iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Harry Reid Forces Action On Stalled Judicial Nominees

Harry Reid Judicial Nominees

First Posted: 03/12/2012 6:18 pm Updated: 03/12/2012 6:35 pm

WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) announced Monday that he is moving forward with a package of stalled judicial nominees and effectively dared Republicans to try to stop him.

Reid filed a procedural motion that allows the Senate to begin debate on the confirmation of 17 of President Barack Obama's judicial nominees, whose nominations Republicans have held up for months. Some district judge nominees have been stuck in limbo since November, Reid said, and 11 are from "judicial emergency states" where there aren't enough judges to hear the cases piling up.

"These long waits have nothing to do with the qualifications of these nominees. They're often confirmed unanimously. What does that say? It says that the wait is dilatory. It's delay for delay's sake," he said on the Senate floor. "As we know here, the Republican leader [Mitch McConnell] has said his number one goal in this Congress is to defeat President Obama. And this is a part of it."

Reid's move begins 30 hours of debate on the first of the 17 judicial nominees. Once the clock runs out, the Senate needs 60 votes to end debate, which requires some Republicans to vote with Democrats. If they don't, the period of debate doesn't end and the judges remain in limbo. Even if Democrats get to 60 votes on the first nominee, Republicans could force another 30 hours of debate on each of the remaining 16 nominees as a way to drag out the process.

"I hope Republicans won't continue to filibuster," Reid said. In what appeared to be a veiled threat that Obama will make recess appointments, he warned that if the GOP delays continue, "we will have no alternative but to take action."

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) later railed against Republicans for refusing to even allow votes on Obama's nominees, saying they should just vote against a nominee if they don't support him or her.

Instead, dozens of nominees are "left in this political limbo created by the Republicans ... in the hopes that, in November, they get a Republican president who will fill these vacancies with 'true believers,'" Durbin said on the Senate floor. "That isn't fair."

McConnell spokesman Don Stewart declined to comment directly on Reid's move but said Obama and Senate Democrats are largely to blame for the 83 vacancies in the judiciary. Obama has only made 39 out of 83 possible nominations, Stewart said, and of those 39, about half are still pending in the Democrat-led Senate Judiciary Committee.

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said Reid's move was "nothing more than a political stunt" aimed at distracting people from Democrats' failed policies on the economy.

"His sudden interest in judicial nominations is a desperate attempt to draw attention away from his party's failure to address our nation's economic emergencies," Lee said in a statement. "The notion that Senator Reid has filed for cloture because Republicans are 'blocking' nominees is ... false. In fact, of the 17 nominees in question, three were only cleared by the Senate Judiciary Committee last Thursday, and the full Senate has not even at an opportunity to consider them. Given such facts, Senator Reid's claims of 'obstruction' simply cannot be taken seriously."

But Lee himself has previously vowed to block all of Obama's nominees in protest of four recess appointments Obama made in January, at a time when Republicans say the Senate was not technically in recess. Lee has said those appointments were unconstitutional and should be rescinded before any other nominees are approved. The White House maintains the recess appointments were legitimate.

Practically speaking, Senate Democrats are running short on time to get Obama's nominees confirmed. Election-year politics typically mean nothing gets done in Congress in the months ahead of the election. Reid warned Republicans last month that he will urge Obama to recess appoint all of his executive branch nominees if Republicans don't help to advance at least some of them by April.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) announced Monday that he is moving forward with a package of stalled judicial nominees and effectively dared Republicans to try to stop him. ...
WASHINGTON -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) announced Monday that he is moving forward with a package of stalled judicial nominees and effectively dared Republicans to try to stop him. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,258
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (30 total)
09:23 PM on 04/09/2013
You go, Harry. Just let us know when to call and write....
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
07:21 PM on 04/06/2013
There needs to be a rule that House Representatives can only
run in every other election. No politicking to keep their short
2 yr. term which ends up being all politicking. Gerrymandered
districts should be snapped back to city, township, and county
lines.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kimpjones
GOP = a whole basket full of crazy
03:45 PM on 03/15/2012
McConnell spokesman Don Stewart declined to comment directly on Reid's move but said Obama and Senate Democrats are largely to blame for the 83 vacancies in the judiciary. Obama has only made 39 out of 83 possible nominations, Stewart said, and of those 39, about half are still pending in the Democrat-led Senate Judiciary Committee.

Half of 39 nominations (or make it an even 40) is 20, of those 20, 17 are still being held up by the GOP. BUT McConnell said it is due to the Democrats?! Huh?
02:27 PM on 01/02/2013
We need to hit the ground running and get all the republicans blocking ... unjustly .... the President's nominations OUT OF OFFICE..... the first one McConnell, 2nd Cantor, and 3rd Speaker of the house!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
groovybeans
09:16 AM on 03/15/2012
These transparent Republican game-players have been given the honor and privilege to serve their country, and the responsibility to act in the best interests of their constituents, and instead of carrying out the responsibilities outlined in their oaths of service, they're acting like petulant spoiled children and bullies. Despicable.
photo
K August
Research Alec Exposed
08:41 AM on 03/15/2012
Reid is right........I read an article where Judges were saying the situation was critical.
They can't do their jobs and cases are piling up.

