iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Lila Shapiro
GET UPDATES FROM Lila:

Unemployment Report: The Jobless Mount Comeback, But Face Long Road Ahead

Posted: Updated: 03/09/2012 6:17 pm

Unemployment Rate
Students and a teacher in a classroom of the Grace Institute, on Wednesday, Feb. 7, 2012.

NEW YORK -- After a year without so much as looking at a job application, Lillian Acevedo once again can be counted as a member of the U.S. labor force.

One catch: She doesn't have a job yet.

Acevedo interviewed for work as an administrative assistant at a nonprofit on Wednesday. It was her first interview for any job even approaching decent money since she was laid off more than three years ago from the New York City Department of Education.

"It's funny," said the 51-year-old New Yorker, still in her interview clothing, a string of pearls and a grey suit, her dark hair carefully styled. "Even though you're starting all over again, it makes you feel good that someone called you and considered you. It's like this incredible jolt of adrenaline."

Since 2007, millions of Americans have dropped out of the labor force. Now, a trickle of workers like Acevedo, who once gave up looking, appear to be returning to the job search. In February, the ranks of the unemployed swelled by 48,000, even as 227,000 jobs were added to the U.S. economy, according to the Department of Labor's latest report on Friday. To be counted as officially unemployed, a person must be actively seeking work. It may seem counter-intuitive, but economists say that when the number of unemployed goes up while the economy is gaining jobs, it's a good thing.

Economists caution not to place too much stock in any one month's data, and that the number of those reentering the labor force is still quite small. But, if this trend continues in earnest, economists say it could prove to be one of the strongest signs yet that a full recovery is at hand.

"These 'missing workers' will start coming back when job prospects improve, and things are getting better," said Heidi Shierholz, an economist at the progressive-leaning Economic Policy Institute, who has long tracked these workers' fates. But Sheirholz cautioned that we're not out of the woods yet. "We're seeing growth, but it's still a hellish job search out there."

Nevertheless, these are optimistic times at the Grace Institute, a tuition-free jobs training program in New York City, where Acevedo is currently enrolled as a student. Although the students at Grace, all women, are among those hardest hit by this recession -- workers without a college degree and the long-term unemployed -- job placement rates and earnings for them have returned to pre-recession levels.

Average wages for first-year graduates have rebounded to around $33,000 a year, after dipping to $27,000 in 2009, according to Jolene Varley Handy, director of career services at Grace. These are low wages, Varley Handy acknowledges, but they are also significantly higher than what students earn when they first apply to Grace -- on average, $6,000 a year. Sixty percent of the students begin the program on some form of public assistance. More students are also finding work at a faster rate, Varley Handy added. Within three months, 30 to 40 percent of students find jobs, and within a year, 80 percent are employed. At the height of the recession, it took twice as long to get those results, Varley Handy said.

"In 2009, I remember sitting here thinking, 'Oh my god, nobody is calling anybody back,' like the world had frozen," Varley Handy said. "We're not out of the woods yet for sure, but I've been greatly heartened by the amount of job call backs."

We are still in a deep hole. In the three years following the start of the recession, the U.S. economy shed nearly 8.7 million jobs, and job seekers outnumbered openings by, at the worst, nearly 7 to 1, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Given the odds, its not surprising that Americans -- economists estimate some 3 to 5 million -- simply gave up looking during that time. Many labor experts have been focused on these "missing workers": Exactly how many are there? When, if ever, will they rejoin the labor market? And, perhaps most critically, how will they get back in?

"Many of these discouraged workers have an enormously steep hill to climb before they can go back to work, and some them may not be able to, ever," said Carl E. Van Horn, a labor economist at Rutgers University who has spent years researching what happens to workers who lost jobs during the recession: skills erode, professional connections fade, depression looms.

"They need tactical help and they need encouragement, and training programs can be very effective," he continued. "The problem, on the large scale, is that these programs are very, very expensive."

Obama's latest budget proposal included $8 million to support job training programs at community colleges, but many experts say that this funding, while a strong step, is not nearly enough. Programs like Grace, which are funded through grants and endowments are great, but are also rare, Van Horn said.

Job training is only half the struggle -- the other half is jobs. The economy is still roughly 5.3 million jobs short from where it stood in 2007; if population growth is accounted for, the jobs deficit looks more like 10 million, Shierholz estimates.

