iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Lisa Murkowski Regrets Voting With Republicans On Blunt Amendment

Lisa Murkowski

LAURIE KELLMAN   03/10/12 10:54 AM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — Sen. Lisa Murkowski says she saw it coming, even before the public scolding last weekend at Alaska's Iditarod dog sled race. Siding with Republican leaders on a contentious contraceptives vote was a mistake.

A moderate in an era of paralyzing partisanship, Murkowski, 54, may be a natural heir to the centrist role played by retiring Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe at a time when their party is hurting for female leaders.

"I think she's in a position for that kind of role if she wants it," Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., another fleeing centrist, said of Murkowski.

Others say she first needs to show more decisiveness and consistency.

Murkowski voted in favor of an amendment by Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., to overturn President Barack Obama's order that health insurance cover the cost of contraceptives even if providers object on religious grounds. She was backpedaling within days.

One woman in the Iditarod crowd yelled at the senator. Another was more civil, but made the same point: Murkowski ticked off a lot of women with that vote.

"With her vote, Murkowski showed her true colors and put her party's anti-female agenda ahead of the Alaska women she is supposed to represent," Fairbanks resident Michelle Cason wrote to the editor of the city's Daily News-Miner.

Before the weekend was out, Murkowski told the Anchorage Daily News that she regretted her vote.

"I knew going into it that there was conflict there," Murkowski said in a telephone interview this past week. When she got home to Alaska, she knew. "I think I made a mistake."

Her statement of regret created new grumbles in Republican ranks.

Supporting the Blunt amendment "was the first time she ever did anything that was even remotely considered pro-life," said Debbie Joslin, a Republican National Committeewoman from Alaska. "She could have won some new friends if she had just stayed constant there instead of flipping back to opposing the Blunt amendment."

The contraceptives vote and recanting of it is not the first time Murkowski has flip-flopped on an issue. In the heat of her 2010 general election fight as a write-in candidate against tea party Republican Joe Miller, she said she probably would not vote for the $700 billion bank bailout in 2008 if she had to do it over again.

As Snowe and anyone who's tried to forge their own way in Congress know, it's much easier to be a reliable vote for one party or another. It's tempting, as a centrist, to fall into the trap of trying to please everyone.

"Lisa is far too ... susceptible to party pressure, as the Blunt vote shows," said Stephen W. Haycox, a professor at the University of Alaska. "She's much more the political animal than Olympia Snowe."

Murkowski denies she was the subject of any arm-twisting by Republican Senate leaders on the contraceptives vote, which she characterized as one in favor of religious liberty.

As a Republican who won re-election in 2010 with support from Democrats and independents, and without help from her own party after losing the primary to Miller, the two-term senator, lawyer and mother of two bristles at the criticism.

"If I were susceptible to pressure within my party, I would have walked away from my primary and accepted that," Murkowski said.

The GOP poured a fortune into Miller's campaign. Murkowski ran as a write-in and won re-election in a three-way race with 39 percent of the vote, keeping the Senate seat she and father, Frank, had held for nearly three decades. It was the first time a senator had won as a write-in candidate since South Carolina's Strom Thurmond did it in 1954.

Returning to Washington, Murkowski resigned her GOP leadership post, but kept her clout as the senior Republican on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. She's still got a coveted seat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, which was led for years by her mentor, the late Sen. Ted Stevens.

Never a strict party loyalist, Murkowski has a head-start on independence. When President George W. Bush asked Congress to reauthorize the Patriot Act, she was one of four Republican senators to insist that the terrorist-fighting legislation contain more civil liberties protections.

She's also voted for some items on Obama's wish list, including ratification of a new nuclear arms treaty with Russia and repealing the "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays serving openly in the military.

Conservative groups are deeply suspicious of Murkowski's support for abortion rights. Focus on the Family, for example, labeled her a "squishy Republican" on the subject.

But voting for the Blunt amendment helped raise her ratings with some anti-abortion groups. The National Right to Life Committee, unhappy with her vote against a measure to stop sending money to Planned Parenthood, for example, has raised her rating from 66 percent in the last Congress to 75 percent now.

