iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Barack Obama Scolds GOP Candidates For 'Casualness' In Talking About War With Iran

First Posted: 03/ 6/2012 2:38 pm Updated: 03/ 7/2012 8:47 am

WASHINGTON -- In his most direct attack to date on the Republicans vying for his job, President Barack Obama on Tuesday knocked his GOP challengers for their "casualness" in talking about the prospect of going to war with Iran, suggesting that their tough talk is devoid of any real substance.

During a White House press conference, Obama said there is still time for dealing diplomatically with Iran as the country signals it may be trying to develop a nuclear weapon. That is the view of U.S. and Israeli intelligence officials, he said, and as such, he said he plans to keep working with the international community to impose sanctions on Iran.

Then, without naming names, the president slammed Republican presidential candidates Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum, who have criticized him for being too passive on Iran by not endorsing military action.

"What's said on the campaign trail, you know, those folks don't have a lot of responsibilities. They're not commander-in-chief," Obama said. "When I see the casualness with which some of these folks talk about war, I'm reminded of the costs involved in war. I'm reminded of the decision that I have to make, in terms of sending our young men and women into battle, and the impacts that has on their lives, the impact it has on our national security, the impact it has on our economy."

"This is not a game, and there's nothing casual about it."

Taking it a step further, Obama said Republicans who are "beating the drums of war" should have to explain clearly to the American people what they think the costs and benefits would be to going to war with Iran. "They should explain to the American people exactly why they would do that and what the consequences would be," he said. "Everything else is just talk."

When pressed for specifics on how to respond to Iran, the president suggested there is some irony in the fact that, for all their "bluster" and "big talk," his Republican challengers end up repeating Obama's policies from the past few years.

"It indicates to me that [their criticisms are] more about politics than actually trying to solve a difficult problem," he said.

Obama's press conference coincidentally -- or not so much -- lands on the same day as Super Tuesday, which could decide once and for all who the Republican presidential nominee will be. The president declined to call out any of his challengers by name, but asked if he had any response to Romney's characterization of him as "feckless," Obama had a message for the GOP hopeful.

"Good luck tonight," he said to laughs. "No, really."

UPDATE: 3:30 p.m. -- Asked at a Capitol Hill press conference about Obama's suggestion that some of the comments that appeared to favor war were politically motivated, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said the issue is the threat that Iran poses.

"I'm a lot more concerned about nuclear proliferation in the Middle East," McConnell said. "In what way would kicking the can down the road and allowing Iran to become the possessor of a nuclear weapon and the ability to deliver them -- in what way does that make us a safer world?"

McConnell has proposed having the Senate pass a resolution to use military force against Iran if Tehran starts enriching uranium to weapons grade. He said that was not necessarily a call to war.

"A resolution authorizing the use of force is not a mandate to use force, but clearly would indicate to the Iranians that we're willing to go beyond sanctions that many of us are skeptical are likely to get the final result," McConnell said.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) countered minutes later by echoing the president and cautioning that lawmakers should leave the matter to Obama.

"I'm not going to be part of rushing forward on a declaration of war. These are things that have to be done very, very cautiously. We have problems around this world that are so significant," Reid said. "Let's just stop throwing the word 'war' around so casually."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- In his most direct attack to date on the Republicans vying for his job, President Barack Obama on Tuesday knocked his GOP challengers for their "casualness" in talking about the prospect...
WASHINGTON -- In his most direct attack to date on the Republicans vying for his job, President Barack Obama on Tuesday knocked his GOP challengers for their "casualness" in talking about the prospect...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,339
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (60 total)
  1 of 7  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
Waltfl 05:48 PM on 03/06/2012
Now the same people who criticized Obama for being to hasch on Lybia are saying he is too sift on Iran.

What irks me is that draft evading Republicans like Romney and Gingrich are already yearning for another war while two wars they started are not all the way finished. They fail to see the political consequences of their ignorant actions.  What we have to deal with in Iran right now is mainly  Read More...
01:21 AM on 03/08/2012
bush started a war and the President ended it. Give the President a break.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
09:15 PM on 03/07/2012
A view from across the pond : Your words Mr. President Sir only go to show that you are both a STATESMAN and a PRESIDENT, and it also demonstrates to me and I believe to the vast American People that you should remain President for another four more years.