"It's a game of musical chairs," said John Schmitt, an economist with the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. "For people who participate, training programs increase the chance of getting a seat. But the problem in the current environment is that we don't have enough seats no matter what."

At Grace, Acevedo and the other women in her class, who are about to graduate next week, try not to think about how tight the jobs market still is outside the school's walls.

"I read about unemployment in the paper, but I try not to think about it too much," said Iris Rodriguez, a student who hopes to find a job where she can help people who are struggling, possibly at a hospital. "I think that just coming to Grace is giving me that extra edge and maybe the people out there, who are just looking for jobs, don't have it."

Grace offers ongoing guidance to students; after graduation, those without jobs return to the school every Monday for career counseling, resume help, and informational interviews with employers. But, like student Ellen Cooper, many seem all too aware of how easy it might be to slip back out of the labor market again.

"I don't want to fall back into that mode again," Cooper said, "just saying home."

FOLLOW BUSINESS

NEW YORK -- After a year without so much as looking at a job application, Lillian Acevedo once again can be counted as a member of the U.S. labor force. One catch: She doesn't have a job yet. Ac...
NEW YORK -- After a year without so much as looking at a job application, Lillian Acevedo once again can be counted as a member of the U.S. labor force. One catch: She doesn't have a job yet. Ac...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 207
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
02:21 PM on 03/13/2012
Without profitable US businesses, corporations, and businessmen, there will NOT BE ANY JOBS for any US citizens to create any new wealth.

Tax payer funded jobs will also disappear if businesses stop creating any new NATIONAL WEALTH so that a portion can be taxed or CONFISCATED to pay for economic stimulus such as bureaucratic government jobs, government contracts, unemployment benefits, social security benefits, welfare benefits, National Healthcare, wars, police, firefighters, INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS and various other tax paid government activities that CONSUMES AND/OR DESTROYS the wealth that was created by and taken from the in-country businesses, corporations, and businessmen.

Governments must stop creating new legislation that drives their businesses and those associated jobs to foreign countries.

Governments should repeal all of the laws that they previously created that caused and economically required that US businesses and their US jobs to relocate to foreign nations.
05:43 PM on 03/31/2012
Really? Last time I heard corporate America was "sitting" on record profits and over $3 TRILLION in cash.....more than at any time in our history. Seems that there is NO will to hire anyone......and that IS the problem....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:08 AM on 04/02/2012
How does anybody even think that any of the big or small US manufacturing businesses (even if their balance sheets are in good shape) would ever even possibly consider creating and/or keeping any jobs in the USA if they are hamstrung with many times more expensive labor costs, electrical energy costs that is required to be generated in compliance with the EPA, health care payroll tax costs, unemployment payroll tax costs, social security and medical care payroll tax costs, environmental compliance manufacturing costs, fringe (holiday and vacation) benefit payroll costs, OSHA compliance payroll costs, union labor work rules, anti-business laws, and general anti-business attitudes that make manufacturing products in the USA many many times more costly than manufacturing the same product in almost any other foreign country in accordance with the FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS that were created in the last 20 years?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
02:16 PM on 03/13/2012
The US government FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ECONOMICALLY REQUIRE that US businesses utilize foreign labor, environmental regulations and electrical costs, if they want to provide the lowest possible price in the USA for each US consumer purchase, instead of going out of business.

Yes, this is oversimplified, but the principal of accumulation of NATIONAL WEALTH (creating marketable things with value) is basic.

Future wars might also be industrial wars where the nation with the most wealth creating industrial manufacturing production will win the economic war by producing more NATIONAL WEALTH! Maybe that was how the US won WWII!

And non-wealth producing nations like the USA might destroy their own economies with (deficit) government spending which will impoverish all of their citizens by selling and/or mortgaging existing NATIONAL WEALTH and spending the proceeds for federal government activities!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
04:45 PM on 03/12/2012
Ms. Lila Shapiro:

What if I start a wind powered electrical generator factory in the USA?

What if I import wind driven electrical generators from China and then hire a couple of US citizens (or maybe illegal aliens) to remove the Chinese nameplates and then attach a new nameplate with my factory name, address, serial number, with "Made in the USA" on the nameplate in my factory, and then that product will be "Made in the USA"?

