iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

David Coppedge, Ex-NASA Worker, Claims In Lawsuit That Agency Axed Him For 'Intelligent Design' Views

David Coppedge

GILLIAN FLACCUS   03/11/12 04:23 PM ET  AP

LOS ANGELES — NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has landed robotic explorers on the surface of Mars, sent probes to outer planets and operates a worldwide network of antennas that communicates with interplanetary spacecraft.

Its latest mission is defending itself in a workplace lawsuit filed by a former computer specialist who claims he was demoted – and then let go – for promoting his views on intelligent design, the belief that a higher power must have had a hand in creation because life is too complex to have developed through evolution alone.

David Coppedge, who worked as a "team lead" on the Cassini mission exploring Saturn and its many moons, alleges that he was discriminated against because he engaged his co-workers in conversations about intelligent design and handed out DVDs on the idea while at work. Coppedge lost his "team lead" title in 2009 and was let go last year after 15 years on the mission.

Opening statements are expected to begin Monday in Los Angeles Superior Court after two years of legal wrangling in a case that has generated interest among supporters of intelligent design. The Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian civil rights group, and the Discovery Institute, a proponent of intelligent design, are both supporting Coppedge's case.

"It's part of a pattern. There is basically a war on anyone who dissents from Darwin and we've seen that for several years," said John West, associate director of Center for Science and Culture at the Seattle-based Discovery Institute. "This is free speech, freedom of conscience 101."

The National Center for Science Education, which rejects intelligent design as thinly veiled creationism, is also watching the case and has posted all the legal filings on its website.

"It would be unfortunate if the court took what seems to be a fairly straightforward employment law case and allowed it to become this tangled mess of trying to adjudicate scientific matters," said Josh Rosenau, NCSE's programs and policy director. "It looks like a pretty straightforward case. The mission that he was working on was winding down and he was laid off."

Coppedge's attorney, William Becker, says his client was singled out by his bosses because they perceived his belief in intelligent design to be religious. Coppedge had a reputation around JPL as an evangelical Christian and other interactions with co-workers led some to label him as a Christian conservative, Becker said.

In the lawsuit, Coppedge says he believes other things also led to his demotion, including his support for a state ballot measure that sought to define marriage as limited to heterosexual couples and his request to rename the annual holiday party a "Christmas party."

"David had this reputation for being a Christian, for being a practicing one. He did not go around evangelizing or proselytizing. But if he found out that someone was a Christian he would say, `Oh that's interesting, what denomination are you?'" Becker said.

"He's not apologizing for who he is. He's an evangelical Christian."

In an emailed statement, JPL dismissed Coppedge's claims. In court papers, lawyers for the California Institute of Technology, which manages JPL for NASA, said Coppedge received a written warning because his co-workers complained of harassment. They also said Coppedge lost his "team lead" status because of ongoing conflicts with others.

Caltech lawyers contend Coppedge was one of two Cassini technicians and among 246 JPL employees let go last year due to planned budget cuts.

While the case has attracted interest because of the controversial nature of intelligent design, it is at its heart a straightforward discrimination case, said Eugene Volokh, a professor of First Amendment law at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Law.

"The question is whether the plaintiff was fired simply because he was wasting people's time and bothering them in ways that would have led him to being fired regardless of whether it was about religion or whether he was treated worse based on the religiosity of his beliefs," said Volokh. "If he can show that, then he's got a good case."

Coppedge, who began working for JPL as a contractor in 1996 and was hired in 2003, is active in the intelligent design sphere and runs a website that interprets scientific discoveries through the lens of intelligent design. His father authored an anti-evolution book and founded a Christian outreach group.

He is also a board member for Illustra Media, a company that produces video documentaries examining the scientific evidence for intelligent design. The company produces the videos that Coppedge was handing out to co-workers, said Becker, his attorney.

His main duties at JPL were to maintain computer networks and troubleshoot technical problems for the mission. In 2000, he was named "team lead," serving as a liaison between technicians and managers for nearly a decade before being demoted in 2009.

