iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Alice Hines
GET UPDATES FROM Alice:

Maclaren Bankruptcy Puts Amputated Finger Lawsuits In Limbo

Posted: 03/06/12 08:12 AM ET  |  Updated: 03/06/12 02:21 PM ET

Daddytypes Photo
A Maclaren stroller with a doll caught in the closing mechanism, created by Greg Allen of daddytypes.com

Kalyani Spieckerman was only 15 months old when she had the tip of her right ring finger amputated by her stroller while her parents were visiting Boston for a medical conference.

The accident happened just a month before stroller company Maclaren issued a recall of 1 million of its strollers, in November 2009. Now, a December 29 bankruptcy filing by Maclaren, first reported by DaddyTypes, has left victims like Spieckerman in limbo.

On the day it filed for bankruptcy last year, Maclaren named among its creditors seven families, including the Spieckermans, whose children’s fingers were amputated by Maclaren strollers. All of them are in the process of suing. Chapter 7 bankruptcy automatically halts all lawsuits against a company, including those from people injured by products.

Unless the seven families with pending lawsuits receive explicit permission from a Connecticut bankruptcy court, their cases will remain in limbo while an independent trustee divvies up the company's remaining assets. Chapter 7, unlike other types of bankruptcy, results in the complete liquidation of a company, with no possibility of restructuring.

Since the 2009 "Macopalypse," Maclaren has faced many such lawsuits. A faulty hinge mechanism in strollers amputated 20 fingertips and caused more than 149 total incidents, including lacerations and bruising, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Maclaren did not respond to The Huffington Post's requests for comment.

Yet Maclaren is not exactly defunct; other branches of the company continue to sell its strollers. This is because Maclaren USA, the unit that filed for bankruptcy, is only one part of a multinational corporation with branches in China and Europe. It is unusual for a company to file for bankruptcy for only one of its branches, The New York Times has reported. The court-appointed trustee is preparing to investigate the filing, the paper reported on Friday.

Because other branches of Maclaren -- such as Maclaren North America, incorporated in October 2010 -- are alive and well, some are calling the bankruptcy an attempt for a healthy company to write off liabilities by shifting its assets to a new, debt-free branch. Court filings put Maclaren USA's liabilities at $15.9 million, much of it owed to other branches of Maclaren and the company's CEO, Farzad Rastegar.

David Netto, the former creative director of Maclaren Nursery and a chief creditor in the bankruptcy filing, has accused Maclaren of fraud, arguing that the bankruptcy was an intentional attempt by the company to transfer profitable assets while writing off debt and liabilities. Maclaren owes Netto $1.1 million for the purchase of his company in 2009.

“I gather [Maclaren North America] was invented to supplant Maclaren USA,” Netto told The Huffington Post. “It had everything to do with writing off the debt."

Netto was made aware of the bankruptcy in late January when he received a letter from the court-appointed trustee naming him as a creditor in the bankruptcy of the company where he was still working. Netto resigned on Feb. 27, and is now pursuing legal action.

“What I find particularly offensive is it seems impossible not to conclude that [CEO Farzad Rastegar] is trying to get out of injury lawsuits for amputated fingers,” he said.

According to Jason Brookner, a Dallas-based bankruptcy attorney, the practice of intentionally moving assets from one company to another before filing for bankruptcy might be a fraudulent conveyance, which can be illegal under bankruptcy law. Typically, the court-appointed trustee will investigate and decide whether fraudulent conveyance has occurred and whether to pursue legal action on behalf of creditors, a process that can take as long as several years.

In a statement to parenting blog BabyGizmo posted on Feb. 25 -- the only statement that the company has released so far -- Maclaren North America said that Maclaren USA, also known as American Baby Products, was a "third party distributor” who had "lost the rights to distribute Maclaren products." This is despite the fact that it was Maclaren USA CEO Farzad Rastegar who first acquired the British company out of a bankruptcy in the United Kingdom in 2001.

On Thursday, Kalyani Spieckerman's lawyers filed a motion requesting that the court remove the “automatic stay” imposed on her lawsuit by the bankruptcy filing. Spieckerman's case may be allowed to proceed, as her claims lie within the limits of Maclaren’s insurance policy with Swiss Reinsurance America, said Larry Cook, a lawyer for the Spieckermans.

"We got derailed and now we're going to get put back on track," Cook said.

Yet in court filings, Maclaren checked a box that said it had no insurance policies at all. "There's a lot of red flags making us scratch our heads and say something's not right," said Elizabeth Austin, who will represent the independent, court-appointed trustee. "We're taking a deeper look to figure out what has happened," she told The Huffington Post.

Plaintiffs are not always so lucky in bankruptcy cases if the damages they seek exceed the limits of a company's insurance policy, according to Brookner, the bankruptcy attorney. “Sometimes there is a limited amount of insurance coverage, which can be exhausted,” he said.

In other words, other families could be left out to dry with no settlement money even while international branches of Maclaren continue to sell strollers, depending on the unreleased details of Maclaren's insurance.

