iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gulf Oil Spill Health Claims: BP Settlement Includes New Process

By CAIN BURDEAU 03/ 4/12 05:25 PM ET AP

Gulf Oil Spill Health Claims
BILOXI, MS - APRIL 17: The full moon rises over Biloxi's beach and lighthouse April 17, 2011 in Biloxi, Mississippi. Biloxi's beaches were impacted by tar balls and weathered oil from the BP oil spill. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)

BOOTHEVILLE, La. — A settlement that BP is hammering out with victims of the massive Gulf oil spill finally provides a system for monitoring health concerns and compensating people whose illnesses are found to have a link to the disaster.

Government and university doctors studying locals' health haven't found significant evidence of spill-related illnesses, but problems years from now remain a question mark. Gulf Coast residents say they're happy their complaints are getting a serious look, even if they'll face hurdles in proving that rashes, shortness of breath and other maladies were caused by the oil or chemical dispersants sprayed to break it up.

Under the settlement announced Friday, BP said it expects to pay out $7.8 billion to settle a wide range of claims that also include property damage, lost wages and loss to businesses. While a previously created fund had already been paying such economic loss claims, it hadn't paid claims over illnesses related to exposure.

Nicole Maurer, a resident of this fishing community, said she feels optimistic about getting medical bills paid under the court-supervised process. She blames the spill for a number of her family's health problems.

"Bright and early, I'm getting my kids on the school bus and calling my lawyer tomorrow, and see what's going on," she said Sunday. "I'm being very hopeful and that it all works out in our favor."

First, Maurer and others like her will have to show that they got sick from the spill. To receive compensation, claimants will be examined by a court-approved health care practitioner. Then, a claims administrator working under the supervision of a federal judge will determine who should be paid.

"The workers have a different kind of exposure because they were there all the time, but anybody living in an area where they were at risk of exposure will be eligible to participate in the program," said Ervin Gonzalez, one the plaintiff lawyers leading the litigation.

The settlement also establishes a program to monitor claimants' health for a period of 21 years. People whose physical symptoms haven't yet developed will also be able to pursue claims. BP has also promised to pay $105 million to improve health care around the Gulf region.

"You don't know what the long-term (health) effects will be," said another of the plaintiffs' lawyers, Steve Herman. "You don't know how the science is going to play out."

Herman said medical claims won't be paid until U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier gives final approval to the overall settlement, which could take months.

Observers said the legal wrangling over who will be eligible for medical compensation likely will be contentious and could take years to play out.

Blaine LeCesne, a tort law professor at Loyola University New Orleans, said getting medical claims covered under the proposed settlement was a victory for the plaintiffs.

At a trial, he said it would have been difficult to prove medical damage. "Medical claims are inherently speculative. We really don't know what the full scope of the medical problems are to exposure to the dispersants and the oil itself."

How much BP will be forced to pay will depend on how broad the criteria for verifying health problems are, he said.

Mitch Crusto, a Loyola business and environmental law professor, said it was a smart move for BP. "It helps give the impression that BP is a responsible company."

He added that Barbier will be more likely to approve the settlement offer because of the medical provision. "Barbier would be less inclined to accept settlement if there was not some process to handle medical claims."

The process is a step in the right direction for residents who felt their health concerns had been ignored. The previous compensation fund, called the Gulf Coast Claims Facility, received roughly 200 claims asserting spill-related illnesses, but none were paid. The older fund did cover injured rig workers on the Deepwater Horizon, the drilling rig that exploded on April 20, 2010.

Since shortly after the spill, government and university researchers have been investigating public health complaints, but so far haven't found significant evidence of illnesses caused by the spill. Still, some caution that their work has only begun.

For example, studies by the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Health Sciences are in their early stages, according to a researcher involved.

"We are trying to pinpoint exposure and unravel those complex questions," said Maureen Litchveld, a lead researcher at the Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine. "Two of the most persistent concerns are those about seafood safety and if the air is safe to breathe."

Some doctors along the coast say they routinely treat cleanup workers and residents for chemical exposure and other problems that they blame on the spill. Dr. Mike Robichaux, a nose and throat specialist in Raceland, La., said he has treated 50 people for a range of health problems that he believes were caused by exposure to chemicals released during the disaster.

"The illnesses are very real, and the people who are ill are apparently people who have sensitivities to these substances that not all of us are sensitive to," he said.

BP employed thousands of fishermen and other locals to respond to the oil spill, and scores have expressed health concerns. Many of those people can be found along the sliver of land south of New Orleans in the fishing and oilfield communities of Plaquemines Parish.

Glen Swift, a fisherman in Buras, said he worked cleanup boats and got sick one day cleaning up a big patch of oil.

"I got nauseated, just real weak and sick with diarrhea for a few days," he said.

Swift said he wasn't sure if he would file a medical claim.

More serious were the complaints of the Maurer household in Bootheville. Maurer said she'd developed cysts on her body since the spill, while her fisherman husband has suffered bleeding from his ear and nose since he did cleanup work. They also believe their daughter's asthma has gotten worse.

