iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'Joyn' Messaging Service Designed By Telecoms To Fight Free Texting From iMessage, Facebook Messenger

Joyn Messaging Service

ALAN CLENDENNING   03/ 1/12 01:11 PM ET  AP

BARCELONA, Spain — Just past the security gate for the world's largest cell phone trade show in Barcelona, executives of big mobile carriers can't avoid walking past a booth they would probably rather not see: It's for "Pinger," a small California company that offers free texting in the United States and Germany and has global expansion plans.

Pinger and an explosion of smartphone messaging services – like iMessage, BlackBerry Messenger, WhatsApp, Viber Media, Facebook Messenger and KakaoTalk – have managed in just a few years to slash away at the important revenue that cell phone companies get from text messaging. Analysts say there's no end in sight to the financial blood letting.

The messaging services do it by offering applications that let phone users chat for free on the carriers' data networks or Wi-Fi. Some, like Pinger, make money from advertisements and work on computers as well.

The London-based Ovum research firm estimates telecommunications companies lost nearly $14 billion last year in text-messaging revenue as consumers migrated to applications allowing them to send messages over cell phone data networks.

Ovum said the companies still took in an estimated $153 billion, but that was down 9 percent from a year earlier, and Pinger co-founder Joe Stipher wants to reduce the amount even more.

"Text messaging is free, and calling is going to be free," said Stipher, wearing jeans in contrast to the dark suits favored by thousands of cell phone company executives attending the four-day 2012 Mobile World Congress that ended Thursday. "Data is going to be like electricity or water, not totally free, but do you worry about giving someone a glass of water at your home or letting them plug in? No."

Needless to say, mobile companies are not happy at the flood of free messaging services piggybacking their networks. Telecom Italia SpA chief executive Franco Bernabe told MWC that free messaging services are undercutting the ability of phone companies to invest in their networks. Paid texting, or SMS, has been a cash cow for phone companies that uses minimal network capacity.

The new "players have based their innovation in the mobile domain, without a deep understanding of the complex technical environment of our industry. This is increasingly creating significant problems to the overall service offered to the end user and driving additional investments for mobile operators," Bernabe said.

After years of study, the big telecommunications operators announced this week that they will try to fight back by introducing software this year embedded in new cell phones that will allow users to do the same sort of Internet-based messaging and voice calls that consumers want without paying separate fees.

The new messaging method introduced by the industry group GSMA, or Groupe Speciale Mobile Association, is dubbed "Joyn" and will be launched this year by operators in France, Germany, Italy and South Korea. A test "beta" version was released this week to Spanish clients of Vodafone Group PLC who have smartphones running on Google's Android software.

In industry parlance, the application is known as "Rich Communications Suite," or RCS.

Joyn tries to deal with one major shortcoming of the messaging apps – both the sender and the recipient have to have the same app. But it's not clear if RCS will work on every phone. Apple Inc., for example, has a long history of not playing by mobile company rules.

"Since Rich Communications (Suite) will be fully integrated in devices, there is no need for our customers to download or install anything," said Rene Obermann, chief executive of Germany's Deutsche Telekom AG. "Ease of use is thus ensured and it will just work. We are looking forward to offer new services like text chat, file and live video sharing during a call to our customers soon."

But analysts say there's no way of knowing whether consumers will migrate to Joyn until after it is released in a full launch to consumers, and note that the last major technological advance by mobile operators came in the 1990s, when text messaging was launched. And cell phones issued by mobile carriers often come loaded with software that many people rarely or never use because they don't like them.

"It is possible this will be their last chance to see if they can play more of a role," said Pamela Clark-Dickson, an analyst at London's Informa Telecoms & Media research group. "The user experience is key, and if they don't get it right people won't use it."

The GSMA didn't say how operators will charge for Joyn – and how much. The carriers face an uphill battle denting the popularity of the free messaging services. WhatsApp chief executive officer Jan Koum told the mobile congress that its users are now sending more than 2 billion messages per day, up from 1 billion in October. The much smaller Pinger saw its users send 2 billion messages in January, up from 1.7 billion in December, Sipher said.

And he says the mobile operators should stay away from free messaging because "they aren't good at it and haven't done applications."

"The carriers should be smart, reliable pipes" providing Internet data access like utilities give reliable water and electricity, he said. "They need to focus on being good network operators."

Obermann said carriers are at a crucial point at which they must "develop our own, innovative product suites" through cooperation with the smaller messaging companies.

"The smart pipe will be one of the areas where (telecommunications companies) will show their innovation," he said.

His company's venture capital division, T-Venture, took a stake in Pinger last week just before the MWC conference began, announcing it would provide $7.5 million in venture capital to help Pinger grow internationally, especially in Europe.

For Sipher, it's a sign that some operators realize they need to work with messaging startups instead of against them.

"We're saying to the telecoms that we're here, we're big, and we're playing," Sipher said. "When's the last time a carrier introduced a successful application? That would be SMS and that's almost 15 years ago."

