iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Posted:  |  Updated: 11/12/12 EST

Super Tuesday 2012 Results MAP (REAL-TIME RESULTS)

Here is where you'll find the results for the Super Tuesday caucuses and primaries.

The 10 states with nominating contests on March 6 -- Alaska, Georgia, Idaho, Massachusetts, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Vermont and Virginia -- have a total of 437 delegates. 18 of these delegates, however, are Republican party officials who are not bound to any delegate. These delegates, similar to "super delegates" who were a staple of the 2008 Democratic nominating process, are not bound to any candidate and can vote for whomever they like at the August Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla.

SCROLL DOWN FOR MAP

As a result, there are 419 delegates up for grabs on Super Tuesday.

(Other media organizations -- and political campaigns -- are going by different delegate counts. Click here for a detailed explanation of Super Tuesday delegate numbers.)

The maps below feature real-time data provided to The Huffington Post by the Associated Press. Every state except for Alaska and North Dakota show county-by-county results.

The map is updated every 5 seconds, so there's no need to refresh for the page for the latest results.

LOOK: Super Tuesday Results

North Dakota Caucus

County-by-county results not available
X

Statewide Results

100% reporting

Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
Rick Santorum
4,510 39.7% 11
Ron Paul
3,186 28.1% 8
Mitt Romney
2,691 23.7% 7
Newt Gingrich
962 8.5% 2
Share these results on Twitter

Georgia Primary

X

Statewide Results

100% reporting

Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
Newt Gingrich
424,976 47.2% 47
Mitt Romney
233,297 25.9% 15
Rick Santorum
176,080 19.6% 3
Ron Paul
58,982 6.6%
Others
7,099 0.8%
Share these results on Twitter

Virginia Primary

X

Statewide Results

100% reporting

Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
Mitt Romney
158,051 59.5% 43
Ron Paul
107,470 40.5% 3
Share these results on Twitter

Vermont Primary

X

Statewide Results

100% reporting

Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
Mitt Romney
23,965 39.7% 9
Ron Paul
15,369 25.5% 4
Rick Santorum
14,273 23.7% 4
Newt Gingrich
4,944 8.2%
Others
1,753 2.9%
Share these results on Twitter

Ohio Primary

X

Statewide Results

100% reporting

Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
Mitt Romney
456,513 37.9% 35
Rick Santorum
446,225 37.1% 21
Newt Gingrich
175,554 14.6%
Ron Paul
111,238 9.2%
Others
13,873 1.2%
Share these results on Twitter

Tennessee Primary

X

Statewide Results

100% reporting

Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
Rick Santorum
205,012 37.2% 26
Mitt Romney
154,911 28.1% 12
Newt Gingrich
132,072 23.9% 9
Ron Paul
49,801 9.0%
Others
9,996 1.8%
Share these results on Twitter

Oklahoma Primary

X

Statewide Results

100% reporting

Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
Rick Santorum
96,759 33.8% 14
Mitt Romney
80,291 28.0% 13
Newt Gingrich
78,686 27.5% 13
Ron Paul
27,572 9.6%
Others
2,990 1.0%
Share these results on Twitter

Massachusetts Primary

X

Statewide Results

100% reporting

Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
Mitt Romney
265,110 72.2% 38
Rick Santorum
44,255 12.0%
Ron Paul
35,037 9.5%
Newt Gingrich
16,990 4.6%
Others
6,046 1.6%
Share these results on Twitter

Alaska Caucus

County-by-county results not available
X

Statewide Results

100% reporting

Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
Mitt Romney
4,285 32.4% 8
Rick Santorum
3,860 29.2% 7
Ron Paul
3,175 24.0% 6
Newt Gingrich
1,865 14.1% 3
Others
34 0.3%
Share these results on Twitter

Idaho Caucus

X

Statewide Results

100% reporting

Candidate Votes Pct. Del.
Mitt Romney
27,514 61.6% 32
Rick Santorum
8,115 18.2%
Ron Paul
8,086 18.1%
Newt Gingrich
940 2.1%
Others
17 0.1%
Share these results on Twitter

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Timothy Stenovec  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,310
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
12:58 PM on 03/08/2012
The road to the GOP Whitehouse should be a walk in the park, go figure the GOP field to be so lame they'll never get there. Huckabee should be the candidate and Paul is my horse. Nothing left to do except sit back and watch Romney or Santorum take a licking. Maybe I'll seek out a dark horse independant. Brother!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:52 PM on 03/07/2012
Promised myself I would vote (for the very first time) if Romney or Santorum won the GOP... looks like I gotta register.
05:07 PM on 03/07/2012
EW!
03:23 PM on 03/07/2012
I don't know who Steele is. I was refering to Mike Huckabee, the man we need as President.