"I don't fit neatly into anybody's political boxes and I think that sometimes disturbs people," Murkowski says. "But I don't think most Alaskans fit neatly into the Republican box or the Democratic box. They don't think of themselves that way."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Sen. Lisa Murkowski says she saw it coming, even before the public scolding last weekend at Alaska's Iditarod dog sled race. Siding with Republican leaders on a contentious contrace...
WASHINGTON — Sen. Lisa Murkowski says she saw it coming, even before the public scolding last weekend at Alaska's Iditarod dog sled race. Siding with Republican leaders on a contentious contrace...
Filed by Paige Lavender  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,380
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (56 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Homer for real
...snap out of it!!
01:13 AM on 04/06/2012
This id-jit - Murkowski - is about as Republican as Nancy Pelosi. Has she been in a coma for the last 3 - 4 years? Did she 'ever' utter a single word in protest to the "DNC War on Woman?" Where was she, when every Dem and every slime ball in the lamestream media was bashing Sarah Palin.... AND Sarah Palin's daughter? Where was the outrage..? Where was the moaning and groaning about this 'war on woman?'

The Dems 'have a lock' on the War on Woman! Murkowski is about as phoney and cynical as they come. She sits silently while her friends 'butcher' a decent, hard working, god fearing... woman... and then gets all up in a tizzy when her phoney friends tell her to react to their trumped up charges.

Jump! "How high," she asks?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BRAINS4USA
Vote. Just do it. Always.
01:41 AM on 04/07/2012
Homer you are a very confused man. It is the GOP waging a war on women. Passing over 500 laws in states limiting womens rights to equal pay and to healthcare.
The dems are your friends Homer - and share your outrage at this GOP War on Women. Thats why women in supermajorities now are voting for us..and why the GOP will LOSE big time.
So dont worry. When we have our victory - we will be signing executive orders on Federal and State levels annulling all that legislation everywhere.
Because that is what real men do - they stand for the women they love. Come to think of it - what does that make GOP men?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Homer for real
...snap out of it!!
01:47 PM on 04/07/2012
"The GOP's War on Woman!" Ha! Now there's a rallying cry suitable for the lying Democrats! They deny the obvious, tout the absurd, and applaud each other for being soooo clever. Democrats don't revere woman! Ask former Senator and Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Ask former Governor and Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin. Ask author and commentator Deneen Borelli, who’s been attacked on air as a “washed-up Oreo” for being a black conservative. Ask Keith Olbermann, a frequent guest of the White House.. and Bill Maher... and Ed Schultz: "Proof" of how Democrats revere woman!!?

The thing is, this 'super majority' of woman you speak of is already dwindling. They see the phoniness.. They see the double standard. They hear Obama talk about supporting woman's rights while assailing Freedom of Religion.. yet see that he has completely exempted the Muslims from having to participate in Obamacare because it's against their religion. More and more woman are seeing that Obama and the Democratic Party adopt this stance of 'championing woman' when it suits them, or when the woman in question carries opinions that align with their platform. It’s not hard to see the glaring double standard of liberals when it comes to women.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:21 PM on 03/13/2012
The Republican men have shown that they have absolutely no knowledge of or interest in the realities of women's reproductive healthcare and the effects of policy on women's health and lives. Ms. Murkowski knew better and still voted for this obscene attack on all women's rights. No excuse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mover
Father, Husband, Ret 1SG
12:17 PM on 03/12/2012
"Murkowski ticked off a lot of women with that vote."

Sen. Murkowski's political problem is not so much a result of her vote. The real problem is the spin put on the issue by those whose ideas cannot stand the light of day and honesty in the presentation.

The legacy media have made the issue about contraception, but the real issue is the central government's overstepping of their constitutional authority and a clear violation of the First Amendment.

The women she "ticked off" would be better served by becoming familiar with the issue and with the propagandist ways of the DNC and their willing accomplices in the legacy media.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:16 PM on 03/13/2012
The Catholic church's doctrine is dangerous to women's health and lives and they have no right to interfere with their employees healthcare coverage causing harm to their health and possibly putting their lives in jeopardy.
10:29 AM on 03/12/2012
"The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit, Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it." Omar Kayam. Suck it up Lisa, you showed your true colors. Now you Dems who voted for her have a chance to undo that next time.