He sued in April 2010 alleging religious discrimination, retaliation and harassment and amended his suit to include wrongful termination after losing his job last year.

Coppedge is seeking attorney's fees and costs, damages for wrongful termination and a statement from the judge that his rights were violated, said Becker.

_____

AP Science Writer Alicia Chang contributed to this report.

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Charles Darwin (1809-1882)

    "The impossibility of conceiving that this grand and wondrous universe, with our conscious selves, arose through chance, seems to me the chief argument for 
the existence of God." <strong>Clarification</strong>: <em>The full quote, from <a href="http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-8837" target="_hplink">one of Darwin's letters</a>, carries a different sentiment. A young admirer <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16949157" target="_hplink">asked Darwin about his religious views</a> (the original inquiry is lost), and the great naturalist answered: "It is impossible to answer your question briefly; and I am not sure that I could do so, even if I wrote at some length. But I may say that the impossibility of conceiving that this grand and wondrous universe, with our conscious selves, arose through chance, seems to me the chief argument for the existence of God; but whether this is an argument of real value, I have never been able to decide."</em>

  • Neil deGrasse Tyson (1958-

    "So you're made of detritus [from exploded stars]. Get over it. Or better yet, celebrate it. After all, what nobler thought can one cherish than that the universe lives within us all?" --American astrophysicist and science commentator

  • Stephen Hawking (1942-)

    "What I have done is to show that it is possible for the way the universe began to be determined by the laws of science. In that case, it would not be necessary to appeal to God to decide how the universe began. This doesn't prove that there is no God, only that God is not necessary." --English physicist and cosmologist

  • Carl Sagan (1934-1996)

    "Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual...The notion that science and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both." --American astrophysicist

  • Francis Collins (1950-)

    "Science is...a powerful way, indeed - to study the natural world. Science is not particularly effective...in making commentary about the supernatural world. Both worlds, for me, are quite real and quite important. They are investigated in different ways. They coexist. They illuminate each other." --American physician-geneticist and director of the National Human Genome Research Institute

  • Isaac Asimov (1920-1992)

    "Emotionally, I am an atheist. I don't have the evidence to prove that God doesn't exist, but I so strongly suspect he doesn't that I don't want to waste my time" --American biochemist and science fiction writer

  • Albert Einstein (1879-1955)

    <strong>Clarification</strong>: <em>While the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/17/science/17einsteinw.html" target="_hplink">New York Times noted</a> that "Einstein consistently characterized the idea of a personal God who answers prayers as naive, and life after death as wishful thinking," he also "described himself as an 'agnostic' and 'not an atheist.'" One ambiguous quote, from <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=58HQXMp1ESwC&pg=PA92&lpg=PA92&dq=einstein+phyllis+wright&source=bl&ots=zn6BlmXlY4&sig=DxDgqkMMwMaJ9pgUVmgwih4WbQE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=2NY6T6euHIbr0gHC4PivCw&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAjgK#v=onepage&q=einstein phyllis wright&f=false" target="_hplink">Einstein's response to a letter from a sixth-grade student named Phyllis Wright</a>, reads "Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe - a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. In this way the pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort, which is indeed quite different from the religiosity of someone more naive."</em> --German physicist, created theory of general relativity.

  • Max Planck (1858-1947)

    "It was not by accident that the greatest thinkers of all ages were deeply religious souls." --German physicist, noted for work on quantum theory

  • Erwin Schroedinger (1887-1961)

    "I am very astonished that the scientific picture of the real world around me is very deficient. It gives a lot of factual information, puts all our experiences in a magnificently consistent order, but is ghastly silent about all and sundry that is really near to our heart, that really matters to us. It cannot tell us a word about red and blue, bitter and sweet, physical pain and physical delight; it knows nothing of beautiful and ugly, good or bad, god and eternity." --Austrian physicist, awarded Nobel prize in 1933

  • Rosalind Franklin (1920-1958)

    "In my view, all that is necessary for faith is the belief that by doing our best we shall come nearer to success and that success in our aims (the improvement of the lot of mankind, present and future) is worth attaining...I maintain that faith in this world is perfectly possible without faith in another world." --British biophysicist renowned for her work on X-ray diffraction.