I LIKE MIKE!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arthur-in-miami
02:29 PM on 03/07/2012
Keep in mind when you look at these votes and numbers you are looking at registered Republicans voting only - If the GOP wants to win the General Election in November they will need to go with a popular candidate that has the broadest appeal and that is Ron Paul that will bring in the First-time voter (young voters) Independents votes and the Democrats that are on the fence, put a Gingrich or Romney as VP and there is a real chance that the GOP can get the White House, Santorum is the kiss of death for the party it will be government under the cross and that will not win in November it would be better to open Santorum a Mega Church. Otherwise it is Obama 2012 - because the other candidates sound off as business as usual and paul is a stick Constitutionalist and that has mass appeal across the board, he will not be pandered to or allow special groups to influence him. My 3 cents.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:28 AM on 03/08/2012
You mean the old guy with the outdated ideology will win young voters? Yeah right.
01:49 AM on 03/08/2012
I'm 21 y/o Republican College student, voted Obama last election. I'd vote Ron Paul over Obama in a heartbeat, if not Obama over Romney/Santorum.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arthur-in-miami
11:55 AM on 03/08/2012
Yeah that's exactly what I mean - all my young relatives in their 20's are interested in Paul, all my friends kids like Paul, my younger co-workers like Paul - who do you talk to and how do you gage your information?
madisgp
All we-we'd up.
06:43 PM on 03/08/2012
Only young poeople that don't bother to research Ron Paul's economic ideas would vote for him, and thats because all they hear is "end the wars" and "Legalize pot". Whos not for that? But I think ending the FED is a crazy idea.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arthur-in-miami
12:32 PM on 03/09/2012
In the end I think it will be Obama 2012
01:25 PM on 03/07/2012
I wish they'd get rid of this system. Get rid of parties having any say in how elections are run. Just let us vote then count the votes. People seem to think that literally anyone can run for President and that we can vote for anyone. Not true. Too many hurdles to jump through. You can't write someone in unless they get on the ticket as a write in in that particular state.
03:38 PM on 03/07/2012
Beautiful, Ah the populance vote.
We have this system because way back when, the powers that be decided that the general public was not intelligent enough to vote for the President. Therefore we have the delegate system. And they can ignore the popular vote and choose whomever they prefer. It has happened that the person who had the most popular votes did not become the President.
06:19 PM on 03/07/2012
The general public still isn't intelligent to elect an eligible president. That's why we have this clown show today. People do not thoroughly research candidates, they vote based upon ads they see on TV, and they band together behind their religions. None of the premise of general election voting is based on anything that will actually fix the country. It's a joke and we're so dumb we can't even see we're being played by the ones in the shadows that actually make decisions. (Hint, it's not politicians making and governing laws in this country anymore.)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:17 AM on 03/09/2012
No! Get rid of States holding partisan primaries. A state has no stake in who parties nominate as their candidates. I don't want republicans or anybody other than Democrats decide who I should have as a candidate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hans sulu
Thanks to CU this space for rent
01:20 PM on 03/07/2012
I guess the march to Mittdom has hit a few snags. Ron Paul in WV at almost 41% is surprising. I have never seen a party not like their front runner as much as the Republicans and Mitt
esaustew
No matter where you go, there you are
12:55 PM on 03/07/2012
Why do I feel like I must decide between who is going to ruin the country even more?

Now Obama wants to give 88 billion to Syria. I can't even begin to imagine what the guy is thinking...

So the next time everyone starts to complain about paying for Social Security, remember, Obama gave away enough money to support the program, for Americans, for years.
03:26 PM on 03/07/2012
esaustew,
He's not thinking of anything. Remember that he is probably a Muslim and besides, it's your money. Not his own.
12:25 PM on 03/07/2012
Looking at these ratings we see the impact of the MSM on the judgement of Americans. Who selected these bozos that we must choose from?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MMiddleDavid
I can see MSNBC *and* Fox from my front yard....
12:41 PM on 03/07/2012
I fail to see how your first and second sentences are connected. The Republicans selected those who are running. This is a republican democracy (or a democratic republic if you like) where the people elect their representatives (although if you have more money, you can certainly influence the process).

The mainstream media reports on the happenings, positions, gaffes, and statements of these folks. Some opinion outlets like Fox and MSNBC try to influce the people's vote, but it's still up to the people.

Sometimes, the team simploy doesn't have anyone worth puting up to bat. A few elections ago, the Democrats couldn't muster up anyone better than Michael Dukakis, which was fine as all they really needed was a sacrificial candidate to run against a second Reagan term.

