iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Russia Elections: Observers Report 'Serious Problems' In Russian Vote

AP  |  By JIM HEINTZ and PETER LEONARD  |  Posted: 03/05/12 04:58 AM ET  |  Updated: 03/06/12 02:45 PM ET

Vladimir Putin
Vladimir Putin

MOSCOW -- There were "serious problems" in the vote that returned Vladimir Putin to the Russian presidency, the head of the major international election observer mission said Monday, adding fuel to an opposition testing its strength with plans for a massive protest rally.

Putin rolled to victory as expected Sunday to return to the Kremlin and keep his hold on power for six more years, but opponents claim the voting was rigged. A rally has been set for Monday evening on Moscow's Pushkin Square, one of the central city's most iconic locations, with news reports say some 12,000 police and troops will be on duty to ensure order.

A brief synopsis by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe observer mission did not address complaints of widespread cases of people casting multiple ballots, but said the election "was assessed negatively" in almost a third of polling stations observers visited.

"There was no real competition, and abuse of government resources ensured that the ultimate winner of the election was never in doubt," said Tonino Picula, the head of the short-term observer mission.

The Central Elections Commission says the prime minister, who was president in 2000-2008, got more than 63 percent of the nationwide vote. The independent Russian elections watchdog Golos says incomplete reports from its observers of individual polling station counts indicate he hovered perilously close to the 50-percent mark needed for a first-round victory.

"It's one pixel away from a second round," said Golos' Roman Udot.

Putin claimed victory Sunday night when fewer than a quarter of the votes had been counted, his eyes brimming with tears. He defiantly proclaimed just outside the Kremlin walls before a sea of supporters that they had triumphed over opponents intent on "destroying Russia's statehood and usurping power."

Putin's win was never in doubt as he faced a weak slate of Kremlin-approved candidates and many across the vast country still see him as a guarantor of stability and the defender of a strong Russia against a hostile world, an image he has carefully cultivated during 12 years in power.

The OSCE observers' conclusions may have significant bearing on whether Russia's opposition forces will be able to maintain the protests of the last three months, the largest public show of anger in post-Soviet Russia. Opposition demonstrations previously had been severely limited by officials, and any unauthorized gatherings were harshly dispersed by police.

Officials gave permission for the massive rallies, which attracted tens of thousands, but it was not clear if the tolerance would continue in the post-election period.

On Monday, outgoing President Dmitry Medvedev ordered the Justice Ministry to present its explanation for last year's rejection of registration for the People's Freedom Party, an organization led by some of the opposition's most prominent figures.

He also ordered the prosecutor-general to re-examine the legality of the conviction of imprisoned former oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky and more than 30 others regarded by the opposition as political prisoners.

Some observers saw the move as a maneuver to try to soothe protesters.

Medvedev, "it appears, is trying in advance to break the protest wave, " political analyst Pavel Svyatenkov was quoted as saying by the ITAR-Tass news agency.

At least one opposition figured vowed that strategy wouldn't work.

In general, this step can be welcomed. But I don't think it should stop the criticism of authorities," Left Front leader Sergei Udaltsov told the state news agency RIA Novosti.

The West can expect Putin to continue the tough policies he has pursued even as prime minister, including opposing U.S. plans to build a missile shield in Europe and resisting international military intervention in Syria.

Communist Party candidate Gennady Zyuganov was a distant second in the election, followed by Mikhail Prokhorov, the billionaire owner of the New Jersey Nets basketball team whose candidacy was approved by the Kremlin in what was seen as an effort to channel some of the protest sentiment.

The clownish nationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky and socialist Sergei Mironov trailed behind. The leader of the liberal opposition Yabloko party was barred from the race.

______

Associated Press writer Mansur Mirovalev in Moscow contributed to this report.

