iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Nuclear Plant Safety Challenged By Aging Facilities, U.N. Report Claims

Posted: 03/13/2012 6:38 am


* U.N. agency says nuclear now safer due "robust measures"

* But old reactors could affect safety, IAEA report says

* Seventy percent of research reactors more than 30 years old

* Fukushima disaster raised global nuclear safety concerns

By Fredrik Dahl

VIENNA, March 13 (Reuters) - Eighty percent of the world's nuclear power plants are more than 20 years old, raising safety concerns, a draft U.N. report says a year after Japan's Fukushima disaster.

Many operators have begun programmes, or expressed their intention, to run reactors beyond their planned design lifetimes, said the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) document which has not yet been made public.

"There are growing expectations that older nuclear reactors should meet enhanced safety objectives, closer to that of recent or future reactor designs," the Vienna-based U.N. agency's annual Nuclear Safety Review said.

"There is a concern about the ability of the ageing nuclear fleet to fulfil these expectations."

The Fukushima tragedy was triggered on March 11, 2011, when an earthquake unleashed a tsunami that left 19,000 people dead or missing. It also smashed into the coastal power plant causing a series of catastrophic failures at the facility.

Images of the stricken plant shook public confidence in nuclear power and forced the nuclear industry to launch a campaign to defend its safety record.

IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano told Reuters last week that nuclear power is now safer than it was a year ago . The report said the "operational level of NPP (nuclear power plant) safety around the world remains high".

It cited steady improvements in terms of unplanned reactor shutdowns in recent years.

But the 56-page IAEA document also highlighted an ageing nuclear fleet, with eighty percent of the 435 facilities more than two decades old at the end of last year.

This "could impact safety and their ability to meet member states' energy requirements in an economical and efficient manner", said the report, which has been submitted to IAEA member states but not yet finalised.

Operators and regulators opting for so-called long term operation "must thoroughly analyse the safety aspects related to the ageing of 'irreplaceable' key components", it added.


LESSONS LEARNT?

About 70 percent of the world's 254 research reactors have been in operation for more than 30 years "with many of them exceeding their original design life," it said.

The document was debated by the IAEA's 35-nation governing board last week, almost exactly a year after the world's worst nuclear accident in 25 years.

Last year's tsunami overwhelmed Fukushima on Japan's northeast coast, knocking out critical power supplies that resulted in a nuclear meltdown and the release of radiation.

The reactors were stabilised by December, but high radiation levels hamper a cleanup that is expected to take decades.

The crisis sparked a rethink about nuclear power and countries such as Germany, Italy and Switzerland have decided to phase out their reactors.

But other states, for example fast-growing China and India, continue to look to nuclear energy to meet their growing energy needs, the IAEA report said, adding that some "are even accelerating their nuclear energy programmes".

France is building its first "advanced" reactor and Russia is seeking to double its nuclear energy output by 2020, it said.

"All countries that are using nuclear power are much more serious about nuclear safety," Amano said last week. But environmental group Greenpeace said no "real lessons" appeared to have been learnt from Fukushima. (Editing by Robert Woodward)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

* U.N. agency says nuclear now safer due "robust measures" * But old reactors could affect safety, IAEA report says * Seventy pct of research reactors more than 30 years ...
* U.N. agency says nuclear now safer due "robust measures" * But old reactors could affect safety, IAEA report says * Seventy pct of research reactors more than 30 years ...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:59 PM on 03/26/2012
No nuke is a safe nuke.

Japan has shut down 53 of 54 of its nuclear power plants and seems to be getting along just fine.

They increased energy efficiency, reduced demand, moved to alternatives and even changed their light bulbs to LED's which use 75% less energy.

Safety should come first. In Japan they will be paying for their trillion dollar nuclear disaster for a long time to come. The disaster there is not over yet and continues today.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:11 PM on 03/26/2012
The Chernobyl Exclusion Zone used to house 120,000 people.

The Fukushima Exclusion Zone used to house 80,000 people.

The area at the Santa Susanna Field Laboratory in California has been designated safe only for day hikers. Given all of the poisons in the ground, it is probably a good idea to wear a mask to keep dust out of one's eyes and nose, and then scrub down after leaving the area.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:56 PM on 03/26/2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Susana_Field_Laboratory

The worst nuclear accidents in US history were in California, at the Santa Susanna Field Laboratory, founded in 1947, about 30 miles north of Los Angeles, in Ventura County.

The average number of deaths attributable to the nuclear accidents has been pegged at 300.
The DOE claimed responsibility for the cleanup, and as such argued that they were not subject to the EPA cleanup rules.
To this day, the site has not been cleaned up.
Because the nuclear reactors at the site were started as experimental reactors, they were not subject to the requirement of a containment dome. Radioactive leaks went into the atmosphere and into the ground. Four separate nuclear accidents occurred at the site, none of them made known to the public until many years after the fact, when a graduate student accidentally discovered the information during a freedom of information search for information related to her thesis.

