iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Child Abuse Costs Victims $200,000 Over A Lifetime, Report Finds

Child Poverty

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 03/ 2/2012 5:29 pm Updated: 03/ 2/2012 6:24 pm

The evidence is mounting on the devastating affects of childhood abuse and neglect.

In a newly released report the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that the average cost to someone who experiences maltreatment as a child -- defined as physical abuse, psychological abuse, sexual abuse or neglect -- is $210,012 over the course of a lifetime.

According to the report, the figure represents the combined costs of child welfare, special education, criminal justice expenses, medical care and lost productivity as an adult.

A person who was abused or neglected when they were young is likely to grow up to earn an average of $5,890 less than their peers every year, the CDC found -- a significant amount at a time when the median salary in the U.S. is only $26,364, and more find themselves struggling just to afford food.

The CDC report echoes a number of other studies showing that people from disadvantaged backgrounds find it hard to get ahead later in life.

Children who grow up in an environment where food is scarce -- as 17 million children currently do -- can end up earning as much as $260,000 less than their peers over the course of a lifetime, according to a 2011 report from the Center for American Progress.

And research suggests that if a child experiences poverty between the ages of one and five, it can actually affect the brain at a neurobiological level -- possibly because of the stress hormones being in overdrive during those formative years.

Children who come from such circumstances are likely to remain poor their whole lives.

Experts are split on the question of whether a weak economy contributes to an increase in child abuse. Some of the evidence seems to point that way: in 2010, researchers found that a regional rise in unemployment is often followed by a jump in child maltreatment cases.

On the other hand, a report released in December from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services showed that despite the economy stumbling badly in 2008, incidences of child abuse declined slightly over the next two years.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

The evidence is mounting on the devastating affects of childhood abuse and neglect. In a newly released report the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that the average cost to som...
The evidence is mounting on the devastating affects of childhood abuse and neglect. In a newly released report the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that the average cost to som...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:29 PM on 03/04/2012
With abortion rights being such a divisive topic in our society, why couldn't we all stand behind an initiative that permitted any low-income pregnant woman who chooses to parent her child to have a guaranteed tax-funded voucher for 24 hour childcare at the facility of their choice, for say the first five years of the child's life? For those concerned about the availability and cost of entitlements, let's assume pregnant women could have the choice of guaranteed housing, utility and food vouchers or guaranteed childcare (I am guessing those expenses would be surprisingly comparable.) Of course, private charities could help provide for other needs. It seems like anything we heavily subsidize we receive more of. Wouldn't we want easy access to reliable, high quality childcare for low-income mothers, that would allow them to commit to any work or class schedule that would help them become more financially independent? I am sure I am missing some logistical challenges here that I welcome you to point out, and I am assuming that most women would use their child-free time for family sustaining as opposed to family destroying pursuits (i.e. drug use or other illegal activities). I just think about how much nurturing and supervision children need at that early stage in life, and mothers are in a better position to provide that for their children when they have guaranteed time to themselves to take care of the myriad of parental duties that demand their attention.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karma2U
Blessed are the Peacemakers
02:31 PM on 03/03/2012
"An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whyus
San Francisco native
03:37 AM on 03/03/2012
Yet the repubkons say conception is a person and to be cherished over any living thing, including diseased and starving children.
04:52 AM on 03/03/2012
ok so
George Picard
Send lawyers, guns and money
03:20 PM on 03/03/2012
Much better to stop those kids before they are born.
bipolarbears60
common sense isn't so common
12:43 PM on 03/04/2012
best to delay those kids until their biological parents are ready for them.....
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
02:14 AM on 03/03/2012
Also...

Roughly 15 years after abortion became legal in the USA crime rates began to drop significantly and continued to do so for over a decade.

A major contributor to the decline was the absence of unwanted children that women had previously been forced to carry to term and then reluctantly raise. This neglected population was absent when they would have entered the start of their crime committing period in their mid teens - roughly 15 years after Roe Vs Wade..

the book Freakanomics has great detail on this.
04:54 AM on 03/03/2012
so based on your thought process crime should still be going down as abortions are up.......laughing
10:10 AM on 03/03/2012
laughing?-- look at the stats
photo
beckola
Dance like no one is watching
10:44 AM on 03/03/2012
Great book, and that particular fact was an astounding eye-opener for me.
photo
uniquindividual
I'm unique and so are you
11:46 AM on 03/03/2012
The logic can't be argued with.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
main945
11:16 PM on 03/02/2012
The war on poverty was an admiral agenda in the 60's maybe some day we will really care enough to follow through and poverty and abuse will be significantly reduced.
04:55 AM on 03/03/2012
no, as the poor are needed to be the grunts of society...........life goes on
George Picard
Send lawyers, guns and money
03:22 PM on 03/03/2012
Poverty won.
07:51 PM on 03/02/2012
This is an interesting study and it comes from the government. Others have shown that children who simply grow up in socioeconically poor areas, using things like water qualtiy, smoke filled environments, also have a permanent decrease in lifetime earnings. This hurts the next generation children and lowers tax revenues over the long haul, not to mention crime and mental health issues.
04:57 AM on 03/03/2012
ok so build more prisons with automation to use less guards
06:46 PM on 03/03/2012
why do we want to imprison yet even more people? who does that serve?