The T/Republican war mongers have no answers at all and are not world leaders like your President either.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bunty4321r
war veteran
01:14 PM on 03/07/2012
Let me tell my friends that there are people in the society with different characteristics like one day a person told lies against another person and for that he was very mercilessly beaten with shoes.

After the person who had beaten the victim left the place and people watching went up to the victim and ask why he did not fight back he being such a strong man. The Victim readily replied “Did you not see the idiot did not have the courage to beat me with his bare hand, look had he beaten with his hands I would crush him to death.

So, my friend apply the same example on our Republican friends, do you think any shame left in them after they obtained Master degree to become first class liars to confuse the general public with Fox news with lies during election time only to get voted to power and later plans to kill the American middle class and poor and serve the rich by Tax cut.

Coming back to Presidents scolding the GOP, President used the sharpest weapon the sophisticated English sentences for the illiterates so that they can go back home and consult the dictionary to understand the meaning and behave accordingly instead of insulting them with blunt English.

However, we can be rest assured these low standard Republican Presidential Candidates would never understand anything what the President said because they are not accustomed with such sophisticated respectful sentences in their entire life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joncie
02:20 PM on 03/07/2012
Fanned. Nicely put.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bunty4321r
war veteran
03:31 PM on 03/07/2012
Thanks my sweet friend joncie you are welcome to my decent friend's circle. thanks once again. Take Care.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dminkel
09:30 PM on 03/08/2012
Thank You. It is good to hear him speak.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bunty4321r
war veteran
11:54 PM on 03/08/2012
Thanks he does very rarely because the illiterate are not accustomed to hear such sophisticated language he uses to do his job that the Republican needs months to realize the meaning as to he said. However, in any case thank you once again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cruiselover11d
01:06 PM on 03/07/2012
why is Romney avoiding MSNBC,, You idiots they could drill on every spot in American it will be at least 45 years before we see it. Also all this other crap about drilling you will save 3 a gallon Look it up stop listening to the fools. Do you really believe in 2.50 a gallon. why does he not for GOOD of the country tell us how. Oh yeah Milt was to drop start a war with Iran. Where has he been for the last 10+ plus years. Since no one in his family tree is a vet Is he willing to send his sons off to war
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Grey
07 Saluting our armed forces
12:35 PM on 03/07/2012
Mr President, please direct your attack on this candidate for President who called Iran a tiny country and no threat to us. His name was Senator Barrack H. Obama.

Look it up if you don't believe me. "Iran a tiny country and no threat to us"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosiebag
Big, Bold, Brassy
01:14 PM on 03/07/2012
Sounds like something he'd say I will look it up
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosiebag
Big, Bold, Brassy
01:28 PM on 03/07/2012
He said it was a tiny threat to us, what an uninformed and truly ignorant statement, just what you'd expect from Obama.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:08 PM on 03/07/2012
What's said on the campaign trail, you know, those folks don't have a lot of responsibilities. They're not commander-in-chief," Obama said. "When I see the casualness with which some of these folks talk about war, I'm reminded of the costs involved in war. I'm reminded of the decision that I have to make, in terms of sending our young men and women into battle, and the impacts that has on their lives, the impact it has on our national security, the impact it has on our economy."

"This is not a game, and there's nothing casual about it."

Taking it a step further, Obama said Republicans who are "beating the drums of war" should have to explain clearly to the American people what they think the costs and benefits would be to going to war with Iran. "They should explain to the American people exactly why they would do that and what the consequences would be," he said. "Everything else is just talk."

Obama needs to shout the above from the rooftops over and over again until all rational people understand. The others are a lost cause and won't vote for any rational person. He should also delineate the cost estimates, probabilities for each possible scenario and publish them for all to see.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timur Graham
Defender of facts and truth.
11:11 AM on 03/07/2012
Yes we can.. Mr President!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lawyer13
retired Lawyer, General and Psychiatric Nurse, wit
09:17 PM on 03/07/2012
Seconded from London England F & F
photo
RepublicanTexasHammer
GET OBAMA OUT NOW!
10:38 AM on 03/07/2012
We had another weak president like Obama. Jimmy Carter tried diplomacy with Iran to get our hostages released, but was met with repeated failures. As soon as Reagan took office the hostages were released. Iran knew that Reagan would have used immediate military action, not just to get the hostages released, but to show the world that the USA was not to be messed with.