What if I make sufficient political contributions to a sufficient number of congressmen and/or hire lobbyists to have a law passed to require that only "US Made Products" be installed on all of the federally funded "Green Energy" projects, then I will be able to sell these wind driven electrical generators at any price that I desire, and the US unemployment statistics will not be changed.

If the US government objects, then I will have the wind driven electrical generators, blades and the towers delivered to my factory without nameplates and then they will be parts for final assembly in the USA by Americans when a US citizen adds only the nameplate to each of the Chinese wind driven electrical generator parts.

I will pay the Chinese with paper US dollars for these wind driven electrical generators.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
04:55 PM on 03/12/2012
The Chinese will accept my paper US dollars and/or electronic US Dollar credits only because they can immediately buy title to privately owned businesses, factories, casinos, hotels, farms, land, ports, breweries, refineries, forests, ports, breweries and other privately owned wealth and other assets located in the USA that were created by previous US generations of US citizens prior to the de-industrialization of the USA, since these US dollars cannot be redeemed for Gold from Ft. Knox.
11:08 AM on 03/12/2012
I wonder if the economy is so great-why are transports down 50%? Container companies are not doing well. Wow, where is the movement of all of the merchandise?
photo
Levonsky
a fan of enlightened self interest
03:45 PM on 03/12/2012
no merchandise, its all wall street profits, thin as the paper its printed on.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Artamentous
Workplace Democracy!
02:35 PM on 03/11/2012
Create a MAXIMUM income in this country, everything else taxed at 100%. Or the very least a massive tax increase after someone has made over 800k or something.. Roosevelt did it, he proposed a maximum income of the equivalent in today's dollars of 350k, he settled for 94%, which went down to 91% after a couple years and STAYED there until the 60's.

Even Eisenhower understood this stuff, it's like we have completely lost our sense of history, collective amnesia. Some of the greatest presidents we've had understood these simple ideas.
12:35 PM on 03/11/2012
It's still the unfair trade deals that are the biggest obstacle to anywhere near getting this country back to work............

We have millions of college graduates and skilled trades people who can't compete in a rigged labor market.............
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
10:07 AM on 03/12/2012
US FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS mean that US workers must (generally) compete with foreign worker pay scales, benefit packages (none), the more productive foreign labor work rules (none), foreign corporate tax rates (lower or non-existent), property taxes (lower) and the lower environmental manufacturing costs that are available in foreign countries.

If US citizens are not willing to work for lower wages than the foreigner workers employed in foreign countries are paid, then the USA cannot compete based upon lower product costs since US located businesses must pay EPA compliance costs, unemployment payroll costs, Medicare payroll costs, FICA payroll costs, and other costs PILED ON TOP of US labor payroll costs.

If US Businesses cannot compete on lower product costs, then maybe we could become competitive internationally through other areas such as superior technology, as the USA did to win WWII and for a couple of decades following WWII when Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics were the focus of our educational systems, instead on non-STEM subjects.
10:26 AM on 03/12/2012
Other countries, be they European, South American, or Asian financially support and protect their manufacturing base..............

Our Congress, mostly Republican, is more interested in our upper classes making a fortune off this cheap labor than they are in protecting American workers...........

Let's face it, Republicans treat American workers as the enemy..............
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
10:40 AM on 03/12/2012
I think that you should blame me and all of the other US citizens for electing both Republican and Democrat US Presidents, US Congressmen, and US Senators that created and ratified all of these "FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS" during the past 20 years that legally allowed and ECONOMICALLY REQUIRED that almost all non-government manufacturing and customer service jobs in the USA be moved to foreign nations by removing the import tariffs that protected the USA jobs, the pay scales, and the benefits of the US worker and required that businesses take advantage of the lower cost labor, lower electricity and lower EPA manufacturing regulation compliance costs available in foreign nations!

Maybe President Obama will ask Congress and the Senate to repeal all of his new FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS (treaties) because they will continue to cause the relocation of many more existing US jobs to foreign nations?

President Obama’s new FTAs will probably have the same results of "sucking our US jobs to Mexico" as when President Clinton signed NAFTA into law except that these US jobs will go to other nations this time. NAFTA was the first of many subsequent treaties created by many subsequent "FREE TRADE" legislation actions!
11:16 AM on 03/12/2012
Yes, Bill Clinton signed NAFTA, a big mistake that he did when he joined Republicans against the Democrats........