  • William H. Bragg (1862-1942)

    "From religion comes a man's purpose; from science, his power to achieve it. Sometimes people ask if religion and science are not opposed to one another. They are: in the sense that the thumb and fingers of my hands are opposed to one another. It is an opposition by means of which anything can be grasped." --British physicist, chemist, and mathematician. Awarded Nobel Prize in 1915

  • Richard Feynman (1918-1988)

    "God was invented to explain mystery. God is always invented to explain those things that you do not understand." --American physicist, awarded Nobel Prize in 1965

  • Wernher Von Braun (1912-1977)

    "I find it as difficult to understand a scientist who does not acknowledge the presence of a superior rationality behind the existence of the universe as it is to comprehend a theologian who would deny the advances of science." --German-American rocket scientist

  • Richard Dawkins (1941-)

    "The more you understand the significance of evolution, the more you are pushed away from the agnostic position and towards atheism. Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature more difficult to explain than simple, statistically probable things." --British evolutionary biologist

  • Nevill Mott (1905-1996)

    "Science can have a purifying effect on religion, freeing it from beliefs of a pre-scientific age and helping us to a truer conception of God. At the same time, I am far from believing that science will ever give us the answers to all our questions." --English physicist, awarded Nobel Prize in 1977

  • Fred Hoyle (1915-2001)

    "A commonsense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question." --English mathematician and astronomer.

  • Sir Arthur C. Clarke (1917-2008)

    "Science can destroy religion by ignoring it as well as by disproving its tenets. No one ever demonstrated, so far as I am aware, the nonexistence of Zeus or Thor - but they have few followers now" --British science fiction author and inventor

  • Walter Kohn (1923-)

    "I am very much a scientist, and so I naturally have thought about religion also through the eyes of a scientist. When I do that, I see religion not denominationally, but in a more, let us say, deistic sense. I have been influence in my thinking by the writing of Einstein who has made remarks to the effect that when he contemplated the world he sensed an underlying Force much greater than any human force. I feel very much the same. There is a sense of awe, a sense of reverence, and a sense of great mystery." --American theoretical physicist, awarded Nobel Prize in 1998

  • Sam Harris (1967-)

    "Atheism is not a philosophy; it is not even a view of the world; it is simply a refusal to deny the obvious." --American neuroscientist

  • Victor J. Stenger (1935-)

    "With pantheism...the deity is associated with the order of nature or the universe itself...when modern scientists such as Einstein and Stephen Hawking mention 'God' in their writing, this is what they seem to mean: that God is Nature." --American physicist