"I'm so tired of being sick," she said.

___

Associated Press writer Michael Kunzelman in New Orleans contributed to this report.

FOLLOW GREEN

BOOTHEVILLE, La. — A settlement that BP is hammering out with victims of the massive Gulf oil spill finally provides a system for monitoring health concerns and compensating people whose illness...
BOOTHEVILLE, La. — A settlement that BP is hammering out with victims of the massive Gulf oil spill finally provides a system for monitoring health concerns and compensating people whose illness...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 53
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Left on Red
Micro Bio 201 T-Th 1 - 2:30 Lab W 1-5 Dr. Price
07:43 AM on 03/05/2012
Lawyers for the plaintiffs should be sued for malpractice for agreeing to this "settlement"
03:40 AM on 03/05/2012
What hope? Money can't buy health
photo
William A
Oh Lord, save me from your followers!
05:05 AM on 03/05/2012
Private healthcare?
photo
pmag88
water and carbon and a bunch of other stuff
03:30 AM on 03/05/2012
In the short term the oil may actually increase yeilds of fish and appear not to have had an adverse impact. Several years out, it could be a whole different outcome.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bink Miller
I love to stir the pot...
02:04 AM on 03/09/2012
I live on the gulf. There are very few birds, the sealife is compromised, do not eat it, do not come to the beaches, the air is full of corexit smog, there's a ring from Destin to New Orleans up past Montgomery. It looks like Los Angeles.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bills Catz
Don't believe everything you think.
11:41 PM on 03/04/2012
Something tells me every coonass from the Texas border onward is gonna come up with some potential future illness and have six doctors swear to that possibility. "Got me a check for a 'ondred grand, bubba! Just tole 'em I might get the arthritis later on... Heh, heh!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
In Financial Theocracy we Trust
09:40 AM on 03/06/2012
Then be responsible and don't fill an entire body of water (habitat for how many species?) and hundreds of miles of beach ecosystems with millions of barrels of toxins. Why this corporate "person" isn't in a maximum security prison is a mystery you won't even tackle because you have been told not to even think about it (and you always do as you are told).

And they still get multi-millions in corporate welfare every year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bills Catz
Don't believe everything you think.
12:11 PM on 03/06/2012
Dude, what are you blithering about? Your comment has absolutely nothing to do with mine... Just dying to say this and couldn't figure out where?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:12 PM on 03/04/2012
Let's not forget, most wouldn't have health concens if it wasn't for a british company drilling off our coast in the first place. Oil that was NOT intended to help Americans. Just like none of it is. And why drill baby drill and all that spouts that is nonsense. Or we wouldn't be held hostage of the big oil companies now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bills Catz
Don't believe everything you think.
11:55 PM on 03/04/2012
@Polly -- "held hostage of Big Oil." Yep, I like that, sums it all up pretty well... The terms 'strangle-hold' and 'captive hostages' also come to mind. Thus it has been since the phony 'oil crisis' of the 70's. "We're Big Oil and we're worldwide! Pay up or walk, we don't care!"
photo
mokvaw
Fox News Survivor 2004
07:56 PM on 03/04/2012
Ah the gulf was once a great place to go, anyone else can take my spot somewhere on the beach. Im never going back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bink Miller
I love to stir the pot...
02:00 AM on 03/09/2012
I live on the gulf and had a front row seat for the oil spill. For almost two years we have been stuck here because of the economy and it's tough getting out. I agree with you, mokvaw, about the beach and I would advise people to make sure they are healthy enough because when you come down here you will not notice you are not able to breathe properly. A friend arrived here yesterday and already she noticed the difference right away.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bink Miller
I love to stir the pot...
02:16 AM on 03/09/2012
I live down here and won't go near the beach. It's toxic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opus1dog
I'm anti-stupidity
07:31 PM on 03/04/2012
That's OK, cons, nothing like this would EVER happen with that new trans-continental pipeline the 11% Congress is ramming down our throats, would it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Obama for Change
We are sorry, your micro-bio did not meet our guid
07:28 PM on 03/04/2012
Offering hope to BP spill victims with health claims would be something more like go to the doctor, go to the hospital and have them send the all bills to BP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Watters
If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal
07:24 PM on 03/04/2012
I guess AP didn't think it worth mentioning that the settlement includes no punitive damages. That's a pretty critical piece of info to leave out but when you consider how, all along, AP has performed like a PR dept for BP, it's not surprising.

BP's offer to contribute $104 million "to improve health care around the Gulf region", a region that extends from Florida through Texas, is a sick joke.