NAFTA votes; Republican 132 yes 43 no
Democrat 102 yes 156 no
Independent 1 no
TOTALS 234 yes 200 no

By any standards, and I was in the middle of this and saw it happening, General Electric came up with this war on American workers, trained Ronald Reagan to carry their message, and has driven this whole "Free Trade" agenda. If you doubt that last sentence, there's abundant proof to support it..............

Meanwhile, any bill that comes up to give American workers relief,except right before an election, is stalled, and then blocked by Republicans...........
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
knotsofast
How much did our nation's debt increase today?
05:00 PM on 03/10/2012
Millions not counted in the 8.3% state unemployment number. Sham.
01:23 PM on 03/10/2012
"Mcdonalds hired 60,000?" Bet all part-time maybe 10 hours a week-without benefits. Jobs only appropiate for 14 year olds. Corporations hire to recieve incentives from the gov. The incentives should be based upon high wages and 40 hour workweeks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Hendricks
see wikipedia
11:24 AM on 03/10/2012
The media keeps saying that the recovery will be slow. That need not be if enough people, or some influential people call for a national hiring day. That would help recover the economy in one day or week.
Corporations are sitting on a lot of profit - all time highs - and they are ready to hire, but scared to stand out and be the first. A National Hiring Day would help them by getting many on board. http://wp.me/p5S9X-nv

National Hiring Day - This is a day that corporatio­ns are encouraged to hire new employees. Corporatio­ns are called on to put patriotism first and help their country in
hard times. Those corporatio­ns that cannot hire, are asked to stop firing for that month.
http://wp.­me/p5S9X-n­v

1. If companies can send thousands of jobs overseas, they can hire one American on National Hiring Day.
2. If companies can get millions in tax breaks and subsidies from the government, they can help it in return by hiring one American on National Hiring Day.
3. With companies sitting on all time high profits, they can hire one person on National Hiring Day - which by the way, would help them in return.
4. McDonalds hired 60,000 last May in their own National Hiring Day, surely other companies can hire one person on a nationwide National Hiring Day.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Artamentous
Workplace Democracy!
02:37 PM on 03/11/2012
ROFL, seriously? National hiring day. Do you understand how this system functions? You think you are engaging the system by creating a national hiring day?

What good is a job if it pays garbage? Most jobs pay JUST above poverty. You need something else to be active about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Hendricks
see wikipedia
07:24 PM on 03/11/2012
Let's let people out of work decide that. When every corporation is called on to help, don't you think they would be watched by the country to see if they took it seriously or turned their back with a garbage job? How do you oppose the country, treat it badly, then beg the same government for more tax breaks, subsidies, etc.?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
03:29 PM on 03/12/2012
Businesses should hire people that they do not need? to stand around and look pretty? LOL
photo
SoylentGreenIsPeople
You know how to use Google too !
10:58 AM on 03/10/2012
It reflects the fact that capitalism* requires that there be not just unemployment but that the unemployed be unhappy. I say so for three reasons:

1. Capitalism requires an excess supply of labor in order to bid down wage growth and industrial militancy. When Norman Lamont said unemployment was a “price well worth paying” to get wage inflation down, he was just blurting out the truth seen by Kalecki 50 years earlier - that “unemployment is an integral part of the 'normal' capitalist system.”

2. Capitalism needs the unemployed to look for work - to be an effective supply of labor. This requires that they be “incentivized” to seek jobs by meager unemployment benefits and by being stigmatized. In other words, the unemployed must be made unhappy.

3. Blaming the unemployed for their plight serves a two-fold function in legitimating capitalism. It distracts attention from the fact that unemployment is caused by structural failings in capitalism, sometimes magnified by policy error. And in promoting the cognitive bias which says that individuals are the makers of their own fate, it invites the inference that, just as the poor deserve their poverty, so the rich deserve their wealth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Artamentous
Workplace Democracy!
02:40 PM on 03/11/2012
Well said. Even the language obfuscates the reality. The employer GIVES us a job, like s/he is some benevolent person. Where the reality is that we give our labor power, which with out he is left with nothing to consume.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
03:30 PM on 03/12/2012
Who else would give you a job?

The Government?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
02:26 PM on 03/13/2012
Government contracts to rebuild INFRASTRUCTURE only CONSUMES AND/OR DESTROYS the wealth that was created by the US businesses, corporations, and businessmen, and spent by the government.

