iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Rick Santorum on Fox News Defends Birth Control Position, Obama 'Snob' Comment

First Posted: 03/04/2012 9:29 am Updated: 03/04/2012 11:32 am

Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace put Rick Santorum on the defensive Sunday with pointed questions about his stance on birth control, his insult to President Barack Obama over higher education, and his low record of charitable giving. A visibly flustered Santorum tried to defend and explain some of his previous missteps and inconsistencies ahead of Super Tuesday.

On the subject of birth control and the controversial Blunt amendment, which would have allowed employers to deny contraception and other health coverage for moral reasons, Santorum tried to drive the conversation away from contraception and toward the issue of religious liberty. But pressed on his own views about birth control and confronted with the fact that 99 percent of sexually active women have used it at some point, Santorum defensively acknowledged that he believes it's morally wrong and that employers should be able to opt out of covering it.

"I'm reflecting the views of the church that I believe in," he said. "We used to be tolerant of those beliefs. I guess now when you have beliefs that are consistent with the church, somehow, now you're out of the mainstream, and that to me is a pretty sad situation when you can't have personal held beliefs. But that's not the issue -- the issue is whether the government can force you to do things that are against your conscience, and that's what we've been talking about on the road. We haven't been talking about my own personal beliefs."

Santorum's reiteration of his Catholic beliefs gave Wallace an opportunity to hammer him on another moral issue: his own lack of charitable giving. While both Obama and fellow GOP candidate Mitt Romney gave around 14 percent of their respective incomes to charity in 2010, Santorum donated only 1.76 percent of his $923,411 in income.

The former Senator blamed the lag on the costs of caring for a disabled daughter.

"I was in a situation where we have seven children, one disabled child who we take care of, and she's very, very expensive," he said. "We love her and cherish the opportunity to take care of her, but it's an additional expense. We have to have around-the-clock care for her, and our insurance company doesn't cover it, so I have to cover it."

Santorum's comments about the cost of having a disabled child and the lack of insurance coverage are particularly interesting in light his recent criticism of free prenatal testing under the Affordable Care Act, which he opposes because the test results might "cull the ranks of the disabled" by encouraging expecting parents to have an abortion.

Finally, Wallace pressed Santorum on the issue of higher education. The candidate had recently called Obama a "snob" for wanting "everybody in America to go to college," but Wallace pointed out that what Obama actually encouraged was for all Americans to have at least one year of higher education or some kind of vocational training or apprenticeship.

Santorum acknowledged that he might have made a mistake.

"Look, maybe I've read some comments where at least it was characterized that the president said we should go to four-year colleges," he said. "If I was in error, you said you haven't found that, I certainly read that… if it was an error, I agree with the president that we should have options for a variety of training."

The latest polls show Santorum slightly edging out Mitt Romney in the pivotal state of Ohio, which, if he wins, could prove significant to his campaign.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,020
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (168 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
confuseddemocrat 12:45 PM on 03/04/2012
"I'm reflecting the views of the church that I believe in," he said. "We used to be tolerant of those beliefs. I guess now when you have beliefs that are consistent with the church, somehow, now you're out of the mainstream, and that to me is a pretty sad situation when you can't have personal held beliefs.
Rick, your personal beliefs are not the issue.  Normally, your  Read More...
08:33 AM on 03/07/2012
RS, this is America, you have the right to your beliefs and WE have the right to OURS and no where does it state that WE have to accept YOUR beliefs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Paleo-conservative and Anti-tea party
07:31 PM on 03/06/2012
Santorum's self righteousness shows a lack of connection from the average American voter. One thing about Mormon in general (that I've learned) is that they are very involved in their communities. While Romney is far from the perfect candidate, his actions and responses show hes more in touch with American communities on the whole.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RRuin
01:41 PM on 03/06/2012
Santorum admits he didn't read what the President said but on opinion he read about what the President said. Once again he shows he's unfit to old any office.
photo
LibRule
So how did that one-term thingy work for you?
01:23 PM on 03/06/2012
Am I the only one that sees that if he is giving less than 2%, he isn't even titheing like his churchREQUIRES?
"When we fail to tithe, we become that weak link. Statistics show that approximately 20% of Christians tithe. That means, 80% of Christendom is not in covenant with their God, but are like beggars and thieves looking for handouts and what they can steal from Him." http://www.bible.com/bibleanswers_result.php?id=161

