cents. If we have that much food in storage then our Goverment should turn it loose at a price we can feed our own people. I'm like a whole lot of other people, I'm tired of our Goverment Feeding and Protecting the World,
our young men dying for them, and all the while we have so many people in need right here at home. It's time we start worring about ourselves.
09:05 AM on 03/01/2012
Now they have a few nukes. Once they get fed will they resort to the same tricks?
photo
Tricia W
Living Life with Passion, Purpose & Laughter!
08:18 AM on 03/01/2012
Seems like particularly good news
since there were many predictions
of Kim Jong-un taking a hard line
to establish his credibility as a military leader.

While we have been down this road before,
this turn around so soon
after his taking power
has to be a hopeful sign.
Perhaps this time will be different
(but I not ready to bet on it, yet).

Of course, the catastrophically bad shape
of the N. Korean economy
undoubtedly has something to do with it,
but this suggests at least
a slight shift in priorities
from making war to feeding people.

.
Seriously people, President OBAMA
DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whitneygre
Crotchety contrarian interested in historical cyle
10:30 AM on 03/04/2012
Tricia's passion is, I assume, fueled by youth, naivete, and good intentions. President Carter and Clinton gave the North Koreans billions in aid for similar photo-ops of our State Department officials signing treaties. Tricia, however, does seem to have some common sense when she writes:

Perhaps this time will be different
(but I not ready to bet on it, yet).

But Obama's foreign policy is no different from Carter's and Clinton's. They all give away billions of tax payers' money to create an allusion of foreign policy finesse, while in fact just putting our children in hock to the Chinese U. S. bond holders.

Repeating the same policy and "hoping" for different results has been defined as "insanity!"
08:06 AM on 03/01/2012
Dear Generous Leader agrees to import food to save US farmers starving under capitalism.

Could be a nice North Korean headline to explain why the workers' paradise needs to import food from that evil capitalist superpower.
photo
PrimoPablo
Rules were made to be broken by the rule makers
07:33 AM on 03/01/2012
Um...excuse me...our offer to Iran is stop or we will attack. Why are we kissing their butts?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ferdinand Berkhof
ratio & respect
07:31 AM on 03/02/2012
1) It's not kissing butts, it's called diplomacy, an alternative to the GOP solution to problems, which is war. 2) Iran's case is a different one in many ways.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whitneygre
Crotchety contrarian interested in historical cyle
10:32 AM on 03/04/2012
American diplomacy is called payola, photo-ops, and bankrupting the nation.
06:20 AM on 03/01/2012
If they breed them why cant they feed them. I am also sick of the US govt. feeding the whole world. When gas gets a little higher and the farmers raise their prices, and it trickles up, who is going to to feed US citizens??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cabinetmaniac
Think for yourself. Question authority.
08:06 AM on 03/01/2012
Read a book.

:-]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ferdinand Berkhof
ratio & respect
07:40 AM on 03/02/2012
'...it trickles up...'? Whatever happened to gravity?
06:17 AM on 03/01/2012
Deja vu!
06:00 AM on 03/01/2012
This is a complete SHAM!

Been done before ... a total farce

The food will go to the N Korean military - period

We, the USA taxpayers - will get zip back in return.

False promises, totally one-sided benefits

Strictly an election year stunt!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beachinstead
socialist libs other countries need you
06:25 AM on 03/01/2012
Agreed! It is that simple for the simpletons!
photo
PrimoPablo
Rules were made to be broken by the rule makers
07:34 AM on 03/01/2012
Iran is the problem, right? Not these guys who have them and have threatened to use them. Stupid Americans.