Republicans are in the same situation today. It happens. But what does that have to do with the media and the current crop of GOP bozos?
01:01 PM on 03/07/2012
As Barbara Bush noted, the "current crop" of "bozos" (yours and his words, not mine) are far, far worse in terms of hate speech, lies, contradictions, etc., than any previous "crop" in history. These Republican candidates have held public office for many years, and I'm in agreement with my friends from Europe and Asia - they are America's laughing stock.
03:37 PM on 03/07/2012
MMiddleDavid,
Being that you led into your reply with a falsehood, it may cause one to question the validity of any following statements you make.
What falsehood you wonder? The biggest one of all.
"This is a Republican Democracy (or a Democratic Republic if you like)."

For this great Nation of ours America, is neither of the above.
The United States of America is a Constitutional Republic.

A Constituional Republic. Not a democracy in any sense.

This is not a history lesson, it is current events as we are still a
Constitutional Republic. And we must remain so as historically all democracies have failed miserably.

America Rising.
The Constituion Stands.
01:38 PM on 03/07/2012
The candidates are self-selecting. Whomever has enough money to mount a campaign can do so. This one of the problems with a purely primary-based system. There really isn't a "party" as such. There is just a bunch of people vying for the nomination. And everyone is on their own so everyone is forced to sell their soul to whomever is willing to pay the bills.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Graff
All LIBERAL ALL THE LIBERAL TIME
12:19 PM on 03/07/2012
I changed my registration to teaop in PA so I can vote for RICKY THE RAT he'll DESTROY the party for us!
12:25 AM on 03/08/2012
My father was a registered Republican from the pre-Reagan years (he didn't vote for Reagan or any Republican that followed, FWIW) and this became a point of pride when he got to inform fellow Texans that he voted against Bush twice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyMorrow
qui tacet consentire - who is silent gives consent
12:18 PM on 03/07/2012
This country needs a new dawn with tremendous change, which could only happen with a man willing to call it like it is and actually do something without the political fluff. . . Ron Paul.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sarita
Please tell me the truth
12:35 PM on 03/07/2012
You kid yourself - there is NO difference between candidates of either party - NONE!

Oh they give a better speech here and there, and they say some tearful words to make us feel all patriotic.

But the bottom line is that the corporations run the world and that's just the way it is!
photo
SantaMonican
Visit the carousel, in the Hippodrome, on the pier
12:50 PM on 03/07/2012
Why are republicans obsessed with limiting legal abortion? Democrats fight to keep abortion legal? Why are republicans obsessed with limiting legal contraception? Democrats are fighting to keep contraception accessible?
If there is no difference, why are republicans obsessed with limiting voting rights, citing non existent voter fraud? Democrats are fighting against denying voter rights. Why are republicans obsessed with lowering taxes for the rich? Democrats are fighting for a more fair tax.
While republicans have declared war on women, President Obamas first act as President was to sign the equal pay for equal work act- there is a difference- a BIG difference.

Vote obstructing republicans out and re-elect President Obama.
02:32 PM on 03/07/2012
Sarita,
The bottom line is that 60-70% of those corporations are run by Democrats. Not wealthy Republicans as the Democrats would have you believe. And that's just the w ay it is!
12:26 AM on 03/08/2012
El oh el. A man who's willing to watch people die in the gutter because they weren't born rich. How is he any better than Rick "if God loved you then you wouldn't have any problems" Santorum?
photo
king soloman
I'Am the cats Pajamas! ! ! !
12:06 PM on 03/07/2012
so who is going to win the presidency. I know they have already predicted it. I still dont even know why we vote. They know who won before i have even gone in to vote. Electoral collegue my . . . . ss
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MMiddleDavid
I can see MSNBC *and* Fox from my front yard....
12:43 PM on 03/07/2012
I'll do you one better - we already know who is going to win the general this time, same as we knew when Reagan was running for his second term. So why spend all the time and money? I assume this election/show is the only thing the GOP currently has as a "jobs jobs jobs" plan....
11:50 AM on 03/07/2012
check out the last hundred years when the republicans are in office the economy goes down hill.
the democrats then have to fix it. clinton came in to a situation not quite as bad as the one obama inherited and turned things around so that for the first time in29 years the budget was balanced, employment was at its lowest in 26 years and then came bush. enough said.
i still say the republicans are the party of mean spirit, power hunger and who cares for the common folk, not us.
11:37 AM on 03/07/2012
Last night when Romney won Ohio he congratulated Santorum and Newt. They both used a significant amount of time trashing Romney like some spoiled brats. It's clear who has class.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dems08
Above all... avoid the moor
11:35 AM on 03/07/2012
they don't like you mint....

they really really don't like you