Now, if that isn't being a hypocrite....
08:27 AM on 03/15/2012
The Catholic Church has no set amount you are required to tithe.
photo
LibRule
So how did that one-term thingy work for you?
12:41 PM on 03/15/2012
Tithe, by definition, means 'tenth'. Read the bible. It is very specific.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Equinator
Shovels manure daily
08:33 AM on 03/06/2012
Santorum had passion but little if any compassion. He has a passion to keep you and me from ever using birth control while at the same time wants to remove financial support from poor disabled children. Santorum to me is not a moral man.
12:32 PM on 04/30/2012
He supports trade with countries that force women to have abortions like China.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fdavidm
08:30 AM on 03/06/2012
I just love Rick Santorum's reason for giving so little to charity. He's too busy supporting his own life choices. Who told him to have all those children? What a phoney!
08:21 AM on 03/06/2012
Because he is a republican? Selfish to the end!
06:47 AM on 03/06/2012
I have an extremely disabled child who requires around-th-clock care. We are in a higher income bracket. At the very most this would cost something in the neighborhood of $50,000 a year, even for a live-in caregiver, which I highly doubt he is spending, because his state has Medicaid long-term care programs that pay for this sort of thing that do not take the parent's income into account and I am guessing she is eligible for all kinds of funding. Not only do I have a disabled child but I work for a long-term care program with our state as a case manager so I know what I am talking about. I highly doubt he would refuse this funding since he has tried to get the state to pay for homeschooling his typical kids. His private insurance may not pay for her care, but I'll bet you any money the state and/or federal government pay for her care. Even if they don't, which I would be surprised if they don't, if he makes almost a million a year, $50,000 less will not impact his ability to give to charity. What a liar.
photo
Floridafish
It all over but the crying
08:21 AM on 03/06/2012
Funny thing is...if we had...I don't know...maybe some sort of government mandated health care...then Rick wouldn't need to worry so much. And you're right, he is a liar.
09:27 AM on 03/06/2012
Yup. I certainly do not begrudge the funding of care for disabled kids, just Santorums' hypocrisy.Like most ultra-conservative fanatics, he doesn't want the government to pay for anyone's benefits or care unless it involves his own family or interests. Most tea-party types are so dead set against entitlements for others but have a blind spot when it comes to their own use of government assistance. I am stunned at the lack of knowledge and compassion for their fellow man typical of the vast majority of Republicans, and the ability of the right wing machine to manipulate them into voting against things they depend on. They are in denial and full of excuses when it comes to just how much they are getting from the government themselves. Many (not all) of the population I work with hate President Obama and his supposed out-of-control spending, but they don't realize how much of that spending is a result of Rebublican policies and the spending is for their benefit and the benefit of the country. Most are on disability, Medicaid, Medicare, food stamps, unemployment, subsidized housing, energy assistance, which is appropriate if the need is there, thank God we have a safety net. It is not the help I begrudge them, just the sanctimonious ignorance and hypocritical denial. Stunning to me. And they want to abolish help for the less fortunate (unless it is them) but do not practice what they preach and donate to charity. Always an excuse.
08:23 AM on 03/06/2012
2
photo
janmB
loves life
08:27 AM on 03/06/2012
What a idiot....Rick attacks two of the most favorite things such as college....(who doesn't think college is great) and birth control that 98% of people use & the other 2% are lying about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Scott
Micro bio? Are you making fun of me?
02:48 AM on 03/06/2012
[A response to the plea for Santorum's character to be noticed.]

thx for pointing out that yes, Santorum, and every candidate, are human beings who deserve a break on this personal drubbing that happens too often and the shame of this condition is the way it spreads the shame among us.

our opponents are not actual demons,
nor angels
(although in their minds,
with a few small modifications....)

human beings giving each other the benefit of the doubt
we call civilization.

adults are what I call
always learning
in the way I heard sales people are
always closing.

Dehumanizing attacks dehumanize us all.
How could anyone escape that kind of judgement?

Occasional good emanates from ballot boxes.

I'm with you... let's give up all the crap as you say
and really try to make something perfect
ly made.

....if the process were perfect

Dog-whistle and coded politics
will once again go first
although not in the way
that they are used to
it.
No one will miss them,
I'm pretty sure
on the way out.

But I was pretty sure
about things before.
I am hopeful, always

though. Which I think
is a human condition
we ought to make politically

viable someday.
Pardon the verse,
and lastly, sincerely,
good luck.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Anderson
independent andy
03:20 AM on 03/06/2012
hey joe,
preach somewhere else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Scott
Micro bio? Are you making fun of me?
09:10 PM on 03/06/2012
actually, the form i posted in tends to resist the hyper-religious, the polemical....but i can see maybe i'm wasting my breath, here?

preaching?

oh, maybe...you could be right.

