iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Richest 1 Percent Account For Nearly All Of U.S. Recovery's Gains: Report

1 Percent Income Inequality

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 03/ 5/2012 11:31 am Updated: 03/ 5/2012 5:44 pm

Technically, the economy has been in recovery for two years. But it turns out the rich have been doing most of the recovering.

In 2010 -- the first full year since the end of the Great Recession -- virtually all of the income growth in America took place among the country's very wealthiest people, says an economist at the University of California, Berkeley. The top 1 percent of earners took in a full 93 percent of all the income gains that year, leaving the other 7 percent of gains to be sprinkled among the vast majority of society.

Those numbers come courtesy of Emmanuel Saez, the Berkeley economist who co-created a resource known as the World Top Incomes Database. Saez and his colleagues crunched the data on income growth from 2010, the most recent year available, and found that it was shockingly lopsided.

While much of the country is simply treading water, with a growing number of people either edging toward poverty or already there, the richest of the rich seem to be coping nicely.

Saez's findings suggest that even though the recession dealt a blow to the 1 percent, it did little to push the U.S. off the path it's been on for decades -- that of a vast and growing disparity between the richest and poorest citizens.

Income for most workers has barely risen in the last 30 years, but the top 1 percent of earners have seen their income almost triple in the same amount of time. Economists and other experts say that could be the result of any number of factors, including the decline of labor unions, the explosion in capital gains during the middle part of the aughts, and tax policies put in place in recent years that favor the wealthy.

In his State of the Union address this past January, President Obama called economic fairness "the defining issue of our time," perhaps mindful of the growing number of voters who say they can't even afford basic necessities like food.

The wealth gap has been cited as a major concern for the nationwide Occupy movement, and research has suggested that income inequality might be associated with the kind of underwhelming economic growth the country has experienced for the past two years.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Technically, the economy has been in recovery for two years. But it turns out the rich have been doing most of the recovering. In 2010 -- the first full year since the end of the Great Recession --...
Technically, the economy has been in recovery for two years. But it turns out the rich have been doing most of the recovering. In 2010 -- the first full year since the end of the Great Recession --...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,930
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (89 total)
photo
gerald1961
Not as nice as I use to be
02:55 PM on 07/29/2012
The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. If the GOPTP get their way the poor wil dry up and disappear. REGISTER AND VOTE! and try not to disappear.
sjaent2001
Change gets Challenged, changer gets Cross/poison
11:10 PM on 07/12/2012
How to be rich part II never give up ----
According to the IRS, which recently released 2009 data from the 400 richest individual income tax returns, the real runaway growth in wealth has come from capital gains. In the last years of the bubble, the "Fortunate 400" made nearly half their income from capital gains (a.k.a.: profit from the rising value of an investment, such as stocks or property) and less than 10% of their income from old-fashioned wages.

The average income of a top-400 earner grew by 650% between 1992 and 2007 to a whopping $344 million. Over that time, the average salary didn't even double. But the average capital gains haul increased by 1,200%. So how do the richest get richer? ((Yahoo Finance))
Those who have lost heavily in stocks by bying at the higher prices should learn that it always pays to listen to the analysts, and the rumors forming in foreign lands, and coordinating with the floor order fillers --------- Good LUCK and BE RICHER OF THE RICH.
sjaent2001
Change gets Challenged, changer gets Cross/poison
11:09 PM on 07/12/2012
How to be Rich ---- Part 1 - If anyone wants to catch up with the richest of the richest here are some facts from a study just released -----------beware that these are the guys who somehow buy the stocks at the nose dive of the programmed sell of at the WS, and then when the prices go up they do not delay to make gains on the investors pains, and then get the capital gains taxed at 15%. It is all about analysts, advisors, programmers, rumorers, that make it happen for the richest of the rich. right or worng but here is how it works: facts from a study published in Yahoo Finance:
In 1992, the 400th richest person in America made $24 million.

In 2007, the 400th richest person in America made $138 million (or $87 million, inflation-adjusted).

Now, that almost certainly wasn't the same guy. There's a lot of churn at the top of the money pyramid. In all of the 1990s, only 25% of the Fortunate 400 made more than one appearance. But the overall message is the same. The rich keep getting richer.
03:40 PM on 06/18/2012
anybody else want to slap on a pair of green tights and join a merry band of followers cahnteing take from the rich to give to the poor.
anyone?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ogg-the-bear
Stunning millions with bolts of lightning...
11:49 AM on 04/10/2012
The President wants "economic fairness" but then gives bailouts to those who don't need them, tolerates right wing conservatives as if they're good-faith dealers (they're anything but), and supports legislation that allows the 1% to keep on keepin' on.