1  of  19
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who claimed victory in Russia's presidential election, tears up as he reacts at a massive rally of his supporters at Manezh square outside Kremlin, in Moscow, Sunday, March 4, 2012. Vladimir Putin has claimed victory in Russia's presidential election, which the opposition and independent observers say has been marred by widespread violations. Putin made the claim at a rally of tens of thousands of his supporters just outside the Kremlin, thanking his supporters for helping foil foreign plots aimed to weaken the country. (AP Photo/Ivan Sekretarev)
FOLLOW WORLD

MOSCOW -- There were "serious problems" in the vote that returned Vladimir Putin to the Russian presidency, the head of the major international election observer mission said Monday, adding fuel to an...
MOSCOW -- There were "serious problems" in the vote that returned Vladimir Putin to the Russian presidency, the head of the major international election observer mission said Monday, adding fuel to an...
Filed by Jade Walker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,403
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (38 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:44 PM on 03/06/2012
Putin tears are communist tears. It means his detractors will cry and wail. Russian peoples are in trouble. If Russia is helping Syria to crash Syrian's opposition, then Putin is warning Russians. It is sad that Russian is an impediment to democracy. All the ruthless dictators are now going to be under the protection of Russia to crash and kill their own people. It is too bad for Putin.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ftkl1234
02:58 PM on 03/06/2012
In a country where investigative reporters and opposition figures get punished and killed, is it any wonder that elections will be rigged? Putin is an oligarch and will do what it takes to stay in power. It's a good gig to have in Russia.
01:41 PM on 03/06/2012
Противно смотреть на этот просыпающейся советский маразм.
11:19 PM on 03/05/2012
We have massive problems with our vote that we should be worried about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:42 PM on 03/05/2012
I want a "Crying Putin" black velvet painting. Somebody get on that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alan Lunn
08:12 PM on 03/05/2012
Mark Ames of exiledonline.com used to report in Russia and found the regime to be highly corrupt. No real surprise there. When he came to America he found a similar kind of regime forming here. Like the old Beatles tune: Back In The USSR. We never seem to graduate to any real form of democracy due to the basic human penchant for greed and the lust for power. I think we're seeing a revived fascist impulse in these countries and we're in the corporatocracy stage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jonnavarra
America has spoken... now shut up!
07:19 PM on 03/05/2012
Of course here in America vote rigging is not as obvious and blatant as in other countries... we just let the supreme court decide or make it into law.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vlad Roudenko
07:53 PM on 03/05/2012
lol The Supreme Court in 2000... 9 people vote instead of roughly 300 million. What kind of democracy is this?

I was listening to an interview by Washington Post chief with Belarus president Lukashenko last year. She told him that if Belarus wants to cooperate with the US, it needs to have fair elections, free press, democracy, free opposition, and a few other absurd things. The funny thing is, the US has none of those things at all. Belarus has 6 registered opposition parties. The US has no opposition parties at all who are allowed into the legislature. She also complained about some law which required registration of NGOs before they could operate. Belarus has perhaps 2000+ NGOs, probably most of them are foreign. Russia has 500,000 and all of them are either foreign or receive most of its funding from abroad. I highly doubt that the US would allow an unregistered NGO to operate on its territory, especially with foreign funding.