These Iranians respect strength but take advantage of weakness. Obama’s recent talk of not ruling out a military strike is just more con talk. Easy to talk tough, but quite another to follow through. Why even give another country a warning…that eliminates the element of surprise. Similarly his announcement of dates for troops withdrawals has aided our enemies to plan accordingly. Easy to see why a president with zero previous military experience can be so naive.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timur Graham
Defender of facts and truth.
11:07 AM on 03/07/2012
Youre so boring dude...
Beating the drums of war... are you yourself going to volunteer or send your sons and daughter to die in Iran?
12:00 PM on 03/07/2012
No he is not so, he really needs to Zip his lips! His Life and family are not at stake so its nothing to him! But if the tables were to turn his tune would change also! @ Republican Texas Hammer!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:35 AM on 03/07/2012
To remind you waht actually happened with Reagan the Cowboy:
"he Iran–Contra affair (Persian: ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-contras), also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or Iran-Contra-Gate, was a political scandal in the United States that came to light in November 1986. During the Reagan administration, senior Reagan administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, the subject of an arms embargo.[1] Some U.S. officials also hoped that the arms sales would secure the release of hostages and allow U.S. intelligence agencies to fund the Nicaraguan Contras. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.
The scandal began as an operation to free six American hostages being held by a terrorist group with Iranian ties connected to the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution. It was planned that Israel would ship weapons to Iran, and then the U.S. would resupply Israel and receive the Israeli payment. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of six U.S. hostages. The plan deteriorated into an arms-for-hostages scheme, in which members of the executive branch sold weapons to Iran in exchange for the release of the American hostages.[2][3]"
12:04 PM on 03/07/2012
Sorry this was not directed towards u it was another writer
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
03:45 PM on 03/07/2012
It was actually worse than that. According to David Stockman (Reagan's budget director) in his book "The Triumph of Politics", the Reagan campaign (in 1980) actually sent agents to meet with foreign ambassadors (Iranian) promising them that Reagan would re-open the arms pipeline through Israel (that Carter had closed in an attempt to get the Iranians to give us our citizens) without which their American-made airplanes could not fly (and they needed them for their war with Iraq). Reagan actually went behind the back of a sitting president and conducted secret diplomacy and the goal of that diplomacy was to prevent the hostages from being released prior to the election so that Reagan could continue to use the hostage issue to make Carter appear to be weak. The Iranians were ready to give back the hostages because Carter's arms embargo worked. The ONLY reason they held on to those hostages for six more months was because the Reagan team promised to reopen the arms pipeline and to treat Iran better than the Carter Admin had treated them. On the day Reagan assumed office, those hostages appeared on the White House steps. True story.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MyResponsibility
Action over hope
10:13 AM on 03/07/2012
The Republicans he denigrates are not calling for war. They are calling for something more muscular and impactful on the mullahs than the feckless policy he has followed for three years. He has had his palm and window for negotiation open for years now, and the Iranians have ignored his entreaties as they rapidly develop their nuclear weapons program. The people he insults are trying to avoid war, yet find his somnolence and nonchalance both naĂŻve and dangerous.  His inactions are likely to lead to the Iranians developing nuclear weapons - and the violence that follows from this leading state sponsor of terror will be far more tragic given his approach.  Yet, Republicans who have actually experienced war and are trying to prevent more deaths  are the ones he denigrates as not understanding the gravity of war. Amazing...

Perhaps Barack Obama, who styles himself  a student of history might heed the words of Winston Churchill who reflected after the end of World War Two:
There never was a war in all history easier to prevent by timely action than the one which has just desolated such great areas of the globe.
Churchill, who actually served in war (as have Senators McCain and Kirk), knew that at various times in the late 30's violence could have been avoided had the world's leaders taken more forceful and far-sighted actions than they did when by their very somnolence and fecklessness stumbled into a World War.

Yet Barack Obama insults those who are working to prevent war by claiming they do not understand the gravity of war.

We have a President who slashes health benefits to our soldiers and veterans, does not know how to honor them or the holiday that celebrates their service, does not bother to learn how to pronounce their titles, uses them as campaign props and insults their survivors for the sake of photo ops.  He both disrespects them and then exploits them for political gain.

Does he understand or appreciate their service and sacrifice?

Indeed, does he understand the gravity of war?

