iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

California Cellphone Ban Reduced Traffic Related Deaths, Injuries, Berkeley Study Finds

California Cellphone Ban

First Posted: 03/ 5/2012 9:03 pm Updated: 03/ 6/2012 9:34 am

SACRAMENTO, California (AP) — California's nearly four-year-old ban on drivers using handheld cellphones is saving lives, according to a University of California, Berkeley, study released Monday.

The study found that overall traffic deaths dropped 22 percent, while deaths blamed on drivers using hand-held cellphones were down 47 percent. Deaths among drivers who use hands-free phones dropped at a similar rate.

The university's Safe Transportation Research and Education Center examined deaths for two years before and two years after the cellphone ban took effect in July 2008. It found a similar drop in injuries attributed to drivers' cellphone use.

The number of deaths among drivers using hand-held phones fell from 100 to 53 during that period, while the number of injuries dropped from 7,720 to 3,862.

The California Office of Traffic Safety, which sought the study, said deaths and injuries are declining in part because of an overall decrease in drivers using cellphones.

An unrelated survey commissioned by the state last summer found 40 percent of drivers say they talk less while driving since the ban took effect, even if they have a legal hands-free device.

The California survey, which included 1,801 drivers 18 and over at gas stations in 15 counties, tracked a similar finding in 2010 by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

The institute's survey found that 44 percent of drivers in states with cellphone bans said they don't use their phones while driving, compared with 30 percent in states that let drivers use hand-held cellphones.

Two previous studies, one by the nonprofit RAND Corp. and another by an affiliate of the insurance institute, found no overall reduction in vehicle crashes after the cellphone law took effect. The university said its study is the first to look specifically at collisions involving cellphone use.

The university findings surprised neither critics nor supporters of the state law.

"When you ban something, you're going to have less of it," said Republican Sen. Doug LaMalfa. "Of course the numbers are going to go down."

Instead of looking for illegal cellphone use, LaMalfa said police should be on watch for erratic drivers no matter if they are distracted by cellphones, putting on makeup, shaving, or changing compact discs in a stereo system.

The Department of Motor Vehicles reported 460,487 handheld cellphone convictions last year, up 52 percent from the 301,833 convictions in 2009.

Sen. Joe Simitian, a Democrat who authored the cellphone law, said he was gratified by the study's findings but thinks the state could do better if the financial penalty was higher.

He plans to amend his SB1310 to raise the current base penalty for a first offense from $20 to $30, with the additional $10 going to driver education programs. With court and other fees, a first offense currently costs drivers at least $159.

Gov. Jerry Brown last year vetoed a bill, SB28, that would have raised the base fine to $50. Brown said current penalties should be enough to deter illegal cellphone use.

"Distracted driving laws can and do save lives," said Simitian, adding that, "as good as these numbers are, they could be better" with a higher fine and more education.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

SACRAMENTO, California (AP) — California's nearly four-year-old ban on drivers using handheld cellphones is saving lives, according to a University of California, Berkeley, study released Monday. ...
SACRAMENTO, California (AP) — California's nearly four-year-old ban on drivers using handheld cellphones is saving lives, according to a University of California, Berkeley, study released Monday. ...
Filed by Ramona Emerson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ciotog17
Deploring neoconservatism since 1968
02:17 AM on 03/08/2012
Here's a better idea. Why not ban automobiles in Evanston? Then everyone can use cell phones whenever they want.
10:04 AM on 03/07/2012
So the reduction in deaths was the same, whether using a cell phone or hands free. Think about that for a heartbeat. The law isn't going to reduce hands free deaths. If anything, it would show an increase in hands free deaths as more people used hands free devices and by sheer quantity would have to die more than before. But that's not the case. THE LAW DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! I don't know if it's the study, or the media misreading the data, but this is poor science. There's no scientific reason why hands free deaths would decrease the same as cell phone deaths if the law only banned cell phones. Please Huffington Post. I implore you to look at this again. Be the first news outlet to point this out. It's bad science.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TaiJi2
07:30 PM on 03/06/2012
Just think how many more deaths could be avoided if people actually obeyed these laws!
12:46 PM on 03/06/2012
This is Socialism.
Where in the Constitution does it say that cell phones should be banned while driving?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stevenson52
11:54 PM on 03/06/2012
"provide for the general welfare"
photo
Arashi
comfort the afflicted; afflict the comfortable
07:20 AM on 03/07/2012
Good for you! #2
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
11:48 AM on 03/06/2012
Yup not news here.
I see less of it now. But I am not fooled, I see drivers looking down when they should be looking at the road, I KNOW WHAT YOUR'E DOING.
12:10 PM on 03/06/2012
Masturbating?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ran6110
Mac, iPhone & iPad developer.
10:46 AM on 03/06/2012
Someone should pass this study on to the entire state of Utah.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel Myers
Then man created god in his image.
10:38 AM on 03/06/2012
Fuel prices and fewer poor people driving has a larger effect, proven in other states that have no cell phone restrictions. It's not the law or regulation improving conditions.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tonyjim
11:13 AM on 03/06/2012
Possible, there are less poor people on the road which means their are less poor people involved in fatalities due to entitled, privileged dim witted drivers with surgically attached cell phones to the side of the head killing themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daniel Myers
Then man created god in his image.
01:19 PM on 03/06/2012
So am I supposed to stick a bow on my opinion and ignore the fact that driving safety has improved across the board nationwide? Curiously the same thing happened in oil shocks in history, back then the came out with a catchy phrase "55 saves lives," uh no.