The companies and governmental bodies responsible for the activities at the site displayed all of the behavior that leads people to distrust nuclear as a power source -- there were several nuclear leaks and at least one meltdown, the public was not notified at the time, and even after the fact both the company and the government fought against spending money to clean up the poisons in the ground.
12:16 PM on 04/02/2012
''The companies and governmental bodies responsible for the activities at the site displayed all of the behavior that leads people to distrust nuclear as a power source''

Spot on. And the pro-nukes here think we should accept everything that these people say. Or in this case, didn't say.
Great link. Thank you.
F & F
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:50 PM on 03/25/2012
You folks all know that the record high capacity factor of nukes

comes at the cost of record short inspection and maintenance times.

What a surprise!!!!!

Big money cuts corners will things break.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
undsoweiter
but I know where to look it up
02:24 PM on 03/22/2012
Then let's do what we should have been doing for the last 30 years, and build new ones.
We can beat big coal and big oil, with a combination of nuclear, wind and solar.
Let's get cracking, people.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:57 PM on 03/17/2012
Old plants run past their design lifetime, with record short maintenance and refueling times....

What could go wrong?
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
01:32 AM on 03/15/2012
So, build new ones with better safety features. Case closed.
02:43 PM on 03/15/2012
Or not.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:52 PM on 03/17/2012
Why? the first generation were sold just like the new generation: to cheap to meter and totally safe.

Just more pr.

Big money will always cut corners till things break.

The "advanced" ap1000 is less safe than the first generation reactors. just cheaper.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
05:51 PM on 03/17/2012
I imagine that it must be fun to make up anything you like, but I prefer to stick to saying what I can prove.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Margie Kronewitter
12:27 AM on 03/15/2012
#1. They still allow the spent fuel to soak around waiting for a Melt Down. #2. This Earth Ending Technology is predominately Primitive. #3. Aren't 4 MELT DOWNS enough for Home Planet? 1 Million will die from Chernobyl and 2.5 as many are predicted to die from Fukushima.

Republicans are still Mocking the GOoD advise to 1. Inflate your tires 2. Get a Tune Up 3. Develop Algae & other renewable Energy. UNTIL the LIES are exposed and TRUTH is Exposed, Humanity will continue to be Endangered. But, there's too much $$$ in Nuclear for that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
01:25 AM on 03/15/2012
I dont see the consequences of these melt downs as planet enders. Unless you believe the Snopes Hoax Map perpetrated by those that dont understand
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
01:32 AM on 03/15/2012
WHO says 5k from Chernobyl, eventually. IAEA says 0 from radiation in Fukushima.

As for the rest of it, frankly it was a bit hard to follow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeMustDoBetter09
08:11 PM on 03/13/2012
Is Nuclear our only choice!?!? Heck no, many new technologies are coming Front and Center and BETTER THAN NUCLEAR!!
SHUT ALL THESE D E A T H MACHINES DOWN!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
10:24 PM on 03/14/2012
Better nuclear is our choice. Better nuclear is already here. Georgia is putting in 2 better nuclear.

Technology evolves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hikerguy22
This is your carbon footprint
10:41 PM on 03/16/2012
Georgia is run by the republicans and they are getting whatever they want. Off shore wind never blew away but Georgia Power will have none of that, being one of only a few states with a monopoly on energy. And coal is their champion with the most polluting coal plant in the country.
With rate increases coming every few months to pay for these monsters, and no clear need for nuclear power as natural gas becomes more viable, Georgia lawmakers and the PSC will drag us to hell with them.
11:36 AM on 04/02/2012
''Technology evolves.''

But greed, corruption, incompetence and human error remain.
photo
Silken17
Just a hare in your soup
12:16 AM on 03/15/2012
Pixie Power!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
如果你不投票,你不能抱怨
06:28 PM on 03/13/2012
OT

Japan struggles to handle plutonium as fast-breeder reactor project becomes unrealistic

http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20120313p2a00m0na012000c.html

Japan had about 45 metric tons of accumulated plutonium...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeMustDoBetter09
06:45 PM on 03/13/2012
Shut them all down!!!
mrjj...long time no see.
PEACE
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joffan
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.
04:52 PM on 03/13/2012
As usual with articles on nuclear power, the headline completely fails to match the content. The IAEA's draft report doesn't appear to claim that older reactors actually reduce safety below some desirable threshold, and merely talks about the potential for increased levels of safety requirements in future which these reactors might or might not meet.
02:50 PM on 03/14/2012
I invite anyone to read the headline again,

"Nuclear Plant Safety Challenged By Aging Facilities, U.N. Report Claims"

This is EXACTLY what the UN report said.

It is time to start decommissioning these old plants instead of stalling merely for the sake of additional profits
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
10:25 PM on 03/14/2012
They are designed to run 60 years or more. There are 80 year old coal plants that put more radioactivity in the air than any operating nuclear plant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
10:25 PM on 03/14/2012
Challenged doesnt mean rebuked.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
03:44 PM on 03/15/2012
I should really have learned my lesson about HP's headlines by now.