I think not.
10:36 AM on 03/07/2012
Well we know the REps now all about Wars how nice for them to think we need a third war so we can spend more money. Obama has shown the most consitent thoughtful approach and not one Rep should be critizing him after Bush. This is all GOP hard line talk for more contracts to our buddies more death to those that don't matter.
12:06 PM on 03/07/2012
They are Calling for War! Tell it like it is, and if Every Element of Your being wasnt created by hate u would see that!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MyResponsibility
Action over hope
12:32 PM on 03/07/2012
It's official.  The word hate no longer has meaning, just like racist, and many other meanings of words that progressives have destroyed.  Good job with that.

That aside, are the Republican candidates calling for war, say, in the same manner that BHO is calling for war in Syria?  Or in a way OPPOSITE of the way we were at war with Egypt? Of course I'll concede that I MAY have this wrong, but do provide a link or two where Republican candidates have suggested we go to war with Iran.  BTW, taking out a nuclear facility is not war, and will not lead to war, because we know from Egypt that airstrikes is not war...or something like that.
cico31
the shovels are to scoop our peas
10:02 AM on 03/07/2012
how pathetic O is...does he realize his rhetoric in 2008 is all on tape..." the high gas prices can be attributed to Bush's failed economic policies" on and on and on....O will finally be vetted in 2012
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosiebag
Big, Bold, Brassy
09:50 AM on 03/07/2012
This from the guy who has turned Lybia into the wild west.
09:59 AM on 03/07/2012
Really? Years of a despotic leader played no role?

Hmm...Big, Bold, Brassy and Brainless.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
03:55 PM on 03/07/2012
I know you baggers are upset that Obama got rid of the terrorist dictator who was best friends with Dubya, but really.
photo
mvaldivia32
"fade to bolivian" - Mike Tyson
09:39 AM on 03/07/2012
OMG! when was the last time a President spoke of war like this................probably since Kennedy. This is how great presidents speak, you want an example of how bad presidents speak of war? listen to a republican debate.


"What's said on the campaign trail, you know, those folks don't have a lot of responsibilities. They're not commander-in-chief," Obama said. "When I see the casualness with which some of these folks talk about war, I'm reminded of the costs involved in war. I'm reminded of the decision that I have to make, in terms of sending our young men and women into battle, and the impacts that has on their lives, the impact it has on our national security, the impact it has on our economy."

"This is not a game, and there's nothing casual about it."
09:28 AM on 03/07/2012
Mitt is no president. Obama in 2012.
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
09:33 AM on 03/07/2012
Obama is no president and has conclusively demonstrated the fact.

Anyone else or "none of the above" in 2012.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sandyinalabama
Prejudices are what fools use for reason.
09:36 AM on 03/07/2012
Uh, excuse me sir, but Mr. Obama IS president.
12:07 PM on 03/07/2012
Lets see u do better! u havent even a clue!
stumanchu35
Tolerance is a one way street.
09:12 AM on 03/07/2012
We'll see how many candidates fill out March Madness brackets, speaking of games.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sandyinalabama
Prejudices are what fools use for reason.
09:30 AM on 03/07/2012
really??? That is all you have? Get a life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eds123
My micro-bio is less filling and tastes great!
10:53 AM on 03/07/2012
You know whats going to happen, Obama will do one then the GOP will all whine that Obama is not focused enough on the job of the presidency.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Devin DeWeil
Live, laugh, and LOVE LIFE!!!
09:10 AM on 03/07/2012
The GOP wants ANOTHER war..why? To drive up oil prices and make even more money. While our Soldiers, families, economy, and safety are sacrificed. This is otherwise defined as LEGALIZED WAR PROFITEERING. thank you Mr. President for reminding people that war is NOT a game! Not that the GOP wants to hear it...but I almost hope their resolution passes, Americans are sick of war, to pass another war resolution would only crush any hope of them retaining any power. OBAMA2012!!
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
03:58 PM on 03/07/2012
They don't actually want a war. What they want is gas prices to rise so they can blame Obama for high gas prices. So they are trying to make the middle east as volatile as possible. The worst that could happen is Iran preemptively starts a war with either us or Israel and then Obama would have a new war on his hands which the republicans would blame on Obama's "policies" despite the fact that they were the one's pushing Iran in their brinksmanship maneuvers.