Maybe these Judges should just start tossing cases out? Is that what Republicans want?
photo
splashy
Really?!?!!!
05:47 PM on 03/15/2012
They could start with the drug possession cases, when there is no violence involved. That would cut about half the cases right there.
09:26 PM on 04/09/2013
Since politicians hate nothing worse than getting bad publicity or being personally responsible, maybe the judges should give the trial participants McConnell's number.
photo
splashy
Really?!?!!!
01:09 AM on 03/15/2012
Republicans will say anything to stop everything they can. They don't care about the country, or anyone that isn't wealthy.
photo
Jackal 99
Nemo me impune lacessit
11:04 PM on 03/13/2012
"Soon after the inauguration of Bush as president in January 2001, many liberal academics became worried that he would begin packing the federal judiciary with conservative jurists. Yale law professor Bruce Ackerman wrote an article in the February 2001 edition of the liberal magazine The American Prospect that encouraged the use of the filibuster to stop Bush from placing any nominee on the Supreme Court during his first term. In addition, law professors Cass Sunstein (University of Chicago) and Laurence Tribe (Harvard), along with Marcia Greenberger of the National Women's Law Center, counseled Senate Democrats in April 2001 "to scrutinize judicial nominees more closely than ever." Specifically, they said, "there was no obligation to confirm someone just because they are scholarly or erudite."

On May 9, 2001, President Bush announced his first eleven court of appeals nominees in a special White House ceremony. This initial group of nominees included Roger Gregory, a Clinton recess-appointed judge to the fourth circuit, as a peace offering to Senate Democrats. Democratic Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York said that the White House was "trying to create the most ideological bench in the history of the nation."

As a result, from June 2001 to January 2003, when the Senate in the 107th Congress was controlled by the Democrats, many conservative appellate nominees were stalled in the Senate Judiciary Committee and never given hearings or committee votes."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whatever97
03:44 PM on 04/06/2013
AND YOUR POINT IS?!?? The doing of this IS NOT proportionate or parallel to what the Republicans ahve been doing. The best you have is "many".
DO SOME@#$'in ARITHMETIC. For starters, THAT was 18 months, NOT the amount of time that THIS mess has gone on.
photo
obiwan49
Every silver lining has a touch of grey
07:12 PM on 03/13/2012
When will republicans realize that when the president fails, we all fail? Our nation fails. The GOP have it easy right now. Its easy to kill ideas when they aren't your own, and destruction is easier than creating. The past 12 years are pretty good indicators of what the GOP's skill sets and MO are.
07:42 PM on 03/13/2012
You must realize that republicans don't care if the nation fails. They are willing to do absolutely anything to get Obama out of office. Anyone who votes republican is nuts.
photo
Jackal 99
Nemo me impune lacessit
10:56 PM on 03/13/2012
So if senators blocked, say, 50 judges from appointment, you wouldn't vote for them?
I'm sure Democrats never employed such low down dirty tricks... Oh wait...
"During President George W. Bush's two term tenure in office, he nominated thirty-nine people for twenty-seven different federal appellate judgeships that were blocked by the Senate Democrats either directly in the Senate Judiciary Committee or on the full Senate floor using a filibuster.[1]"
"During his presidency, Bush also nominated 23 people for 23 different federal district judgeships who were never confirmed by the United States Senate."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_judicial_appointment_controversies#List_of_stalled.2C_blocked_or_filibustered_nominees
06:12 PM on 03/14/2012
Well, you see, anyone nominated by the war criminal Bush would automatically be unfit to serve, because they would share Bush's insane notions about governing and the economy.
09:24 PM on 03/13/2012
This has been my thinking all along. It puts our nation in a very bad way. Because we all will fail. So this sitting around and refusing to do their jobs and acting like a bunch of babies is not really working very well for our country. If they can't budge on doing their jobs they need to go for good, and get new jobs! I think most of us are fed up with these games and the fire they are playing with.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whatever97
03:44 PM on 04/06/2013
This is not "their" fault. YOU THE VOTERS chose to elect 44 Republican Senators, so IT'S YOUR fault.
07:09 PM on 03/13/2012
Were it not for concern for casting jerks in a worse light, one might suggest that Harry should be counted amongst their number
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
se72748
05:39 PM on 03/13/2012
A forceful democrat? What a refreshing concept.
photo
murphy66
Hillary 2016
05:37 PM on 03/13/2012
half-farted Harry will accomplish nothing the rest of the yea
evekat
Quod erat demonstratum
05:27 PM on 03/13/2012
Ho hum...Sen. Lee another lying TePub? Now you hear it, now you don;t...pure magic!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rcott1019
05:22 PM on 03/13/2012
Make nominations for all 83 vacancies. If the Republicans decline on all 83, then it's a blatant obstruction of the judiciary process and they'll end up the bad guys. If only half are approved, then at least the federal system will be able to conduct business.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanwill2
05:08 PM on 03/13/2012
they need to shut down and stop paying themselves until they pass a budget!
09:25 PM on 03/13/2012
That's a grand idea! But they continue to be clueless!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whatever97
03:46 PM on 04/06/2013
How much "they" do or don't get paid DOES NOT EVEN MATTER ONE BIT to HALF of them, since HALF of Congress ARE ALREADY MILLIONAIRES! The half to whom it DOES matter, the half who are poorer and who NEED the salary, ARE PROBABLY the half who care MORE about the middle class (since they themselves are in it) and are probably FIGHTING FOR YOU!
So STOP trying to cut off your nose to spite your face!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bcinu2
Slow down and go Faster
05:04 PM on 03/13/2012
They should have already appointed the judges during the last recess. Now do it as soon as there is another recess.....bc