By the way, Ben Nelson's a what? He's a DINO who votes R.
10:25 AM on 03/12/2012
"But I don't think most Alaskans fit neatly into the Republican box or the Democratic box. They don't think of themselves that way."

You know what, most people in this country don't fit neatly into either party's box. That's why we have human representatives from each region who are supposed to cast votes on policies/issues base on the needs and wants of whom they represent. But nowadays, politicians just blindly cast votes base on their party line only. If that's what we want, we could have computers do that rather than hiring human beings. At least it'd be a lot cheaper and it would be consistent.

Even though I'm not from Alaska, I am still disappointed that she actually supported the Blunt amendment. Given how her party has dissed her in 2010 and chose to support Joe Miller the clown over her, I'd assume that she'd repay her supporters by showing some backbone. But no, she just want to get back into her party's good grace again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p456
Walking Tall.
09:47 AM on 03/12/2012
Republican women all suffer from Stockholm syndrome.
10:30 AM on 03/12/2012
That seems sadly true, those who aren't Stepford wives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LBA7895
08:34 AM on 03/12/2012
Actions speak louder than words, Lisa....

You voted for it, regardless of your "apology" after the fact....
photo
Obama20122016
I'm a Progressive dog who speaks
08:07 AM on 03/12/2012
Murkowski is just trying to have her cake and eat it too . Just like Scott Brown . Scott Brown is condemning Rush . Yet this is the same Scott Brown that voted with the extremist Tea Party Republicans in support of the Blunt Amendment .
photo
unionave
Old Codger
07:39 AM on 03/12/2012
Lisa proves that Bohner was correct when he remarked about the stupidity in Congress . There is supposed to be a "party of opposition somewhere in there . Where is it ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndrewFrisbie05
Indepents of the world, UNITE!
10:15 AM on 03/12/2012
You simply couldn't have cited a dumber source. Boehner calling Congress stupid is the red pot calling the red kettle red. Wasn't it he and his merry band of stalliticians that almost killed the tax cuts over the holidays because they WANTED THEIR OWN VOTE, their own discussion?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:01 AM on 03/12/2012
Oh come on Lisa. You've been at this long enough to know that you make up your mind BEFORE you vote, not after. You're there because you're supposed to represent the wishes of the people who sent you there. Perhaps you should spend some time getting to know what they want. Apparently you're not really sure about that yet, and if you don't know by now, you're just not paying attention.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Got Moxie
09:24 AM on 03/12/2012
Well said lexigram. Senator, you spit in face of those who supported you to stand with those who did the same thing to you last election cycle. What a sad, sad shame. While it is certainly acceptable for someone to change positions on issues over a lifetime there's no excuse for this. I wonder who will vote for you next time.
10:32 AM on 03/12/2012
Oh yeah. Good points. Fanned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:34 AM on 03/12/2012
I feel like we use the term "flip-flop" too easily. While it is true that she changed her mind after the vote, it may have to do with the fact that she obviously disconnected from her constituency in doing so and she didn't find out until later.

Does this show some indecision, or perhaps pandering? Possibly. But at the same time, it could also show the ability to adapt and to respond to changing situations and the opinions of the people she represents. I just think it's a touch hasty to label her a "flip-flopper."

We all make decisions that we regret later, for various reasons, so it's a little silly to expect our congresspeople to be any different. Sure, it'd be nice if they were 100% on every decision they made for their entire lives, but we all know how unrealistic that is. It's just that her (and all congresspeoples') decisions get highlighted and have a much heavier meaning than most of ours.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mickey Ellis
02:02 AM on 03/12/2012
She saw it coming and she voted for it anyway, but now she realizes it was a mistake. Perhaps she'll realize how big a mistake at the next election. Republicans and their agenda is pretty clear. Its up to the voters who are allowed to vote to decide what America the want to live in.
01:05 AM on 03/12/2012
Just shows how much ANY Republican can be trusted!
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
12:53 AM on 03/12/2012
Wait a minute here, she voted FOR the amendment and AGAINST the Women in her State, too bad she did not see that it was wrong before she supported it. I can understand her backing off quickly when back home surrounded by angry sporting women and hundreds of hungry, lunging, sled dogs and the possibility of the odd ulu being out. But I do not think cowardise makes her a candidate for the moderate of the month club.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
khjack57
11:59 PM on 03/11/2012