Cook declined to comment on the exact amount the Spieckerman family is seeking, but in a letter that he wrote in May to the insurance company, Cook asked for a $400,000 settlement, mentioning Spieckerman's medical bills, permanent disfigurement and her mother's emotional distress. In the filings, lawyers call Maclaren's actions "malicious," alleging that the company knew about the potentially dangerous mechanism even as it continued to distribute and sell the strollers.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story stated that David Netto resigned from Maclaren on Jan. 27. He resigned on Feb. 27.
FOLLOW BUSINESS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:27 AM on 03/07/2012
I am confused. There are more questions raised than being answered. Has the picture been changed since yesterday's post? The way the hand was forced into the hinge did not seem natural and was most probably created to generate emotions! Is this story a scam by an Ex-creative designer of Maclaren who happens to be a contributing editor of Wall Street Journal and with colleagues at Huffington Post and NY Times and last but not least a close friend of Greg Allen from Daddy Types, who is using the social media to settle his personal claims or grievances. It is so sad that you seem to be misleading the public without knowing your facts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MerrieWay
02:17 AM on 03/07/2012
A SAD STORY... CHILDREN ARE AT THE MERCY OF UNCONSCIONABLE CORPORATE NEGLIGENCE.
01:35 PM on 03/06/2012
Corporations are people until they commit a crime or their product kills or maims it's customers. Then they have all kinds of special rules that allow them to sidestep their responsibilities and buy their way out of punishment
noahmarder
Exposing the regressive lies, one by one
02:55 AM on 03/07/2012
You are right. What's worse is that the 14th amendment guarantees equal protection under the law, but if corporations are people, then any special privileges granted to corporations become violations of the 14th amendment. It would be like saying that men over 6'2" tall could wipe away student loans in bankruptcy while everyone else can't. These supreme court (in)justices need to be removed from power.
photo
Captain Hindsight
Seeking the truth is my only agenda.
12:34 PM on 03/06/2012
After they pay out the Bonuses to Company Execs there won't be any money left.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
12:10 PM on 03/06/2012
Isn't that special. Then corporations wonder why we all hate them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
01:34 PM on 03/06/2012
Hate them enough to stop buying their stuff?
02:47 PM on 03/06/2012
No one can live in Western society without doing business with the corps. Give us a break.
QuantProgrammer
Cap welfare benefits at two kids.
03:42 PM on 03/06/2012
Who made your computer?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
09:15 AM on 03/07/2012
What does THAT mean? 
Talk about missing the point. I'll try to spell it out for you. If somebody chops your finger off, they can be taken to court, tried and put in jail, you can sue them for damages. The corporation chopped off the fingers of hundreds of kids, so they just "declare bankruptcy", take their money and give it out as "bonuses" to the leadership, and say "sorry, we have no money left".
Why do corporations get the RIGHTS of a human being but not the RESPONSIBILITY of a human being?

Hope that helps!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackranger
11:54 AM on 03/06/2012
These companies, with multinational games, can now avoid responsibility in the US. No company who is "multinational" should be able to call itself a US corporation, that would end some of this nonsense. Too many "US companies" now operate primarily outside the US and many have even moved their corporate offices overseas. We even have someone running for president that has the nerve to do so while maintaining "offshore accounts" which we all know is a euphemism for "tax evasion" Americans need to stand up for America and cut these corporations loose from claiming US status.
11:27 AM on 03/06/2012
Humm, when I was growing up in the 60s a lot of products caused injuries. We used to blame it on the parents not watching their children.
How come when it is a child a lawsuit is never considered frivilous?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
01:35 PM on 03/06/2012
After all, it was just the tip.
photo
jf12
Esta vez saldré como las otras y me escaparé.
11:06 AM on 03/06/2012
Bankruptcy does not prevent clawing back prior years' profits from people and other companies, including distributors, who profited.
QuantProgrammer
Cap welfare benefits at two kids.
03:46 PM on 03/06/2012
Actually, if it is a C-corp paying dividends to non-controlling minority shareholders, it largely does.

However, given that Maclaren owned a controlling interest and knew about the contingent liability ahead of time, it may have to pay back some or all of those dividends.

I am with the plaintiffs on recovering the dividends paid out to the main company but against them on suing for additional amounts. Everything that MacLaren had in 2009 that was not part of Maclaren NA, it gets to keep.
photo
jf12
Esta vez saldré como las otras y me escaparé.
03:51 PM on 03/06/2012
Thanks for the clarification.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
09:16 AM on 03/07/2012
It should be allowed to go after the shareholders who profited from the sales.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:27 AM on 03/06/2012
Oh, great.  Another scam to allow corporations to evade their responsibility to their clients.  I hope that McClaren is hit with a barrage of class action suits aimed at their moving assets from one company to another.  BTW, doesn't this place their shareholders and venture capital investors in jeopardy as well?
photo
baxtron
tek phlarpt
09:22 AM on 03/06/2012
welcome to the right wing utopia. complain about our litigious society, then hide behind laws when they favor a corp.