With regard to vote rigging, it would appear that the poll in Nevada was most likely rigged. There was an article in some paper that said that Romney won prior to polls being closed. He could not have possibly won there given his statements about the poor and the disadvantaged. That state is in a financial mess right now. Either it was rigged or the people have become incredibly stupid to vote for this elitist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bayard Waterbury
social philosopher
07:03 PM on 03/05/2012
Having just commented on the Russian democratic experiment, I shall now comment on the similar state of the American democratic experiment. Although, in America, the financially elite have always had a significant say in the shape of the America in which we live, it has recently moved far beyond significant to extremely dominant. OWS is the head of the beast that has arisen in the wake of the perfection of American plutocracy (i.e. rule by a cabal of cooperative oligarchs). We now live in a country where the electoral system is quickly becoming a real piece of black humor greater than any yet devised. The rules of elections are controlled by legislative actions which are taken by elected officials who have been fully sponsored by money. They are treated as real and honest and competitive by the media (which, of course, is one of the cooperating oligarchies), and analysed by pundits selected for their capability as actors who portray the elections as actual contests between competing interests. Ask yourself why Wall Street gave congressional candidates contributions of $120 million split nearly equally between the major parties candidates. Duh!! They always "bet" both sides, figuring that they win anyway. So, unlike Russia, which gets the best leadership they can enforce, we simply get the very best that millions and billions can buy. The average American is no better off in terms of well being and opportunity for success than the average Russian. What an "experiment"!!!!!
07:51 PM on 03/05/2012
what i've always dreamed of, all being equally...POOR!!!
07:01 PM on 03/05/2012
Yeah, like we should talk with Bush stealing two elections.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bayard Waterbury
social philosopher
06:53 PM on 03/05/2012
There is, of course, no real news here. This is the defacto state of government in the Russian state since the overthrow of the cabal governing the USSR and the breakup of the Soviet empire. Not only that, but it is important to understand that there are essentially the same forces at work there as in the US, just that they are more apparent to those who wish to know, which is a massively abused Russian citizenry. It is simple a "democratic" sham which replaced a communist oligarchy, neither of which was or is what it claimed or claims to be. Yes, individual liberty in everyday life has improved somewhat dramatically to a similar extent as in the USA. But, economically there have only been changes resulting from modernization, but no in individual prospects for financial success. I am friends with a successful Russian in the their small "middle" class, and, though he is financially secure, he must be always mindful of "stepping on the wrong toes." The more things change, as they say, the more things stay the same.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1tourist
10:19 AM on 03/06/2012
The major difference between the USA and Russia, is that we act like it makes a difference which "side" wins, the key word being "act'. The Russians have not yet perfected the charade of competing interests., but in both cases, it is the big money intrests that get preserved.
06:44 PM on 03/05/2012
Golos is funded by the State Department. It's not reliable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vlad Roudenko
07:18 PM on 03/05/2012
They were exposed not too long ago in a major way. Some tabloid hacked their email server and revealed some incredible emails from the State Department. They were essentially telling Golos to work off the money that they were already paid; fabricate violations and "evidence" to back up those allegations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BoudiccaBlanc
~Yes, my micro-bio is emply! ~
05:54 PM on 03/05/2012
Hmmm....And how is this different from the USA's 2000 election?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sitemfg
07:05 PM on 03/05/2012
Right? Living in the past. Best you can do while the constitution is trampled.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bayard Waterbury
social philosopher
07:07 PM on 03/05/2012
BoudiccaBlanc, please read my two posts. We both have peeked behind the veil and seen the great and powerful Oz. Amazing that he seems to resemble both Romney and Obama. Odd, isn't it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BoudiccaBlanc
~Yes, my micro-bio is emply! ~
10:34 PM on 03/10/2012
Yes!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:32 PM on 03/05/2012
Interesting turn of events happening Putin is coming back in Russia and China's Liberal Leaders Hu and Wen are going to leave and be replaced by a Conservative Iron Man Xi Jinping next year.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:22 PM on 03/05/2012
I WONDER WHAT DR. PHIL says about Mr. Putin?
Or OPRAH?
AMERICAN CULTURE at its best, in all these comments.
4 are funny.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MichaelGuy
Swiis Canton, Dutch Republic, advocate
05:16 PM on 03/05/2012
Chicago comes to Moscow? Did Rahm Emanuel and Cass Sunstein hire on as putin campaign managers? The democrats have been stuffing ballots since Tamany Hall and Richard Daley corrupting the ballots for Kennedy.
Vladimir Putin is a patriot, albeit a Machiavellian one. Vladimir Putin advances the peace, prosperity, hegemony and interest of his nation and citizens, unlike our "global citizen".He is not a groveling vassal to Israel nor the UN, Saudi Family and the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood, George Sorros , the Socialist International etc, like our politicians are. God bless President Putin
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vlad Roudenko
07:31 PM on 03/05/2012
It's far better to have a Machiavellian leader than a puppet controlled by foreign entities. His victory was celebrated not just by majority of Russian people, but also many others around the world.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mky8_BssUms&feature=share

The title of this article is incredibly misleading. Many observers and journalists from outside of Russia praised the elections as transparent and without serious violations. They also praised the monitoring system, saying that it exceeds all world standards. Around 1.5 million observers were present, both foreign and domestic. What other country has this many observers present during their elections? The US does not even allow observers to be present at its elections. There were allegations of ballot box stuffing in Dagestan. They were proven by video surveillance. It's hard to tell if this was a provocation by opposition figures or genuine fraud on some candidate's part. In either case, the results were annulled there. Problem solved, no?