And the well may still be leaking: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2012/03/20123313318459762.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bink Miller
I love to stir the pot...
02:06 AM on 03/09/2012
I live here, we still have oil washing up. There are reports there are cracks in the gulf floor close the explosion site leaking oil. The coast guard dumps corexit on the gulf daily, we can see the planes. It's a modern day love canal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Watters
If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal
07:39 PM on 03/09/2012
Sorry to hear about the oil - and the pitiful "settlement".
photo
99er2049er
Democrats create jobs and build strong economies
07:16 PM on 03/04/2012
We have increased drilling and it isn't lowering prices. Unlimited drilling also leads to BP type massive accidents that all of us will pay the price for as we will eventually ingest some of these chemicals through our food supply.

When are we going to move to new energy sources?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zaruga
Dad, Martial arts guru, writer, goofball...
10:44 PM on 03/04/2012
When the people in power who profit most from oil get out of the way and let us do this.
photo
99er2049er
Democrats create jobs and build strong economies
07:39 AM on 03/05/2012
There were people who thought the horseless carriage was a joke or going to the moon was impossible, or inventions that we thought were crazy turned out to be life-changing. And we are being told there is no other realistic way to power our cars than 100 year old sludgy oil? We have seen first hand proof that electricity works and solar can work.

First we were told electricity wouldn't make the car go fast enough, then we see the Testla or the cars can't go far enough, they can go 150 miles. Electrical stations need to be built and invested in. But there are still other fuel sources. We can do this, but we must before it gets far worse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Left on Red
Micro Bio 201 T-Th 1 - 2:30 Lab W 1-5 Dr. Price
07:47 AM on 03/05/2012
You nailed it! F/F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bills Catz
Don't believe everything you think.
12:04 AM on 03/05/2012
@99, in case you didn't notice neither the Gov't or Big Oil give a rats arse about new energy sources, seriously. The technology is there to a great degree, but it's sparsely funded and never implemented. Miles of solar panels in the Nevada desert to eliminate oil and coal powered generators -- and cut the profits of Kind Coal and Big Oil? You must be MAD, they'd rather see us walk, starve and freeze first. LOL Welcome to USA, Inc -- if it doesn't fatten the bottom line of mega-corps, we can't have it, sorry.
photo
99er2049er
Democrats create jobs and build strong economies
07:40 AM on 03/05/2012
I do agree and am still amazed simply out of an economical necessity or national security that we don't move away from oil. Imagine the amount of jobs and industries we could build right now if we invented some better energy sources.
07:13 PM on 03/04/2012
evil, thy name is BP
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bink Miller
I love to stir the pot...
02:09 AM on 03/09/2012
Evil also lives in the local governments along the beach areas that want to minimize the pollution here from the spill because it will kill tourism. They don't care about the citizens at all.
12:45 PM on 03/09/2012
don't you think those gov't officials are being lobbied by BP and their tendrils?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry Harper
Birds of a feather flock togethger
07:08 PM on 03/04/2012
The Moderators must have gone to supper .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bink Miller
I love to stir the pot...
02:20 AM on 03/09/2012
WEll, they must be back, cuz every post I've written has been deleted. I live here, HP, I know what's going on, people should know for their own safety.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
jeb50
Retired.
07:04 PM on 03/04/2012
How long was it before Nam vets got help for Agent Orange (proudly brought to you by Mansato), or the 911 responders, who the EPA was told by bush to say the toxic air wasn't toxic?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heartsmindsvision
06:54 PM on 03/04/2012
Why does the media let BP continue to lie.
photo
99er2049er
Democrats create jobs and build strong economies
07:17 PM on 03/04/2012
The media runs very short on fact checkers, which is why we see so many CEOs, oil companies, and republicans constantly lie.
Helloise
Healthy skeptic admires reason, trusts intuition
08:10 PM on 03/04/2012
When I was a sapling at a tv news organization in the 80's, every fact that aired had to have at least two sources. But of course, back in those days, news was viewed as a public service, not a platform for grandstanding propagandists. I'm pretty sure that papers like the NYT demand similar standards for its investigative journalists, but it's open season on talk shows. What I find more reprehensible than the "pundits" are the interviewers, who blithely let obvious distortions and outright lies stand up and take a bow without challenging them. Perhaps they're afraid an argument might ensue, precious minutes might be lost when they could be racing to the next subject or a commercial? Perhaps with certain guests it happens so frequently that rather than tell the person to put up or shut up, they give up? Either way, it's incredibly frustrating to witness.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bink Miller
I love to stir the pot...
02:21 AM on 03/09/2012
The media should hire the Huff Post moderators to fact check, they seem to be very alert.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry Harper
Birds of a feather flock togethger
06:52 PM on 03/04/2012
Although the BP oil spill sure didn't help these people .Their businesses were going down the tube before ,with the foreign seafood was bombarding the country from Vietnam and other Islands across the pond . Without food having the place of origin on it ,we are in danger everyday .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bink Miller
I love to stir the pot...
02:14 AM on 03/09/2012
Our seafood here is not safe to eat. We get most of our seafood from the North Atlantic now. As far as the economy before the oil spill, you are right, it was going down a bit, but since the oil spill, we have a ruined environment and the beach areas are busier than ever. Of course most of them are BP employees, military and police from all over the place. It's a war zone.