Actions beat words. Period.
ColoradoPete
End of term coming.......
10:10 PM on 03/25/2012
I think the headline for this story ought to be:

"Obama Administration Doing Nothing for the 99%"
08:47 AM on 04/27/2012
But he is doing it TO the 99%
05:59 AM on 03/25/2012
The surest way to keep the rich from getting richer is to not buy their products. Of course, if you want to join them, find out what they're doing and just do it better.
01:26 AM on 04/26/2012
What world are you living in?! These platitudes are ridiculously hollow. The richest aren't selling products. They're finding ways to make their money without consumers. Consumers are on the road to obsolescence. The only snag is the old world order US economy is still based 70% on consumerism, according to Reich. That consumer economy's only a snag that the wealthiest will deal with soon enough and dismantle to their advantage.

As for your second assertion, well it is just absurd.
08:57 AM on 04/27/2012
"Reich"? Is that the Kilroy kinda guy who was in the Clinton administration? I don't believe he's ever run a successful enterprise of any kind. Hardly an expert. Otherwise, re-read your post and think about it instead of parroting the Democrat cac.
09:01 AM on 04/27/2012
BTW, when was the last time you sought a street beggar to seek a job?
photo
D W Smith
Obama/Biden 2012
10:27 PM on 03/12/2012
huh...
"Trickle-Up"

... didn't see THAT comin...
02:45 PM on 03/11/2012
The real reason that income inequality is less in the Euroland countries? The rich have all left! The brightest and the best leave because the government wants to take too much of what they have. Look at the Forbes richest in the world and it is littered with people taking up citizenship elsewhere. You want better employment that will truly fix the gap in the US? Stop punishing people for building or expanding their businesses here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tommygun264
2Q2BSTR8
05:39 PM on 03/11/2012
Businesses don't hire because they make more money or recieve bigger tax cuts, they hire and expand when there is greater demand for their products and a population with enough money to afford those products. As for your unfounded assertion that there is less income disparity in Europe because the wealthy have fled, PROVE IT. It will come as quite a shock to Getmany and other countries whose economies are outpacing our own. And BTW, if all the rich people fled to the US and they are the job creators, WHERE ARE THE JOBS? You've got nothing but long ago refuted talking points in support of the FAILURE of trickle-down.
07:58 PM on 03/11/2012
Where to start? Ask Obama about the jobs, he got everything he wanted the first two years and is a failure on jobs. 10 Million are off the roles and unemployment barley budges. How about Germany, they have a AAA Bond Rating, Constitutional caps on Debt and made the unions take huge pay cuts a few years ago. Obama did the opposite on all of these. He would not listen to his own commission and tried blaming the GOP , as you blame them for jobs. He is the POTUS. Everyone knows it. It is his economy as Orzag said three years ago. Business? They want to grow larger and make profits. That is why in fact they want to hire. They cannot grow without hiring people. When they hire it creates demand, an economic principle. Your notion 100% wrong, also neglects in the strongest sense the Obama disincentives to demand and growth across the country. That is why they do not hire. Lastly did you also neglect on purpose that the reference in my post was the Forbes list? Or did you just assume there was no proof. Again wrong and without credibility. I will help you get a start. Look up Soros and Fredriksen, just two that would rather do business elsewhere because their own countries either tax too much or are basket cases. Who is staring business today in Spain, Portugal and Italy? No one. Why? Unlike Germany and America under Obama they have too much debt.
06:07 AM on 03/25/2012
"Businesses don't hire because they make more money or recieve bigger tax cuts, they hire and expand when there is greater demand for their products and a population with enough money to afford those products"

Haven't you totally contradicted yourself in just one sentence ?
photo
D W Smith
Obama/Biden 2012
10:32 PM on 03/12/2012
lowest taxes in FIFTY YEARS
THEY PAY LITTLE TO NOTHING
SOME GET MONEY FOR NOTHING

and you want us to stop "PUNISHING" them??

WHAT KIND OF SICK, TWISTED lDl0T ARE YOU ANYWAY???
06:10 AM on 03/25/2012
"lowest taxes in FIFTY YEARS
THEY PAY LITTLE TO NOTHING
SOME GET MONEY FOR NOTHING"

Can you be just a little more specific, here ?

WHAT KIND OF SICK, TWISTED lDl0T ARE YOU ANYWAY???
02:06 PM on 03/26/2012
"like you, he knows EXACTLY what I was talking about, but prevaricates

I'm not playing that dum. bass game "

I knew what you were saying...it was the way you said it..why do Liberals have to be so nasty?

googled..

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jun/29/barack-obama/barack-obama-says-tax-rates-are-lowest-1950s-ceos-/

Between 1960 (when the "1950s" faded into history) and the 1980s, when Ronald Reagan pushed through landmark tax cuts, top tax brackets had much higher rates than those in place today. For instance, the top rate was 91 percent in 1960, and 70 percent on the eve of Reagan’s election in 1980.

