iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Syria's Armed Opposition No Threat To Regime, Says U.S., Which Plans To Provide Nonlethal Aid to Civilians

Syria Crisis

First Posted: 03/14/2012 5:24 pm Updated: 03/14/2012 8:50 pm

WASHINGTON -- On the one-year anniversary of the uprisings in Syria, U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that the armed resistance is not able to mount a credible military threat to the regime of Bashar al-Assad, senior U.S. intelligence officials told The Huffington Post.

The powerful, Russian-armed Syrian army remains firmly in control behind the Assad regime, senior intelligence officials say.

That assessment underlies the Obama administration's reluctance to become more actively involved in the uprising against Assad that began on March 15, 2011. After a year of sporadic and inconclusive violence against the regime, the White House has flatly ruled out providing arms to the opposition and instead is focusing on coordinating international pressure against the Assad regime and providing humanitarian relief.

The White House has authorized providing medical supplies and nonlethal equipment to civilian Syrian groups that would transport the supplies, according to a source close to the administration's deliberations on Syria.

But the failure of the armed opposition to take advantage of defections from the Syrian armed forces or coordinate its actions into a meaningful security challenge of the regime appears to leave the United States and other critics of the regime without a long-term strategy for ousting Assad. By contrast, in Libya last year, a relatively well-organized and armed opposition eventually drew Western military support, and the country's strongman, Muammar Gaddafi was overthrown and killed last fall.

Syria ranked high on the agenda when President Barack Obama met Wednesday with British Prime Minister David Cameron. "Right now we are focused on getting humanitarian aid to those in need," Obama said after the White House meetings. International economic, political and diplomatic pressure is becoming stronger, Obama said, vowing, "Assad will leave power. It's not a question of if, but when."

Cameron agreed on the nonmilitary approach. "What we want is the quickest way to stop the killing -- that is, through transition, rather than through revolution or civil war," he said at a White House news conference.

White House officials reiterated this week that sending arms to the opposition has been ruled out. "We believe it could heighten and prolong the violence in Syria," said White House spokesman Jay Carney.

Brutal onslaughts by the Syrian military against mostly unarmed civilians have captured the world's attention, most recently the shelling by artillery and tanks of urban neighborhoods in Homs and Idlib.

Clearly, Syrian civilians are being bludgeoned by the Assad regime. More than 8,000 Syrians have died in assaults by Syrian forces, according to the United Nations. Some 200,000 Syrians have been forced from their homes and an additional 30,000 Syrians have fled across the borders into Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey, the United Nations reported.

A senior U.S. intelligence official told The Huffington Post that the Free Syrian Army and other rebel groups are able to mount only sporadic hit-and-run attacks and anti-regime demonstrations in a handful of mostly urban neighborhoods and isolated villages.

Other intelligence officials have said despite the appearance of an increasingly broad-based armed resistance, the rebels have been unable to coordinate their attacks or work in concert with Syrian civilian opposition groups outside the country. The intelligence officials spoke on condition that they not be identified by name or agency.

Reports suggesting widespread attacks by armed Syrian rebels are exaggerated, these officials said.

Reuters reported Wednesday, for instance, that fighting "raged unabated across Syria in recent days." Reports from Syrian opposition groups and others do show fighting on Wednesday in seven of Syria's 14 provinces, suggesting a thriving nationwide insurgency.

A closer examination, however, shows a different picture. The violence reported in the province of Hama, for instance, consisted of shelling by Syrian forces on Tuesday in three neighborhoods in the provincial capital, Hama. The provinces of Aleppo and Daraa were listed as sites of fighting; one person was killed in each provinces, the opposition groups reported. In Raqqah province in northern Syria, one person died in a skirmish.

All together, the opposition groups reported 46 people were killed on Tuesday.

In one typical engagement, opposition forces claimed in January to have seized the mountain town of Zabadani, some 25 miles outside of Damascus. Several days later the Syrian army arrived and retook the town.

When the opposition is able to operate against the Syrian army, "it's small-arms attacks with a few [rocket-propelled grenades] and pretty widely scattered,'' the senior intelligence official said.

According to another intelligence source, anti-regime violence is confined to local neighborhoods, "posing little threat to central authority.''

U.S. intelligence officials said defections from the Syrian army continue, but it is not clear that defecting soldiers are joining the opposition; they may be simply deserting.

Russia, Syria's main weapons patron, vowed this week to continue arms sales to the Assad regime, delivering an arsenal that ranges from small arms and ammunition to sophisticated antiair missile systems, according to the Defense Intelligence Agency.

Against the disorganized and ill-equipped opposition, Syria's armed forces "remain a viable, cohesive and effective force,'' U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Ronald Burgess, the Defense Intelligence Agency's director, told the House Intelligence Committee last month. The regime "is cohesive," he added.

Even though the Assad regime has fended off the challenge so far, its long-term future is in doubt, some critics say. In a recent assessment, the International Crisis Group, an independent think tank, wrote that Assad's days are numbered.

The regime "continues to enjoy substantial military superiority over the opposition,'' the International Crisis Group reported. "Its conduct on the ground -- including excessive use of force by regular troops … horrendous treatment of detainees and indiscriminate punishment of entire swathes of the population -- precludes even a semblance of normalization."

