iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Super Tuesday: How Much Did Republicans Spend On Television Per Delegate?

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 03/07/2012 2:13 pm Updated: 03/07/2012 2:23 pm

Mitt Romney emerged from Super Tuesday the winner of a majority of delegates -- 208 -- from the 11 states that went to vote. Winning those delegates, though, cost both his campaign and a super PAC supporting him a pretty penny on television advertisements. His campaign and the super PAC Restore Our Future combined to spend $36,380 on advertising per delegate won on Tuesday.

Television advertising is usually the biggest expense of a presidential campaign. This year candidates have seen that spending augmented, or in many cases, wholly outsourced, to allied super PACs that are not subject to fundraising limitations. On Super Tuesday, the candidates and the super PACs that support them combined to spend a little more than $12 million on television advertising, according to NBC First Read.

Newt Gingrich and Winning Our Future, the super PAC that supports his candidacy, spent the most on television ads per delegate -- slightly higher than former Massachusetts Gov. Romney -- with a rate of $38,541 per delegate won. Former House Speaker Gingrich's campaign and Winning Our Future spent $2.775 million on television ads across the 11 Super Tuesday states -- mostly paid for by the super PAC and concentrated in Georgia, Oklahoma, and Tennessee -- to win 72 delegates.

Last night's runner-up, former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), combined with the super PAC Red White And Blue Fund to spend $1.596 on television ads, almost entirely concentrated in Ohio. He spent $19,000 for each of the 84 delegates won on Super Tuesday.

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) brought up the rear with very little television spending and the fewest number of delegates. His campaign and the super PAC aligned with it, Endorse Liberty, spent only $102,000 on ads in the Super Tuesday states and took home 21 delegates.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:19 PM on 03/07/2012
How much did the Democrats spend on ads attacking Romney in Ohio? Friends of mine in Ohio said there were lots of ads by the Dems in Ohio leading up to Super Tuesday.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CharlieVer
Rush is a rock band...
06:46 AM on 03/08/2012
$577,000 is the TOTAL spent by Democratic Super-PACs. Far less than any the other candidates. Thank you google.
photo
john rajah
'Why do u call me Lord and dont do what I say?'
09:07 PM on 03/07/2012
Not to worry about the money.

There is sufficient from Citizens United
06:58 PM on 03/07/2012
There sure is a lot of money flying around in this pre-election race. All of these uber rich folks are donating millions so their candidate will be elected, yet they wince and cry and scream when someone asks them to pay 3.5% more federal income tax. Ever wonder why they're willing to donate so much? Ever wonder what the payback is (because with all that money, there must be a payback)? Check this out: http://www.owen.vanderbilt.edu/vanderbilt/faculty-and-research/vanderbilt-business-inbrief/campaign-contributions-boost-roi.cfm
06:12 PM on 03/07/2012
And no way will Willard ever go into any of his money----he didn't even do that at Bain. I thought I was hallucinating when I saw him ask for as little as a $3 donation at one of his rallys. Since he told a roomful of people he was unemployed, too, maybe Ann is not lying when she whines that she doesn't feel wealthy. Getting to know Ann has the same effect as getting to know Mitt----one is as obnoxious as the other.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:21 PM on 03/07/2012
Really? She said her wealth didn't matter after going through MS and breast cancer. She said she cared more about family and friends than money. You stupid liberals are so desperate to make people look bad you even twist the words of someone talking sincerely about going through 2 terrible illnesses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CharlieVer
Rush is a rock band...
06:39 AM on 03/08/2012
She certainly cares about HER family and friends. Doesn't give a rat's ARSE about YOUR family or friends. I can't speak for the far-left liberals (the far-left liberals are too busy screaming how Obama is just as bad as the Republicans) but we moderates can plainly see that it doesn't take much to make Mitt Romney look bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CharlieVer
Rush is a rock band...
06:42 AM on 03/08/2012
It is WONDERFUL however that she can afford any health care treatment necessary for her MS and breast cancer. Her cancer is now cured and her MS gives her virtually no trouble. Many of us are not so fortunate as to be able to afford health care, even though we work two or three jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kahauna
Howl, Zabimaru!
04:39 PM on 03/07/2012
It's like an old traveling carnival...Gingrich is the ringmaster/shill, trying to draw you in. Santorum is guy in the crowd, trying to pick your pocket while Romney's up on the stage, trying to sell you the snake oil.
03:51 PM on 03/07/2012
Seem like Romney is buying the nomination? May be trying, but Santorum is getting more bang for the buck and when the South votes, I think Romney may start slip sliding away. After all, why are we seeing folks all gung ho for the reject of 4 years ago? He hasn't changed.......
03:45 PM on 03/07/2012
If you want the best, most professional candidates to run for president or political campaigns to become good-natured as opposed to the negative campaign we are seeing today, cap the amount of money one can spend on elections. This way every dollar is important. Instead of wasting money on running negative adds that do nothing to edify their audience on the qualifications of the candidate paying for the ad, each dollar will be spent more wisely. The most qualified candidates will in turn not be deterred from the elections in concern for themselves and their families. Super-Pacs will no longer be able to make a difference in the campaign. Every delegate will be earned by the qualifications of the candidate running instead of his or her wealth. Of course, money can only influence elections to a certain extent.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rickie007
i am in 2% but vote democrat
03:35 PM on 03/07/2012
wow wow roughly 105 million dollars spent on super tuesday what a waste of good money 3 of the 4 canidates wasting there time and money isn's willard in the lead but the right really dont wan't him or not sure ,the system to run needs to be over hauled badly.no one has the backbone to do so.lets hope any good idea's commenters?