Peggy Fikac, in the Houston Chronicle of Sunday August 14, 2011 quotes Texas Governor Rick Perry with saying,

“As Americans, we realize that there is no taxpayer money that wasn’t first earned by the sweat and toil of one of its citizens. That’s why we reject this president’s unbridled fixation on taking more money out of the wallets and pocketbooks of American families and employers and giving it to a central government.”

I like that statement.

Only the private sector businesses and corporations generate and create JOBS for US citizens to create new NATIONAL WEALTH for those same US businesses, and that new NATIONAL WEALTH is then available as business profits, private personal income, property taxes and personal inheritance to be CONFISCATED through taxation TO PAY FOR GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATIC EMPLOYEE PAYROLLS, GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS, OTHER GOVERNMENT EXPENSES, at every federal, state, county, and local level.

Paying for Government contracts and grants consume the US economic capability, resources and strength the same as GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATIC EMPLOYEE PAYROLLS and other government expenses consume the economic capability and strength of the USA.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Olderandwiser55
getting older and wiser....
10:48 PM on 03/11/2012
Yes, well said, new fan here.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
08:53 AM on 03/10/2012
What a joke article. No one drops out of the labor force. It's a kind way to say that the safety net of our country has given up on you. Or, you won't start paying taxes soon enough to be considered a real citizen. Yes, there are millions sleeping in cars and under bridges or doubling up with friends and family. Our country is pathetic. We have a government that spent a trillion dollars on an unnecessary war, but will spend far less on it's own citizens. When money is involved, look for the evil that hoards it and shun them from our nation. We don't need such predators in our midst.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Artamentous
Workplace Democracy!
02:42 PM on 03/11/2012
It will not last however. The pendulum will swing the other way. It's a dangerous game the wealthy are playing, by seeing how much crap we will take. The backlash wont be pretty if they keep it up.
07:10 AM on 03/10/2012
Informative post your post really helpful for my research and development.......Thanks a lot

http://www.bharatbook.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Anderson
independent andy
05:23 AM on 03/10/2012
Lillian, don't get too hyped up over the interview. They're looking for the most qualified who will accept the least amount of pay. Employers are exploiting employees at every level. Good Luck
02:44 AM on 03/10/2012
I live in Las Vegas and have been looking here for almost a year. I lived in IL previously and could not find anything there either. I was terminated from my job in IL due to medical reasons. I am assuming that either my age (56) or my medical condition ( bad knee) is stopping me from getting a job. Although I must say that I believe I am the wrong nationality to be getting hired.... the Station Casinos ran a television ad featuring one of their hispanic / mexican / latino employees , who stated she loved her job and it was good to have a job in this economy AND that the employer would help with citizenship!!!!!!
I have just renewed my unemployment for another 12 weeks, so hopefully I will find a new career in that time frame. So at this time, I am still a statistic, after the 12 weeks I assume I will not be counted as unemployed since I won't be eligible for it. But then I will be eligible for Food Stamps ( I make too much on unemployment) so I will still be a statistic. Although I don't qualify for any kind of medical aid either.
BUT the taxes taken from my unemployment pay for the ILLEGALS to get all kinds of aid!!!
06:04 AM on 03/10/2012
sounds like you're not smart enough to manipulate the system like "those illegals" do. c'mon are you not better than them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
07:23 AM on 03/10/2012
You forget that they are hard workers, unlike many of us!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
07:22 AM on 03/10/2012
You are wrong about not being counted once you fall off the UI rolls. The CPS survey is totally separate from unemployment benefits.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Crabtree
12:38 AM on 03/10/2012
Most all service related jobs no new construction jobs were created at all and only some minor manufacturing jobs were created.some ninety six if memory serves me correctly..oh yea we are booming indeed..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Artamentous
Workplace Democracy!
02:45 PM on 03/11/2012
Dont' forget real wages have GONE DOWN! How can we even buy crap if we are making less relative to last year?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:30 AM on 04/02/2012
The FRE TRADE AGREEMENTS allow/economically require that US Businesses use lower cost foreign labor instead of US labor.

US Businesses must offer lower labor pay scale rates to American workers in the USA to be lower that they pay in foreign nations in order to compensate for the additional costs that the EPA, OSHA, FICA and other regulations add to the costs of US labor.