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SCIENCE

LOS ANGELES &mdash; NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has landed robotic explorers on the surface of Mars, sent probes to outer planets and operates a worldwide network of antennas that communicates wi...
LOS ANGELES &mdash; NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has landed robotic explorers on the surface of Mars, sent probes to outer planets and operates a worldwide network of antennas that communicates wi...
Filed by David Freeman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,528
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (58 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:16 AM on 03/20/2012
Anybody dumb enough to believe in intelligent design deserves to be fired. What took NASA so long.
09:00 AM on 03/19/2012
Mr. Coppedge's religious views may have contributed to his getting laid off but not for the reason he states, not as discrimination against him. If Mr. Coppedge is handing out DVDs and finding opening points to bring up the subject of salvation at work he's been doing this for a while and is comfortable with it. That doesn't mean his coworkers are comfortable with it. Mr. Coppedge is in a position of authority over other. Those others hold different beliefs including the other Christians. What may seem inoffensive to him is offensive to others. Using the salvation at work talking points are offensive to me. They are quite literally a "challenge and response" couched in polite and loaded wording.
I am biased. I had to work with someone who I call Mr.Youarethewrongkindofchristian, for over two years and it was a daily ordeal. He was polite and friendly until I used logic against him then I was the one who was hostile and was "turning this into a argument". I said "No I am not turning this into an argument, I've told you what I believe and that I have no intention to change, I've told you I don't want to talk about religion at work, I've made excuses to get out of these conversations, you have been abusing my politeness, do not bring this up to me again." I was fired.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tolms
What Would Cory Booker Do?
02:39 PM on 03/16/2012
ID is religion, not a science. He was pushing his religion on people at work. He deserved to be fired. End of story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
resquedog
08:36 PM on 03/16/2012
Gee, I always thought intelligent people engage in intellectual exchange of ideas, opinions, reasoning. Do you truly want to maintain your opinion that one should be fired from his job for participating in an intellectual exchange just because you see it as "pushing"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brian Austin
Gets more props and stunts than Bruce Willis
05:38 PM on 03/17/2012
ID is hardly an intelligent idea and promoting it a work is grounds to be fired. I do not mind if someone believes in unicorns, leprechauns or Santa but don't bother me at work by trying to sell me on the idea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tolms
What Would Cory Booker Do?
10:37 AM on 03/19/2012
It is unacceptable in any work environment to push your religious beliefs on your co-workers. Again, ID is a religion, not a science so no, in this instance it was not an "intellectual exchange".
07:24 AM on 03/20/2012
If one pushes atheism at work, do they deserve to be fired?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tolms
What Would Cory Booker Do?
09:50 AM on 03/20/2012
Yes.
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
04:50 AM on 03/16/2012
If he believes in evolution in addition to intelligent design, then he believes in something that is possible. But if he does not believe in evolution, then that is like hiring an astrologer or an alchemist, really strange.
07:34 AM on 03/20/2012
No. You are wrong.

Evolution is as open to examination, investigation and discussion as any other subject. Evolution is a theory, not a scientific truth, and bears examination.
12:28 AM on 03/16/2012
Just an aside question; Has anyone else besides me had the same kind of problems with AMWAY sales people?
I some time wonder if all the 'in your face' evangelicals are simply failed AMWAY folks.
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
09:23 PM on 03/15/2012
What a shame NASA is forced to deal with Christian Conservative Victim issues...even now, in 2012. Bummer.

Hopefully, reason will prevail and the court will dispatch this case, stat.
12:47 AM on 03/15/2012
*frowns*

What is left there exactly to discuss in a court? "engaged his co-workers in conversations about intelligent design", "handed out DVDs on the idea", "team lead" -> the rule is easy understandable, works pretty well since 1789 and reads: leave your religion at home or in your temple. If you are in a "position of power", even more so.
07:37 AM on 03/20/2012
There is nothing in the Constitution that requires people to leave their religious beliefs at home or in the temple.

The Constitution defines, and is a restraint on government, not individuals or individual beliefs..
photo
democratbob
Equality for all, including marriage.
03:55 PM on 03/20/2012
It's called harrassment and badgering, and it falls under creating and maintaining a hostile workplace. Believe me, I've been there and lived through it, and it is extremely uncomfortable.
08:55 PM on 03/14/2012
Yeah, uh, promoting disruptive and divisive (not to mention scientifically false) theories at work is a pretty good reason to get fired.
07:59 PM on 03/14/2012
I stopped reading at the headline. All is fine here. Net story.
photo
John J3
Better to have a bleeding heart than none at all
07:57 PM on 03/14/2012
I'm sure the judge in this case is familiar with the precedent from the Federal case "Kitzmiller v Dover Area School District" - hopefully he will include it in his instructions to the jury. In his decision in that case, Judge John E. Jones III (a conservative Republican appointed by George W. Bush) began by saying, "we conclude that the religious nature of ID [intelligent design] would be readily apparent to an objective observer, adult or child."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:22 PM on 03/14/2012
The Kitzmiller case centered on the issue of whether Intelligent Design was scientifically tenable, not whether a (faith-based) belief in ID was justified (which appears to be the sub-text of the article above).