Guess it is the lowest in 50/60 years..
02:37 PM on 03/11/2012
Really this is so misleading. Many on the bottom are hurting because of Obama polcies, like gas prices doubling, insurance premiums going up even faster than under Bush and the poverty rate going up, etc; while the top 100 people in the world control almost $2 Trillion by themselves. We need more equality, but Obama is just using this as a pretext for re-relection. If he cared about the 99%, he would do somthing about unemployment and the fact that over 10 million have stopped looking for work. That all comes down to his anti business policies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tommygun264
2Q2BSTR8
05:48 PM on 03/11/2012
The US is producing more oil now than in the prevoius three years- unless you are advocating Socialism in the form of nationalizing the oil industry, it's speculators and higher demand in other countries driving up the price of gas. Healthcare insurance premium increases you try to blame on President Obama were instituted BEFORE. the Affordable Care Act went into effect. In fact, as the regulation in the Affordable Care Act tha requires insurers to spend 80% of premiums on patient care and refund any excess to customers, heslth insurance companies have refund MILLIONS in overcharges to customers. Take off your O-hater blinders and look at the FACTS.
08:10 PM on 03/11/2012
Firstly we need to produce more oil because we have more people. How about an empirical relationship as opposed to just saying we are producing more and think that means anything at all? We can produce even more and create more jobs, help the debt and exports without harming the environment. Obama is blocking it. Secondly, socialism is your word and projection. Again, just want to say something even if it does not apply?

And here are some more real facts. The growth in Health Care Premiums went from 12% to 3% under Bush. They went from 3% to 9% under Obama. You are also trying to mislead people if you think that the debate that started the moment Obama took office did not cause the increase to start. Saying that HCR passed when to start counting is nonsense. I count the minute Obama took office. No blaming Bush on that one?

I know that the insurance companies overcharge. And HCR puts 50 Million more on the Insurance Companies roles. That is why HCR will cost far more for even less services. Obama failure.

These are the unemotional facts. Are Obama and his supporters so desperate that they are now deceiving and lying on purpose? I like to skewer a good spin, but some of these comments are way over the truth line. No shouting here. Just facts.
noahmarder
Exposing the regressive lies, one by one
03:52 AM on 03/12/2012
Bush left Obama a totally gutted economy that couldn't recover for at least several years no matter what Obama did. Obama has continued to make things worse by continuing many of Bush's failed policies. There are no jobs here because it is economically advantageous for American businesses to outsource them. Furthermore, since Americans have so little income, there is less demand for products. Reversing some of the regressive class warfare that has been taking place since 1980 might help the situation, but you want to do exactly the opposite.

Business in America is no longer about producing things and selling them for a profit. Instead, the model is to extract other people's wealth while contributing less than nothing yourself, or to defraud others into buying garbage. We need MORE regulation, and HIGHER taxes, especially on those who have benefited so much from this corrupt system. We need penalties for outsourcing jobs, and a financial transaction tax, which would put a damper on what is, at best, a zero sum game, and in practice, a wholesale pillaging of ordinary Americans' wealth. Most importantly, we need to GET MONEY OUT OF POLITICS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChristianEcon.com
"The Lord abhors dishonest scales."--Proverbs 11.1
08:10 PM on 03/09/2012
I propose a welfare-to-work program for the 1%. Wean them off the workers slowly, let them learn skills and eventually get jobs. I call it "compassionate liberalism."
02:45 PM on 03/08/2012
Is extreme income inequality unfair? Yes, our system is unfair in producing extremes of poverty and wealth. But it's worse than unfair: it's doomed.

Society cannot survive further increase in income inequality. The "recovery" is not happening. Wealth disparity is increasing, not decreasing.

Forget "fair". Think "stable". What we need is a system that is capable of achieving stability, and what we have is not.

Something has got to give, and it will.
01:17 AM on 03/08/2012
93% of the recovery never happened. if Obama can hang this on the perps in a spectacular way he'll get another shot.
01:14 AM on 03/08/2012
Occupy yacht clubs, country clubs, golf courses, exotic car dealerships, private schools, 5 star restaurants, marinas, hotels, etc. You can run but we'll already be there.
02:55 AM on 03/12/2012
one of the top expensive restaurants where I live was immediately adjacent to the 99% movement encampment, I was always startled to walk past their plate glass windows to observe the diners completely oblivious to the police cordons, bread lines and commotion going on within inches of their cocktails and dinner plates, it was so incongruous and made me feel like I lived in a 3rd world country, let them eat cake!
09:35 PM on 03/12/2012
Next time phone in some uniforms to interrupt their dinner.
09:50 PM on 03/07/2012
An Alternative to Capitalism (if the people knew about it, they would demand it)

Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative". She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists.

I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider. Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?" which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:

http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm

John Steinsvold

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
~ Albert Einstein