Given enough time, the International Crisis Group said, "the regime might be able to destroy the urban and social fabric of entire neighbourhoods, as it appears to have done in parts of Homs. But that will only reinvigorate protests and armed resistance elsewhere."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

 
 
  • Comments
  • 110
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djuno1966
food taster for the astronauts
01:32 AM on 05/07/2012
maybe we can finally use the gay bomb, providing the wind is right.
12:18 PM on 04/10/2012
The U.S.A wiill lose their incredibility If th left Russia and Iran govern Syria.
Lavroof became the the governer and al Assad troops slaying activists with knives after bombing withe planes ,cannons and tanks.
we are homeless.
I am homesick
please . please please help
02:32 PM on 04/04/2012
In order for the opposition forces to mount attacks against the Assad regime, requires the international community to provide them with weapons. For the American intelligence to state the opposition forces are no threat is simply being stupid; especailly, when no one is willing to provide them with weapons to fight Assad. The UN is all talk but no bloody action by not providing the opposition a fighting chance. The UN is NOT helping the situation with talk because talk is dirt cheap.
photo
AskandThink
OWS! Because WAR is HELL!
10:05 PM on 03/31/2012
Darn good idea if I were to be asked. Non-lethal weapons are still weapons! And humanitarian aid is CRITICAL in a war zone right? Never mind the fact that the use of non-lethal weapons means at least someone is paying attention to NOT killing people...!

Got to say this IS making the best of a bad situation from what I can see. Good job USof A! About time WE showed some LEADERSHIP!
USA ROCKS it!
(Wait… is a rock consider non-lethal…?)
; )
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miz-ribble
Some will rob you with a six gun, other's with a f
02:39 PM on 03/31/2012
An excellent article in Asia Times , by Pepe Escobar............War porn .
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/NC30Ak02.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miz-ribble
Some will rob you with a six gun, other's with a f
02:35 PM on 03/31/2012
Ha ha ha ha ha ........ Ok, if you say so :)
12:01 AM on 03/31/2012
The cohesion, capability, concentration, and even effectiveness of the "Free Syrian Army" has been the biggest non-truth of this whole fiasco...

These are people mounting spot raids, sneak attacks, and guerrilla tactics. They are murdering judges, prosecutors, police officers, government supporters, and civil servants. They are setting off car bombs in urban areas, and striking at Syrian Army forces in sporadic, but sometimes effective (and lethal) manner.

When these same Sunni-based groups do this in Iraq (a mere 65 miles away) we call them "terrorists", or "Al Qaeda in Iraq"...
03:08 PM on 03/30/2012
Flashpoint Funding: UK doubles Syria rebel cashflow

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GFIFe2Xtps&list=UUpwvZwUam-URkxB7g4USKpg&index=4&feature=plcp

The UK has announced it will allocate some £500,000 ($795,000) to supply non-military aid to the Syrian opposition.
mortonrchrd
How you gonna get down that hill
11:10 AM on 03/30/2012
Isn't that how we got into Vietnam ? First supplies, then advisors, then ...........you know the rest.....
photo
G R
Ad astra per aspera
12:29 PM on 03/29/2012
Russia still has considerable political clout, but assisting the Syrian government with the sale of arms seems to be a throw back to cold war philosophy, but with much more aggression in European matters, as if it has a soveriegn right to do so...Russias' political stratgey is flawed and cannot possibly gain favor with the U.S. or its allies. But the U.S. is now so fervently entrenched in the Middle East, Russia can bear influence elsewhere with little fear of U.S. apprisal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
musicmasterno1
Euthanize the dogfighter, not the dog.....
01:32 PM on 03/24/2012
Non-lethal aid.

That means no Taco Bell, because that stuff can easily be weaponized.
09:00 AM on 03/21/2012
Syria is the last domino to fall before Iran. As Syria is a proxy arm of Iran it means that if the US and allies gain control of Syria effectively America/Britain/ etc.. gain total control of the middle east bar Iran itself.
photo
BrutusHonestus
Don't Ask Me for the Answer You Want to Hear
07:52 PM on 03/24/2012
Oh sure . . . total control . . . of an area in total chaos!

. . . yeah, the USA is in control of Egypt, Gaza, Lebanon, Iraq, Kurdish areas, Yemen

. . . and heading west, we have those US-controlled areas of Tunisia and Libya
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amber15
01:38 PM on 04/02/2012
toppling Syria is a far cry from "Controlling"......
photo
Pod-gers
Jeremy Lin = Game Change
11:52 PM on 03/20/2012
Syrian opposition commiting crimes against humanity, including kidnapping, holding hostages for money, torture used as extortion, and racist, ethnis and religious killing sprees.

Obama should be helping assad, not the insurgency, which for some reason Progressives call the opposition.
01:47 AM on 03/24/2012
wait sorry im confused is the syrian opposition the rebels ?? the ones against assad ??
photo
Pod-gers
Jeremy Lin = Game Change
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
musicmasterno1
Euthanize the dogfighter, not the dog.....
01:38 PM on 03/24/2012
So you expect the people who are being bombed mercilessly to take the moral high ground? Especially in a society that subscribes to Sharia law......an eye for an eye?
09:21 PM on 03/20/2012
Look I am the first to say that if we sneak guns to the rebels to fight off the tyrant then good. But don't sugarcoat the extent of US support to the Syrian rebels. If Russia is providing military troops then we should arm the rebels. The hell with Assad. I can't believe that two superpowers have to get involved when all the surrounding countries in the middle east do nothing. They are cowards afraid that rebellion will come to them. If they treat their people well they have nothing to worry about.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
richodg5
03:20 AM on 03/19/2012
Not our problem .
photo
AskandThink
OWS! Because WAR is HELL!
09:48 PM on 03/31/2012
Do you want to rethink that inhumane a response....?