Let's say we just go ahead and "preach" the words right here that EVERYONE claims as their own, the ones that NO ONE in the ultra-right seem to mention, so yeah, let's call this a time to "preach for accuracy and janet" :

Visit the sick in hospitals, visit those in prisons, feed the poor, do not cause a little one to stumble (children), do not financially plunder the houses of weak, isolated widows after their husbands die, and the golden rule, treat others as you would want to be treated.
09:03 PM on 03/07/2012
I'm fine with you preaching right here, Joe. We could all use a little more compassion and reason.
02:37 AM on 03/06/2012
In a word: cheapskate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Anderson
independent andy
03:21 AM on 03/06/2012
you said it !!!!!
02:02 AM on 03/06/2012
Has obama ever explained why he doesn't give to charity?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ruben4obama
02:06 AM on 03/06/2012
did you not read the article? obama gave 14% of his income.
02:11 AM on 03/06/2012
LOL!

What, this year? An election year in which he's pretending to support the "working class"?

Why wasn't he donating to charity when he was buying mansions in chicago?
02:40 AM on 03/06/2012
But as a member of the "one percenters," Obama's charitable giving is pretty low, especially for someone who is supposed to be a role model. I'm just sayin'.
02:37 AM on 03/06/2012
Also a cheapskate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Anderson
independent andy
03:24 AM on 03/06/2012
and what % did you give over the last ...umm...say....5 yrs? or does cheapskate apply to you too? or maybe you're on the other side looking for a charitable contribution to your income.........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frogluv73
01:51 AM on 03/06/2012
"I was in a situation where we have seven children, one disabled child who we take care of, and she's very, very expensive," he said. "We love her and cherish the opportunity to take care of her, but it's an additional expense. We have to have around-the-clock care for her, and our insurance company doesn't cover it, so I have to cover it."

So much said about his true character in these few sentences...and none of it shows any redeeming qualities whatsoever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Scott
Micro bio? Are you making fun of me?
02:21 AM on 03/06/2012
Being good family men, in a highly visible and public way -- as part of a political platform, can only be cautiously endorsed, and should be specifically limited, its relevance to governing an often specious one. In short, it's often irrelevant.

Even Italy flirted with this with the rise of their ultra-right problem in the last century.
I say 'even,' for today folks equate Italy with the finest and most subtle designer of goods that part of sensate living in a cultured way.

I can see Mr. Santorum's conservative brand of religion, having been subjectt to it in my life.
He seems quite sincere in his faith, and the 18 point loss of his seat after only one term in Pennsylvania may be a testament, not to pun too heavily, to his fidelity to speaking conservative right-wing ideologies for social arrangements against almost anyone's advice you talk to...

However, others point out cynically that Santorum knew he'd have only a brief moment in the sun against the Romney money machine, and so better to speak your mind plainly, get points for being consistently ultra-right and maybe channel that to a small speech/platform visibility at the RNC? Would a politician be that pragmatic, taking what he/she can, while they can, to gain name recognition for later runs?
Ah, to enjoy the big money machine that is a gas to ride when you're flying high, say the pundits along for the show...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:41 AM on 03/06/2012
THE PRESIDENT IS GIVING, FOLLOW BEHIND THAT RICK! OH YOU ONLY WANT TO BE ON THE RECEIVING SIDE!
02:40 AM on 03/06/2012
So does Ms. Fluke it seems.
photo
BigRex
We need to talk about your TPS reports.
07:41 AM on 03/06/2012
yeah you're right she's receiving a bunch of BS from mouth-breathers such as you. Lemme guess, you too never read her testimony and are only basing your opinion on what ol' Larda$$ said.
07:43 AM on 03/06/2012
Rush?????? is that you?
twarns
Just the facts
12:30 AM on 03/06/2012
"I was in a situation where we have seven children, one disabled child who we take care of, and she's very, very expensive," he said. "We love her and cherish the opportunity to take care of her, but it's an additional expense. We have to have around-the-clock care for her, and our insurance company doesn't cover it, so I have to cover it."

What kind of father and Christian would blame their disabled child for his lack of charity?
photo
katie2673
Faux News: When facts don't matter.
02:42 PM on 03/06/2012
Mittens
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Paleo-conservative and Anti-tea party
07:36 PM on 03/06/2012
Hes also putting his disabled child into the lime light. It makes the President and Romney seem much more in touch with their communities and they don't have to offer "cold" excuses like santorum did. His position does have some logical justification but Mitt has children too and he gave 14 percent. 1.7 percent is quite small.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:26 AM on 03/06/2012
Does he get money from the gov. for his child, because it's said he gets paid to home school his children from the government! This guy is so phoney it's pathetic!