In context, Coppedge is not being judged on whether ID takes primacy over science, as was the case of Kitzmiller.
photo
John J3
Better to have a bleeding heart than none at all
11:20 PM on 03/14/2012
But it does show that he wasn't merely discussing a scientific theory - as he claims - he was trying to spread his religious belief.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:26 PM on 03/14/2012
Stopped reading as soon as I got to the word "promoting". There is not a single company in this nation that will not have HR all up in your grill for promoting religious beliefs. Holding them is fine, promoting them at work is not
12:19 AM on 03/16/2012
I agree totally - And, your last sentence is so well put.
I think we need a law in this country that says: "Holding religious beliefs is fine, promoting them publicly is not". Just imagine the decrease in stress levels that would occur.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James Martini
Your micro-bio is empty
08:46 AM on 03/20/2012
I think public promotion of one's religion is absolutely integral to the free exercise of speech and religion. The workplace is not, however, a public forum.

ID is a contentious religious doctrine especially in education and scientific circles. Mr. Coppedge's continued promotion of it in the workplace, when it is clearly outside the scope of his duties, almost certainly generated conflict and ill will. Had Mr. Coppedge limited himself to expressing himself outside the workplace I'm certain he'd still be working at JPL.
photo
BillZBubb
Cogito ergo sum. Cogito.
06:00 PM on 03/14/2012
Funny how the righties are willing to let people be fired for every reason under the sun, except for annoying your co-workers and wasting their time with your medieval views. This guy crossed the line when he started using work facilities and time to pass out DVD's.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mattsspats
i feel like i'm taking crazy pills!
11:09 PM on 03/14/2012
yeah, the irony is pretty rich since NASA is probably one agency that Repugs would eliminate entirely if they had their chance (maybe not Newt: he wants to go back to the moon for some reason). Pretty simple: if you are talking about jesus and passing out dvds, you're probably NOT doing your job.
09:04 AM on 03/15/2012
Newt will occupy the moon with NASA. It will be done by DoD with defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and GE.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:59 PM on 03/15/2012
But, but, but... They're taking away his religious liberty. Can't you see that? It's all about a person's right to follow their religious beliefs. Infringing on somebody else's beliefs doesn't matter.

Unless those beliefs allow them to use birth control, of course. Then it's all about their employer's right to religious liberty by not letting the insurance company pay for birth control.
05:41 PM on 03/14/2012
I believe in God, & I read the Scriptures, but if someone started asking me questions about it at work, or many other places, ...I would feel interogated. Religion is not a light subject, it is a very in depth subject, so trying to talk about it casually, is very disrespectful of how serious it is.
05:37 PM on 03/14/2012
Well, that is why they say there are 3 things people should not discuss openly in school, work, & cirtain other social settings; Religion, Politics, & Money, ...unless the reason you are getting together, is to duscuss those topics, but even then, you should question why you are gathering to talk about those things.
If he is at work, he should be concentrating on & talking about work. If he wants to evangelize, or prostalize, he has plenty of time to do that now.
He may think that he can persuade others to walk his path, but he is only going to put them on the defensive. Even if they are decent religious church going people, ...because they have their own church, religious beliefs, & opinions. As soon as HE asked the question, "What denomination are you?", HE is prying too much into other people's personal lives.
When ever he met someone who was a Christian, he should have just smiled & continued working. Why would he ask, "What denomination?"?!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:28 PM on 03/14/2012
People like to discuss these areas - religion, politics and money - because they are interesting and can be intellectually stimulating (unless one's sole purpose is to cause offence). As an atheist, I find religious discussions interesting on a philosophical level..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kyle10
those who sharpen perception tend to be antisocial
05:26 PM on 03/14/2012
Frothing zealot cries 'victim!' after being held accountable for actions.

(this comment suitable for cut and paste on numerous neocon stories)