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

BARCELONA, Spain — Just past the security gate for the world's largest cell phone trade show in Barcelona, executives of big mobile carriers can't avoid walking past a booth they would probably ...
BARCELONA, Spain — Just past the security gate for the world's largest cell phone trade show in Barcelona, executives of big mobile carriers can't avoid walking past a booth they would probably ...
Filed by Ramona Emerson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:36 AM on 03/02/2012
The trend is unstoppable, that telecom industry will lose out on the messaging services all together. This is the same reason that Kodak lost out on the digital world. Telecom industry is simply to complacent to adapt to the fast changing online world. Underneath, it is all about providing convenience and best services for their customers, and that has to come from competition, and telecoms aren't known for being competitive. So, inevitably all text messaging will be from internet, and sms will die. But telecoms do have a couple of aces up their sleeves to slow down this process besides simply sitting on their infrastructure to collect money. First, they can provide free apps themselves to keep customers away from using any dominant messaging service. As long as their is no free messaging service which can reach all cell phone users, people will have to use sms at some point. Second, they should try to encourage users using apps which help customers sending sms text, such as PhoneBook+, which makes it a lot easier for user to send group sms.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anthonytaurus
don't f&f me. you dont' know what I'll say next
11:51 PM on 03/01/2012
LOL I just reread this article. There's a lot of technical talk which is nothing more than a tsunami of bullsh-t to demonize these data messengers. It's hilarious to say the least. With all the throttling and limited data plans, it's clear the cellular phone companies are looking for ways to gouge the consumer where they can't gouge them anymore. This is hilarious stuff. Pure comedy. I could reread this again and find something else to laugh about. Keep it coming cellphone execs lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anthonytaurus
don't f&f me. you dont' know what I'll say next
11:38 PM on 03/01/2012
This really speaks more to the stupidity of the typical user than anything else. To think, even when cell phones weren't that smart, we all still had instant messengers like.... AIM, MSN, and Yahoo. On top of that, we have push email. There really is no reason for all of these extra messengers ESPECIALLY when a good portion of them is mobile only.

I really do blame the consumer on this one. It's like these things don't exist until someone makes it SPECIAL just for them. It's not good enough to have 3+ messengers that work on both mobile phones and computers. You need to have it specifically DESIGNATED for mobile phone use.

Then, we wonder why Apple has so much market share and why texting is a multibillion dollar business. Duuuuuuuuuuh. You're all dumb. I've killed my texting plan already, saving that money for marijuana. Want to reach me - email, bbm, aim, yahoo, msn, facebook messenger, and liveprofile. Don't forget, you can always call me. You really still need to text??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyNinja
N.W.A. Ninjas With Aptitude
08:44 PM on 03/01/2012
Awww poor cell companies, my heart's bleeding peanut butter for you...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Beer 1
05:42 PM on 03/01/2012
Will this work on my rotary dial AT&T model 500 desk phone?
05:06 PM on 03/01/2012
Every time I see a BlackBerry anymore, I cringe. I've owned several over the years, then switched to Android, but was never satisfied with only a touch-screen, so longed to return to BB. Finally, I took the plunge, purchased a Bold 9900. This is the flagship of RIM, by the way. Retails for $599, right up there with the top-of-the-line Android devices and the iPhone. You'd think it would be competitive.

It is not. Not even close. I finally sent it back, and got an HTC Amaze. I'll just have to figure out something to do about the keyboard.

The funny thing is, I knew it would be a trade-off. That I was sacrificing cutting edge for keyboard. I just didn't realize HOW MUCH I'd be sacrificing. The thing is little better than a flip-phone. Perfect for 11-year-olds. Of course, even 11-year-olds realize how far behind the damn things are and would never in a million years touch one.

It's too bad, really. I used to love BlackBerry and have a lot of nostalgia for them. But then, I have nostalgia for the Commodore 64, too, but I sure as heck wouldn't trade in my modern, quad-core computer for it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anthonytaurus
don't f&f me. you dont' know what I'll say next
11:58 PM on 03/01/2012
That's pathetic. What exactly are you missing from a BB that you get with Android? Go ahead, make me laugh.

I've got the 9860 myself for $99 and my 32gb memory card that I've been using since my Bold 9000 and Torch 9800. I am pretty much a happy camper over here.

I bet you say apps LOL.
01:31 PM on 03/03/2012
The deal-breaker was not apps, actually. I was willing to forgo many of my favorite apps. No, the deal-breaker was the spotty call-quality and that T-Mobile was going to charge me $14 to $30 for using the mobile-hotspot feature. I already pay $100 a month for unlimited data, talk, and text, there's no way I'm paying more for something that is free on Android.

(And before you say something foolish like, "It is not free." Rest assured, I used it for a year on Android and never paid a penny.)

I'd urge you to use a good (not one of the pathetic cheap-a** devices either) Android device or an iPhone for six months, then go back to your BlackBerry and tell me they are even equivalent.

With all that you are missing on BlackBerry, you might as well be using a flip-phone, albeit one with an industry-leading physical keyboard.

But each to his own, I always say. If you like your BlackBerry, cool, man. Whatever floats your boat. It just wasn't for me anymore, for the reasons I gave.

Peace.
04:39 PM on 03/01/2012
RCS? Been there, done that. The industry has been trying to do RCS and now RCS-e, for years and they keep failing to realize it's pointless in an Internet based IP world where the market dictates what it will accept, not what the industry "tries" to dictate to the world.